Wednesday, July 4, 2007

Today's This & That - July 4, 2007



Happy Post July 4th

Rush on over to NYC Educator - DO NOT PASS GO - to read this week's Carnival of Education round-up of the blogs, where he features a few choice items from this abode. http://nyceducator.com/

There is an item from blogger and NYC teacher jd2718 "Do we really want Black and White kids to be educated not only separately, but differently?" that makes so many good points I wish I had written it myself as he analyzes some crucial issues related to the small school movement and how it has been implemented. As I pointed out in my post about how the DOE has a dog in the hunt, when it comes to this issue and will use every PR move to make sure their dog wins.

While I have had issues with jd2718 over his support for the role the former opposition caucus New Action has played with its total support for Weingarten and Unity, it was nice to see him at least raise the the possibility that the UFT should be taking more of a role on this issue besides passing resolutions and issuing reports - both PR moves from my point of view. I repeat uncle Normie's mantra: watch what the UFT leadership does, not what it says. jd2718's point below pretty much nails it:

"The United Federation of Teachers issued a report saying that we support a mix of large and small schools. But there is no mix. Some groups of neighborhoods have large schools. Some have good mini-schools. And some have ‘redesign’ and Gates mini-schools. Which groups of neighborhoods have a mix? The UFT’s resolution has never been acted on. We have never challenged in a serious way the Department of Ed’s willy-nilly opening of lousy mini-schools, or their disruption of larger schools. And today? Today the UFT is partnering with Green Dot to bring a small charter high school to…. the Bronx. We already set one up in Brooklyn. And Green Dot doesn’t have a pretend report about supporting a mix of types of schools."

I just hope New Action leader Mike Shulman doesn't get too much agita that one of his members might have gone too far to make Randi mad. Bet he gets a call from Leo Casey.


Jolanta Rohloff in today's Daily News:
"We're very pleased and relieved," said Lise Hirschberg, who heads
East Harlem's Manhattan Center for Science and Mathematics school's chapter of the teachers union. "Klein objects to moving bad teachers around the system, but that is apparently what they're doing in this particular case."

In her new $130,000-a-year job, Rohloff will be developing a new high school that she will run when it opens in 2008 - a job specially created for her, said schools spokeswoman Melody Meyer.

We're sure teachers will just be dying to work there. They'll probably have to hire them off the dead scroll list. Jolanta has already given U-ratings to 20% of the prospective staff before hiring anyone. Gary Babad of GBN News at the NYC Public School Parent Blog reports the real story behind the scenes and reveals who the other candidate for principal at Manhattan Center really is.


Check Samuel Freedman's article in Wed. ed section of the NY Times which I posted on the Norms Notes blog. Of note are the assinine comments of Andres Alonso regarding the overwhelming paperwork ESL teachers labor under. His blabber just reaffirms my post on my own brief experience with Alonso. I would love to hear from any teachers who actually worked with Alonso. I bet he had real disdain for his colleagues. As I said, "Good luck Baltimore."


In response to this post on ICE mail,
"I heard a rumor in the Unity grapevine that Randi is trying to set her table up for a possible nomination for Secretary of Labor should Hillary Clinton be elected President. Randi wants to appear more conservative and tougher on labor in order to have an easier nomination process before conservative Republican Senators. This could explain Randi's collaboration with BloomKlein."

Michael Fiorillo responded:
Well, if Randi wants to appear tough on labor, she's done a pretty good job by going out of her way to undermine the AFT local in Los Angeles. Her embrace of Green Dot, despite their maintaining a company union in LA, is a disgrace.

I had assumed that the green Dot ploy was her entrance onto the national stage vis-a-vis her expected assumption of the national AFT throne. Either way, duplicity and betrayal, in the guise of "new realities" and "cooperation" with management, is the order of the day.

EdNotes comment:
I totally disagree that Weingarten is interested in the Dept. of Labor position, since once out of that office she would not gain entrance back into the labor movement. Leading the AFL-CIO eventually is the perfect arc. But it all starts with the AFT presidency in July '08.



I was at a meeting last night with a bunch of people of various ages and experience in the schools who represent a wide constituency of interests in education. One of the article I read in prep was on Neo-liberalism as it relates to education by Lois Weiner. It nailed and tied together so many points related to privatization of schools, Eli Broad, the World Bank, standards, testing, etc. and the role the unions, in particular the AFT contrasted with the NEA, play in this scenario. We're working on a series of events addressing many of these issues for next year. We'll keep you posted.


I was at the annual July 4th party in Rockaway today - this is about the 30th edition we've been to - where we get to see people only this once a year. Naturally there were a bunch or retired or soon to be retired teachers. One of them works a few days a week doing PD in a small school - one of 4 or 5 occupying a large school that was closed years ago. She said that with each year things in these small schools get worse and in a few years the building will be as bad as the one that closed. She feels so bad for the newer, younger teachers and said their first year, one of the main things she does is pass out tissues. A lifetime high school teacher with an impeccable rep, she gave more insight into how the DOE has been able manipulate the grad rates through lots of subtle and not so subtle pressures to pass kids so they graduate on time. She points to the importance to the DOE of keeping students in their cohort - one of the major words we hear bandied about - and all sort of little tricks are used. Like a few days or even hours of summer school instead of a full course to pass kids for courses they have failed. And of course, teachers marking their own students' regent exams. She said she actually gets physically ill at some of the things she sees going on. There was more but it's midnight and time to go.

2 comments:

NYC Educator said...

Nice to see the all-night blogging, Norm.

Sleep is overrated, and thanks for the mention, by the way.

Anonymous said...

Does ANYTHING point out the incongruities of the DOE and the true
nature of Bloom/Klein regarding their attitudes towards parents,
students, and teachers more than how they are "creating" a spot for
Madame Rohloff?

According to the Daily News article of July 4, a shill for the DOE
has said that Rohloff is considered to be a "talented leader".

Oh, brother! The muckity mucks wanted to place a Principal in a
school known for teaching Math and Science that released a pie chart
to parents and students that averaged OVER 100%? Obviously, the woman
can't add, or is detail oriented- unless, of course, it's to pursue
teachers and students with a vengeance.

As for her other "talents"- NOT a people person... made a Special Ed.
student cry, compared Lafayette to Auschwitz ( it wasn't that way
until SHE took the helm, I understand), alienated teachers, students,
local politicians and alumni while running Lafayette into the ground
( a once illustrious school in Brooklyn). Engaged in dubious
practices (paying her favorites to adorn bulletin boards), and
bringing upon Lafayette so much negative publicity the school could
NEVER recover from her shenanigans.

I know many teachers from other schools in Brooklyn that have worked
under this woman. Rohloff has employed the same tactics on students
and teachers prior to her supervising the demise of Lafayette.

If Bloomberg and Klein are REALLY interested in turning around the
N.Y.C. school system, WHY is someone like Rohloff ( and other
Principals that are similarly protected) STILL allowed to work, be
granted bonuses, AND have special schools set up for them?

As parents and teachers, I consider this to be a TREMENDOUS waste of
taxpayers' monies. I, for one, resent the fact that a Principal so
obviously unsuited for this position is allowed to carry on within
the system, while the DOE unilaterally uses taxpayer money to protect
one of its' own ( again, as well as others). WHY isn't the money used
to pay these incompetents funneled towards the schools?

I'm outraged ( as both a teacher and parent of a child attending a
N.Y.C. school), and so should you be. Let's organize a campaign
letting our politicians and the NYS Dept. of Ed. know of how we feel
about this present Mayoral control of the school system, and register
our
displeasure at how the policies of this administration exclude and
squelch the voices of parents, students, and teachers regarding
educational control of our schools.