What's Leo Casey's response to Haimson calling out the UFT on not fighting to lower class size???? He actually tries to defend the UFT's inaction by insinuating that parents don't want lower class size. .... Roseanne McCosh, PS 8X
|Leo, the gift that keeps giving|
And your mean-girl antics continue...Leonie Haimson fights for lowering class size. She has also been vocal against high-stakes testing and vocal in support of parents who opt their children out of state tests. It's bad enough that the Unity-controlled UFT is on the wrong side of all of these issues but now you seem hell bent on attacking Leonie Haimson for merely pointing out where the UFT stands on class size. You guys have done nothing, own it.
More disturbing news on the UFT.....The arrogance and snarkiness continues from Leo Casey of the UFT. Leonie Haimson's organization, Class Size Matters, understands the detrimental effects of large class size. What's Leo Casey's response to Haimson calling out the UFT on not fighting to lower class size???? He actually tries to defend the UFT's inaction by insinuating that parents don't want lower class size. We know they do, but my question is... why doesn't the Unity-controlled UFT care that we, the dues paying teachers they work for, want lower class size? The MORE caucus of the UFT supports lowering class size. The Unity caucus led by Mulgrew does not. (The line in the sand gets clearer and clearer, doesn't it? MORE=GOOD for teachers, UNITY=BAD for teachers. As always---please share this with whomever you want. See Unity-UFT Casey's tweets below :