tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33431390.post4186499821291668503..comments2024-03-26T11:07:03.496-04:00Comments on Ed Notes Online: UFT Election News - March 12, 2007ed notes onlinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15018047869059226777noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33431390.post-8752288238874551172007-03-13T21:05:00.000-04:002007-03-13T21:05:00.000-04:00Actually I can produce screenshots of redhog and s...Actually I can produce screenshots of redhog and spinner's comments from haloscan with the same IP number.<BR/><BR/>I can't post from that IP number, and I can't change it either. I don't actually need to be in front of a computer. I could email the screen shots to anyone, I guess.NYC Educatorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12188066345722781723noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33431390.post-42852201941975822092007-03-13T20:31:00.000-04:002007-03-13T20:31:00.000-04:00Whatever the election results you are irrelevant a...Whatever the election results you are irrelevant and will continue to be so. <BR/>If the truth will rest in the results, then George Bush is gold.<BR/><BR/>I hearby ban you from reading this blog. If you do, a cyberload of Palonium will be instantly transmitted through your computer and make you sterile. But then again, in your case, that's a good thing.ed notes onlinehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15018047869059226777noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33431390.post-19602987831077681162007-03-13T20:16:00.000-04:002007-03-13T20:16:00.000-04:00Beethoven recognized his own talent, which does no...Beethoven recognized his own talent, which does not mean that he had no talent. I acknowledge mine; that doesn't mean I have no gift, though it may mean that I'm vain. Anyway, let's sit back, await the election results, and the truth shall rest in the results.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33431390.post-87567712275818027232007-03-13T18:11:00.000-04:002007-03-13T18:11:00.000-04:00I'm pleased to see you're so impressed with your s...I'm pleased to see you're so impressed with your skills. However, praise from one's self is not generally regarded as the most objective of criticism. None of the good writers I know indulge in such nonsense.<BR/><BR/>Sorry, but for all your bluster, you're a liar, I just checked, found two posts, one from redhog, and one from spinner, and they share the same IP address.<BR/><BR/>You've concealed your identity before, the IP numbers are clear, and I can prove on any computer to anyone with internet access.<BR/><BR/>So please, keep denying it. Someone may just get curious enough to ask me to do so, and I'd be delighted.NYC Educatorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12188066345722781723noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33431390.post-84845402416058465572007-03-13T17:52:00.000-04:002007-03-13T17:52:00.000-04:00I never used the name Harold Spinner. I never outt...I never used the name Harold Spinner. I never outted you. You archive the comments: show where I did so. You lose all credibility when you say I have no debating skills. And just because I don't choose to write on your stupid little blog ( there are tens of millions of them nationwide) doesn't mean that I haven't the ability. And really, I was quite established as an education commentator before EdNotes. You must be joking: EdNotes has no traffic, no traction, and no credibility. And you will be trounced in the curremt election.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33431390.post-9448451383028197262007-03-13T17:33:00.000-04:002007-03-13T17:33:00.000-04:00In fact, Redhog, I certainly matched the IP number...In fact, Redhog, I certainly matched the IP numbers. They are still in my comments section. Haloscan provides me with the IP number of every commenter. <BR/><BR/>Furthermore, your debating skills are non-existent. When asked to back up your grandiose claims on my blog and Edwize, you repeatedly failed.<BR/><BR/>You are a liar, you've again confirmed you're a liar, and as it happens, I have proof.NYC Educatorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12188066345722781723noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33431390.post-68514040192249694662007-03-13T08:19:00.000-04:002007-03-13T08:19:00.000-04:00Who is the coward? Note how you didn't respond to ...Who is the coward? Note how you didn't respond to one thing I said. Want a debate? Ask your glorious leader why she won't debate? Why don't you write a flowery column condemning Unity McCarthy comments? Bet you don't. The true mark of a coward.ed notes onlinehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15018047869059226777noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33431390.post-52734989885950014352007-03-13T08:11:00.000-04:002007-03-13T08:11:00.000-04:00I have never used the Harold Spinner name. You did...I have never used the Harold Spinner name. You did not match IP numbers.<BR/>Except for one occasion, two years ago, I never used an alias. Nor did I breach your name. Who is your source?<BR/>I would debate you anytime about my past, present, or future, and yours also. but you are a coward and know that I would crush you. This is redhog.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33431390.post-18168195275267376352007-03-13T07:42:00.000-04:002007-03-13T07:42:00.000-04:00You outed me in a comment, using my real name whil...You outed me in a comment, using my real name while using your "Harold Spinner" character. And while you claim to express yourself in a civil manner, you indulge in name calling.<BR/><BR/>You are indeed a liar, and indulging in your multiple aliases is, in fact, lying. You may deny it but I matched your IP numbers.<BR/><BR/>You are indeed abusive, and you are indeed banned. I tolerated your dissent. However, I gave you my name long ago in a private email, and you had no right to breach our confidence. It's my choice to reveal my identity or not, not yours.NYC Educatorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12188066345722781723noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33431390.post-10067214960685383612007-03-13T07:21:00.000-04:002007-03-13T07:21:00.000-04:00I would ban you too Redhog if I had the tech skill...I would ban you too Redhog if I had the tech skills to do it. As a shill for the UFT after selling out your principles for filthy lucre, that's what you deserve. <BR/><BR/>You have become a total suck-up and shill for Weingarten/Unity. You write letters as if you are just another teacher and you comment on blogs with lies and distortions wihtout identifying yourself as an employee of the UFT. You are amongst the sleaze and slime. Enjoy wallowing in them. <BR/><BR/>Who had ever heard of you until Ed Notes gave precious space to your columns issue after issue? And published your wife's cartoons when you asked? Randi Weingarten had already been president for 5 years and still ignored you no matter how hard you tried to get noticed. After how many years (at least 10 as chapter leader) of being ignored by the union leadership you ran with ICE in the 2004 elections? Your gripes against the leadership were that great. I know. I had to listen to them time after time.<BR/><BR/>Suddenly, after the exposure in Ed Notes and the high profile from using ICE to get noticed, you get a job with the NY Teacher, thus allowing you to retire from the hell-hole of the NYC DOE. Ed Notes/ICE should get a nice big fat check from you. Sign it RedDog.ed notes onlinehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15018047869059226777noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33431390.post-2926412822131810452007-03-12T18:26:00.000-04:002007-03-12T18:26:00.000-04:00This is "redhog." I cannot post any comment on NY...This is "redhog." I cannot post any comment on NYC Educator's blog because he has banned me from it. I have never used foul language, lied, committed slander or libel, or otherwise done anything but express myself in a civil manner. This is the kind of fake, phone, and fraud that alleges that Unity does not brook dissent. What a vile and appalling hypocrite.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com