Zuckerberg came to recognize that school reform alone isn’t enough, that if we’re going to make a difference in the classroom, we also need to make a difference in the lives of these children, many of whom struggle against the debilitating effects of poverty and trauma... Review of The PrizeDUHHHH! What happened to the "no excuses" response to teachers who have been saying the same thing and pleading for services for their children for the past 20 years of ed deform? Zuckerberg should have asked me and I could have saved him a cool 100 mil.
The subtititle of this account should be "How to drop 100 million into a trench of ed deform consultants and scam artists. Instead it is Who is in charge of American Schools? We know who is in charge - the ed deformers though mayoral control and control of the national and state education agencies - directed by people like Bill Gates and other billionaire deformers.
Ed Notes Newark reporter Abbie Shure sent this excellent review analyzing the Facebook/Newark debacle.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/08/23/books/review/the-prize-by-dale-russakoff.html?referrer=&_r=0
‘The Prize,’ by Dale Russakoff
By ALEX KOTLOWITZ
August 19, 2015
In
America, education was long seen as the great equalizer, but that has
become mostly myth. So, over the past decade, there has been a vigorous
effort to fortify and rebuild our schools, and in this there is a
recognition that we have failed our children, especially those living in
poverty, those for whom education could — and should — be
transformational. From Chicago to New Orleans, school reform has been
engineered by the well heeled and well connected — from hedge fund
managers to corporate heads to directors of foundations — who believe
that with the right kind of teachers and pedagogy, and with a
business-like administration, schooling can trump the daily burdens and
indignities of growing up poor. “No excuses” has become the rallying
cry of the reformers.
Along comes Dale
Russakoff’s “The Prize,” a brilliantly reported behind-the-scenes
account of one city’s attempt to right its failing public schools. When
Russakoff began reporting this book in 2010, fewer than 40 percent of
the students in the third through eighth grades in Newark, N.J., were
reading or doing math at grade level — and nearly half of the system’s
students dropped out before graduating. The schools were so broken that
the state had taken them over. Something needed to be done. From this
rubble emerged an exciting if not unusual partnership between three
individuals who couldn’t have been more different from one another. The
city’s black Democratic mayor, the charismatic and ambitious Cory
Booker, joined hands with the state’s blustery and ambitious white
Republican governor, Chris Christie, to reimagine Newark’s schools.
Together, they enlisted Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, who pledged a
whopping $100 million — to be matched by another $100 million, which the
city raised, mostly from foundations and private individuals. It was
such an extraordinary gift that Zuckerberg, with Booker and Christie by
his side, announced it on “The Oprah Winfrey Show.” As Russakoff writes:
“Their stated goal was not to repair education in Newark but to develop
a model for saving it in all of urban America.” This is what makes “The
Prize” essential reading. Newark was to be our compass for school
reform.
Russakoff, a longtime Washington Post
reporter, had the good sense to recognize the potential power and
import of this story early on, and so embedded herself in Newark,
winning access not only to the key players — Booker, Christie and
Zuckerberg — but also to some remarkable teachers and students whose
stories serve as a reality check to the maneuverings of those commanding
the reform efforts. A lesser reporter might have succumbed to the
seduction of such intimate access to the rich and powerful, but
Russakoff maintains a cleareyed distance, her observations penetratingly
honest and incisive to what she sees and what she hears. I suspect some
may have regretted letting Russakoff in. We couldn’t have asked for a
better guide.
When Zuckerberg declared his
grant, the agenda was pretty clear: Turn the Newark schools around in
five years and make it a national model. But from the get-go, there
seemed little agreement as to how best to proceed. More than anything,
Christie wanted to break the hold of the entrenched teachers’ unions.
Booker wanted more charter schools. Zuckerberg wanted to raise the
status of teachers and to reward teaching that improved students’
performance.
Their five-year plan gets off to
a rocky start. Initial funds go to a bevy of consultants, most of them
white, most of them well connected, some of whom are getting paid $1,000
a day. One educator labels them the “school failure industry.”
Moreover, it quickly becomes apparent that this is a top-down effort,
with politicians and the well-to-do setting the agenda. When Booker sets
up a local foundation to handle Zuckerberg’s gift, the seats on the
board go only to donors of at least $5 million. You can begin to see
where this story’s headed. Booker shows more interest in his own
political career than he does in running his city. Christie hires an
ideologue as his point person on the Newark schools. And Zuckerberg, a
newcomer to philanthropy, seems frustrated by the inability to negotiate
a union contract that would quickly raise the salaries of promising
young teachers and pay substantial merit bonuses for high performers.
Moreover,
they bring in a superintendent, Cami Anderson, from the New York City
schools, whose unbending management style only affirms teachers’ and
parents’ worst fears. To be fair, she’s a complicated figure. She
doesn’t simply line up behind Booker, Christie and their moneyed backers
in their ideological furor to create more charter schools, which as
we’ve seen in city after city leaves behind an eviscerated public school
system. Anderson, Russakoff writes, “called this ‘the lifeboat theory
of education reform,’ arguing that it could leave a majority of children
to sink on the big ship.” But Anderson, like the other main characters
in this effort, seems tone-deaf to the demands of the community to be
involved in the process. It’s the irony of ironies. Public education is
the bedrock of democracy — and yet when it comes to repairing our
schools the democratic process is too often ignored. What ultimately
derails this grand experiment is the unwillingness of the reformers to
include parents and teachers in shaping the reforms.
“The
Prize” is paradoxically a sobering yet exhilarating tale. For alongside
the stories of those calling the shots, Russakoff tells the stories of
those most profoundly affected by their decisions: teachers, students
and their parents. It’s here where rhetoric, politics and grand plans
meet reality. I repeatedly found myself writing in the margins, “Wow,”
either because of the heroic efforts by teachers and staffers or because
of the obstacles facing their students. Russakoff writes of three
siblings whose mother is badly beaten by her boyfriend. The principal
goes to court with the mother and helps her file charges while other
staff members create a car-pooling schedule to get the kids to and from
school each day. Another student, Alif Beyah, continually disrupts his
classroom. With unusual self-awareness for a sixth grader, he tells a
teacher, “If I get thrown out of class, nobody finds out I can’t read.”
So the school assigns a teacher to meet with him in one-on-one sessions,
and over the course of the year he jumps three grades in his reading
levels. In a school that had one social worker for 612 students,
teachers create a special class for children suffering from trauma,
offering tai chi, yoga and breathing techniques. But what becomes clear
is that these are exceptions rather than the rule. In fact, when Beyah
enters high school, most of his support disappears.
“The
Prize” may well be one of the most important books on education to come
along in years. It serves as a kind of corrective to the dominant
narrative of school reformers across the country. I’m not giving
anything away by telling you that this bold effort in Newark falls far
short of success. Most everyone moves on. Booker is elected to the
Senate — and his nemesis, a high school principal deeply critical of his
school reform efforts, becomes the city’s next elected mayor. Christie
gets caught up in the bridge-lane-closure scandal, and of course is now
running for president. Anderson recently announced her resignation as
superintendent.
The one individual who appears changed by the experience
is, somewhat surprisingly, Zuckerberg. Last year, along with his wife,
Priscilla Chan, who as a pediatric intern cared for underserved children
around San Francisco, Zuckerberg announced a gift of $120 million in
grants to high-poverty schools in the Bay Area. This time, though, they
declared their intent to include parents and teachers in the planning
process. But more to the point, a key component to their grants includes
building “a web of support for students,” everything from medical to
mental health care. Zuckerberg came to recognize that school reform
alone isn’t enough, that if we’re going to make a difference in the
classroom, we also need to make a difference in the lives of these
children, many of whom struggle against the debilitating effects of
poverty and trauma. Here is where this story ends — but also where the
next story begins.
THE PRIZE
Who’s in Charge of America’s Schools?
By Dale Russakoff
246 pp. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. $27.
Credit goes to schoolgal on the Ravitch blog.
ReplyDeleteAbigail Shure