"He pressed his hands between her thighs, spreading her legs. She  moaned as he gripped the band of her silk panties and pulled them  down...." - New curriculum for NYC schools proposed by Black?
Susan Ohanian sent this:
Warning: There is objectionable language here,  language unsuitable for family viewing. This article raises the question  of how the media mogul who sat at the top of the empire producing this  material is now in charge of New York City Schools--without a peep from  conservatives who claim to represent moral issues. David Berliner is on target: Why no MORAL outrage at Hearst chief Cathie  Black's selection as the leader of schoolchildren in New York City? I've always preached that there's no escaping it: We can only teach who  we are. I am happy that David Berliner forces the reader to face this  issue.
by David C. Berliner 
I must state at the start of this essay that I am no prude, no  Victorian. In fact I am generally quite tolerant of contemporary mores  in the area of sexuality. But I have my limits. I still expect my school  leaders to behave with sobriety, to be prudent, to not push the limits  of our secular and permissive society and to model more of what might be  called traditional American values. Although I choose to live my  personal life according to more modern and secular values, I do not see  my position to be hypocritical. I think modern youth needs some  grounding in prudence, restraint and responsibility, before their  involvement in the difficult work of becoming a responsible young adult  in our tumultuous times. Perhaps this belief is shared by others and is  why there is such a furor over the new MTV show "Skins." The blatant  sexuality of the young people in this TV show, understandably, is  scandalizing many of those who worry about the moral behavior of our  youth. But for some reason they let another questionable event go  without protest. 
For reasons I don't understand, the chairman of a large corporate  entity that publishes salacious material was selected to be the leader  of a major American school system. I always had considered some of this  business leader's publications akin to soft-core pornography. Thus, I  wondered about the propriety of this person's appointment to lead a  school system and the lack of attention to the person's publication  record. The new school leader in question, while in business, published  magazines with suggestive photos and articles. For example, highly  sexualized, barely clothed woman stare out at you from some of the  chairman's best known publications. The women often have what on the  street would be called a "come hither look." Often these women are in  intimate positions. Some pictures suggest bondage by the woman, to  please a man. 
This chairman/now school leader has published prose like this: 
 Mikayla felt his lips trail down the side of her neck. Her body  stated tingling with anticipation. He caressed one nipple with his  tongue, then the other.... 
He pressed his hands between her thighs, spreading her legs. She  moaned as he gripped the band of her silk panties and pulled them  down.... 
Nik led her to the bed.... Then suddenly his mouth was on her,  exploring her with his tongue as he gripped her ankles with his hands. 
A month later another one of the publications of the chairman/now school leader included this: 
His hands, hardened and callused ... ran up her thighs, until he  reached her panties. She felt a quick tug and heard a ripping sound,  then felt his fingers, gentle and tender, finding her, stroking her and  bringing her to higher and higher levels of pleasure. 
.... He entered her slowly, deeply, but then pulled back out. He groaned with pleasure. 
"Please" was all she could utter. 
In what genre might we classify the prose represented by these  recently published excerpts from the chairman/now a school leader?  Readers may disagree but I would label them "woman's romance," soft-core  pornography, or both. 
On another page of a publication by the chairman/now school leader  one woman tells us that the casual sex she engaged in was "so good, it  was worth the guilt." One can question the wisdom of such advice to any  young woman, but to teenagers still in school it is simply bad advice.  In fact, in the advice realm, the chairman/now school leader seems quite  enthusiastic about what is possible sexually. 
For example, the chairman recommends the following as fun: That  woman/girls choose a deserted corner of the parking lot and back in.  Then put up their sunshade on the windshield and hang their jackets on  the hooks over the back windows, so it's harder for people to see in.  The chairman then recommends: "Jump his bones." Other advice to spice up  relationships include light whipping, or a new high-tech form for  arousing a male partner, namely, texting pictures of your vagina via  your cell phone to your boyfriend across the table while dining out.  Apparently, when he checks his mail, his appetite is increased! 
Other advice presented is from men to women. One guy says he liked  it when his date undid her shoes under the table at a restaurant and  gave him "a foot job under the table." Another reported "This girl was  riding me in reverse cowboy when she stopped, leaned way forward and  started sucking my toes." Still another told women what he liked about  his ex-girlfriend: She would "put my whole package in her mouth. Then  she would hum to create vibrations." 
And we also learn from the horoscope in a publication of the  chairman/now school leader that Aries men, in particular, are visual and  thus would like to have sex doggie-style in front of a mirror. On the  other hand, the chairman apparently believes that Taurus men would  prefer woman to slowly lick down their chests and nibble their thighs,  before ending up at their package. Gemini men, different than others,  like to take the lead, so, ladies, bend over against a wall and have  these gentlemen enter you from behind and let the Gemini guys set the  pace and depth for themselves. Capricorn men are equality minded so,  ladies, you might want to "Guide him into 69, with you on top, using  your lips and tongues to trigger insane pleasure." And if you forget all  these helpful hints the corporation headed by the chairman has an  iPhone and an Android application offering you the sex position of the  day, allowing your phone to choose your position! 
Honestly, you cannot make this stuff up! As I stated at the start of  this essay I am not personally offended by any of the text cited. What I  do find distasteful is that women are presented as objects in these  publications, apparently under the guise of making them powerful. To me,  the major publications under the chairman, now a school leader, make  objectification of women their theme. A smart business person like the  chairman must understand that the stories told, the advice given and the  photos that accompany them could be harmful to youth. That is probably  why, stuck away in an obscure part of the publications from which I drew  my illustrations and in small font, the chairman cautions "The models  photographed ... are used for illustrative purposes only: [This  publication] does not suggest that the models actually engage in the  conduct discussed in the stories they illustrate." 
The former chairman, Cathleen Black, was recently appointed by Mayor  Bloomberg of New York to be the Chancellor of the New York City Public  Schools. By all accounts she is a successful businesswoman. Among other  accomplishments she was chairman of the Magazine Division of Hearst  publications, whose flagship magazine is Cosmopolitan. The examples I  just provided of what Black has published for girls and young woman all  come from the January and February 2011 issues of Cosmopolitan magazine,  selling well on newsstands across the country right now. 
Although many complained about the mayor's appointment of Black  because of her lack of knowledge about schooling, I was surprised there  was no mention of the appropriateness of her appointment on the basis of  her ethical and moral fitness to lead our schools. Doesn't that count  anymore? Where were America's conservatives, such as Alan Bloom and Bill  Bennett, when her appointment was announced? I expected them to be  outraged. Where was the Christian right, when so clear a secularist and  morally suspect person as Black was appointed? Why did Pat Robertson and  Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council give Black a free ride?  Where were the critics, now attacking "Skins," when Black was appointed?  Why weren't critics pointing out that the success of 
Cosmo and other magazines over which Black has editorial responsibility (e. g. 
Seventeen, Marie Clair), is not based on their literary qualities, unless sexual titillation is the readers' goal. 
I am afraid that I see a difference only in degree, but not much of a  difference in kind, between Black and two other successful publishers,  Larry Flynt and Hugh Heffner. But they would never be allowed to  interview for the job, despite equal records of business success. My  question is this: Shouldn't an appointment of this magnitude have  generated more debate? Black's lack of knowledge for the position of  chancellor of the New York City schools is surely matched by the  questionable moral values expressed in the publishing empire she headed.  But debate about her lack of knowledge has been muted and debate about  her moral fitness to lead the system has been virtually non-existent and  that makes me angry. 
Debate should have occurred. What Chancellor Black believes and does  will, literally, affect the lives of millions of American teachers and  students in New York and the nation. I am appalled that a position of  this significance can be obtained without proper and public vetting of  the candidates qualifications, especially when it is quite clear that  her knowledge and her moral vision are both questionable. Although we  have been told that mayoral control of the schools would aid in  reforming them, it looks to me like mayoral control of the schools  simply allows for the old New York patronage system to continue. 
David C. Berliner has authored more than 200 articles, books and  chapters in the field of educational psychology teacher education, and  educational policy, including the best-seller The Manufactured Crisis  (co-authored with B. J. Biddle) and six editions of the textbook  Educational Psychology (co-authored with N. L. Gage). He is a past  president of the American Educational Research Association, and of the  Division of Educational Psychology of the American Psychological  Association. Berliner is a Regents' Professor at Arizona State  University in the Educational Leadership and Policy Studies division.   — David Berliner
Truthout
2011-01-25
http://www.truth-out.org/soft-core-porn-and-crisis-school-leadership67125