Saturday, February 20, 2016

Mon Cri De Coeur

My rating for the Midyear Evaluation is INEFFECTIVE. I am a moron who can barely tie my shoes....
The two most challenging aspects of the demise of my so called career are the humiliation and the concomitant anxiety. I generally awake twice each night and my entire being is affected by the unremitting criticism. I look forward to life after elementary school teaching. I hope and I pray that my district in their infinite wisdom will discover teachers more dedicated and better prepared than I to guide our children into productive adult lives.... Newark teacher
Dropped into the ed notes inbox.

Mon Cri De Coeur

It has been confirmed beyond a reasonable doubt that I am not only an incompetent teacher, but an idiot to boot. Yesterday afternoon I met with my administrator for my Midyear Review. My areas of insufficiency include the following. It is unfortunately not a complete list because I do admit to experiencing brain freeze at certain crucial moments of the presentation.

First and foremost, my lessons lack direct instruction, which I was informed refers to my lack of modeling. My kindergarten and first grade ESL (English as a Second Language) student work folders, which I proudly shared, reflect a variety of assignments and rubric scores, but sadly they lack comments and evidence of revisions.

My administrator freely admitted that my charges would most likely not be able to read my comments so they would serve as reminders for me of what skills I need to target next. At present, I have forty four students. Although I was able to describe my students’ progress on the high end, I was unable to articulate an accurate portrayal of the low end of my groups. I am not to make critical remarks about my students such as, “He cannot do much.” Unbeknownst to me, the student work needs to be analyzed in reference to the Common Core Standards. Despite the fact that I am administering pre and post tests for each curricular unit, I am not utilizing the data to drive instruction. The next step will be instruction on planning lessons to reteach the skills in accordance with the data I am collecting. In my numerous conferences with parents, I am not sharing the data. My most egregious sin is I am not implementing a Balanced Literacy Program of Readers Workshop and Writers Workshop as developed by the infamous Lucy Calkins.

The coup de grace is my areas of proficiency. I am never tardy and my attendance record is satisfactory. I have built a good classroom culture with rules in place for my students. My lesson plan objectives are aligned with the appropriate Common Core Standards. I can hold the students’ attention and they exhibit enthusiasm for my lessons. I have attended numerous professional development workshops. I participate in grade level meetings and I collaborate with my grade level cohort to plan units. I cooperate with my ESL colleagues to screen students and provide information for district reports. I have completed my assigned readings of the acclaimed Teach Like a Champion (Lemov) and Launching the Writers Workshop (Calkins). Best of all, I do not give my administrator “attitude.” I attend the sessions as required by my CAP (Corrective Action Plan) and I am respectful. An illustration of my lack of “attitude” would be how I sit in the meetings like a good little girl, dutifully record everything in my trusty little notebook and ask pertinent questions.

My rating for the Midyear Evaluation is INEFFECTIVE. I am a moron who can barely tie my shoes. I am three quarters of the way down the road to being brought up on tenure charges. As I reflect on my practice, I have to entertain the possibility that this is the first time in my life that I have been accused of being inarticulate.

When I was about four years old, my older cousin David challenged me to shut up for a complete timed minute and I was unsuccessful. I was given the opportunity to observe two fellow teachers whose combined ages are roughly equivalent to my own. It is my role to emulate their practice. In my upbringing, respect for my elders was encouraged with the expectation that when I would be older, younger people would respect me. As a teacher, I was advised to seek out best practices that are evidence based. Lemov asserts that his methods were formulated by observing teachers primarily in charter schools. As for Calkins, I have yet to read any research on her recommendations. She does disparage ESL instruction nicely in one of her numerous volumes as Second Language Learners sitting around looking at flashcards when they would be better off participating in Writers Workshop.

My administrator held out hope of redemption to be accomplished by investing a lot more time. I responded that I am spending on average six hours every two weeks planning the lessons that are considered to be crappy and often in need of revision. In my view, it is unrealistic to expect that I could climb the mountain of proficiency in the little time remaining in the school year. The two most challenging aspects of the demise of my so called career are the humiliation and the concomitant anxiety. I generally awake twice each night and my entire being is affected by the unremitting criticism. I look forward to life after elementary school teaching. I hope and I pray that my district in their infinite wisdom will discover teachers more dedicated and better prepared than I to guide our children into productive adult lives.

Abigail Shure

Chicago Tribune Digs Up Photo of Bernie's Arrest in 1960's Protest


Some Hillary supporters has been mocking Bernie's participation in civil rights protests. The case for Hillary is that she went down south at one point to do some legal support work. Once. Not quite to the level of Bernie's commitment.

I must question his choice to wear white pants to a protest where you can get arrested. This can be a crucial issue in the next debate. Does Bernie have the judgement to be president if he would wear white pants? Hillary, get crack'n.

Daily Kos
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/02/20/1488072/-Chicago-Tribune-Digs-Up-Photo-of-Bernie-s-Arrest-in-1960-s-Protest?detail=emaiclassic
Arrest photo of young activist Bernie Sanders emerges from Chicago Tribune archives http://trib.in/213VWAS 

Here it is. Pretty badass. He was protesting housing segregation. 

This picture confirms what Shaun King reported the other day. There is a VIDEO of Bernie’s arrest: m.nydailynews.com/…
He's wearing the same clothes and crouched in the same position.
Somewhere, Jonathan Capehart and Joy Reid’s crack team of photo-detectives are huddling around a table, theorizing that this might actually be Sandy Koufax.

The ICEman and Woman Meeteth

Yesterday afternoon we had an ICE meeting and as usual some great conversation and analysis of current union events plus some heavy duty petition signing - like 300 of them. I felt like a slave driver keeping Mike Schirtzer from eating his bagel until he had signed a batch.

James and Camille Eterno called in from their car on the way home from Georgia. Too bad they couldn't sign the 300 petitions virtually.
But I'll get to them when they come home.

Once petitions were signed and we were fed we tackled a draft of an upcoming MORE leaflet and that is where the deep experience of ICEers shone brightly as paragraphs, sentences and words were parced and sliced and diced until more clarity emerged. We don't get the luxury of engaging in this process very often in MORE due to the larger numbers of people at meetings, so work is often done in committee on the phone. Having some time in a mixed group of working teachers and retirees was a real treat.

And then there was the gossip.
My lips are sealed.

Working with New Action
We talked about the relationships with New Action. There is no group that has been more critical of New Action over the last decade than ICE. And when the new arrangement between MORE and New Action was first being explored there was some raised eyebrows coming from some ICEers. But people seem to have accepted things and I didn't hear much in the way of criticism.

There was some discussion of the New Action leaflet going out to schools that talks about their arrangement with Unity over the years and what broke that and why they went with MORE. People did not agree with the case New Action is making for that having hd that arrangement. ICE has been more heavily critical of the UFT/Unity leadership and many in ICE consider the leadership as being lined up with the deformers and politicians who have gone after public education. Even in MORE, the ICE crew is more vehement about the MulGarten leadership than some of the younger recruits. But I think that is due to our relative age - we've been through the wars with Unity. On the other hand, most of New Action is in the same age range as the ICEers and they do not seem to have that same level of vehemence.

People did point out yesterday that ICE and MORE have been consistent in the position that once the New Action deal with Unity was over, we could work together. And so we have and as far as I can tell things have gone fairly smoothly, though there have been a few glitches here and there.

I believe the way ICE has dealt with MORE is a potential model for New Action going forward. ICE people had a choice: join MORE and work within MORE while also maintaining ICE as a group, though not an official caucus that would run in elections. A few ICE people did not join MORE or have any interest in working with MORE. They have not been involved with ICE very much if at all.

I feel after the elections, New Action has the opportunity to do something similar to ICE. MORE would welcome those in New Action who wanted to work within MORE while still being connected to New Action, which could take positions in support or even counter to MORE.

No loyalty oaths here.

Friday, February 19, 2016

The Case for Reparations Undermines the Ed Deform Argument That Schools and Teachers Matter Most

I've been listening to Brian Lehrer on NPR on the reparations for black people issue and lots of interesting ideas have been put on the table. One of the dominant points about historic and institutional racism is the long-term effects. Schools and education are symptoms, not causes. One fact I just heard this morning: black college graduates are worth $10,000 less than white high school grads. Pretty astounding when you hear Obama and the rest of the ed deform pack shift billions of dollars into a focus on everyone being a college grad as the solution.

Ed deformers focus on teachers and schools as a way to hide their real agenda - to undermine teacher unions and local community controls. By weakening these institutional forces they create the wedge to privatize schools and allow billions of  dollars to flow from public to private hands.

The reparations movement, whether you agree with it or not (note that holocaust victims got and still get reparations from Germnay), has opened up the door to a full debate. When anti-ed deformers brought many of these same ideas up (like the effects of poverty) they were charged with status quoism.

Tie the reparations discussions into the Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton debates over this issue and race and there is a lot to chew on. I heard Bernie trying to skirt the issue by talking about poverty and class as an alternative to racial identity politics.

A certain segment of the left find the race/ class discussion often very divisive. Over my 45 years in organizations that tried to grapple with this issue, there has been no issue that has caused people to line up on different sides of the fence, even in the same organization. MORE has grappled with this almost from the beginning and at some point after the elections I hope there will be a fuller airing of views on the race/class analysis.

Here are 2 views on the issue:
Class vs. Race how the liberal elite just don’t get it

Bernie seems to be coming from this direction:
We should be talking about class in America as much as race issues
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/28/martin-luther-king-poverty-message


Originalism and Antonin Scalia, 1789-2016 -

Cogent commentary about the late conservative Supreme Court operative. His philosophical doctrine of originalism is ridiculous on its face, and hypocritical in the way he applied it. Those who praise him as a brilliant legal scholar and thinker need to explain that a lot more.... Pete Farruggio, PhD

Originalism in the constitution
Pete is an old colleague from PS 16 c. 1969-70 and one of the early members of Another View in District 14 before heading west. He sent this piece from Glen Newey, London Review of Books

As someone who studied the constitution in college the idea of originalism advocated by Scalia is so far fetched as to invite ridiculousarism by any one who looks at American history. To me originalism calls for the re-institution of slavery and counting every black person as 3/5 of a white.
Killing Unarmed Animals
Glen Newey 15 February 2016     London Review of Books

The US Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia is dead, and not before time. The co-author of some of the dodgiest court opinions since Judge Taney’s in Dred Scott v. Sandford, Scalia was duly hymned on Saturday night’s debate in South Carolina by the self-avowed psychopaths – Ted Cruz has vowed to make the Middle East ‘glow’ with US bombs; Donald Trump’s problem with waterboarding is that the torture doesn’t go far enough – slugging it out for the Republican presidential nomination. Scalia’s judicial opinions reveal a mind whose fixation with the jurisprudential genetic fallacy known as ‘originalism’ betrayed his embrace of legal ancestor worship in a peculiarly pure form. It seems fittingly bizarre that he died on a quail hunting trip (his Supreme Court crony Clarence Thomas noted that Scalia ‘loves killing unarmed animals’).

‘De mortuis nil nisi veritas’ is a useful rule of thumb for commentary when the mighty die, and Scalia was certainly one of those in his own mind. He unflinchingly opposed marriage equality. He was still at it last year, dissenting from the court’s decision to make same-sex marriage legal throughout the States on the ground that liberalising marriage law ‘robs the people of… the freedom to govern themselves’, posing a ‘threat to American democracy’ because ‘today’s decree says that my Ruler, and the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, is a majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court’ – a role that he seemed content with when he was one of those in the majority.

Scalia repeatedly blocked federal action on climate change. There he found his jurisdiction ample enough to define the air. In a dissent in Massachusetts v. EPA in 2007, Scalia opposed the plaintiff’s claim that CO2 is a pollutant causing global warming. Scalia found that air, as mentioned in the 1963 Clean Air Act, includes only ‘air near the surface of the earth’, not ‘the upper reaches of the atmosphere’, where ‘the build-up of CO2 and other greenhouse gases… is alleged to be causing global climate change.’

Scalia helped deliver the 2000 presidential election to George W. Bush by guillotining the Florida recount. Here, again, Scalia seems not to have been cowed by thoughts of limits on the court’s powers. More striking was his ad hoc invocation of the Fourteenth Amendment to argue that the recount should be stalled because Florida counties’ different methods of counting ballots would violate the equal protection clause – something that applied only to the recount, and not to the state’s elections generally. Dubya duly walked down Pennsylvania Avenue the following month.


In the 2008 case of DC v. Heller, Scalia applied originalism to offer a wide reading of assault-rifle owners’ Second Amendment rights. He decided the amendment’s prefatory clause about militias was irrelevant to the operative clause’s meaning as understood by the Founders, which turned out to include protecting the personal use of firearms such as semi-automatic rifles whose invention lay well in the future. Boldly eschewing engagement with what the Founders had actually written, Scalia decided that they were talking about weapons in ‘common use’, not that this phrase figures in the amendment (semi-automatic rifles comprise around 2 per cent of privately owned firearms). Presumably the revered Founders had guns like muskets in mind, but where as often they don’t say anything explicit, originalism comes into its own: they say whatever the medium who tongues their thoughts say they said.

Scalia’s most pernicious opinion may prove to be Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission from 2010. That declared that the First Amendment extends to corporations. Under the Citizens United decision, bungs from SuperPacs, the consortia formed to buy elections for private corporate interests, are protected ‘speech’. Last month Hank Greenberg, the former head of AIG, gave $10 million to the SuperPac supporting Jeb Bush. Greenberg crashed his firm with junk securities and then bleated that the $180 billion federal bailout was paltry (his AIG shares were ‘virtually worthless’, he complained in 2008, ‘about 100 million dollars’). So, thanks to Scalia, public money paid out by George W. Bush’s administration is now bankrolling his brother’s faltering White House bid.

Citizens United came to court when the lobbying group of that name appealed against a ban on airing Hillary: The Movie (an attack on Clinton) during the 2008 election campaign; its specific target was clause §203 of the ‘McCain-Feingold’ Act of 2002 which prohibited ‘electioneering communications’ in the sixty days before a general election. Earlier, in an indication of how it really valued free speech, Citizens United had tried to use §203 to gag the broadcast of a trailer for Michael Moore’s documentary Fahrenheit 9/11 during the 2004 election cycle. When it later decided to push for the Supreme Court to rule §203 unconstitutional, Citizens United found Scalia compliant. His legal case – that 18th-century Englishmen didn’t dislike corporations as much as some people think – was uninhibited by the Founders’ failure to say anything at all about corporations in the Constitution.

At the start of Saturday’s GOP brawl, soon after Scalia’s death became public, the candidates stood in righteous silence for a moment (presumably a whole minute would have been beyond Trump). And rightly: a friend of guns, pollution and big money buying elections, Scalia did the job for which Reagan installed him.


Thursday, February 18, 2016

Big Win For Bernie: AFL-CIO Holds Off On Presidential Endorsement

How much egg is on Randi's face as Trumpka doesn't play ball for Hillary? They may still end up endorsing Hillary, but unlike Randi and the AFT they playing a waiting game.

The largest union federation in America won't be backing Hillary Clinton for now.

 Dave Jamieson Labor Reporter, The Huffington Post

Evan Vucci/ASSOCIATED PRESS
AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka testifies in Washington on April 21, 2015. Trumka told the body's executive council that they wouldn't be holding a vote right away on who to endorse for president. 

The biggest prize in labor endorsements won't be doled out next week as many people expected, according to an email from the president of the AFL-CIO labor federation obtained by The Huffington Post.
In his email, Richard Trumka told members of the AFL-CIO executive council that the body won't be holding a vote on whether to endorse Democratic presidential candidates Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders at its annual winter meeting in San Diego.
"Following recent discussion at the AFL-CIO’s Executive Committee meeting and subsequent conversations with many of you, I have concluded that there is broad consensus for the AFL-CIO to remain neutral in the presidential primaries for the time being and refrain from endorsing any candidate at this moment," Trumka said.
The decision is a coup for Sanders' backers within organized labor. Clinton has managed to lock down endorsements from unions representing a majority of unionized workers in this country. But the AFL-CIO endorsement is the most potent of all, and it won't be going to Clinton -- at least, not yet.
Under AFL-CIO procedures, an endorsement by the executive council needs to be ratified by leaders of the federation's member unions. It's likely that Clinton doesn't yet have the required votes for an endorsement to be ratified.
"We're extremely happy" about the decision, said RoseAnn DeMoro, executive director of National Nurses United, a union that has broken away from many other labor groups and endorsed Sanders.
In his email to members, Trumka said the council would "continue its ongoing discussion" about the 2016 campaign.
"[W]e encourage affiliated unions to pursue their own deliberations with their members and come to their own endorsement decisions, if any, through open and rigorous debate," he said.

Wednesday, February 17, 2016

Howard Schwach on Negative Impact of Moskowitz Charter on Rockaway Schools

To make room at MS 53, the city’s DOE is moving its district 27 Alternate Learning Center [ALC] to the Beach Channel Educational Campus... [a program] for really troubled kids who can’t be maintained in traditional schools and who have been serially suspended for things such as assaulting other students and staff, assaulting safety officers, bringing a weapon to school and selling drugs in the school building. And, they will be all ours by the beginning of the next school year in September.... Howard Schwach
Eva invades and they pull the most troubled kids from the building and dump them in a vast building like Beach Channel HS which already has 5 or 6 schools. My former editor at The Wave, retired NYC teacher Howie Schwach, now has a web-based Rockaway news service, http://onrockaway.com/. As always he's on the case.
Arverne by the Sea, a middle income area of homes that has stabilized the center of Rockaway is Eva's target, not the nearby projects. Eva must already have a massive got to go list for any of those kids that slip into the lottery.

Moskowitz charter coming to Rockaway, forcing problematic students to Beach Channel and revealing lie to ABTS parents


Moskowitz sad
Success Charter School, headed by CEO Eva Moskowitz, left, will soon be coming to MS  53 in Far Rockaway, forcing a program called “Alternate Learning Centers” to move from that school to Beach Channel Educational Campus. ALC is a program for disruptive students who have been suspended for a year and up because of Level 3 and Level 4 violations of the DOE’s discipline code.
MS 53
The local ALC has been running at MS 53 in Far Rockaway, a school aptly sited right behind the 101 Precinct house.
By Howard Schwach
Commentary from onrockaway.com

Rockaway has been dumped on one more time and this time it especially impacts those Arverne by the Sea homeowners who were promised a charter elementary school and parents and students at the Beach Channel Educational Campus, as well as the rest of those who live in Rockaway.

Follow the bouncing ball.
Eva Moskowitz, the CEO of the Success Charter School network and earns more than $300,000 a year for running two dozen schools wants to come to a school in Rockaway.
After first stating that charter schools would no longer be granted co-location in crowded public school buildings, he relented and now regularly gives public school space to charters, allowing them to avoid paying rent in a private building.
The fact that Moskowitz, who was once the chair of the City Council’s Education Committee and is therefore well connected, wants to come to Rockaway should come as a surprise to homeowners who live in the 2,200-unit Arverne by the Sea. They were told last year by Gerri Romski, the CEO of the development that, despite the fact they had long been promised a K-8 school, they were going to get a middle school charter sponsored by the Rev. Les Mullings, whose assistant principal is City Councilman Donovan Richard’s wife.
When challenged, Romski said very clearly that they had to accept the middle school because nobody wanted to open a charter school in Rockaway. Then, comes Moskowitz with a K-1 school in Far Rockaway that will, if it follows the pattern of the other schools in the network, expand each year by one grade.

Where will her charter school, which has not yet been approved by the city, but most likely will be before the end of this school year, will be sited at what is now Middle School 53, at 1045 Nameoke Street in Far Rockaway, the school directly behind the 101 Precinct.
To make room at MS 53, the city’s DOE is moving its district 27 Alternate Learning Center to the Beach Channel Educational Campus, on Beach 100 and Beach Channel Drive.
What is an ALC?
You don’t want to know, because it will not be good either for the surrounding community or for those who ride public transportation during the time students are going to or from school.
According to the DOE’s own website, “ALCs provide an educational setting for students who are serving a Superintendent’s Suspension up to one year.  Each borough has a principal that oversees 5-9 sites. Each site has a site supervisor, four core content area teachers, one special education teacher, one counselor, one paraprofessional, and one school aide.  Our goal is to provide a continuity of education for ALC students. “ALCs cultivate pro-social beliefs, attitudes and behaviors in students, and provide a variety of positive behavioral programs such as Positive Behavior Support Systems (PBIS), Restorative Approaches, and Life Space Crisis Intervention (LSCI).  ALCs offer the same Core Curriculum materials schools have for consistency, and provide intervention measures that build students’ capacity to return to school better able to be productive and engaged members of their school communities.”
That’s all edu-speak for really troubled kids who can’t be maintained in traditional schools and who have been serially suspended for things such as assaulting other students and staff, assaulting safety officers, bringing a weapon to school and selling drugs in the school building. And, they will be all ours by the beginning of the next school year in September.
When I was teaching at then Intermediate School 53 in the 80’s and 90’s, the city had 600 schools, so named because they had designations such as PS 605 and Junior High School 630. Those schools were heavily monitored and school aides were off-duty or retired cops. The ALC program is the new iteration of that program.
People are already lining up to stop the ALC from coming to Rockaway Park, led by local politicians and civic leaders.
The questions do not stop there.
Why is Moskowitz getting an elementary school charter in the east end of Rockaway when homeowners at ABTS were told by Gerri Romski that he had personally contacted every charter group in the city and that none of them wanted to come to Rockaway?
He should be asked that question by the homeowners.
Ed Williams is the head of the Harbor Point II Homeowners Association, one of those who was promised an elementary school.
“We were lied to, and I feel betrayed,” he told onrockaway.com. “Now that [Moskowitz] is here, you have to wonder whether this whole thing was a fair process. We were told that no charters wanted to come to Rockaway and now it turns out that one of the largest did want to come here all along.”
Then there is a growing question about Moskowitz’s charter network.
There have been allegations in the New York Times and other daily papers that her Success Charters are not all they are cut out to be.
Recently, there was proof that at least one of her schools had a list of students who were not performing up to standards or who were disruptive. The list was called “The Got To Go” list internally and parents of those children were reportedly harassed by the schools and then told to take their child back to the local public school.
Published reports said that such lists were widespread in the Success network.
In another case, a video of an interaction between a Success teacher and one of her students has gone viral as a lesson in how not to treat children.
In the video, a first-grade class sits cross-legged in a circle on a brightly colored rug. One of the girls has been asked to explain to the class how she solved a math problem, but she has gotten confused
She begins to count: “One… two…” Then she pauses and looks at the teacher.
The teacher takes the girl’s paper and rips it in half. “Go to the calm-down chair and sit,” she orders the girl, her voice rising sharply.
“There’s nothing that infuriates me more than when you don’t do what’s on your paper,” she says, as the girl retreats.
The teacher in the video, Charlotte Dial, works at a Success Academy in Cobble Hill, Brooklyn. She has been considered so effective that the network promoted her last year to being a model teacher, who helps train her colleagues.
After sending the girl out of the circle and having another child demonstrate how to solve the problem, Ms. Dial again chastises her, saying, “You’re confusing everybody.” She then
The video was recorded surreptitiously in the fall of 2014 by an assistant teacher who was concerned by what she described as Ms. Dial’s daily harsh treatment of the children. The assistant teacher, who insisted on anonymity because she feared endangering future job prospects, shared the video with The New York Times after she left Success in November.
After being shown the video last month, Ann Powell, a Success spokeswoman, described its contents as shocking and said Ms. Dial had been suspended pending an investigation. But a week and a half later, Ms. Dial returned to her classroom and her role as an exemplar within the network.
Moskowitz dismissed the video as an anomaly. Interviews by the New York Times with 20 current and former Success teachers suggest that while Ms. Dial’s behavior might be extreme, much of it is not uncommon within the network.
She did not address the other incidents detailed in the New York Times article, including threats to call 911 and repeated meetings designed to wear parents down until they withdrew their students.
According to the Times, Success is known for its students’ high standardized test scores, and it emphasizes getting — and keeping — scores up. Jessica Reid Sliwerski, 34, worked at Success Academy Harlem 1 and Success Academy Harlem 2 from 2008 to 2011, first as a teacher and then as an assistant principal. She said that, starting in third grade, when children begin taking the state exams, embarrassing or belittling children for work seen as slipshod was a regular occurrence, and in some cases encouraged by network leaders.
Following a report detailing Success Academy schools trying to remove unruly students, school founder Eva Moskowitz denied any systematic effort to push students out of her schools, took responsibility for the oversight of her school leaders, and elicited a tearful apology from the principal who created the list.
Success Academy is the largest charter-school network in New York City, serving 11,000 students, and its schools post impressive test results in traditionally hard to serve communities. Critics have long accused the network of posting high test scores by pressuring undisciplined students to leave.
Moskowitz and other Success Academy leaders have frequently compared the schools in their network to district schools, making the case that Success provides superior educational opportunities. At several press conferences and this year, Moskowitz has called on Mayor Bill de Blasio to treat charter schools as equals and provide them with better space and funding.
Yet on Friday, Moskowitz said that “a very small percentage of kids,” particularly those with special needs, might not find the right support at Success and should instead consider a district school.
“Success may not be the absolute best setting for every child,” she said.
The third question, of course, is why put a school full of problematic students in the midst of other schools that have a good reputation in the community, including the highly-rated Channel View School for Research, with which it will share the building, its cafeteria and gymnasium.
The answer: Because they can and because they have to find room for an elementary charter at MS 53.

Tuesday, February 16, 2016

The Indypendent Features MORE/New Action Presidential Candidate Jia Lee

“People are fed up,” said Jia Lee, a parent and special education teacher in Manhattan who opted her child out of the test and refused to administer it to her students. “We’ve been able to build a grassroots movement, and it is growing because parents and teachers, and even some administrators, are getting frustrated and angry.” --- The Indypendent,  https://indypendent.org/2016/02/02/chalk-victory-sort


CIVICS LESSON: Robert Bender, Principal of PS11 in Chelsea, left, and City Councilmember Corey Johnson, right, lead parents and students of the school in a chant to protest the use of high-stakes standardized tests in public schools. The groundswell of opposition from parents, students and teachers across New York state has forced Gov. Andrew Cuomo to backtrack on his support for standardized testing. Photo: Stephen Yang

LOCAL


Chalk Up a Victory (Sort of)
FEBRUARY 2, 2016
ISSUE #
212
Education, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo told lawmakers last year in his annual State of the State address, “is the area, my friends, where I think we need to do the most reform ... This is the year to roll up our sleeves and take on the dramatic challenge that has eluded us for so many years.” 
In March the governor introduced and the legislature passed the Education Transformation Act. Under the new law 50 percent of a teacher’s job performance rating was intended to be tied to statewide standardized tests. The tests are based on federal Common Core standards for third through 12th graders implemented by New York in 2013 that link grant money to scores. However, when it came time for the exams last spring, 240,000 students in grades three through eight, or 20 percent of test-eligible New York public school pupils, opted out. By the end of the year Cuomo was singing a different tune. 
“Simply put, the education system fails without parental trust,” Cuomo said in this year’s State of the State on January 13, acknowledging the growth of the opt-out movement. 
Following the recommendation of a task force the governor charged with reviewing implementation of the Common Core curriculum, Cuomo had already announced in December a four-year moratorium on putting the statewide tests toward teacher evaluations. 
“People are fed up,” said Jia Lee, a parent and special education teacher in Manhattan who opted her child out of the test and refused to administer it to her students. “We’ve been able to build a grassroots movement, and it is growing because parents and teachers, and even some administrators, are getting frustrated and angry.” 
Teachers and parents have widely complained that emphasizing the tests forces educators to teach to the tests and that the exams are not grade-level appropriate and are biased against students with special education needs and English language learners. One analogy testing opponents frequently use to explain the futility of the high-stakes exams is that of a hospital patient. Instead of treating what’s ailing New York’s public school system — a lack of funding and resources — students are perpetually subjected to tests.
“We already know which schools are struggling,” said Jeanette Deutermann, a leader of the opt-out movement in Long Island. “It’s the same schools year after year; New York City schools, Buffalo schools, inner-city schools that are desperate for money and resources. Why spend all that money on identifying them again and again? Instead let’s take that money and put it into schools that are struggling.”
On top of these criticisms, the tests are simply ineffective measures of student and teacher performance. The six-day exams only cover reading and math, yet the results have been used to evaluate teachers across the academic spectrum. 
“I am curious to hear how teachers can improve the scores of kids we don’t teach,” remarked Jake Jacobs, a New York City art teacher whose rating went from “effective” to “developing” last year based on his students’ math scores. 
The test results are measured using complex statistical algorithms, a method known as Value Added Modeling (VAM), that predict how well a student is expected to perform and then penalize teachers whose students fail to meet formulaic projections. A judge with the State Supreme Court in Albany is set to rule over whether to throw out the tests used to evaluate a fourth-grade teacher in Great Neck, New York, who was rated effective in 2013-2014 and ineffective the following year, despite her students’ test scores being virtually the same.
Big Data in the Classroom
Last March, lawmakers approved Cuomo’s Education Transformation Act. Under the law, student performance measures, i.e. standardized test results, account for 50 percent of teacher evaluations, up from 40 percent. Teachers rated ineffective at least three years in a row could be terminated. 
“The theory behind testing is that if you have more data, you’ll be able to figure out what works,” said Leonie Haimson, executive director of Class Size Matters, a parent-based group that advocates smaller classes and student privacy. 
Under pressure from Class Size Matters, New York withdrew from inBloom in 2014. Founded with $100 million in seed money from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Carnegie Corporation, the nonprofit start-up sought to collect not just test scores but a range of private student information — Social Security numbers, health and social service records, economic status, disciplinary records — and to store the data on cloud-based servers. The stated intention was to track students from kindergarten until graduation, but Haimson sees more nefarious motives.
The aim of all this data collection, she said, “is to push education into private hands and generate a thriving market in education software. The Department of Education and groups like the Gates Foundation seem to feel that technology is going to solve our education problems even though there is no evidence to support that.” 
Jia Lee admits that assessing student growth “is a key part of teaching” but says the results shouldn’t be used to penalize educators. “We’re constantly assessing our students to see how they’re making progress. But they’re using those tests to go after teachers and to close schools.”
Lee is running for president of the United Federation of Teachers (UFT) as part of the Movement of Rank and File Educators (MORE) caucus. Her supporters accuse the current union leadership of complicity in devising New York’s high-stakes testing regime. Despite public statements decrying high-stakes testing, the UFT’s current president Michael Mulgrew opened the door to the exam blitz in an agreement reached with Cuomo and Education Commissioner John King in 2012. It stipulated that test scores would account for 40 percent of teacher evaluations. 
“We need a different level of engagement from our union,” said Lee. “It’s going to take real organizing power.” 
A taste of that organizing power came during last spring’s opt-out actions, which included approximately 80,000 third through eighth graders opting out on Long Island, where Deutermann organizes, and some teachers, including Lee, refusing to administer the tests. However, Cuomo’s apparent retreat has turned out to be more ambiguous than it first appeared.
“Initially my reaction was positive,” Lee said. “In my mind I was thinking, is this really happening? But there’s still a state law in place that says we have to be evaluated by some kind of statistical metric. What that is, we don’t know.” 
Students will still take the Common Core tests and the Transformation Act remains in place, meaning that teacher evaluations will continue to be based on student performance data, making it likely that tests implemented by local school districts will take the place of the Common Core exams to assess educators. 
Still Opting Out
Deutermann plans on refusing to let her children take the tests again this year. “Opting out isn’t just done to change political policies or to get legislators to take notice,” she said. “It’s also about protecting kids from six days of testing that is completely inappropriate.” 
As New York stepped back from high-stakes testing, so did the federal government. Congress passed and President Obama signed into law the Every Student Succeeds Act, which allows states to devise their own education standards rather than follow Common Core and no longer mandates that states tie teacher evaluations to test scores in order to receive grant money.
Both developments are signs that grassroots efforts led by teachers and parents are making an impact. But a new trend in the education industry has some advocates shuddering. It’s been called “stealth assessment” or“competency-based” learning. Education companies like Dreambox, Scholastic and the Khan Academy have developed software that registers every answer students give as they learn reading and math. “The companies that develop this software argue that it presents the opportunity to eliminate the time, cost and anxiety of ‘stop and test’ in favor of passively collecting data on students’ knowledge over a semester, year or entire school career,” noted NPR education correspondent and author of The Test, Anya Kamenetz. 
In other words, in the future big standardized tests could be a thing of the past. Students, and by extension their teachers, would simply be tested all the time.
Instead of tweaking the current teacher evaluation system or moving towards ubiquitous data collection models, Deutermann believes it's time for a paradigm shift. “Why not start focusing on the things that really matter: parent input, student input. Creative lesson plans, mentoring programs for new teachers?”
Another key component to real education reform adds Leonie Haimson: increased funding. “We need to spend money on things we know work like smaller classes, more schools and more teachers.”

The Indypendent is a monthly New York City-based newspaper and website. Subscribe to our print edition here. You can make a donation or become a monthly sustainer here.

Monday, February 15, 2016

2 UFT Dissident Slates Close Ranks Behind Lee: The Chief Features MORE's Jia Lee

Ms. Lee said she wasn’t afraid of the two dissident tickets splitting the potential opposition votes because she considered it a sign that more members were ready to challenge the status quo... The Chief

Good point by Jia. All votes for either slate will count against Unity in this election without the confusion over the past 10 years.


The Chief:

Underdog Takes on Mulgrew


2 UFT Dissident Slates Close Ranks Behind Lee

Posted: Monday, February 1, 2016 5:00 pm | Updated: 5:04 pm, Mon Feb 1, 2016.
http://thechiefleader.com/news/news_of_the_week/uft-dissident-slates-close-ranks-behind-lee

By DAN ROSENBLUM |

Citing her opposition to top-down leadership and standardized testing, two dissident slates—the Movement of Rank and File Educators and the New Action Caucus—recently nominated Jia Lee to challenge United Federation of Teachers President Michael Mulgrew.

Ms. Lee, a special-education Teacher at the Earth School in Manhattan since 2011, said the union’s leadership has often disregarded rank-and-file members in favor of political considerations such as adopting Teacher evaluations.

‘Give Teachers a Voice’

“It’s really about establishing some democracy within our union,” she said. “There’s very little in the way of giving Teachers voices in the decision-making that happens within our union.”

The 15-year veteran said she would do more to encourage parents to have their children opt out of Common Core-based standardized tests. After a campaign by parents and the New York State United Teachers, 20 percent of students statewide sat out the math and English exams last April. But in New York City, where the Teachers union advised parents to not withdraw their kids, the rate of opt-outs was less than 2 percent.

In 2014, she and other educators at her school refused to administer standardized tests to fourth- and fifth-grade students. Ms. Lee said she helped draft a letter and position paper to the DOE and got support from her Principal, but not her union. “They basically said I was on my own,” she said.

Francesco Portelos, a Staten Island educator and activist, is also running to unseat Mr. Mulgrew on the UFT Solidarity Caucus slate, which is advocating for school staffers who feel ignored by the Department of Education.

Both candidates—who are running slates seeking to also gain executive-board seats in May—face an uphill climb in mounting a significant challenge to Mr. Mulgrew. He was selected in 2009 to succeed Randi Weingarten, who departed the local to lead the American Federation of Teachers. The following year, he was elected over James Eterno by 41,521 votes to 4,075. He was re-elected in 2013 with 35,913 votes to 5,708 for MORE’s candidate, Julie Cavanagh. The New Action Caucus endorsed Mr. Mulgrew’s Unity Caucus that year.

Critical of Wage Deal

Since Mayor de Blasio was elected, the UFT has developed a closer relationship with City Hall and his Schools Chancellor, Carmen Fariña. But MORE, billed as the UFT’s “social-justice” caucus, protested the contract reached between the union and the de Blasio administration in May 2014, saying that Teachers deserved raises more generous than were offered in the agreement.

Ms. Lee, a chapter leader for seven years, said the union should fight against the Teacher-evaluation system. “It feeds into the ed-reformers’ rhetoric of the bad Teacher, and which is part of a bigger agenda to basically bust our union and privatize the public-education system,” she said.

She testified last year before a U.S. Senate Committee that was debating the successor to the Federal No Child Left Behind law. She also proposed an unsuccessful resolution last year at a UFT delegate assembly to express “no confidence” in newly appointed State Education Commissioner MaryEllen Elia.

Approximately 30 officer and executive-board positions are up for election, she estimated.

“The UFT is a democracy,” Mr. Mulgrew said in an e-mailed statement.

Unfazed by Split Challenge

Ms. Lee said she wasn’t afraid of the two dissident tickets splitting the potential opposition votes because she considered it a sign that more members were ready to challenge the status quo. She added that even if her campaign, which is driven by word of mouth and local organizing, didn’t propel her into the presidency, it would still be a success if it engaged less-active members.

“The true test of what we’re doing is really whether or not we’re able to help build our rank-and-file-led push within our union,” she said. “And if we can get more Teachers to feel empowered—to organize at the school level and within their communities and to have a voice—I think that is the true win.”

Rebecca Friedrichs in Mourning

The anti-union case being heard today by the Supreme Court: A backgrounder
Friedrichs: Please, pay me less.

Untold story: How Scalia's death blew up an anti-union group's grand legal strategy

http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-mh-scalia-s-death-anti-union-group-legal-strategy-20160214-column.html

The anti-union lawsuit known as Friedrichs vs. California Teachers Assn. is widely viewed as one of the leading casualties of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia's death.

What's less well-known is how the anti-union plaintiffs connived to fast-track the case through the federal judiciary in order to get it before the court while it still harbored a conservative majority. Their method was to encourage the lower courts to rule against them, so they could file a quick appeal. But Scalia's passing is likely to leave a 4-4 deadlock over the case, so the last ruling, in which the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled for the teachers union, remains in force.


This wasn't how the anti-union group behind the lawsuit, the Center for Individual Rights, expected things to work out. As we write, the group's website still features a photograph of nominal plaintiff Rebecca Friedrichs and the center's lawyers standing in front of the Supreme Court on Jan. 10, looking plenty chuffed about that morning's oral arguments, which plainly went their way. The poet Robert Burns had a line for the subsequent developments: "The best-laid schemes o' mice an' men gang aft agley."*  
 

Here's the background, drawn in part from our previous coverage here and here.

“The CORE sit-in that Bernie helped lead was the first civil rights sit-in to take place in the North.” -Danny Lyon

The Bernie Sanders critics on race are being taught a history lesson when his fundamental activism from his earliest days are recalled. I am of the same generation as Bernie though a few years younger. I joined ROTC in college and sat on my ass in the 60s. Bernie did not. One Hillary supported wrote:
....she backed Democrats in the subsequent presidential elections. Or that her civil rights bona fides go back to 1972, when she investigated school discrimination in Dothan, Ala., for the Children’s Defense Fund.

Right. She "backed" and "investigated" while Bernie acted and led.

This post refutes the controversy over a photo of Bernie by having the very guy who took that photo tell all about it.

http://vetsforbernie.org/2016/02/yes-bernie-sanders-protested-for-civil-rights/

New Pictures Emerge of Bernie Sanders’ Civil Rights Activism

NATIONAL (VFB) – Despite attempts by critics to discredit his early activism, Bernie Sanders was in fact a Civil Rights organizer in the 1960s.  Sanders attended the University of Chicago before the 1964 Civil Rights Act was enacted, which led him to protest the school’s segregated housing policies.

According to reports, Sanders spent so much time organizing for Civil Rights that “his grades suffered . . . [and] a dean asked him to take some time off from school.”

Moments of Sanders’ early activism were captured by famed photographer, Danny Lyon, who at the time was a student journalist. Lyon recalls,
“In 1962 and the spring of 1963 I was the student photographer at the University of Chicago, making pictures for the yearbook, the Alumni Magazine and the student paper, The Maroon.”
“That winter at the University of Chicago, there was a sit-in inside the administration building protesting discrimination against blacks in university owned housing. I went to it with a CORE activist and friend. The sit in was in a crowded hallway, blocking the entrance to the office of Dr. George Beadle, the chancellor.”
Bernie Sanders University of Chicago
Bernie Sanders (standing), then a college student at the University of Chicago, leads his classmates in a sit-in to protest segregated housing for black students. (Danny Lyon/Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library)

“I took the photograph of Bernie Sanders speaking to his fellow CORE members at that sit-in,” Lyon says.

A second picture, also taken by Lyon, shows Sanders standing next to the school chancellor, George Beadle

Bernie Sanders University of Chicago
Bernie Sanders (standing, right), member of the Committee on Racial Equality’s steering committee, stands next to University of Chicago President George Beadle, who addresses a CORE meeting on housing sit-ins. (Danny Lyon/Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library)
“I photographed Bernie a second time after he got a haircut, as he appeared next to the noble laureate and chancellor Dr. George Beadle. Time Magazine is now claiming it is not Bernie in the picture but someone else. It is Bernie, and it is proof of his very early dedication to justice for African Americans. The CORE sit-in that Bernie helped lead was the first civil rights sit-in to take place in  the North.”
Yet despite his courageous stands so long ago, Sanders’ noble activism is more than some Clinton supporters can stomach.  Post-writer Jonathan Capehart, for example, who wasn’t even born when Lyon snapped them, claims the pictures are of someone else.  He even wrote a story about it.

Unfortunately for Capehart and Clinton, however, Lyon, who snapped the pictures now in question, took other photos of Sanders at the University sit-ins, which he has now released.
“The slander that Bernie was not a very early leader for African American civil rights got so outrageous that persons went into the archives of the University of Chicago and changed captions on Danny Lyon’s 1962 photos, claiming it was Bruce Rappaport standing in Bernie’s clothing leading the demonstration in the Ad Building. These newly discovered pictures, (below) including close up photographs of the student activists show us exactly what Bernie was and what he remains.”

Lyon describes the pictures (above):
“Here at the University of Chicago, in the winter of 1962, students led by Bernie Sanders and others have occupied the hallway of the Administration Building, spending the night inside. The Chancellor cannot get into or leave his office. Bernie is leading a protest against the discrimination practiced by the University of Chicago against African Americans in its extensive housing. This protest for equal rights for African Americans is the first sit-in to be held in the north as part of  the great 1960’s civil rights movement.  Bernie is the real deal.  And voters, all voters know it.”
If Lyon’s pictures aren’t convincing enough, stories of Sanders leading boycotts from Chicago and elsewhere are also emerging in print.


And if that still isn’t enough, Sanders himself was even arrested and convicted of resisting arrest.

His arrest, as reported by the Chicago Tribune, took place at “74th and Lowe” in Chicago, which is just blocks from the University.
74th and Lowe
So even though renowned Civil Rights activist Rep. John Lewis says he “never saw” Bernie Sanders during the 1960s, “That doesn’t mean he wasn’t absolutely there, fighting for justice, fighting for open housing,” according to Rep. Keith Ellison.
“He didn’t see Bernie Sanders because Bernie Sanders was doing fair and open housing in Chicago — that’s why he didn’t see him. No matter how good your eyesight is — if you are standing in Alabama, you can’t see people in Chicago.”
Ellison is right.  You can’t see the inside of a Chicago jail cell from Alabama.
Special thanks to Danny Lyon for taking these pictures over 50 years ago, and of course to Bernie Sanders for standing up for what was right, even when it was an unpopular thing to do.

Tyson Manker is a former combat marine, attorney, college professor, and candidate for State’s Attorney in Morgan County Illinois. He serves as the National Director of Vets for Bernie. Follow him on Twitter @mankerlaw.



Should Eva Be Forced to Change Charter Name to "Success" in her Version of Guantanomo?

Is Success Academy really the model we want for the education of urban children of color, many living in economic disadvantage? "Got to go" lists? High suspension rates? Teachers who rip up their students' work (according to one teacher in the Times story, it happens regularly at SA)? Test score fetishism? Churning faculty, many of whom are young, white, and not adequately trained? Chanting in the classrooms and marching in the halls? Moskowitz's approach is premised on the idea that urban students of color need extraordinarily harsh discipline codes; she says so herself: - See more at: http://jerseyjazzman.blogspot.com/2016/02/success.html#sthash.4dl03TsW.dpuf
Jersey Jazzman pretty much sums it up with his blog post:
"SUCCESS" by putting the word in quotes. The use of the very word "Success" by Eva is turning into a horrifying joke. There should be an attachment: By Any Means Necessary.
The latest "Success" School at Guantonomo

The blogosphere is alive with comment over the NY Times released video of child abuse at Eva's gulag. Ed Notes has been on the case: Video: Child Abuse on Eva's Plantation

Reporter Kate Taylor deserves credit for sticking to the Success story. I met Kate when, new to the Times ed beat, she attended a hearing for another Eva invasion in Brooklyn's District 13 in Sept. 2014. MORE had 8 people there to join community members to speak out. I remember noted charter abuser Steven Perry, looking to get a piece of the charter gravy, in the audience there to observe. But Eva only sent a few observers and no one to even try to make the case. Eva knew it was a slam dunk. I wonder if that arrogance turned on some light in Kate Taylor that has led her to where she may one day win an award for exposing the mess at "Success". Unless someone with power gets to the Times to stop Kate. (I've seen other NYT reporters who had a clue like Mike Winerip and Anna Phillips be moved out.)

I taught grades 4-6 and at times did engage in some behavior that if someone filmed would be embarrassing. But I can honestly say that it was rare behavior on my part and I did deal with older kids.

Jersey Jazzman makes a similar point:
I'm not about to say, on the basis of a one-minute video, that Dial should be fired immediately. If any teacher tells you that they've never said anything to a student that they later regretted, they're either lying, deluded, or a living saint.
I've been in touch on FB with a chunk of former students from my 1978 and 79 5th and 6th grade classes (I looped and had most of them for 2 years.) Their memories 40 years later seem pretty positive. When children are treated badly in school those memories last a long time. I can remember a few of the times where I was yelled at by a teacher even today.

But these little kids who are 5 and 6 years old? What damage! And to me it is also disturbing that so many "Success" parents want this for their kids. I have had disagreements with some of my colleagues in ICE and MORE over how to address these parents, who most make excuses for. I on the other hand have had numerous conflicts with those who are used politically to back Eva and at one point, as we began to see each other at meeting after meeting, began to have some decent dialogues going.

There are some wonderful commentaries out there on this issue. Here are a few.

The growing storm around Success Academy

Ravitch: NY Times: 8 Experts Censure Moskowitz SA Methods

Moskowitz’s Success Academy Is Being Sued Again

Jersey Jazzman
"SUCCESS" 

Alan Singer at Huffington Post:  Success Academy's War Against Children

Jersey Jazzman gets into the race issue that touches so many charters where young, white, mostly women, are engaging black children.
The fact that Dial is white and the student is black makes this especially troubling. I'm all for teachers being authoritative, but too many students of color are living a school experience where they are dehumanized by teachers of a different race. To be clear: I don't think this is confined just to "no excuses" charter schools; we've seen far too many examples of bad behavior against students of color in public district schools to pretend that it's only the charters that are guilty of perpetuating a hidden curriculum.
See more at: http://jerseyjazzman.blogspot.com/#sthash.T5K9chmx.dpuf

Let's get into the white teacher/black student issue in further depth in future posts since it ties in with our call for more teachers of color to create a diverse teaching corps that is a better reflection of the student backgrounds.

ADD-ON:
Fear and Learning at Success Academy
Whatever Eva Wants, Eva Gets 

Sunday, February 14, 2016

NY Post Features Jia Lee: Anti-Common Core activists seek control of teachers union

Hope all the Muscota, 187, CSS and D6 teachers are voting for MORE!!.... Parent/Activist Tory Frye on Facebook
An interesting piece in today's NY Post linking the MORE campaign against Unity to the parent activism movement. Having parents on our side is a positive thing. And if they talk to their children's teachers about voting for MORE, all the better, though I don't expect that would translate into all that many votes this time. While they may not do so openly because they have to deal with Mulgrew, most parents and groups active in the opt-out movement support Jia and MORE. Some are even teachers who vote (Teacher is Motivated by Jia Lee Candidacy).

Anti-Common Core activists seek control of teachers union


As the Cuomo administration tiptoes back from its testing mandates for Grades 3 to 8, opt-out activists are trying to wrest control of the United Federation of Teachers and the state Board of Regents to push their anti-Common Core agenda to the limit.

Teacher Jia Lee, of Brooklyn, seeks to unseat powerful UFT President Michael Mulgrew in spring elections. “There’s a huge disconnect between leadership and membership,” Lee said. “We have a teacher evaluation system based on flawed metrics that force us to rank and sort our students. It’s totally counter to what brought us to the profession.”

The opt-out movement is a revolt against the Common Core — a set of learning benchmarks that New York adopted in 2010 to claim $696 million in federal education funds — and the matching standardized tests that kids as young as 8 must take every year.

Parents complained the new standards were rigid and age-inappropriate, and teachers hated that their annual evaluations would be based on student test scores. Up to 240,000 students statewide boycotted the tests in 2015, pushing Gov. Cuomo to announce a set of reforms in December.

The union spent $1.4 million on an ad campaign claiming Cuomo and the UFT have seen the light on testing. “The Common Core rollout was a disaster,” a narrator intones. “And now, Gov. Cuomo’s task force is doing what’s right.”

Activists say the ads just show how deeply the union and Albany fear backlash from parents and teachers.

“There are a lot of angry parents, teachers, and superintendents out there who don’t see the changes that the governor claims are happening,” said Lisa Rudley of New York State Allies for Public Education . High-stakes tests are still scheduled, with only minor tweaks to length and content, she said. Fifteen opt-out activists will interview this week for seats on the Board of Regents.

http://nypost.com/2016/02/14/anti-common-core-activists-seek-control-of-teachers-union/