There's confidence. There's chutzpah. And then there's Dan Loeb,
hedge fund king extraordinaire and head of Third Point Capital, who's
getting set to claim the World Heavyweight Championship of Balls... Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone
Matt Taibbi's take down of Loeb seems to be inspired by Loeb's comments on Andrea Cousins and his links to Eva and Success Academy - he is on their board. Taibbi cuts him up:
Dan Loeb, who isn't known as the
biggest hedge-fund asshole still working on Wall Street (only because
Stevie Cohen hasn't been arrested yet), is on the board and
co-founder of a group called Students First New York. And the national
Students First organization has been one of the leading advocates
pushing for states to abandon defined benefit plans – packages which
guarantee certain retirement benefits for public workers like teachers –
in favor of defined contribution plans, where the benefits are not
guaranteed.In other words, Loeb has been soliciting the retirement
money of public workers, then turning right around and lobbying for
those same workers to lose their benefits.
The NYT had an interesting piece on Saturday:
Comment on Race Reopens New York Democrats’ Split Over Schools --
Politicians who have long benefited from Mr. Loeb’s generosity scurried for cover and distance. And his enemies pounced.
Mayor Bill de Blasio and his wife, Chirlane McCray, called on Friday for Mr. Loeb to step down from his post as chairman of Success Academy, a major charter schools network. Democratic groups in New York and beyond pushed Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo to return the $170,000 he had raised from Mr. Loeb and his wife over the years, including at a fund-raiser two years ago at Mr. Loeb’s Hamptons home.
The day’s events captured years of interwoven and lingering grievances that have defined Democratic politics in New York. On one side are left-leaning Democrats like Mr. de Blasio and the Assembly speaker, Carl M. Heastie, who have traditional ties to the powerful teachers union. On the other are those backed by donors who support charter schools, politicians like Mr. Cuomo and Senator Jeffrey D. Klein, the leader of the renegade Independent Democratic Conference.
Chalkbeat had links to all the articles on Loeb:
POOR POST In remarks made well before this weekend's
events, Daniel Loeb, chairman of Success Academy's board, sparked
outrage after writing that an African-American New York state senator
had done “more damage to people of color than anyone who has ever donned
a hood." Chalkbeat, Wall Street Journal, Politico New York, New York Times, New York Daily News, Business Insider, Newsweek
Mayor Bill de Blasio and Al Sharpton both called for Loeb's resignation. New York Daily News
The New York Post's editorial board defended Loeb, arguing that his
broader critique is correct, while the Daily News said he should "slink
away." New York Post, New York Daily News
Loeb gave the the maximum allowable donation to presumptive Republican mayoral nominee Nicole Malliotakis. Gotham Gazette
SPLITTING UP Democrats for Education Reform President Shavar Jeffries is no longer on the board of Success Academy, Politico reported on Monday. His departure highlights a growing divide among charter supporters about how to deal with the Trump administration. Chalkbeat, Politico
SPEAKING UP At a political rally on Monday,
New York State Senator Andrea Stewart-Cousins weighed-in on racial
comments by Success Academy chair Daniel Loeb. She stopped short of
calling for his removal after Loeb wrote on Facebook that the senator
has done “more damage to people of color than anyone who has ever donned
a hood.” Chalkbeat, New York Times
At the rally, pols called for Democrats to take control of the state
Senate, and Comptroller Scott Stringer said he will use a $4,500
donation from Loeb in 2011 to help make that happen. New York Daily News, Observer
The entire Taibbi article below the break:
Dan Loeb Simultaneously Solicits, Betrays Pension Funds
Union leaders – don't fund your demise by investing with this hedge fund king
There's confidence. There's chutzpah. And then there's Dan Loeb,
hedge fund king extraordinaire and head of Third Point Capital, who's
getting set to claim the World Heavyweight Championship of Balls.
On April 18, Loeb will speak before the Council of Institutional Investors,
a nonprofit association of pension funds, endowments, employee benefit
funds, and foundations with collective assets of over $3 trillion. The
CII is an umbrella group that represents the institutions who manage the
retirement and benefit funds of public and corporate employees all over
America – from bricklayers to Teamsters to teachers to employees of
Colgate, the Gap and Johnson and Johnson.
Loeb is going to be, in essence, pitching his services to
these institutional investors. He already manages the money for several
public funds, including the Ohio Public Employees' Retirement System,
the New Jersey State Investment Council, the Sacramento County
Employees' Retirement System, and the City of Danbury Retirement System.
To give you an idea of the scale, New Jersey alone has $100 million
invested with one of Loeb's funds.
When he comes to speak at CII, Lobe will almost certainly be
seeking new clients. There will be some serious whales in these waters:
For instance, CalSTRS, the California State Teachers' Retirement
System, will definitely be represented (Anne Sheehan, the director of
corporate governance for CalSTRS, will be moderating Loeb's panel).
But here's the catch. Dan Loeb, who isn't known as the
biggest hedge-fund asshole still working on Wall Street (only because
Stevie Cohen hasn't been arrested yet), is on the board and
co-founder of a group called Students First New York. And the national
Students First organization has been one of the leading advocates
pushing for states to abandon defined benefit plans – packages which
guarantee certain retirement benefits for public workers like teachers –
in favor of defined contribution plans, where the benefits are not
guaranteed.
In other words, Loeb has been soliciting the retirement
money of public workers, then turning right around and lobbying for
those same workers to lose their benefits. He's essentially asking
workers to pay for their own disenfranchisement (with Loeb getting his
two-and-twenty cut, or whatever obscene percentage of their retirement
monies he will charge as a fee). If that isn't the very definition of
balls, I don't know what is.
It's one thing for a group like Students First to have an
opinion about defined benefit plans in general, to say, as they have,
that "today's district pensions and other benefits are not sustainable
and contribute to a looming fiscal crisis." But it's another thing for a
CFO of Students First like Rebecca Sibilia to tweet the following just a few weeks before one of its state chapter board members asks for money from a fund like CalSTRS:
Outdated & underfunded #pension systems like CALSTERS break promises to #teachers#edreform #thinkED http://huff.to/15vdALJ via @HuffPostEdu
That's a hell of a sales pitch for Loeb to be making: "I
belong to an organization that thinks you're all dinosaurs. Now give me a
hundred million dollars."
Not long ago, the American Federation of Teachers got wind
of Loeb's association with Students First and their lobbying efforts,
and confronted him about it, leading to a somewhat incredible
correspondence, the details of which I'll get to in a moment. But first,
a little background on Loeb.
Dan Loeb became famous in the early 2000s not just for being a jerk, but for being a very particular kind of jerk.
His favorite activity was to invest heavily in a company and then write
blisteringly insulting public letters to management, berating them for
not making him enough money. When he spotted the CEO of one company
courtside at the U.S. Open, he publicly attacked him for "hobnobbing and
snacking on shrimp cocktail" when, presumably, he should have been out
making Loeb money. Loeb loves the word "hobnob."
Loeb's schtick is a kind of living tribute to the legendary scene in Wall Street when Gordon Gekko undresses the executives from "Teldar Paper" at
a shareholder meeting, urging investors to defy the fat-cat
"bureaucrats with their steak lunches, their hunting and fishing trips"
who paid themselves big salaries but lacked the stones to buy stock in
their own firms. Like Gekko, Loeb pitches himself as the guy who does have
the stones, who puts his money where his mouth is. Known as the "Angry
Investor," he has made a career as a kind of investor's ombudsman – a
man who wouldn't tolerate anyone taking his money and doing anything
with it that he didn't absolutely approve of.
So if a CEO using Loeb's money to buy himself tickets to the
U.S. Open is bad, just imagine how much Loeb would disapprove of
someone taking, say, $100 million of his money, and then using that cash
to lobby to end the carried-interest tax break that allows billionaires
like himself to pay a maximum tax rate of 15 percent. One can only
imagine the letters Dan Loeb would write in that circumstance. "Angry
Investor" would be hugely understating the characterization, I would
guess.
In any case, when the American Federation of Teachers got
wind of Loeb's political activities, its president, Randi Weingarten,
wrote him what was, in retrospect, quite a polite letter. She began by
noting the apparent oddity of Loeb simultaneously campaigning against
defined benefit plans while pitching his services to public funds:
Given your strong support for StudentsFirst, an organization which is
leading the attack on defined benefit (DB) pension funds around the
country, I was surprised to learn of your interest in working with
public pension plan investors.
After reminding Loeb that AFT's members participate in
benefit plans worth a combined $800 billion, and that those members are
"examining" their decision to invest in hedge funds, Wenigarten then
politely asked Loeb if he would be willing to meet with her and some of
AFT's trustees during the CII conference.
Since these two interests of yours seem to us perhaps inconsistent, a
meeting with you, me and some of our AFT trustees during the CII spring
conference could be clarifying. We hope this discussion will allow us
to find common ways we can work together to strengthen the retirement
security of educators.
Loeb replied that he was "not aware" of Students First
having taken a strong stance on the defined benefit/defined contribution
issue, and that he was "not an expert" on the issue and was
"uninformed." He said he was happy to meet, and that he would "do some
research on my end" before the gathering. "I tend to be evidence based
and don't bring any ideological baggage with me," he added, "as I simply
like to understand how systems work (as a hedge fund manager)."
Then, having said that, he wrote this:
Third Point has compounded at an annual rate of 21pct per annum for
18 years. Although the funds are closed for now to outside investors,
I'd be honored if down the road we could help AFT members realize their
financial goals and reduce the tax burdens for states and our citizens.
Needless to say, I completely respect the political considerations you
may have and understand if other factors dictate how funds are
allocated.
Translation: I'll make you a lot of money, but if my politics are going to get in the way of that, that's your problem.
Weingarten quickly wrote back to shore up the meeting,
letting Loeb know that there would be some other voices at the table. "A
small group of pension fund trustees are interested in joining us," she
wrote, "including two funds that are current clients of yours."
It seemed that representatives from New Jersey and Ohio,
along with several groups from states like New York, Pennsylvania and
California who had not yet invested with Loeb, wanted to meet with him
personally to clarify his views on public pensions before making a
decision about whether to invest (or, perhaps, disinvest).
After receiving this letter, Loeb suddenly changed his mind
about wanting to meet. "Unfortunately, I am not free following my
presentation as I have made a prior commitment and am then leaving for
New York." He added:
I have learned that SFNY advocated a choice between the two types of
plans, a recommendation favored by a majority of younger teachers.
Beyond that, I'd be pretty useless in a discussion on such an esoteric
copy, so I suggest that Ms. Weingarten discuss her concerns with either
Michelle Rhee, the national director of Students First and a member of
our board, Joel Klein, our Chairman, or Micah Lasher, our executive
director.
This one doesn't need much of a translation. Yeah, I know
you represent $800 billion, and that some of your members have already
given me tons of cash, but I'm busy, so blow me.
Loeb, incidentally, isn't the only hedge fund manager with a
God complex who works with Students First while simultaneously taking
money from public plans. Paul Tudor Jones of Tudor Investment Corp. is
another – he's on the SFNY board with Loeb and manages $15.7 million
from the School Employees' Retirement System of Ohio.
Anyway, one hopes that pension funds and unions don't end up
inadvertently funding their own political demise by investing with the
Loebs and Tudors of the world. For AFT president Weingarten, the whole
episode has been unsettling.
"It is the height of hypocrisy to solicit the hard-earned
retirement savings of teachers and turn around and use that money to
advocate for the dismantlement of those very same plans," she says.
"Teachers continue to face a barrage of attacks, and the last thing they
expect is that their pensions will be used to fund attacks on their
profession, their unions, and their retirement savings."
One thing that people need to realize about Wall Street and
the financial system in general: many of the self-congratulating
millionaires and billionaires you read about in the news aren't
"self-made" in any real sense, but actually live either directly or
indirectly off of your money. The quickest way to extreme wealth in this
world is to attach oneself to giant piles of institutional money like
public pension funds. The subprime mortgage crisis was fueled in large
part by sociopathic hotshots from banks and hedge funds who convinced
institutional investors – your corporate retirement fund, your public
pension, your union – to buy crappy mortgage-backed securities.
Guys like Dan Loeb, they don't actually do anything,
other than shave cuts off of other peoples' money. The psychological
justification for taking such high fees is that they earn for their
clients, but even that's debatable in some cases (AFT points out that
some of Loeb's funds haven't even outperformed the S&P).
The point is, many of these guys owe their outrageous
lifestyles to people who actually work for a living, who've been putting
nickels and dimes away week after week for years, just so guys like
Loeb can swoop in, make a pitch after a fancy lunch or two, and then
take big chunks of that cash to buy private jets and Picassos. For them
to suddenly become self-righteous and political, to tell the world that
it can't afford real pensions and retirement funds for regular people
anymore, is a rich irony.
Hey, Dan, you know what might make pensions more affordable?
Excising the fees that hedge-fund managers get to tend to that money.
Let's try that first – what do you think?
2 comments:
The Rolling Stone link of the article is broken. Here's the link that takes you straight to that article:
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/dan-loeb-simultaneously-solicits-betrays-pension-funds-20130411
Great analysis, and such a shame that most teachers will never read it.
Post a Comment