| 
                        
                             Join Retiree Advocate/UFT - Become a member: $20 annual fee 
Send check made out to Retiree Advocate/ UFT 
P.O. Box 22567, Brooklyn, NY 11201-2567 
or click this link to pay with Paypal 
Retiree Advocate is a member of  UNITED FOR CHANGE 
                         | 
                     
                 
				
                
				
             | 
        
    
    
        
            
              	
			    
				
                
                    
                        
                        | 
                        
                             We
 are participating in the " Be A Hero Day of Action" along with hundreds
 of others around the country. We will tell the NY Senators to protect 
our public Medicare from Medicare Advantage millionaire CEOs whose focus
 is on profits over patient health.  
 
For generations, Medicare has been the rock solid guarantee of 
healthcare for seniors and people with disabilities. But now, for-profit
 insurance companies have used Medicare (dis)Advantage plans to line 
their pockets with BILLIONS of dollars by preventing patients from 
getting the care they need. 
 
According to the National Bureau of Economic Research, 10,000 Medicare 
Advantage patients die every year because their insurance providers 
delay them in getting the care their doctor ordered. Recent studies have
 also suggested that insurance companies offering Medicare Advantage 
plans are overbilling the U.S. Government by 75 Billion dollars every 
year. 
 
Join us on July 28th to celebrate Medicare’s 58th Birthday and encourage
 our NY Senators, Schumer and Gillibrand, #ReclaimMedicare from 
CORPORATE GREED. 
 
List of Sponsors 
CROC- Cross Union Retirees Organizing Committee 
Metro NY Healthcare for All 
NYPL Retirees Association 
JFREJ-Jews For Racial & Economic Justice 
PNHP-New York Metro Chapter  
RetireeAdvocate/UFT 
New York Senior Action Council 
Professional Staff Congress- PSC 
  
Bring signs and water. It will be hot!  
                         | 
                     
                 
				
                
				
             | 
        
    
    
        
            
              	
			    
				
                
                    
                        
                        | 
                        
                             UFC Statement of Support for OTs/PTs, Nurses, and Audiologists: UFT Must Return Back to the Negotiating Table  
                         | 
                     
                 
				
                
				
             | 
        
    
    
        
            
              	July 25, 2023
On July 10, 2023, the American Arbitration Association (AAA) certified 
ratification results for the 2022-2027 UFT-DOE contracts. While most 
bargaining units approved their tentative agreements, one did not. 
Occupational and physical therapists, nurses, audiologists, nurse 
supervisors, and therapist supervisors, who were grouped together as one
 bargaining unit, voted down their contract 1,129 to 782. This 
bargaining unit also voted down their contract in 2018. In that case, 
the UFT went back to the bargaining table and came back with a new 
contract that included some improvements – standard procedure when a 
contract is voted down.
This time around, OT/PTs in particular voted down their contract in 
higher numbers than in 2018. However, instead of forcing the City back 
to the bargaining table, UFT leadership appears to be mocking the 
democratic process by orchestrating an unprecedented ‘revote’ campaign. 
This revote campaign is problematic for several reasons: (1) it denies 
the roughly ⅔ majority their chance to go back to the table; (2) it sets
 a dangerous precedent to do revotes for unpopular contracts in general 
(rather than organize for improvements); (3) in order to garner support 
for a revote, UFT leadership seems to be weaponizing their own 
unwillingness or inability to renegotiate with the City. For all of 
these reasons, our union leadership must take ‘no’ for an answer (from 
their members) and go back to the table. That’s how it works – plain and
 simple.
United for Change, a coalition of caucuses/groups including New Action, 
MORE, Solidarity, ICE-UFT, Retiree Advocate, and Educators of NYC, is 
calling on UFT leadership to cease abdicating its duty to represent the 
affected bargaining unit in good faith. Instead, we demand that UFT 
leadership work forcefully and expeditiously to pressure the city back 
to the bargaining table and achieve all necessary improvements to the 
contract in question. Our union siblings deserve better than a revote to
 make up for poor union leadership. They deserve better than UFT 
negotiators capitulating to the city by dragging their feet. 
Finally, UFC urges that all UFT members send a message to President 
Mulgrew and leadership that now is the time for them to do the work they
 were elected to do— represent the rank and file.
                        
                    
                
				
                
				
            
        
    
    
        
            
              	 Built right into the Federal Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI or Innovation Center) is a system for permitting Fraud and Abuse.
https://www.corporatecrimereporter.com/news/200/kay-tillow-on-medicare-fraud-and-abuse-waivers/
July 10, 2023
Health
 care corporations in a Medicare privatization program set up by the 
Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) are being granted fraud 
and abuse waivers.
The program is called the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI or Innovation Center).
Kay Tillow, who is with the group National Single Payer, came across a CMS page titled Fraud and Abuse Waivers that lists the programs that are entitled to the waivers.
Tillow says that the Affordable Care Act of 2010, among its many 
provisions, set up the Innovation Center within CMS to promote 
experimental models in Medicare that would save money while maintaining 
or improving quality, or that would cost the same while improving the 
quality of care. 
Models approved by CMS can be automatically implemented into Medicare without congressional approval.
Tillow says that the Innovation Center models are not working to accomplish the stated purposes of quality and cost savings. 
“The majority have not saved money, and several are on pace to lose 
billions of dollars,” reports Bill Frist, former senator and an owner of
 the giant hospital chain HCA. 
The majority of models do not show significant improvements in quality, 
says Brad Smith, former Innovation Center director.  The models are 
neither saving money nor improving care, but the Innovation Center has 
$10 billion dollars to spend each decade and keeps churning out new 
models.
How did you come across the fraud and abuse waivers page?
“For a period of time a number of us have been working on the 
privatization of Medicare,” Tillow told Corporate Crime Reporter in an 
interview last month. “We are concerned about that. And we are concerned
 about people who chose traditional Medicare being placed into Direct 
Contracting Entities. They were renamed ACO Reach. We were looking into 
the extent to which the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
 is actually handing over this public program to private equity, private
 venture capital, and big insurance companies.”
“I’ve been wandering around, exploring it, working to explain it to 
senior groups and other organizations to try and get a movement against 
this privatization. Medicare Advantage is being overpaid and is gouging 
the Medicare Trust Fund.” 
“I read what I can about it. And I came across a CMS web page called 
Fraud and Abuse Waivers. It’s an official government CMS website that 
lists all of these programs that are given the green light to commit 
fraud and abuse.”
How many programs like this are there?
“Dozens I think. I don’t know the exact number. They are part of the 
Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI). It was born as part 
of the Accountable Care Act of 2010 when it was created. All of these 
programs are within the CMMI.” 
“That is the privatizing machine to turn over healthcare to private 
industry, to recreate a kind of managed care organization with middle 
men who make money. I don’t know if it’s all of the programs created by 
CMMI, but it certainly is many of them.”
What percentage of Medicare enrollees are enrolled in these programs?
“Just barely over 50 percent are in Medicare Advantage programs. Then 
there is another 2.2 million in ACO Reach. I think it’s probably 
two-thirds or so that are now in one of the privatized programs under 
CMS.”
But not all Medicare enrollees are in programs eligible for fraud and abuse waivers.
“No. But there is a program called Value Based Insurance Design (VBID). 
It’s a model under the CMMI. That program seems to have something like 
over nine million people in it. That program is eligible for Medicare 
fraud and abuse waivers.” 
“They offer so many dollars a month for groceries, which can be 
meaningful for someone who has a very modest income. That’s $70 or so a 
month. But that’s peanuts compared to the amount of money the company 
will make by getting you into their plan. They can make a lot of money 
off of each person who goes in.”
If they weren’t exempt, those companies would be liable under federal criminal laws?
“There are several laws they are exempt from. One is the anti-kickback 
law. One provides a monetary penalty for offering beneficiaries 
inducements. And then there is a self-referral law. There are several of
 these laws that they are being exempted from in order to proceed with 
their models.” 
Don’t Medicare Advantage do this all the time – offer inducements for 
seniors to get out of traditional Medicare and sign up with Medicare 
Advantage?
“The major inducement is a lower monthly payment. You can get away with a
 low or no premium. Because we have millions of seniors on inadequate 
fixed incomes, that’s all that is needed to get people to switch to 
Medicare Advantage.”
Is Congress taking a close look at these waivers?
“As far as I know, no one in Congress has said a word about them. I 
didn’t know about them until I stumbled on the waiver web page.”
“The insurance companies have a history of violation of law and paying 
fines and then going ahead with what they do. Those companies are being 
given contracts within the ACO Reach program. They are never kicked out 
of the CMS programs.”
The overriding drive behind all of these programs is to privatize Medicare. What portion of Medicare has been privatized?
“It’s over half. Medicare Advantage is 50 percent or so. Then all of 
these programs under the ACO Reach program. I would say the overall 
number in privatized Medicare is now probably about two-thirds. The 
Innovation Center has an announced objective of having all seniors into 
these programs, which are privatized, by 2030.”
If you were to ask the average person on the street, they would say that
 Republicans are into privatizing Medicare while Democrats are into 
defending Medicare, keeping it public. 
But here you have the Biden administration saying explicitly, if I’m 
understanding you correctly, that they want to privatize Medicare by 
2030. 
“Yes. Elizabeth Fowler, the head of CMMI, served in the Obama 
administration. She was the advisor to Senator Max Baucus and she wrote 
the Affordable Care Act. In the Affordable Care Act, she created this 
Innovation Center through which the privatization is occurring. And now 
she is the director of it. She comes from the insurance industry. She 
was with Wellpoint. And then she worked on the Affordable Care Act. And 
then she went to Johnson & Johnson. She is an industry person and 
government official. And now they are the same people. That’s the 
problem.”
“Whether it’s Trump appointees or whether it’s Democratic appointees 
they are all doing the same thing, which is privatization through that 
Innovation Center.”
Wouldn’t most liberals be shocked to learn that Biden has someone in his
 administration whose explicit goal is to privatize Medicare?
“People in general don’t know or understand it. This gets complex and 
that’s why it becomes difficult for people within the movement to build 
an understanding. They never go under the names that admit what they are
 doing. They don’t call it privatization. They call it moving people 
into value based payment models. They say they are moving away from fee 
for service and into value based payment, that they are going to pay for
 quality rather than volume. And that’s their plan for how they are 
going to cut back on the cost.”
 
                        
                    
                
				
                
				
            
        
    
    
            
                
                    
                        
                            
                                
                                    
                                        
 
No comments:
Post a Comment