Written and edited by Norm Scott: EDUCATE! ORGANIZE!! MOBILIZE!!! Three pillars of The Resistance – providing information on current ed issues, organizing activities around fighting for public education in NYC and beyond and exposing the motives behind the education deformers. We link up with bands of resisters. Nothing will change unless WE ALL GET INVOLVED IN THE STRUGGLE!
Tuesday, August 2, 2011
GEM/E4E Debate Seniority in Costco Mag: I Go Manno o Womano With Sydney
Eight million copies in print and the link to our movie in print. They wanted 400 words max. As you know I can spit out 400 words in one sentence so I didn't get everything in I wanted too. But the Costco people were dolls to work with - I felt they were sympathetic to our side - and I rewarded them by spending $350 Monday on what seems like nothing. But do we love that store - I ate my way through the shopping experience today but my wife claims Costco calories don't count. And let me add that Costco is the anti-Walmart as they treat their workers really well. I never had contact with what seems like a happier work force than at my local store. Unionized too I believe.
Their only mistake? Labeling Sydney who taught for 2 or 3 years before taking Gates and DFER money and running into political chicanery an "expert in the field." Note how she calls for laying off ATRs -
And how about that sick pic of me - yeah, my wife took it.
http://www.costcoconnection.com/connection/201108#pg19
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
ATRs and Seniority: An Historical Perspective
Too bad I didn't see Jamaica HS teacher Marc Epsteins must read piece at Huffington:
Cathie Black's Tenure Trap
I just could have read it out loud.
I used the very excellent ATR Q&A put together by Julie W. that she posted on the ICE blog as a reference. No one knows more about this issue than Julie.
Here are some of my notes - which I will expand into prose later if I have time.
ATRs and class size- a direct relationship - why not just give them regular jobs - but we know ATRs have a political purpose - a wedge against teacher seniority and LIFO.
Seniority pre BloomKlein
Excessing and layoffs by license - could bump others but generally with scarcity of teachers not an issue.
Early 70's signs of tightening up - surplus social St teachers in HS
1975 crunch - only mass layoff in history - 13-15,000 - order of seniority and massive excessing and bumping of teachers - my school a little more senior than neighbors - 13 people.
Next 10 years - not many hired other than special ed which went from 0 to 60.
Seniority transfers allowed- 5-700 a year took advantage
Public - big advantage for teacher but reality - 5 choices - given one, principals covered up, if refused couldn't reapply for 2 yrs. Most took to be closer to home - also to move from very difficult schools to middle class schools where despite princ opposition - exp in tougher schools often gave them advantage in discipline
Needed princ to sign off if want to leave - most did - if not like - good ridance. If like
Klein- 2002, Aug
Dual attack on Sen Trans from almost first days:
Loss of senior teachers from poor schools drained them of exp, good tchrs
Senior trnsf forced principals to accept bad senior tchrs.
Klein made these contradictory points all over - city council
Randi followed - no defense - UFT not only didn't call them on this but agreed there needed to be changes.
It was clear there needed to be some reforms and here is a major one:
SBO - School Based Options: 400 schools out of 1200: Teachers/union and princ outside contract - interv transfers and didn't have to take them.This gave teachers in schools where the principal didn't totally control things to have a say in which teacher transferees were coming into the school.
UFT Agreed to cut number of seniority trans - 2003 contract (I believe)
LIMITS ON SCHOOL CLOSINGS DUE TO THESE RULES - HAD TO PLACE EVERYONE BY SEN RULES
2005 Contract: End seniority, create ATR
Open market - princ couldn't stop you from leaving but also didn't have to accept you - if excessed or school closed - had to get job on own. No more placement
Had to get own school
2005 Accel school closings because it allowed Klein to not worry about having to place the teachers in a way that can cause bumping.
Life as an ATR
Not equal rights for after school jobs, and other rights.
sub out of lo
Fair School Funding
Charged school for cost of teachers - incentive to get rid of higher priced teachers
Debate often framed as newbie vs senior but more insideous:
COST EFFECTIVENESS - 10 yr/22 yr diff in salary vs. experience benefit.
Have to pay ATRs - Investment by Bloomberg - view to ultim not have to pay -
Part of Cathie Black Mission. Use budget crisis and public pressure.
Nov. 2008: ATR Rally at Tweed
UFT side agreement day before, wine and cheese party
Tale of 2 rallies
Central will pick up salary if ATR hired -
ATR vilified and tainted.
Agree expired Dec. 1 2010.
Current attack:
No LIFO for layoffs, no tenure
Open season on ATR agreement.
--------
Check out Norms Notes for a variety of articles of interest: http://normsnotes2.blogspot.com/
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
On Seniority
I had been leaving comments on various blogs with bits and pieces of ideas and also had been reading some of the comments Michael Fiorillo and many others made at the Diane Senechal piece on seniority at Gotham. When I stopped writing I had 2200 words, well over double the space John had given me.
John was the editor on the piece and we had a few very long conversations that revealed the complexities of the seniority issue. I found it a very rigorous exercise to go through a process like that with someone who was very astute but not tuned into all the details that boil up when you start drilling. John took my scattered thinking (see yesterday's front page article in the Times on the distractions of the internet to see why) and focused things in a way that makes sense, to such an extent that I hesitate to take total credit for the article.
The article is at http://www.indypendent.org/2010/06/03/teaching-under-assault/
and is called:
FIRST PERSON: Teaching Under Assault: Two visions of education clash as Bloomberg prepares to lay off 6,400 teachers
I had to leave out a bunch of stuff I wanted to say. If you have anything to add leave a comment at the Indypendent and here so I can track them and add them to a more comprehensive piece. We have to do this ourselves since the UFT/AFT is unwilling and unable - because they are in tune in so many ways with the ed deformers.--------
Add-on
No time to add links. Heading up to Manchester, NH for my yearly trip with a carload of teachers, engineers and other parties working on robotics here in NYC. There will be reps from all over the nation and the world. The amount of time and effort put into making these tournaments run is almost astounding, especially since it is just about all volunteer driven. We even get to go to dinner at the home of the founder of the robotics program (the helicopter hanger is turned into a dining room for a hundred) - his house is one of the most spectacular I've ever been in, built around a giant Sterling engine. I will try to get pics.
Wednesday, June 2, 2010
Memories of Klein's Twists on Seniority
I was asked to write an article on seniority for The Indypendent by John Tarleton. My brain is semi-mush and I went off on a hundred tangents in trying to explain the entire mess. Thanks to John's brilliant editing, the article actually makes sense. It should be out in a day or two. In my original draft version I touched on some of the issues brought up here by Leonie, Lisa and myself below but there was no room for a full explanation. So this back and forth below fills in some of the gaps if you happen to read the article. (How interesting that two parent leaders are so adept at addressing this issue while you know which org doesn't even try or does it ineptly when they do try.)
On the NYCEdNews Listserve (where info flies like UFOs)
Leonie Haimson writes:
Does anyone besides me remember how Joel Klein used to complain that seniority transfers led to a dearth of experienced, accomplished and properly licensed teachers in low-performing, high poverty schools, because it allows those teachers to transfer out into high-performing schools? And that he needed to be able to perform“involuntary transfers” to move experienced teachers into high needs schools?
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/17/nyregion/klein-assails-job-protection-for-teachers.html
On the matter of seniority, he criticized the system whereby new teachers are generally placed in the lowest-performing schools, while senior teachers have the option to transfer into better schools, calling it ''so profoundly unfair to our children and to our youngest teachers.'' And now he has been complaining, endlessly, that seniority protections in the contract means that some schools would have to lay off their new, enthusiastic and energetic teachers, in order to accept more experienced ones?
I (Norm, in case you forgot) followed up:
I remember - it was bait and switch. Klein twisted the seniority issue every way into a knot. He also made the claim that schools with senior, higher priced teachers were getting unfair higher funding which he twisted into the fair funding formula that led to schools being charged for teacher salaries and principals wanting to dump salary. All part of a plan. The 2005 contract was the key that opened the door. In the business model, assume that any difference in skill between a 10 year and 23 year teacher is not worth the large difference in salary. Why keep anyone over 10 years? Like some twilight zone episode where the planet was so crowded the day you turned 30 you were put to death. Ideally for the ed deformers, the day you reach your 10th anniversary as a teacher - you are gone. The long term future of the teaching "profession."
Lisa Donlan added
Yes- this was the justification for inventing the so called Fair Student Funding Formula- which DoE said would finally stop the inequities among schools w/ unequal quality staffs. Quality teachers at that time were defined as the more "experienced" teachers and those trained in math and science.
Shortly thereafter the Tweedies began repeating that research showed that the best way to achieve academic progress- as defined by rising student test scores- was to hire high quality teachers - as defined by those that raise student test scores.
This tautology made it apparent that the last "accountability" mirage re-org strategy was to actually make the tests the curriculum, deprofessionalize teaching, reducing NYC schools to test prep factories w/ temporary workers.
Then they realized charters could do it all for them, and all they'd have to do is run the accountability data collection/measuring part.
Voila- no more pesky education to be bothered with at all anymore.
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
Obama Admin Connected to Anti-Teacher Union Ads?
I got a call from a retired teacher yesterday asking for ICE. He said he had done some research on the anti-UFT ads and traced them to some Obama administration operatives. Here is the email he sent me as a follow-up.
Re: keepgreatteachers.org. ads against seniority.
It appears the Obama administration or its operatives are behind these ads.
1. The phone# 212 561-8730 for this org. belongs according to the White pages Dunn Squier and Knapp Squier(home phone).
2. A google search of Dunn Squier results in Squier Knapp Dunn Communications info on its merge with Knickerbocker SKD to form SKDKnickerbocker.
3. Management includes William Knapp, Anita Dunn and Stefan Friedman.
4. Anita Dunn was Obama's communications director for his Presidential campaign.
5. According to Wikipedia, Anita Dunn is married to Robert Bauer who is Obama's personal attorney.
6. The home page of the communications firm is: WWW.skdknick.com. Check out the management info to verify info above.
Who will you support for president in 2012?
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
Fact finder calls on Bronx Science administrator to step down- Riverdale Press
I'm amazed that the fact finder also recommends that chapter leader Peter Lamphere, who has been active in the opposition, also transfer when the crimes have clearly been perpetrated by Reidy and Jahoda. I recently met one of the young math teachers hounded out by them (luckily she landed in a great place) and she told me Peter is one of the best math teachers she's seen. That 20 math teachers in one department filed a complaint should have been cause for an instant response from Tweed. Here is the classic case for why seniority rules MUST be maintained. If the geniuses at Tweed had a clue and wanted to make a serious case for eliminating seniority, they would have been smart enough to not let these lunatic supervisors run rampant.
Why this took at least a year or more to come to a decision, giving the Bronx High admins time to go after more people, is something some of the "impartial" NYC Ed press should take a look at. And by the way, if you are going to write articles on seniority, why is only the Riverdale Press reporting on this important story going on at one of the elite schools? (And I can tell you some stories about what Valerie Reidy has done to students but I'm waiting for the statue of limitations to run out (meaning the kid has to graduate.) And ditto for the principal at Stuyvesant - just wait till June.
Fact finder calls on Bronx Science administrator to step down
By Kate Pastor
An fact finder has substantiated 20 Bronx Science teachers’ complaints that an administrator harassed and intimidated them.
In May 2008, the vast majority of teachers in the school’s math department filed a Special Complaint charging that Assistant Principal Rosemary Jahoda attempted to make changes in the math department by focusing on four untenured teachers. They claim she harassed them, treating them like children in an effort to meet the goals set out for her by Principal Valerie Reidy.
“It would be difficult to have heard the testimony of seven of the complainants, to have read the statements of the 13 others and to have listened to the June 10, 2008 audio recording of the meeting in Jahoda’s office and not conclude that Jahoda has a confrontational style that is intimidating and demeaning,” according to the arbitrator’s report issued on April 15.
The fact finder, Carol Wittenberg, concluded that Ms. Jahoda and UFT Chapter Chair Peter Lamphere should transfer out of the school, that the school remove all ‘letters to the file’ issued to the complainants during Jahoda’s tenure and that actions affecting teachers who transferred out of Bronx Science be rescinded.
"After hearing extensively from all concerned, the Fact Finder is convinced that the education community at the Bronx High School of Science, one of the flagship high schools of the Department of Education, needs to see substantial change to overcome the disruption caused by the events and to begin the healing process," the report said.
The recommendations have been sent to School Chancellor Joel Klein, who will make a final decision in the case.
This is part of the April 22, 2010 online edition of The Riverdale Press.
Have an opinion on this matter? We'd like to hear from you. Click here.
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
Is Seniority Killing Pawtucket Schools?
Teachers Pool
Who: Any teacher in Pawtucket may participate.
Where: Auditorium of one of the schools
When: Thursday after the last day of school in June
Why: Collective Bargaining Agreement has said so.
What: The assistant superintendent stands in front of the crowd (generally 500 seated teachers with others crowding the aisles) everyone carrying a card listing their seniority number.
The assistant superintendent stands before a large screen that has projected all of the available vacancies across the district for the next school year. The assistant superintendent starts by saying, "Ok, numbers 1-79, stand up if you see a position you would like and are certified for." Mr. x, a 9th grade math teacher holding onto a card with the number 54 on it, who hates his high school, sees that there is a projected vacancy at the other high school, stands up, and says, "I will take the math position at Tollman High School." Assuming no one else has bid into that position, he is the new 9th grade math teacher at Tollman High School.
Thursday, January 15, 2009
Thirteen New ATRs at John Dewey HS
Advertisement
The UFT will do little unless forced. ICE has formed an ATR/School Closing committee (ASC-ICE-UFT) to address these issues and is working with the Ad Hoc ATR committee to create pressure on the union. One of our goals is to get the UFT to take a stand against closing schools - no, not by passing a useless motion at a Delegate Assembly, but to hold rallies and pressure politicians and educators, especially in the closing schools' districts, to support us. We have been in touch with teachers at some of the announced closing schools with the idea of holding a meeting so they can take action together. We are meeting on Wed. Feb 4 at 5PM the Skyline Diner on 34th St. and 9th Ave. Join us. There is also a listserve you can join. Email asc.ice.uft@gmail.com.
Back to our announcer
Those of us who remember the NYC budget crisis of 1975/76 (15,000 layoffs) can testify to the long-term negative impact of the cuts to come. Teachers were given the choice by the city and the UFT of tossing a good deal of the contract in the garbage - rising class sizes, cuts in preps, frozen salaries, closing schools, and more – in order to prevent more chaos. The UFT's Al Shanker even loaned the city part of the teacher pension funds to help with the bailout. Sort of like holding the knives while they cut your limbs off.
In 1975, there was a seniority system in place that, while wrenching, at least provided an orderly procedure. Thus career teachers of, say, 10 years, would not be facing the prospect of seeing first year teachers who are 50% likely to leave within a few years (maybe tempered this time by the lack of jobs anywhere) in their places.
We assume that at least the seniority rules are still being followed in each license area, but who knows for sure? Some ATRs will remain at the school doing day-to-day sub work and at some point, some will be moved out to other schools. In the pre-Klein era, there would a system-wide procedure for placing them into other schools based on seniority.
This orderly seniority placement system, much vilified by Randi Weingarten and Joel Klein, has been replaced by the Open Market system, which throws many veteran teachers on the mercy of the whim of principals, many with little experience in education.
While on the surface, the old system of bumping seemed inefficient, in fact it bought stability to the system. The anti-teacher market-based ed reformers, unfortunately joined by the UFT, have used the seniority system as the whipping boy for failures in education. But there is not one iota of data, in the world of data munchers, to show this is true.
Advertisement
Before going on in defense of the seniority system which will open Ed Notes up to attacks as being an old "the union is right at any cost" troglodyte, I want to point out that I have been urging reform of the education system and the UFT since 1970. Believe me, I saw some of the evils of seniority up close and personal, but given the alternatives, I feel it still works out best for schools and, yes, even students, over the long haul. It seems to work in Scarsdale and other top performing school systems in Long Island and we don't hear too many complaints.
Back to our program
Human capital in the sense of dislocation and fear among teachers is not conducive to good teaching or learning. I don't know why people think having teachers constantly on edge builds good learning environments. From personal experience, no matter how much I tried to hide it when I was anxious, it would seep into the classroom. Maybe just a bit less patience with a student's behavior. Maybe a little more time in reacting before doing something stupid that would lose a student forever when I was relaxed.
Advertisement
A friend who once came to my class, said I was the most relaxed teacher she has ever seen. She must have caught me on a really good day. But I always was conscious of how much more effective I was when I was feeling good about things. Luckily, I am a fairly optimistic person and always felt free to let my instincts work, especially when it came to dealing with behavior issues, always using humor where possible to deflect issues. And to a great extent it worked. I can't imagine succeeding in a time when nothing is funny.
Concluding...
The UFT will advise these brand new ATRs of their right to remain silent and will hold workshop sessions teaching them how to write resumes, how to dress for success and how to apply makeup.
Advertisement
Help pass out the ASC-ICE leaflet in your schools. If you can't download it, email me and I'll send you a pdf. Remember. Everyone is a potential ATR. Ich Bin Ein ATR. No one is exempt. ACT NOW TO DEFEND YOUR RIGHTS, WHATEVER RIGHTS YOU STILL HAVE .
Download the ASC-ICE flyer.
Related
The Ad Hoc ATR committee is doing important work by focusing on monitoring the recent UFT/DOE ATR agreement, handing out a survey to schools. See a report of their last meeting and their survey at Norms Notes.