Did Tweed and the Leadership Academy Pull the Plug on New (and old) PS 84 Principal?

The Sordid Hand of Tweed and the Leadership Academy at PS 84 revealed, how they throw their own under the bus.

Tweed worried over how actions at PS 84 will affect the Latino community's support for Bloomberg.

The PS 84 community objects to another LA grad:

This the second “in a row” inexperienced graduate of the School Leadership Academy to be assigned to P.S. 84. THE LATINO AND AFRICAN AMERICAN CHILDREN OF P.S. 84 CANNOT CONTINUE TO BE USED AS A TRAINING GROUND FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF RAW, UNTESTED “POTENTIAL” PRINCIPALS TRAINED BY THE ACADEMY. Would you have sent either of these candidates to Stuyvesant? How would you expect those parents would react?

Principal of PS 84 resigns

When the Leadership Academy grad principal of PS 84 in the Williamsburg section of Brooklyn suddenly resigned last Thursday afternoon (Sept. 17), Tweed moved quickly to appoint another Leadership Academy grad as interim acting principal. The appointment was made from the very top levels of Tweed and the Leadership Academy, with James Quail, the District 14 Superintendent being notified but having no say.

With the new version of mayoral control supposedly giving back some powers to the local superintendents, this is a clear sign that Tweed will continue to go around them.

Parent activist Lisa Donlan has discovered that there is a line of LA grads (38) longer than the line at a Kennedy runway on July 4th weekend waiting to be placed and that they are being forced down people's throats.

But wait, this story gets better and better.

The teacher union response
On Friday morning (Sept. 18), a scheduled union meeting was taking place before school began. The union was under a new and more aggressive leadership, mostly in response to the tactics of the old principal, one of the Leadership Academy fave types - young, aggressive and with a mission to decimate the union and any organized parent opposition. She failed in that task, but that is for a follow-up story.

Even though it was her last day in the school, she felt comfortable interrupting the union meeting by bringing her replacement in for an introduction. The chapter leader, expressing years of frustration at the arrogant actions of this principal said, "Sorry, we are having a union meeting" and shut the door, sending a message that milquetoast unionism was at an end at PS 84. Later, at a luncheon for the new principal, the teachers went in to introduce themselves. They were impressed by the new guy's willingness to meet with the UFT reps immediately on Monday to discuss all issues of their concern,

The community response
In the meantime, lots of stuff was going on in the community. There is no official PTA at PS 84 because no elections were held in the spring. Sources say they were told it was not necessary by people in the office of family engagement. (There needs to be a lot more investigation of the political role Martine Guerrier's operation plays at the local level.) Maybe someone at Tweed knew of the coming resignation (there was an investigation going on) and didn't want any PTA interference in their plans, so they "discouraged" elections so there would be no functioning PTA.

But that didn't stop active elements in the old PTA from contacting local community forces, who came to the school on Friday (Sept. 18).

Former PTA president Jaime Estades and long-time District 14 activist Juan Martinez, founder of Progress HS based at Eastern District HS campus in Williamsburg, met with the principal, who had been an AP at Legal Studies, another HS at that campus that had its principal removed, before entering the Leadership Academy, but seems to have had no previous contact with them).

They told him in no uncertain terms they did not want him as the new principal as imposed on them by Tweed. It was nothing personal, but a process that brings in a total outsider with no elementary school experience and without any consultation with any of the interested parties was just not acceptable.

They raised concerns about the fact that the school is overwhelming Latino/a and the process didn't give them an opportunity to urge the placement of a supervisor who had been part of the community and had a similar background to the children. They also pointed out that the current Assistant Principal was a long-time teacher at the school and would have certainly been a natural choice as interim acting principal, especially considering the fact that the Tweed appointee had zero experience in elementary schools.

That the current AP who spent her career at the school and who would have made for a seamless transition was not even a consideration certainly creates suspicions about Tweed intentions, which we view as twofold:

1. getting someone in with no ties to the school or community to make sure there is no stakeholder in trying to keep PS 84 from being a target for closing or for charter school invasion
2. cutting into the 38 person Principal Academy ATR list – where's the press when supervisors get paid for nothing?

There was some back and forth and the principal said a few things that have come back to haunt him.

Before I go on, I want to say that the teachers and some of the parents have nothing bad to say about this guy and in fact in the last week he has impressed people with an attitude totally different from his predecessor. But it's less than a week and people say all kinds of things. Besides, the process is under discussion, not the person.

They send a letter to Klein
I won't get into the details of exactly what he said (you can read it all at the link to the letter sent by the parents below), but when he was asked how he could deal with a community of children he was not familiar with, he responded he was used to dealing with foreigners. While he meant it fairly innocuously and the people present understand that and bear him no ill will, they used his response to make a point about having someone who has been involved in the community branding their kids as "foreigners". The upshot was that a letter was sent to Joel Klein and released on listserves with 10 points opposing the appointment, one of the key points being:

This the second “in a row” inexperienced graduate of the School Leadership Academy to be assigned to P.S. 84. THE LATINO AND AFRICAN AMERICAN CHILDREN OF P.S. 84 CANNOT CONTINUE TO BE USED AS A TRAINING GROUND FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF RAW, UNTESTED “POTENTIAL” PRINCIPALS TRAINED BY THE ACADEMY. Would you have sent either of these candidates to Stuyvesant? How would you expect those parents would react?

You can read the entire letter at Norms Notes.

This resistance on the part of the community as push back against a Tweed appointment is remarkable considering the almost total lack of community action in the BloomKlein years and may be a harbinger to come. I don't expect Bloomberg's third term to be as peaceful as the first two as school politics at the local level begin to bubble to the surface. Martine should have her hands full running around putting out these fires.


Tweed responds
Just as remarkable was the response of Tweed.

The Klein administration immediately cut off communications with the parent and community group and charged this was all a stunt to create animosity towards Bloomberg among the Latino/a community in the upcoming election, which shows you what the Children First people really have on their mind.

Now comes the part which shows it's all about public relations with Tweed.

El Diario got involved towards the end of the week (they were busy with UN stuff earlier) and called Tweed about the story.

They blamed it all on James Quail, the superintendent of District 14 who was ignored a week before over who would be principal of PS 84. "It was his appointment," the Tweed press department told the paper, claiming no responsibility, an out and out lie.

When El Diario was informed later they were blatantly lied to, they supposedly blew a gasket. An article was supposed to appear today.

The acting principal soon after announced he was withdrawing from consideration as the permanent principal of PS 84. It is pretty clear he was ordered to do so by Tweed and the Principal's Academy, which is desperate to avoid scrutiny over how they pour money into a ditch.

My guess is this has to do with the Bloomberg election and when it's over things will be back to Tweed normal time.

As I said, the principal had started winning people over in the last week. He supposedly sounds like a real educator. But I warned my contacts that it is not what he says but how he will function. PS 84 is a prime target for charter school invasion. The principal may think he is there to really address educational issues, when in fact he will be expected to make sure there will be no opposition when the charters come calling.


There is a lot more back story that I will try to get up over the weekend.
Was the resigned principal forced out? Was an investigation of the resigned principal covered up? How the UFT chapter, under brand new leadership, responded.

To understand how PS 84 is a target for charter schools, read these Ed Notes back pieces of how the PS 84 community fought off charter schools in the past.

January 12, 2009
The Impact of Gentrification on One School in Williamsburg

January 29, 2008
Victory at PS 84K: Tweed Backs Down

January 28, 2008
PTA of PS 84K Protest on Wed at noon- I spent 5 years at this school and this is beyond outrage

The Impact of Gentrification on One School in Williamsburg

Gentrification and apartheid (see James Eterno's letter to NY State Ed Commissioner on the ICE blog) as a dual school system is created.

From 1997-2003, I worked at the District 14 multi-media center based at PS 84 on Berry Street in Williamsburg, a few short blocks from the Bedford Ave "L" train stop, which was the epicenter of the gentrification of the neighborhood. Naturally, there would be an impact on the local schools (PS 17 and PS 84) which were mostly Hispanic and very poor performing schools on standardized tests. Think having loads of ELA's (and about 15 special ed classes at PS 84) had an impact.

Ed Notes reported on PS 84 last January with these 2 posts:

January 28, 2008 PTA of PS 84K Protest on Wed at noon- I spent 5 years at this school and this is beyond outrage

January 29, 2008 Victory at PS 84K: Tweed Backs Down

A year later, the story has come back. I am still in touch with some teachers over at 84 and will get more info. Many people have left due to the usual suspect- a young principal with an agenda. Many who remain are disgusted or afraid. What lovely conditions for learning.


From Jaime Estades,
President of the Parents Association at PS 84 in Williamsburg, District 14, Brooklyn

Since last year, the DOE has tried to suppress parent participation at P.S. 84, in the midst of such issues as unfair grading of children and the probability of a co-located Separate but Equal school planned for this September.

Last year, P.S. 84 in Brooklyn was the only school to successfully fight the DOE's plans to place a separate, co-located within its building. In February 2008, the DOE withdrew its plans to locate a "Separate but Equal" elementary school specifically designed for Williamsburg's newer residents, with a promise not to place a second school within the building during the 2008-09 school year and to consult with parents about any future plans.

Once again, P.S. 84 is confronted the same and new issues. This year, while anticipating DOE plans for a new school at PS 84 for September 2009, the PTA of P.S. 84 is confronting the issue of grading of our children.

As described in detail in the complaint (see below), the DOE has developed a policy at P.S. 84 in which teachers are discouraged from giving and required to provide justification to the Principal for "3" and "4"s (at/above grade level) while "2" and "1"s (approaching/well below grade level) are accepted without review. As a result, children typically bring home report cards with grades which reflect a lower level of achievement than the work that they bring home to their parents throughout the semester. This policy has a serious detrimental effect on self esteem and confidence and frequently leads to parents applying additional unnecessary pressure on children who may be doing better than reflected in their report card. In a school where more than 90 percent of the children are Latino and African American, this policy raises concerns of racial stereotyping and discrimination which is all the more troubling when viewed within a political, cultural, and historical context.

The PTA voted to request an investigation of this policy by the New York State Education Department and also approved a press conference on this issue, to be announced soon.

John White, of the DOE's Office of Portfolio Management, has stated consistently that the location of an additional school similar to the one originally planned at P.S. 84 remains a possibility. This year, he rejected the parents' and school's request to extend P.S. 84 grades through eighth grade.

Information from confidential reliable sources within the DOE reveals that a separate school inside PS 84 offering the same grades currently provided and requested by the school community is planned for P.S. 84. We are also informed that the DOE has explicitly acknowledged in their discussions that class sizes (which are currently ideal with an average of 21 children per class) will increase by roughly 50 percent!

If the sources are correct, we will find ourselves in the same position as last year, fighting a Separate but Equal policy and fighting for our children's right to a quality education. We are asking John White and Chancellor Klein to confirm or deny this information, and, if true, whether they have communicated their intention to any elected official in the area, particularly Councilmember Diana Reyna. We will keep people posted.

Again, regarding the grading policy, please see below*.

Very truly yours,
Jaime Estades
President
PTA of PS 84 Brooklyn
Cellular: 347-446-5786
Email: jaimeestades@yahoo.com

*Full Complaint posted at Norms Notes

Follow-up:
I asked Jaime Estades where teachers stand and he replied:

Teachers are very supportive considering the context of intimidation in which they operate. The principal has no support. We believe that this problem exists in many schools around the city. A parent from Nest told us exactly the same story as in 84. This is obviously a policy to show improvements during the year in the school. If you could spread the word in your blog, I am almost sure that more parents from other schools will react. Our experience is that most parents do not ask questions but put more pressure on the children. However once they hear what is happening, they understand that their suspicion was correct.

PTA of PS 84K Protest on Wed at noon- I spent 5 years at this school and this is beyond outrage

P.T.A. of P.S. 84, The José de Diego School
A Magnet School for the Visual Arts
250 Berry Street, Brooklyn, NY 11211

MEDIA ADVISORY FOR JANUARY 30 at 12 PM:

Contact: Jaime Estades 347.446.5786

CHANCELLOR KLEIN JOINS GENTRIFICATION PROCESS
IN WILLIAMSBURG IN A SECRET ‘SEPARATE BUT EQUAL’ POLICY

At the January 24, 2008 meeting of the PTA of P.S. 84, more than 350 incredulous parents and teachers heard District 14 Superintendent Quail confirm that the Department of Education plans to place a separate elementary school within the building of P.S. 84, an existing elementary school serving minority children within the same grades as the proposed school. Quail stated that the new school is in response to the demands of a group of overwhelmingly white parents who have recently moved into the Williamsburg community and who have demanded their own school to provide them with additional “options and choices” -- by eliminating the “options and choices” of the predominantly Latino and African American children of P.S. 84.

This is a clearly discriminatory decision with no policy or social justification, and in which P.S. 84’s school administration and families were not consulted or notified. P.S. 84 children will be over-crowded in fewer classrooms, teachers will lose their jobs, the school will lose many enriching educational programs, students will have less access to its computer lab and other resources and the children will suffer the effects of negative stigma as a result of this segregation which will send our City back 120 years! P.S. 84 welcomes the integration of newcomers’ children into our school, without the creation of a separate school. This plan endangers our children’s education, safety and self esteem!

WHO: PTA and Community of P.S. 84

WHAT: Press Conference to Protect the Children of P.S. 84

WHEN: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 (12:00 P.M.)

WHERE: 250 Berry Street (corner of South 1st Street) Brooklyn

I watched the neighborhood gentrify but PS 84 is still mostly an Hispanic school with some special ed classes. Over time we expected that some new parents would start sending their kids to the school but this sounds like pure segregation.

Reminds me of the time a Hasidim group of kids were put into PS 16 (not that far away on Bedford) about 30 years ago and the Superintendent ordered a wall to be built to keep the 2 populations from coming into contact with each other. It led to a boycott of some kind by the Hispanic community and the wall was taken down.

I will try to be at PS 84 on Wed. maybe with a video camera. If anyone wants to come, take the L to Bedford Ave. Walk north a few blocks to Grand St. trying to avoid becoming overly hip as this is the epicenter of hipsterdom in The Burg. Go left for one block to Grand and Berry. School is on the corner. Walk one block on Berry to South 1st.