If it's such a great deal, why wouldn't they jump at the opportunity? If
we bloggers and opponents are spouting myths, as UFT President Mike
Mulgrew repeatedly told the DA last Wednesday, why doesn't he grab this,
a golden opportunity to demonstrate it? ... Arthur Goldstein at NYC Educator blog.
I'm ready to tape this one but as I said in previous posts, I'm predicting the Unity people will never go face to face on the contract, especially with Julie Cavanagh, whom they seem to especially fear (Mulgrew shut down debate at the DA with Julie standing at the mic to speak next.) During the UFT election campaign the FDR chapter asked for a debate and at first the UFT said YES but then pulled out.
On Friday I decided it would be a good idea to have a forum in which
both sides of the contract proposal are examined. I asked my friend
Julie Cavanagh if she would be interested in presenting the con side,
and she agreed. I went to my principal and asked if we could use the
school auditorium. He said if we got a permit and did so after school
hours it was fine.
I then happened to be speaking to Geoff Decker from Chalkbeat NY, and he
offered to moderate if we could find a time to fit his schedule. We
envisioned either that a panel of him, me and someone pro-contract to
select questions from the audience. We wanted to do something balanced. I
asked my district rep, who said this would have to go before a UFT
officer. So I wrote the following email to Janella Hinds, UFT VP for
Academic High Schools:
Hi Janella,
We are trying to organize a forum on the contract,
and are thinking about doing it next Thursday afternoon at FLHS. My
committee would get a permit, and anyone who wished to co-sponsor could
help pay. We think it will be between 100-300, depending on how large a
room we use, with auditorium at 300.
We envision a pro and con
speaker, equal opening and closing statements, and questions from the
crowd taken by a committee consisting of one pro, one con, and one
non-partisan, perhaps Geoff Decker of Chalkbeat NY. We envision giving
each speaker equal time to answer each question.
Do you think UFT would be interested in participating in such a forum?
Arthur
Thus far, we've gotten no response. It doesn't appear UFT leadership is
jumping up and down for a fair discussion of the agreement they
brokered. That's too bad. If they have such great faith they've made a
good decision, it behooves them to subject it to the sunlight of
reasonable scrutiny.
Hey Arthur, maybe it will happen due this public scrutiny. Good luck if it does.