Coverage of DC 37 Press Conference Opposing 800 Layoffs of Lowest Paid School Workers

See Brooklyn Eagle article on the press conference below.

I taped almost the entire event until it started raining. There were some excellent speeches exposing the hypocrisy of the high spending on consultants by the BloomCott administration while stripping schools in the neediest areas of the people who work in the lunchroom and put children on the buses. Who will be asked to do these jobs now? Why the teachers of course, the people who are already overloaded with so much bullshit work in addition to the teaching load which will be exacerbated by higher class sizes.

Teacher Kelly Wolcott shows school supplies for the year

Here are the first cuts of videos. City Councilman Jumaane Williams, whose arrest I wrote about. where I pointed to the reality of so many kids of color who get stopped by police so often and asked where are the ed deformers on monitoring bad police instead of bad teachers on this so-damaging an aspect of kids' lives. Williams shows up at everything and is one of our fave politicians.

Then Leonie Haimson, who needs no introduction as Noah Gotbaum paid homage to her incredible work for over a decade.

And the UFT's Michael Mendel. To some people's surprise, Michael and I have had a great relationship over the years. He goes out of his way to be civil to everyone and puts politics aside. (He even called me twice after I broke my arm.) What I love about his speech is his putting the UFT on the line on class size. Of course, always watch what they do not what the say.

Finally in this batch is UFT Chapter Leader and 9 year teacher Kelly Wolcott who has started to make a big splash on the young activist scene who talked about the importance to a school of the workers being laid off and held up the entire year's supply of paltry supplies. Kelly is a core member of Teachers Unite.

The narrators are Noah Gotbaum, whose dad Victor headed DC 37 for so many years, and Magnificent Mona Davids, who was the major organizer behind this event. More vids up in a post later tonight.

What's Worse for Black Kids? Bad Teachers or Bad Police? Or Bad Politicians?

UPDATE: Weds. Sept. 7: I'm reposting this to include the NY Times article.

Where are the ed deformers on the issue of how some police (a minority I believe - I hope) treat young men of color? Maybe those Moskowitz troops will be out there when their HSA kids are teens and instead of calling for the heads of public school teachers they will look at the bigger picture.

Councilman Says Racial Bias Led the Police to Detain Him at a Parade

reflected a pattern in which the police unfairly single out young black men.
Mr. Williams said he was stopped recently by the police in South Brooklyn while driving a new car with temporary tags; the officer, he said, “wanted to make sure it was my car.”
He said that none of these incidents would have occurred “if I did not look the way I look — young, black, with locks and earrings.”
What their arrests demonstrated, the two concluded, was a classic case of racial profiling and a policing culture exacerbated by the department’s “stop, question and frisk” policies, which critics say are aimed unfairly at young blacks and Latinos.

Sunday, Sept. 4
I got a personal call today from a local guy running for office. He will probably win so I made sure to get my 2 cents in.

We had met when he was campaigning at a supermarket and chatted about education. I guess the call may have come due to my recent column in the Wave (I Have a Feeling We May Be In Kansas---or Texas).

So we talked education. When he said, "We have to retain our best teachers," I cut him off. "That's ed deform code for getting rid of LIFO," I told him. "We don't retain 50% of the teachers - good, bad or ugly - after 5 years and all we hear about is that some 2nd year untenured teacher might be let go while a 15 year (higher paid) teacher maybe retained.

"What about lousy politicians," I said? "You will never open your mouth about another awful politician and they can cause much more harm to children than a bad teacher."

"And cops. Talk to any black kid, even the best behaved. Every single one will tell you of being stopped on the street for doing nothing. But beyond that is the way so many are talked to and treated. Like they were slime. Profiling supreme. How much more damaging to young men than the effect of a poor teacher? Where's the campaign to remove police who abuse their authority? Do I think they are a majority? Not at all. Probably the same percentage of bad teachers.

Given the above, note this Labor Day item from Chris Owens:

Paranoia Will Destroy Ya'

Today's arrest of City Council member Jumaane Williams at the West Indian Day Parade in Brooklyn is a reminder of the reality facing so many men of African descent in New York City:  prejudice still rules ... and prejudice within the New York City Police Department remains a lingering cancer.

Mr. Williams, a distinguished public servant who happens to be tall, dark-skinned and wears braided hair, was allegedly thrown to the ground and handcuffed when police officers refused to acknowledge his status as an elected official as he was walking in a restricted area along the parade route.

The City of New York owes Mr. Williams an apology -- specifically Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Commissioner Ray Kelly.  The Police Department owes it to all of us to examine this incident closely and make immediate changes -- again.  How many more times must this prescription be demanded?

This may be the "age of profiling," sadly, but the truth is that "paranoia will destroy ya'!"  Our greatest enemy are our own fears.  And we don't need police officers on duty in Central Brooklyn who fear the people who live there.

Check out Norms Notes for a variety of articles of interest: http://normsnotes2.blogspot.com/. And make sure to check out the side panel on right for news bits.

AFT/Weingarten Celebrate Cuts? AFT President to Visit Two Long Island Schools to Highlight Reforms in the Face of Cuts

What else says it all? Instead of engaging in a battle for more funding, Randi Weingarten will be highlighting schools that "made do" in the face of cuts. What worse message to send to the ed deformers? "See, we can do it with less."

Leonie Haimson pointed out:

“Freeport had a $5.5 million reduction in school aid from the 2008-09 school year to the 2011-12 school year; Hempstead saw a $1.8 million funding drop from 2008-09 to 2011-12. Despite the cuts, both districts have implemented reforms that are yielding improved student achievement.”

Strange message; when school budgets are being cut to the bone, thousands of teachers are being laid off and excessed, and class sizes are increasing at unprecedented rates.

Does this mean that the AFT agrees w/ Klein and Gates that resources don’t matter?

This is not a strange message at all from the leading teacher unions that gave up the fight for more resources a long time ago and instead sends a message of: cut, cut, cut - we are professionals and will make do.

I responded:

yes, yes, yes, yes, yes- they practically scream it from the rooftops. They celebrated in NYC when test scores went up. They agreed to merit pay, and the premise that the classroom teacher is the most important element. They leave off class size from major policy statements. They partner with Bill Gates.

What else do they have to do to convince people they are enablers of ed deforms - wolves in sheep clothing?

As long as people view and woo them as "potential allies" the ability to fight back for public education in this war will be weak because they will make some move in what appears to be the right direction but will break your hearts every single time.

What is the alternative as they are the big dogs in town? Build a movement from the ground up that will put the leadership of battle for public education in the hands of people who will stay true to the cause and will not waiver from the commitment to fight for resources instead of continually compromising until there are few resources left to fight for.

For Immediate Release September 6, 2011

Contact: Scott Stephens 202/400-7940 sstephen@aft.org

American Federation of Teachers President to Visit
Two Long Island Schools to Highlight Reforms in the Face of Cuts

WASHINGTON—American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten will visit two schools in the Long Island, N.Y., school district tomorrow as part of the AFT’s coast-to-coast back-to-school tour highlighting schools that have persevered with reforms despite deep funding cuts and other challenges.

On Long Island, Weingarten and New York State United Teachers President Richard Iannuzzi, who also is an AFT vice president, will visit Archer Street School and Freeport High School in Freeport, N.Y., and Alverta B. Gray Schultz Middle School and Barack Obama Elementary in Hempstead, N.Y.

Freeport had a $5.5 million reduction in school aid from the 2008-09 school year to the 2011-12 school year; Hempstead saw a $1.8 million funding drop from 2008-09 to 2011-12. Despite the cuts, both districts have implemented reforms that are yielding improved student achievement.

Reporters are welcome to join Weingarten as she visits schools. She will be available for interviews following the visits.

===============

Check out Norms Notes for a variety of articles of interest: http://normsnotes2.blogspot.com/. And make sure to check out the side panel on right for news bits.

The Callaghan Files: Mulgrew Ordered Story on ICE's Yelena Siwinski to Be Held Until After UFT Election

I began a series addressing the UFT/AFT in this post: How Far Do We Go When Criticizing the UFT/AFT Leadership?  that addressed the issue of whether Ed Notes should function as a wikileaks for UFT dirty laundry.


Before getting to the revelation of how the leadership uses the NY Teacher to make sure members of the opposition get no recognition, I want to mention my response to the comment from Chaz about whether airing the union's dirty laundrey in public weakens the union and assists the ed deform assault. I posted it in the comments section but also as a postscript at the end of this post along with some other comments.

 As you will read, Yelena Siwinski who is one of the top chapter leaders and would have made a great district rep had no chance for that job because she was not in Unity Caucus. Even Mulgrew recognized that and offered her an after school job, which she accepted, one of the few opposition people working at the union.

Yelena Siwinski is chapter leader of PS 193 in District 22 in Brooklyn. She ran for Elementary School Vice President against Karen Alford in the spring 2010 UFT elections on the ICE-TJC slate. In 2010 she applied for the vacant District 22 District Rep position, knowing full well the position would not be given to a non-Unity candidate. She was interviewed by Mulgrew who offered her a job as a PM staffer in the Brooklyn office, where she still works one day a week. She is core member of ICE and GEM and active in Teachers Unite.


Jim Callaghan after seeing Yelena was appearing on the radio on Labor Day posted this:

I remember Yelena well; Mulgrew ordered that a story I wrote about her taking her class to the Aviation Museum be held until after the election because he told me she "wasn't with Unity." Mulgrew of course doesn't know its illegal to make such distinctions but he does so every day.

Deidre McFadyen, my tyrannical editor, held the story from Feb. to June 2010. McFADyen told me she got in trouble for assigning the story before checking to see if the member had proper UNITY credentials.

Some shake down racket Mulgrew is running- pay up -to the Unity bank account- or we ignore you.

Jim Callaghan

Yelena responds:

I was suspicious that this was the reason they didn't run the story.  They actually wanted to wait until August to run it and I told them my students had been waiting to see it published so they finally ran it in June.  This teaches you that sometimes when you think you're being paranoid there's a real reason that you are!  It's great that Jim can let all these secrets out now.

My Response to Chaz:
I believe the union is weakened by the very nature of the type of accusations being made. We don't need ed deformers to do the dirty work - our leaders in their grasp for total and permanent power have made us ripe for pickings. Taking your cue we have no hope for any change at the top if we can't be critical of the leaders.
That you received so little help from the union that was supposed to protect you means that you are getting precious little for the silence. Reform movements in the union weaken the ed deformers in their attacks as such reform movements grow.

==================

Check out Norms Notes for a variety of articles of interest: http://normsnotes2.blogspot.com/. And make sure to check out the side panel on right for news bits.

How Far Do We Go When Criticizing the UFT/AFT Leadership?

When we do so are we aiding the enemies of unions?

There are people who will argue that publishing negative information about our union leadership helps our anti-union enemies attack unions by providing them with ammunition on how corrupt unions are. Plus it undermines whatever faith union members still have left in their union, thus weakening the unions even further. The argument goes: with teacher unions under such attack, we must remain united by stressing the positive.

I am increasingly sensitive to these arguments. But where does adhering to this line lead us? Basically to where New Action, which was the leading opposition, joining in a partnership with Unity Caucus in 2003, thus removing a major voice of criticism and leaving the leadership to force through any policy it wants without open discussion or vetting.

How has that stance worked out over the past 9 years as we have seen devastating policies eviscerate so much of both education programs that benefit children and teacher rights along with the rights of parents and community to have any say in their local schools (something the union leadership is actually happy about)?

The "we are under attack and should mute criticism to stay united" is an argument George Bush supporters used to attack critics. (Why not cancel elections to mute criticism?) As a member of the Independent Community of Educators (ICE) which ran 3 campaigns after the New Action move into the Unity camp with intense criticism of the leadership over their capitulation to so much of the ed deform program we saw vicious attacks on us for doing so. And I'm told that these attacks from both New Action and Unity resonated with people as ICE was branded as being obstructionist.

ICE differs from even the group that has run with us - Teachers for a Just Contract (TJC) – which has never come under the level of attack ICE has. Many of us see the UFT leadership as apart from the membership. Not only do we not view them on the side of the members, but many of us see them as being on the other side of the fence all too often, incapable of truly acting in our interests but with the ability – by dominating the total communications machinery to the members  – to fudge their message to the members to give them the impression they are fighting for them. It is mostly the few people who do the day-to-day hand to hand combat with Unity Caucus who understand the game being played on the membership by the leadership. But it seems to work.

This is not to say that even within ICE, there aren't varying degrees of feeling on this issue. The old hands like me who have been involved for 40 years tend to be the harshest critics, seeing the continuity from Shanker through Mulgrew. But as retirees we have the luxury to feel that way. People in the schools, even those who agree with us, have a different reality and have to walk the minefield of being critics since they often need the assistance of the union. And they often do find people who work for the union who are competent and who assist them in addition to the slugs (read: Washington Sanchez). They don't have the luxury to look at the bigger, long-term picture.

This polemic was inspired by a couple of recent events.

First was a debate I was involved with on the NYCEducation Listserve over my views of the union with no less than people like Deb Meier, Diane Ravitch, Leonie Haimson and others plus some of the internal debates I've been having with people in GEM, many of whom do not take as harsh a view of the leadership as I do, arguing that with a push from the rank and file the leadership can be made to move in a better direction. I totally disagree, thinking that the leadership will do something to MAKE IT APPEAR they are responding but in reality they will continue on the path determined within the narrow confines of the few people (maybe even one person) determining the direction the union is going in. I hope to publish some of the back and forth.

The second was the revelations of Jim Callaghan, not only in the comments section of Gotham Schools, but in private communications to me over the last year since he was fired by Mulgrew last summer. Truly a treasure trove of an array of accounts of cronyism between the UFT leaders and Bloomberg.

Jim Callaghan was the top investigative reporter at the UFT house organ, The NY Teacher. I have thought seriously about the role Ed Notes plays in disseminating this information and have hesitated, especially after the Wisconsin story, even though some of the actions of the union leaders leading up to and through that battle has been disturbing - we WILL NOT FIGHT YOU ON THE BEACHES type stuff until their backs were against the wall.

Sure I'm concerned when Eric Grannis, Eva Moskowitz' husband, tells me he is a fan of Ed Notes, mostly because of the union revelations. But I am on the side of full disclosure. UFT members should know what their leaders are doing behind the scenes and Callaghan is one of the few insiders to come out of the cold. I also think of the charges against Wikileaks. I personally think the amazing stuff coming out there has helped shake up the world for the better.

I don't want to do just a wikileaks like data dump. So I have been trying to parse the info and release it in some order, along with the background information I am aware of to flesh out the information.

Look for parsed releases of both published and unpublished information in upcoming posts.

Here's a tidbit from Jim:

Lots to come about malfeasance, nepotism, favoritism, incompetence, corruption, no-bid contracts and Mulgrew, Hickey and Weingarten allowing one of their top married  aides to  retire -with a Tier One and UFT pension---after he was caught taking kickbacks in the form of free hotel rooms so he could coerce his subordinate  into having sex with him on union time. She said she was going to the press and was going to file a lawsuit if he stayed (on the job). -----Jim Callaghan, former UFT staffer fired after 13 years.

By the way, many of us have known of this story, which took place during a NYSUT convention at the NY Hilton. The amount of money the person being referred to along with relatives took down in salary and benefits would make you scream. Have fun Eric.

=====================
Check out Norms Notes for a variety of articles of interest: http://normsnotes2.blogspot.com/. And make sure to check out the side panel on right for news bits.

Use Your Teacher Voice

Going along with our branding article (Who are we? A common vocabulary is indispensable to building a movement), Chicago Teacher Adam Heenan (and CORE member), who we met at SOS in July, is spearheading this project. Subscribe to the videos and start doing your own. Contact me if you need advice.

Teacher Kim Bowsky talks to students on class size.

Teachers and Supporters across the United States-

Yesterday I testified before congregants at First Lutheran Church of the Trinity in Chicago as part of the Teacher in the Pulpit event organized by Arise Chicago and the Chicago Teachers Union.  The goal of Teacher in the Pulpit was to give educators an opportunity to speak and in their religious communities about working, teaching, and learning in Chicago Public Schools.  My theme was that our vocation, our life-work, is both art and science, and ultimately the work of the spirit.  I was amazed--but not surprised--by the warm responses from congregants. 

It re-affirmed my belief that people want to hear from teachers about education in America.

An emphatic thank you to those who are helping spread the word about UseYourTeacherVoice on YouTube.  I have received only positive feedback about the project.  There are now ten loaded videos and 39 subscribers waiting to see how you Use Your Teacher Voice.  We are growing, and with the school year underway, I expect to see many more videos.

If you are a teacher like me than I know how your school work can pile up on you.  Please make it a priority to make a video sooner than later.  For the sake of the work you do, for the sake of you students, for the sake of their families, claim your seat at the table, and Use Your Teacher Voice.

Subscribe to UseYourTeacherVoice on YouTube, find us on facebook, and tweet your followers.  

We are growing, and people want to hear from you.

Happy Labor Day.  Let's make this school year the one in which teachers' voices are prominent on issues surrounding teaching and learning.

Best,

Adam Heenan

Quick Tip #1: Pick Your Audience

If you are one of the many individuals who said to me, "I plan to do a video, I just don't know how to start, try addressing a specific group of people.  Are you speaking to school board members?  to students?  to parents? to the President?  What would you say to them?

--
Facebook: Use Your Teacher Voice

Twitter: @UseYrTcherVoice, #UseYourTeacherVoice

YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/UseYourTeacherVoice

Scan, copy, paste and repeat

"The Great Aim of Education is not knowledge, but action."  -Herbert Spencer

More Attacks on Public Workers - This time Post Office

 Today's NY Times on the Post Office catastrophe starts out by assuming even mail delivery isn't a guaranteed service that should be subsidized by the government. Let someone suggest that the Wars being funded by the fed should be self-funded. Maybe they need private defense departments to compete. 

Postal Service Is Nearing Default as Losses Mount

The agency is so low on cash that it will not be able to make a $5.5 billion payment due this month and may have to shut down entirely this winter unless Congress acts to stabilize its finances.

Naturally, they blame the union and the pensions:

Missing the $5.5 billion payment due on Sept. 30, intended to finance retirees’ future health care, won’t cause immediate disaster. But sometime early next year, the agency will run out of money to pay its employees and gas up its trucks, officials warn, forcing it to stop delivering the roughly three billion pieces of mail it handles weekly. The causes of the crisis are well known and immensely difficult to overcome....Congress is considering numerous emergency proposals — most notably, allowing the post office to recover billions of dollars that management says it overpaid to its employees’ pension funds.

But the best of all:

Cutting the work force is more difficult. The agency’s labor contracts have long guaranteed no layoffs to the vast majority of its workers, and management agreed to a new no layoff-clause in a major union contract last May. But now, faced with what postal officials call “the equivalent of Chapter 11 bankruptcy,” the agency is asking Congress to enact legislation that would overturn the job protections and let it lay off 120,000 workers in addition to trimming 100,000 jobs through attrition.

So the managers sign a contract in May guaranteeing no layoffs but a few months later are asking to overturn the agreement they signed?

Changing the subject
Here are some items from the listserves worth checking out

From @AnthonyCody (one of the national teacher leaders behind SOS): Business guru Steve Denning Helps us Reframe education reform in surprising ways  http://bit.ly/nWkLk4

This article comes from a post Denning had in Forbes.  Much food for thought in here!

-------------
Check out this video of a professor who has studied Sir Michael Barber and the destruction he brought to England. He is amusing and right on point.

http://www.thesystemsthinkingreview.co.uk/index.php?pg=18&backto=18&utwkstoryid=257&title=Deliverology+destroys+service%3A+Professor+John+Seddon+addresses+the+faculty+of+California+State+University&in
 
=============


Check out Norms Notes for a variety of articles of interest: http://normsnotes2.blogspot.com/. And make sure to check out the side panel on right for news bits.

Labor Day Special: Yelena Siwinski, Mark Torres, Brenda Walker, Clarence Taylor on WBAI, 6PM

Labor Day- Monday, September 5th, 6pmWBAI-Building Bridges Radio Show
Education Panel to start the program at 6PM on the issues ahead for this coming school year for parents/teachers/children - preserving and enhancing public education.

• Yelena Siwinski  (GEM/Grassroots Education Movement)
• Mark Torres (PPM/Peoples Power Movement)
• Brenda Walker (CPE/Coalition of Public Education)
• Clarence Taylor (Recently released book - "Reds At The Blackboard")

      WBAI’s Radio Building Bridges: Your Community & Labor Report
                           Produced by Mimi Rosenberg and Ken Nash
               Monday, September 5, 2011,  6  - 11 pm EST, over 99.5 FM
                           or streaming live at http://www.wbai.org            
                                           ******************
Fighting the Merchants of Austerity, a Building Bridges Labor Day Special
Now, in the U.S. one percent of the population rakes in almost a quarter of the national

income and has amassed forty percent of the wealth. That class sees this as a problem

– it’s simply not enough!

For corporate America, the recession has  meant the opportunity to mold the economy

into something approximating the Third World model: vast wealth, power and privilege

for those at the top, and chronic unemployment, falling wages, and inadequate or

nonexistent services for the rest of society.

The mantra of the “haves and have mores” has been to further slash benefits and

entitlements at a time of heightened need, while simultaneously calling for more tax cuts

for themselves. And, President Obama has as well advocated for cuts in Medicare,

Medicaid and Social Security, life-sustaining entitlements, as sacrifices on the altar of a

balanced budget, while talk of the pain of the ever increasing masses of theunemployed

has all but disappeared from the mainstream discourse.

The merchants of austerity across the country demean those fighting for  jobs, and those

seeking to hold onto jobs with benefits as some insidious special interest undermining

the public good.  The hope that the protests in the mid-west against ultra-reactionary

state governments and union busting employers would prove to be a catalyst to create a

national movement have yet to reach fruition.  But, there are voices raised offering

guidance and inspiration not only for fighting the cuts backs, but for forging a new agenda

for us, which must involve mass redistribution of the wealth.

This Labor Day join Building Bridges as we bring a diverse array of voices to you who not

only resist going backwards, but will provide new insights to reverse the war on the workers

and move forward.   
 *******************
                                     Listen on your Smartphone     WBAI live streams are available on the iPhone, BlackBerry, Android &
     other smartphones. For more information, go to http://stream.wbai.org            

                                             Listen When You Want        Building Bridges and most WBAI Programs are now being archived
     for 90 Days. These links will be live ca. 15 minutes after the program ends.
                         To listen, or download archived shows go to                       http://archive.wbai.org/show1.php?showid=bbridges            

                                                  Visit our web site -
                                     www.buildingbridgesradio.org 

Check out Norms Notes for a variety of articles of interest: http://normsnotes2.blogspot.com/. And make sure to check out the side panel on right for news bits.

Protest and Rally Against Egregious School Staff Layoffs: Weds Sept. 7, 4PM

Update: From Leonie Haimson

Happy Labor Day and welcome back to a new school year.  I hope you had a good summer and rest. 

Unfortunately, the DOE has not been honoring those who work in our schools.  Instead, they are planning to lay-off nearly 800 school aides and other school-based personnel; people who help our kids every day.

The day before school begins, on Wednesday, at 4 PM in front of Tweed, we are co-sponsoring a protest against the proposed lay-offs; for more on these layoffs, see Juan Gonzalez’ column here and a flyer on our blog.

This year, we also expect to return to a much diminished teaching force; with more than 3000 or more teaching positions lost and/or teachers excessed. While enrollment is still increasing, this is likely lead to the highest class sizes in eleven years  in many grades.  (See how the DOE received an “F”  in the city’s performance reports, largely because of rising class sizes.) 

Meanwhile, DOE keeps adding hundreds of positions, in an unprecedented expansion of the mid-level and central bureaucracy, spending tens of  millions of dollars for highly paid educrats called “achievement coaches” , “teacher effectiveness consultants”, “talent managers” and the like, none of whom will ever directly  help a single child. 

They also plan to spend more than $36 million for new local assessments,  $12 million for new teacher evaluation systems, $10 million to expand the central “innovation office” and “innovation managers,” and millions more to expand online learning -- even as school budgets are cut for the fifth year in a row.  (For more details on all this new spending, see the DOE document here.)

One of the new achievement coaches was just appointed to that post after the Special Investigator found that as principal, she had  passed 30 students who had failed their courses; this is more evidence of DOE’s deep-rooted pathology,  just like the way they rewarded Verizon with a $120 million contract after the company was found complicit in fraud.

The entire way the department is  run is the antithesis of Children First – instead it should be renamed Educrats First. 

Please join us in protest against these unfair layoffs and the systematic way DOE is disinvesting in schools and the classrooms -- and further bloating the bureaucracy:

Who:   Parents, teachers, labor and community leaders including Class Size Matters, NYC Parents Union, Local 327-DC 37, UFT, CEP, GEM, the Mothers' Agenda New York, NYCORE, Teachers Unite, ICE, NY Charter Parents Association & OurSchoolsNYC.org

When:  Wednesday, September 7, 2011 at 4 PM

What:  Protest & Rally Against egregious School Staff Layoffs

Where:  New York City Department of Education, 52 Chambers Street

Bring your kids! They’re the ones being deprived of a quality education; they might as well get an education in politics and protest.

And on Thursday, please try to count the other students in your children’s classrooms, or ask your children do that for themselves, and report back to me what the situation is at leonie@att.net.

MEDIA ADVISORY

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

September 2, 2011

Contacts:

Mona Davids, New York City Parents Union, (917) 340-8987

Protest and Rally Against Egregious School Staff Layoffs 

Who:   Coalition of parents, teachers, labor and community leaders including the New York City Parents Union, Local 327-DC 37, United Federation of Teachers, Coalition for Public Education, Grassroots Education Movement, Class Size Matters, The Mothers' Agenda New York, NYCORE, Teachers Unite, Independent Community of Educators, New York Charter Parents Association and OurSchoolsNYC.org

When:   Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Time: 4:00PM

What:   Protest & Rally Against Egregious School Staff Layoffs

Where:   New York City Department of Education, 52 Chambers Street

================
Check out Norms Notes for a variety of articles of interest: http://normsnotes2.blogspot.com/. And make sure to check out the side panel on right for news bits.

Who are we? A common vocabulary is indispensable to building a movement

Updated: 9AM

The ed deformers have spent a lot of time and money in the branding game. They are reformers. We are status quoers (though that game is wearing thin given that they control so many school systems for a decade or longer and are now the status quo themselves - something we need to point out at every opportunity). In their branding game, they are for children, we are for adults. Another term we need to turn around by showing how the adults like Rhee and Klein and Moskowitz are doing very well on the backs of the children they claim to represent and that teachers and parents who oppose them truly represent children.

One of the goals behind the GEM movie "The Inconvenient Truth Behind Waiting for Superman" was to turn the tables on the so-called ed reformers by reframing the debate using our terms, not theirs. Thus they are not reformers but deformers, a term I take credit for creating years ago. The current vogue seems to be referring to them as "corporate reformers" and us as the Real Reformers – thus the reason we call the GEM committee that work on the film "Real Reform Studio."

It is important for us to take back the language of reform from the deformers. It is important to label them for what they are - when we talk to people, speak publicly, leave comments on blogs, etc. If you are in a school, hold a seminar on this topic when you get back to school - make these points at union meetings and to parents.

And make sure to challenge the ed deformers on the trashing of class size as a major Real Reform - that's how you can tell the difference between a Real Reformer and an Ed Deformer. I got that insight when I had a mini debate with E4E's Sydney Morris in a bar where she through out the ed deform argument that you can only make a difference if you lower class size to 15 (like ed deformers who pay 30 grand a year for their own kids to get low class size). Sydney argued that there was no real difference between mid-20's and 30, showing the agenda is NOT children first- or teachers either from a group supposedly representing teacher interests.

You can get the best arguments on class size from Leonie Haimson - here is a post on Norms Notes you can use: Unproven Online Learning Fails Test by Ed Deform Standards - Contradictions on Class Size

In going through old email I found this interchange from last June. Leonie Haimson responds to an email titled "Who Are We?":

I have long believed that we need to reclaim that word “reform” for ourselves; we at PAA say we support “progressive education reform.” and oppose “corporate reform” that’s based on privatization, competition, and high-stakes testing. I am starting to use the hashtag #realreform when I tweet (if I have the room.)


Leonie Haimson
Class Size Matters/Parents Across America

Who Are We?

The other day a local paper referred those opposed to school privatization and de-professionalization of teachers as “critics of the school reform movement.” I don’t regard privatizing schools, abolishing local democratic control of schools, or replacing qualified teachers with untrained temporary workers as a “reform movement,” especially give the positive connotations that the word “reform” carries. The dictionary definition of reform is 1. to make better 2. to improve by removing faults and or abuses. School privatization is no more a reform movement than the policy to privatize prisons is a “prison reform movement.” Both share the goal of shifting public assets into the private sector and removing publicly funded institutions from direct elected government oversight and accountability.

But the ease with which the media can characterize us as contrarians does raise an important issue. A common vocabulary is indispensable to building a movement. The privatization advocates have done this well, wrapping the market-based model in the language of choice, opportunity, rights, and equality and even arrogating the image of the “new civil rights movement.” This last piece of word play is especially offensive give that the goal of the civil rights movement was to empower dispossessed and disenfranchised people, not steal what little they controlled.

So who are we? What terms should we use as political shorthand that will convey what our goals are? The school privatizers dismiss us as supporters of the “status quo” and the label will stick as long as we don’t reach a consensus on how we define ourselves and that encoded shorthand phrase conveys our vision of education.

In a sense, we are defined by the other opposition—we are resisting “reforms” that don’t make education “better” and don’t remove “faults.” We are “anti-privatization, “anti-business model,” “anti-market-based model” and anti teacher-deproffesionalization. Defining us in oppositional terms may makes sense—the “anti-war” movement had its appeal. But is there a positive, visionary and universal definition that would serve us better; one that would denote our belief in educational excellence, equity, and democracy?

Are we the “school democracy” movement, or is that too narrow and does that not address that democracy by itself is not the solution to the problems of inadequate and inequitable educational funding, high-stakes testing, and poverty? Without a common analysis of the problem and its solutions and a common vocabulary to express those ideas, we allow the other side to define our public image.

So how do we encapsulate the message that we are “status futurum” rather than “status quo”? I am sure that this discussion is occurring in other circles but it would be helpful to engage our growing movement in a public discussion through the internet.

ATR Life In Limbo Strikes Again

The saddest thing I saw was a male teacher about my age, who had two kids with him, about the ages of my older two. His name tag said, “Technology and Computer Science” and his kids kept pointing to tables saying, “What about this one, Dad?” or “This is a high school, Dad, how about here?” and he kept answering, “No, they don’t want me, they don’t want me.” My heart broke for this man, and my anger flared at a system that throws people on the trash heap like day-old bread.  

she was behind me, shouting. “Move over here! Yes, YOU! I’ll speak slowly. MOVE…OVER…HERE."

But do you know who there was an abundance of? TEACHING FELLOWS! Brand new, shiny, sparkling Teaching Fellows! Everywhere! Even though the invitation e-mail specifically stated that this “job fair” was for ATRs exclusively.

Life in Limbo over at NYCATR has been chronicling the indignities that exist in the ATR world. Here is a post on the hiring hall at the Brooklyn Museum this past week.

I wasn’t going to go. 

I’ve become tired of dancing to the same old song and, sorry, I was just going to sit this one out. And I’ve already seen all of the paintings in the European Masters room. While I love Rembrandt, THSC, could you please move the fairs to a different gallery? I think the Surrealists make a better backdrop for this, anyway. 

But my inner masochist had been looking forward to this all week, and she’s such a whiner when she doesn’t get her way, so off I went.

MORE at  Job Fair Tale #3: Fine Art and False Hopes

The work being done over at NYCATR has inspired us at GEM to gather some of these folks together to start getting the word out to other teachers and the general public as to what this game is all about.
------------------
Check out Norms Notes for a variety of articles of interest: http://normsnotes2.blogspot.com/. And make sure to check out the side panel on right for news bits.

Math Applied to the NYC DOE

This came via email and no source. Thanks to Loretta Prisco.

There is discussion of eliminating algebra, trigonometry

and calculus and replacing it with “applied math”.

My suggestions for a new, and more useful test.

1)     The Dept.of Ed. (DOE) notified Principals that they could obtain waivers on the hiring freeze for new Math, SS and English teachers.  This, in spite of the fact that there are still over a 1000 ATR (those excessed from closing/closed schools) yet to be placed.

(a)   How much will the DOE spend to hire 1,000 new teachers at approximately $50,000 per teacher?

(b)   How much will the DOE spend to keep 1,000 experienced teachers at approximately 70,000 per teacher?

(c)   Explain the statement:  I don’t want the DOE managing my money.

2)     The Regents issued rules that (1) Districts could raise teacher ratings based on state tests from 20% to 40%, and (2) If the teacher were “Ineffective” in the rating based on student data, the overall rating be “Ineffective”, regardless of how well the teacher did on the 60% of the rating on other measures. The judge overturned the second rule, and said the first rule was subject to collective bargaining. The State is appealing.

(a)   Who’s on first?

(b)   Construct an evaluation system for at least 2 of the following: Tinker, tailor, soldier, sailor, rich man, poor man, beggar man,thief.

3)     Verizon was implicated, by Condon’s office, in a probe of consultant Willard Lanham accused of stealing $3.6 million. Lanham was to wire public schools for high-speed Internet. He was arrested and accused of overbilling the city for millions. Verizon’s direct profits from this deal were $800,000.

(a)   How long will it take you to run to check your Verizon bill?

(b)   How many positions could be saved if Verizon paid the city the $800,000 that it owes?

(c)   When was the last time you heard the phrase “your dime, start talking”?

4)     The DOE cut 737 school aides paid between $11,000- $27,000 each including benefits.  The city said that it was done because the union wouldn’t agree to concessions.

a)     Using an average salary, how much is the total savings from layoffs of school aides?

b)     How much more will the DOE spend to use Assistant Principals (salary approx. $110,000) to do lunch and bus duty?  Run off materials?   Take inventory?

5)     Since 2004, DOE contracts to outside consultants has soared 450% or more than $800,000.

a)     Develop a persuasive essay:  All contracts should be made with corrupt US companies that overcharge rather than foreign countries that do the same.

6)     British tabloid "News of the World" was shuttered amid a phone hacking and police bribery scandal.

NYS entered into a $27 million (to be paid with from the state’s $700 million award from Race to the Top) contract with Wireless Generation, a News Corp. affiliate, headed by Rupert Murdoch. They were to develop software to track student test scores.

(a)   If allowed to sign off on the $27 million contract, how much of the $700 million would remain to improve teaching and learning?

(b)   Would you trust a Rupert Murdoch subsidiary with your child’s personal data?

(c)   Do they have no shame?

7)     NYC  scores on English Language Arts (ELA) barely budged, and only 1/3 of Black and Latino children can read and write at state standards. More than 234,000 students failed to meet state standards in ELA – more students than in the entire Philly district. 8^th grade scores fell. In the 100 lowest-performing schools, ELA scores were completely stagnant. This year, as last year, 15% of students in those schools met standards in ELA. Out of the 27,726 children in those 100 schools, only 4,235 are proficient in reading and writing. Some of the least progress, 1 in 4 students, are meeting standards in some of the lowest-performing districts. And in these districts, boys are having the most trouble. In one district 10% of 8^th grade boys can read and write at state standards.  

(a)   What percentage increase would be achieved if we converted the lowest performing districts to all girls schools?

(b)   Restate the statistics above as the Mayor and Chancellor does to announce that the schools are doing better.