Tuesday, March 11, 2025

ABC Exposed the Pension Legislation—Now UFT Is Backtracking - Join ABC Retiree Zoom Tonight

The response team at A Better Contract jumped on the pension issue immediately and the pressure worked.
 
 

Join us tonight, to discuss this and other matters, in a retiree forum. Arthur will be hosting. Meet the retiree members of the ABC Executive Board, our presidential candidate, Amy Arundell, and maybe other surprise guests. Last I heard there were over 400 registered.

CLICK HERE to register for the meeting.






Dear UFT Member,

Tonight, UFT leadership finally notified some members, retirees thus far, about the pension-related legislation they had been quietly supporting. If you’re an active member and this is the first you’re hearing about it, that’s because they never told you.

What Was This Legislation?

The proposed bill would have extended the city’s required pension fund contributions, originally set to end in 2033, until 2045 through an amortization process. This was framed as a way to “protect” the pension system from market volatility. However, this would have significantly changed how city contributions to our pension fund are managed—without any consultation with active or retired members.

A Better Contract Made This an Issue—Not UFT

  • A Better Contract’s candidate for Treasurer educates us with an important article posted to our substack: https://open.substack.com/pub/uftmembers/p/why-is-hochul-seeking-to-underfund?r=hbbt4&utm_medium=ios

  • Our candidate for Assistant Secretary Arthur Goldstein was one of the first to uncover and raise the alarm about this legislation.

  • UFT leadership had no issue with it—until we forced them to address it.

  • Only after A Better Contract exposed it, members started asking questions, and public scrutiny grew did the UFT leadership claim they were backing out for now.

  • And now, on Lobby Day, of all days, they are trying to quietly control the narrative.

A Timeline That Doesn't Add Up

UFT leadership claims they backed out of supporting this legislation last Wednesday—but:

  • Who is the “we” in “we determined last Wednesday”?

  • Why wasn’t this ever discussed at the Delegate Assembly (DA)?

  • If this decision was made last Wednesday, why did leadership wait until tonight to notify retirees—but not active members?

This is the same pattern we saw with Medicare Advantagebackroom deals, no transparency, and members only learning about it after the fact. The difference this time? A Better Contract members were watching, organizing, and refusing to let leadership get away with it.

The Takeaway? Member Power Works.

Make no mistake: this win belongs to the members, not UFT leadership. If A Better Contract and engaged members like you hadn’t been paying attention, this deal could have been pushed through without any input from those it actually affects.

We won this round, but the fight for real union transparency isn’t over. Stay informed, stay engaged, and let’s keep pushing for a better, member-led UFT.

In solidarity,

A Better Contract (ABC)


Thanks for reading A BETTER CONTRACT - UFT MEMBERS! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

 

No comments: