We demand the full contract language, every single detail, and a chance to hear directly from the negotiators who cut this healthcare deal in our name. This is our healthcare, our families, and our shared future. We cannot allow Unity to gamble with our lives in backroom deals ... Be informed, be independent of what Michael Mulgrew and Unity Caucus tell you to think and do, and make the choice that protects you and the UFT members you serve..... ABC
Healthcare is not an abstract policy issue or some political football. It is not a bargaining chip. It is not a spreadsheet of “savings.”It is life and death for us, for our families, for our dependents.... Educators of NYC
A Pig in a Poke: What's in the new health plan?- Arthur Goldstein - Unity, who’s lied to us before, is asking us to trust them.
Is anyone insisting that those who can’t attend the meeting be allowed to view on zoom especially since they say the meeting is at capacity? Maybe we should have this meeting at a larger venue so everyone who wants can come. Why don’t the use the rooms upstairs like they used to for DA overspill and observers? The Union leadership wants to discourage this vote... a retiree
From a retiree: I just listened to a Marianne update. She said Mulgrew is going to an MLC meeting at 9 to vote on the healthcare contract. But the DA is not until the afternoon. What's up with that? See Marianne video on Monday MLC Steering Meeting
Friday, Sept. 26, 2025
Yeah, what's up with that? Will Mulgrew cast a UFT vote BEFORE the DA at the MLC?
And I'm hearing from retired delegates who tried to register immediately and were told it was full. I did get in in person and will do a head count of all the staffers who got in, including some so-called high school exec bd members who won election with 35% of the vote, the lowest "winning" total in UFT history.
It's the proud fear mongerer here, preparing for Monday's Delegate Assembly vote on the new healthcare issue.
After almost a month of internal debate, ABC has come up with a statement that reflects the variety of opinions on the healthcare issue within the broad group, while any individual - like me - is free to disagree - and I say vote NO.
As does Daniel Alicea from Educators of NYC:
The 3 big reasons to vote NO!!!
Why UFT Chapter Leaders and Delegates Must Vote “NO” on the NYC Employees PPO Plan
Taken together, these three reasons — the missing contracts, the reckless self-funded gamble, and Mulgrew’s record of betrayal — all point to one unavoidable conclusion: this plan cannot be trusted.
https://thewire.educators.nyc/p/why-uft-chapter-leaders-and-delegates
There's lots of fodder in the ABC statement to justify a NO vote and MORE has also taken a NO vote position for its chapter leaders. MORE (Why are UFT Chapter Leaders and Delegates in the Delegate Assembly Voting No on the Proposed Changes to Our Healthcare?
Now here is where member-driven ABC differs from a proclamation like MORE made, as evidenced below: LET YOUR CHAPTER DISCUSS AND VOTE. Yet how do they do that without at least having access to the entire document which has redacted parts from what I hear (what are they hiding.)
But retiree delegates are in a different situation and Retiree Advocate's 300 delegates have been chiming in, with the ABC crew leaning a strong NO while the other caucuses represented - have been more ambivalent, as I wrote about this the other day:
A number of the 300 retiree delegates are not associated with a caucus or organized group - in the case of ABC, semi-organized - and there is a large group of delegates who have been associated with NYC Retirees and Marianne Pizzitola and they seem a definite NO. Some others in the leadership of RTC want to be seen as the "responsible" opposition who do not automatically question a UFT leadership presentation like so many of us do.
The PSC summary:
Here is the entire ABC statement - click on the title to take you to the site if you want to leave a comment.
No comments:
Post a Comment