Ross Global Charter to be Closed Along with 11 Public Schools

Here is the list announced today with more to come tomorrow. Beach Channel knew it was a fait accompli.

Ed Notes had a detailed report on Ross Global Charter which is such a bad school it couldn't be protected due to the relationship between Courtney Ross and Joel Klein's wife - maybe the real reason he is leaving - so he doesn't have to face his wife and Courtney.  

SEE ADDED MATERIAL BELOW THE FOLD

Story at Gotham Schools.

Here is the background with some an interesting robocall from Ross to the parents when the DOE tipped hre off that some activists (Lisa Donlan) might attend a meeting so Ross packed it.

DOE Warns Courtney Ross at Ross Gobal Charter: The Real Reformers are Coming, The Real Reformers are Coming

Courtney Sales Ross' Robocall Warning of Anti-Charter School Attendees at Meeting. Ross' charter school was tossed out of Tweed and many consider it in the running for one of the worst schools in NYC with countless principals and other problems. There are stories that Ross is a pal of Joel Klein's wife. He authorized the opening of the school and it has been protected despite the poor results.

Ross is the widow of deceased Time-Warner head Steve Ross, whose bio I read and was a fascinating figure (grew up around Newkirk Ave in Brooklyn- look what his inheritance has unleashed on the world.)

Read Lisa Donlan's account of the meeting as it scrolls over Ross' call to parents to come out. 

Here is the you tube link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CJTnWjv_cc

Also see at Norms Notes 

Council for District One On Ross Global Academy charter school DoE authorized charter renewal hearing

More on Ross Global at Norms Notes - and check comments too for a laugh.

Parsing Mulgrew on tenure, teacher effectiveness, teacher evaluation, value-added: What he should be saying, but won't

Just heard Mulgrew on Brian Lehrer in relation to Cathie Black's positions opposing tenure and last in first out (LIFO) for layoffs. Talk of teacher effectiveness and cost effectiveness.

Not the latter is a newer wrinkle of the ed deformers - the argument that given 2 roughly equal teachers it is more cost effective to get rid of the one who makes more money. They can even argue that if a teacher who makes 100G is superb, it is still more cost effectie to keep two 3rd year teachers making 60G.

Now if you are running a business that idea looks good. But is it really cost effective over the long term when you are dealing with an entire profession that would react poorly - even the younger teachers who hope to put in a long career and one day get paid accordingly? Other than real newbies who have no plans to stay - think Teach for America - the shock troops of the ed deform movement - the degrading aspect of this attack undermines the profession and weakens teacher effectiveness over the long run. I would bet most teachers from 3rd year on would be absolutely opposed to weakening of tenure and the end of seniority for layoffs - which are a pretty rare affair. Many teachers I know starting around 1969-70 were excessed at least once - and in '75 we had massive layoffs by seniority and call-backs by the same means - an orderly system instead of the chaos the ed deformers are calling for.

Of course we heard none of this argument by Mulgrew who instead talked about the fact that tenure is due process not life-time jobs and that if there are ineffective teachers the principals should have gotten rid of them before it was time for layoffs. Good points for him - he even talked about how tenure is not a contract provision but state law long superceding the lifetime of the union. (By the way - tenure as people talk about it as a lifetime job is more aligned with college teaching though even that is based on some due process system). He also talked about the fair funding formula - the tactic tha charges principals for the costs of the teachers instead of lumping all salaries into a central fund - and how it encourages principals to get rid of of more expensive teachers. So not terrible even though he could have been much stronger - but as we know- the UFT is partway on the ed deform bandwagon - or wants it to appear that way.

When Brian brought up the release of individual teacher evaluations, Mulgrew was weak I thought in not arguing how they should never be released for all sorts of reasons that have been argued. Instead he attacked the accuracy of the value-added results at this point and seemed to argue that when they were accurate it would be OK to release them.

I think there have been enough arguments about VA and the narrow tests they are based on. We think there is a lot more to a teacher than can be expressed in a number. The union should be making that case instead of bragging how they are willing to cooperate in their own members' demise.

For the kind of defense we would like to hear from out union - but never will read this at Modern School:

Value Added & Performance Pay Scams Weaken Teacher Pay and Autonomy

Stephen Krashen, from Schools Matter, has an excellent posting on the idiocy of Value Added teacher assessments and performance pay: Seniority and Teacher Layoffs: A Red Herring

Like so much of Ed Deform: It's all about money. Senior teachers are higher on the pay scale and cost districts more money than younger inexperienced teachers. Krashen argues that this is the only rational argument for dumping experience over youth since veteran teachers generally do a better job. They have more years of on the job practice. They have more experience from workshops, professional development, and collaboration with peers.

However, there is one more reason to dump older teachers: Control

Experienced teachers are less likely to go along with every hare-brained ed deform plan concocted by their administrators. This is one reason why charter schools like KIPP are able to get their teachers to work weekends and summers and be on call well into the night. 

Retired UFT Bronx HS District Rep Lynne Winderbaum on the NYCEDNews Listserve said:

Of all the words used to describe Cathie Black, "parrot" may be a new one. But it seems that after her listening tour of Tweed, she has now come out repeating the tired old propaganda that has been adopted by the Department of Education for the last nine years.

This morning at 6:15 AM on NPR Cathie Black announced that she "has a problem with the practice of granting 25-year-olds tenure, insuring them a job for the rest of their lives for just showing up to work everyday".   Also, she "has a problem with laying off the 'last in' first".  She stated that she could never run a company successfully if these practices existed and that these practices would never be accepted in business.

Frightening to see that her ignorance regarding these issues had been replaced by the misrepresentations she is being taught. First of all, there is no practice of granting 25-year olds tenure. Anyone of that age who does achieve tenure has already served three years in a classroom and has been trained during that probationary period to work on techniques and strategies to improve their pedagogy. At any time during the three year period, if the teacher does not show improvement or an aptitude for the job, he or she can be summarily fired--no questions asked. It is called a "discontinuance of probation" and it is used frequently. After three years, if the teacher has been satisfactory rated, only then is tenure granted. And if an administrator has any doubts about granting tenure, there is the option to extend probation for an additional year...no questions asked. 

Cathie Black is also showing her ignorance of the fact that tenure is not a "job for the rest of their lives for just showing up to work everyday." Tenured teachers can be fired under the terms of state education law Section 3020a. That's all tenure gets them: a due process proceeding. It does not mean a job for life. It is just a guarantee of a fair hearing, with evidence presented and with representation. Private sector workers would love to have such security, but apparently a successful business cannot incorporate fairness according to Black. A tenured teacher cannot be summarily fired for any reason as a probationary teacher can. That's all tenure means. And if Cathie Black is unquestioningly passing along the false myths that we expect of a person who simply repeats what she hears without any independent research, we should fear what lies ahead in her decision making process.

May I add that without tenure, teachers risk discrimination, being punished for their political leanings, and they will rightly fear exposing wrongdoing or questioning violations such as failure to follow special ed or ELL laws, for example. It is just protection Cathie, not a lifetime guarantee. Get out of your cocoon.

"Last in, first out" was never a policy that was debated until the wholesale closing of schools left many veteran teachers without jobs. Before that, the only teachers in excess were those with one or two years experience. Suddenly there were hundreds of employees who had given their lives to the children of New York City, twenty or thirty years in many cases, who had no place to work, through no fault of their own. They were also the most highly paid. So, despite the fact that many are fine teachers, Tweed looked for a way to paint them all with a negative brush and build a pr position around firing them. Black says the practice would never be accepted in business where the model is to have the power to hire and fire at will. But first she must make a convincing argument that the basis of retaining teachers will never be favoritism or silence about problems at schools. Seniority is a fair way to fight favoritism and nepotism. Do away with seniority and tenure and watch what is unleashed in our workforce. After her week of listening to folks downtown, the breadth of her understanding of the issues may be a mile wide but it is a quarter inch thick.

That does not bode well for anyone in the school system.

Cathie Black, Bill Gates and the Ed Deformer Assault on Class Size

I didn't see the quote myself but there were reports that Cathie Black said that teacher quality was more important than class size. Of course that would be her position since disparaging class size as a factor is a basic belief of ed deform – not really a belief since ed deformers full well know about the impact of class size since they either went to schools themselves with low class sizes (Black, Gates) and/or send/sent their own kids to private schools with low class size.

But ed deformers must focus their attention on the teacher not the conditions in their assault on the profession and the unions.

The Dec. 4 edition of the NY Times had an article about how Bill Gates is funding new teacher evaluation projects supposedly intended to find the best teachers and practices, often by video taping lessons.

This really is a must read article because of what Gates won't fund as part of these studies.

First of all, a lesson doesn't exist outside of the results. My old principal Benjamin Bromberg who came up through the ranks of teaching used to say "Nothing learned, nothing taught." Thus, if you teach a lesson on the Pythagorean theorem you need some mechanism to see if the kids got it. And then a follow-up method of seeing if they still get it a week later, a month later and at the end of the year. And maybe next year too.

Second, can you place the blame solely on the teacher for those kids who do not get it? Did some not do any work at home to practice? What about the level of the kids coming in? What if a bunch had never learned or understood basic times tables? Can they really understand the theorem unless a good base has been laid?

And then comes the big enchilada - what is the impact on the lesson of the number of kids in the class?

So to do the full research, let's see the same teacher, same lesson, done in classes of widely varying class size with follow-ups to see which kids learned it and which didn't and the staying power of the lesson.

But Gates won't fund that as the results would show that the basis of the ed deform movement has no legs.

Afterburn
I know many excellent private school teachers who shudder at the thought of teaching in public schools and one of the main reasons are the high class sizes. Some think it is the kids they would have to teach that keep them away but they say they could teach anyone of the class size was reasonable.

I laughed at the idea of videotaping lessons since I was part of a similar project at PS 16 in my 3rd year of teaching - the spring of 1970. They set up a camera and videotape machine. The idea was that I would stay after school and watch the lesson with the idea of categorizing each question I asked the kids looking for the percentage of questions that just asked for facts vs those that made them think. It was time consuming but valuable. I wasn't uptight at them looking at my lessons - I trusted they wanted to help me be a better teacher. Not like today when they are interested in dumping people.

A Tale of Two Michaels: UFT and Mayor Bloomberg - Who is more undemocratic?

We are waging a two front battle against major powers - the millions of our own union leadership and the billionaire mayor.   

NYC Teacher Seung Ok on NYCEDNEWS listserve:

The NY Post, no friend to the teacher's union, has the following to say about the public relationship between the Mayor and the UFT president, Michael Mulgrew:

"Even though they're often in adversarial positions, Mulgrew has a good relationship with the mayor and the two men rarely clash in public."

"Loeser said the only time Bloomberg spoke to Mulgrew about Black was right before the appointment, when the mayor pointed out that Mulgrew had met her once before.

Mulgrew declined comment.

"Michael Mulgrew and Mayor Bloomberg have private conversations. We do not comment on what might or might not have been said in private conversations that might or might not have happened," a UFT spokesman said."

So the biggest enemy known to public education in New York, and to veteran teachers advocating for what's best for their students has a friend in Michael Mulgrew. No wonder teachers are losing the battle for public opinion. We are waging a two front battle against major powers - the millions of our own union leadership and the billionaire mayor.

On closer inspection the two Michaels seem to have more in common than not. Both run their organizations with the guise of democratic proceedings. It was not democratic for Bloomberg to bribe and coerce his way into a third term.

For those who are unfamiliar with UFT proceedings, let me say that watching it live as a delegate - I imagined this is how so-called democracy is run in countries such as Afghanistan, Russia, and Nigeria.

The UFT has about 3000 delegates, 2200 of whom, can not fit into the small meeting space at 52 Broadway. This is done so that any vote taking place is always dominated by union personnel and Unity party loyalists. They meet for two hours each month and the majority of the time, Mulgrew uses up in the President's speech - which is as long winded as a Sunday sermon. Apparently Mulgrew saves his vehemence against the mayor in these closed meetings.

After that, comes the ceremonial guest speakers, awards, and placards of appreciation to some organization or people (usually a tug-at-the-heart cause that not even the political opposition can help but clap for). In the one year I was attending meetings, these ceremonies included: UFT sending 1000 dollars to the Honduran Teachers Union, the factory strikers at Stella Dora, the NAACP anniversary, a teacher who finally won a grievance for a medical transfer, etc.

Then, finally, when about 20 minutes are left - the floor opens up to the motions that have been already set forth by the Executive Board (sort of like the Senate of the UFT). Good luck trying to get a motion brought forth from the rank and file - because in order for it to be put into next month's New Motions list, it has to be voted on by a majority of those 800 (mostly Unity brethren) sitting at that assembly.

And good luck ever getting to the microphone, because there microphones set up in the aisles. Specifically breaking UFT union and Rules of Order procedure, Michael Mulgrew hand picks who gets to receive roving microphones handed out by, you guessed it, Unity union workers. And they have the ability to shut off any one of those microphones whenever Mulgrew deems it necessary. In most other unions, microphones are set up in each aisle, and the president must address the first member that asks for the floor.

Even if, after all these roadblocks, a member manages to get in a motion to be heard and voted on at that meeting (requiring 2/3 vote), there are further undemocratic hurdles to overcome. Let me give a specific example of an instance where these abuses had important implications.

In the last mayoral election, a member stated a motion for the UFT to support Bill Thompson for mayor. The whole floor was enthused, as evidence by the unanimous clapping in the room - a rare instance of the majority and minority in agreement. After a period of debate, a member asked for the motion to come to a vote.

Again breaking UFT and Rules of Order procedure - Mulgrew stepped into the debate (which is not allowed by the president) and basically took the floor from that member's motion right for a vote. He proceeded to continue the debate by calling on his cabinet to argue against voting for Thompson. After the Unity loyalists basically got the message that Mulgrew wasn't pleased - the eventual vote was unanimous against supporting Bill Thompson.

Now remember the results. Thompson lost by only 5 %. Had only 3 % of the votes shifted, or had not even shown up to vote for the Mayor, public education would be safer today. Had the UFT, sent out its people, like they did for Tony Avella, and mobilized it's full voting membership - we would not be dealing with Mayor Bloomberg.

The main error that both Michaels perpetrate is the notion that they know more than the democratic voice of the populace. And in a little defense of the two Michaels, the problem goes beyond the egos of these two men - but the very system that allows men like this to come into power. It's a problem that democracy has faced since its infancy.

Remember that when the constitution was ratified, only 10 to 16 % of the population (white men with property) were allowed to vote. It's an endless struggle between the interests of the rich and the interests of the majority. Let us remember that this vision of an equitable and free public education is only 60 years old. Like a new democracy, it has to be fought for and nothing is assured. True public education was born of struggle, and nothing short of struggle will keep its ideals alive.

Seung Ok
- Teacher

UFT Failed Policy on School Closings: Ignores School Closings Based on Political and Ideological Grounds

Gotham schools Reports Backroom Dealings Between DOE and UFT on School Closings
Longtime Outcomes: DOE: 90-120+, UFT: 0

This story is so typical - if true, which I believe it is - of how the UFT has dealt with school closings.
It should be pointed out that the DOE has closed over 90 schools with barely a whimper from the UFT. But the announcement last December that they would close 19 schools, just as Mulgrew's first UFT election campaign was getting started forced the UFT to act - bringing out people to the Jan. 26 PEP meeting and filing a law suit - not a law suit based on the premises I will lay out in the following paragraphs that closings are based on ideology and politics, not educational grounds, but on procedural grounds, something the DOE is correcting this year. So the schools were kept open another year and despite the fact that the DOE did everything it could to keep students from going there the UFT made a deal to allow them to insert new schools to further undermine them. This year they are again a target.

UFT Wiki-leaks
So this item in the Gotham piece caused me to take notice:

“I think they’re making a real attempt to avoid what led us to win that suit against them,” said the [UFT] official. “I don’t think it’s any glasnost, there’s no kumbaya here. But they’re making an effort to avoid getting sued.”

So the UFT is leaking that the DOE is afraid of another law suit - over what - procedures that they are following to the T? This leak is for the members who are agitating within their schools and communities - "SHHHH! We may be able to make a deal for you if you are quiet." And desperate schools may just do it. I was at the Dewey rally on Friday and saw some signs (which I may be misinterpreting) that there might be a behind the scene buzz emanating from the union that a deal could be made by the UFT and DOE to save the school - for now. I bet they are telling that to all the schools. Just like they probably told to the staffs of the now closed over 90 schools.

One GEMer said:

That is why I think having Fight Back rallies and Demo's might actually make a difference.  If the DOE sees that a school community is going to fight, they might think twice about closing it or even using the turn-around model.  My understanding is that the Federal government only allows a certain percent of schools to be transformed.  I believe that is 17 out of the 55/60. Interesting that they do not seem to be using the "conversion to charter" model.  It is one of the 4 choices.  Perhaps this is because "charter" school operators do not want to take on such a "hard" job as "fixing" a struggling high school.  Remember Jeffrey Canada's Harlem Children Zone Charter School "fired" a whole 9th grade class instead of having them move on to high school. Have any of the schools on the list been contacted by the UFT to have input into the negotiations?

Note that Randi Weingarten and the AFT have not made a peep against the federal turn around mandates that forces locals to do their bidding. Well, you know, they wouldn't want to be branded by the ed deformers as a union unwilling to go along.

I have been a critic of the UFT/AFT policy on school closings since BloomKlein took over, claiming much of the policy is based on politics and ideology rather than on educational grounds. And on the use of numbers, at times cooked (see Jamaica HS) rather than looking at the real situation within the school. The idea is that the only way to get around seniority and tenure rules is to use these closings or turn around models to dump out the teachers and start new schools with many newbies who cost less and are often more compliant.

By that I mean they can wring more "productivity" out of newbies who won't complain if prep periods or lunch periods go missing or people have to stay in school until 6PM to get their work done. I mean, why pay people per session for extra work if you can get it for free? We hear that charter school teachers work 30% more. That is the ed deform model.

And let's not forget that these teachers get so much lower pay as newbies they can hire more of them.

[As a sidelight - note the latest ed deform attack is on the salary structure itself that is based on number of years and qualifications. Their ideal: all teachers start out with the same base salary no matter how many years and get bonuses each year based on the kids' performance on standardized tests. How about a gym or art or music teacher you ask? Get your kids to run a 4-minute mile, produce a Picasso or write a symphony and you'll be rich.]

The ed deformers have come up with this policy nationally to enforce their ideology, part of which holds that small schools only are the way and that large comprehensive high schools must go. That these large schools are often bastions of strong union support is a factor.

Tweed has used various techiniques to make large schools disappear. Using a geographical method, first in the Bronx, then in Brooklyn and now in Queens, the DOE has created a domino effect by keeping the most at risk kids out of their cherished small schools and forcing crowds of them into the next school down the line. Examples: Far Rockaway/Beach Channel - and next John Adams. Lane/Jefferson/Canarsie/South Shore - next Sheepshead Bay. Lafayette - John Dewey. I don't know the Bronx geography well enough to map it but I hear Lehman HS is a big target now.

But the UFT refuses to act as if this is true. They refuse to try to organize the threatened schools as a united force, giving behind the scenes advice to each school individually. The outcomes have been disaster for the schools.

This comment came in from another GEMer:

Has there been any rank-and-file involvement as our leadership helps decide which schools stay and which get thrown on the trash heap? Note also the new emphasis on the more draconian "turnaround" rather than just "transformation."  Funny that the CSA is publicly protesting that this would be extracontractual, but no peep from the UFT about all their members in a school being forced to reapply for their jobs (and only half being able to be rehired).

Yes, pretty funny that the union for supervisors comes off as being more supportive of their members than the UFT is.

Full Gotham story below the fold

A Generation of Students Under BloomKlein

Last update: Sunday, Dec. 5, 9:30AM

Miss Eyre in a post at NYC Educator called,  The First Joel Klein Generation asks, "Why doesn't there seem to be a difference?" 

It will always be true that students who come from even slightly more privileged families and/or are taught by the creatively subversive teachers will have something of an edge. But the students we're talking about today are coming from schools that were most directly targeted by the Klein/Bloomberg "reforms," and were targeted the entire time these children were in school.

Yes, kiddies, kids who entered kindergarten under the BloomKlein regime are now in the 9th grade and my prediction 7 years ago that the school systems of Kabul and Baghdad will recover sooner than the ones here. Since I have been out of the system for so long and never has to teacher under Klein dictates, I was intrigued by some of the pedagogical comments that seem to apply in so many places.

Karen Sherwood :  We should not forget the all-powerful "point of entry" lesson model which relegates the teacher to the role of facilitator. Teachers should be the "guide on the side", not the "sage on the stage". Hence,we had to give up our role as experts in which we'd use our full period to present information (using the board for notes and diagrams) and to guide full-class discussions with questions and answers. Instead, the teachers had limit themselves to ten-minute mini-lessons, and then put the students into groups where they would teach each other the material. Now we see the results.  

Sad to say:  I'm not sure where it came from either, other than out of the idea that talking in groups about a topic is helpful. That morphed somehow into having children "do" something and talk about it being the same as being taught a subject.

The latest math curriculum in my fair city has a noticeable lack of a lesson. First the kids do a fast paced warm-up type activity -- but teachers are not supposed to correct incorrect answers, just note who had problems on your note sheet (while maintaining a brisk pace of calling out problems). Then the kids do a hands-on activity as part of a small group or solve a quick problem as part of a small group (of course, they're "solving" this before they've been taught the concept) and then you guide the kids to talk about their solutions. THEN you point out where the book actually tells you how to do these things (as far as I could tell, this was where an actual lesson would have been and could be inserted) and do one or two problems as examples.

Then they work in small groups to do a few assigned problems (or individually if you're really old school) while the teacher walks around but doesn't provide any help (though s/he can ask "guiding questions") and notes who seems to be getting it and who doesn't. Then you call students up in increasing order of the complexity and correctness of their answers and discuss the sim. and diff. of the answers, all the while trying to hold the attention of the kids who already had it ages ago and the kids who never got it and have by now tuned out. At the end of that, you wrap up by rereading the objectives and asking a couple of high-level questions.

Top off this curricular extravaganza with a chunk of "differentiated instruction" where you work with a small group (maybe today's kids who didn't get it according to your notes...or the kids who didn't get it yesterday...) while the rest of the kids do related activities in, you guessed it, small groups. As long as it looks like they're talking about/doing math that seems to be enough. It's up to you during this time if you attempt to answer questions of those working independently while you try to teach a small group, or if you just circulate putting out fires.

Rinse and repeat. No time in the pacing for reteaching -- though of course, you must have notes from every day of who you will reteach in some mystical time not found in the regular course of the day.

By the way, there are attacks on the Teachers College as being responsible. I have supported many of the progressive ideas coming out TC but the way it was implemented without taking into account class size and other factors. I was once mentoring a 2nd grade 2nd year Teaching Fellow in Park Slope who was doing the Workshop model for writing - and doing quite a nice job of it. She had 22 kids and all but one seemed capable of working independently. But that one child kept interfering with her individual meetings with the other students. I suggested she give him a workbook to keep him busy so she could deal with the other kids. "Oh, we're not allowed," she said - Carmen Farina was the Dist. 15/Region 8 Supt at the time. So better to allow a more unproductive setting than violate a cardinal rule of TC, thus not taking account of reality.

Check out Norms Notes for a variety of articles of interest: http://normsnotes2.blogspot.com/

Survival, Rockaway Style

I've got an idea for a new reality TV show. Throw 8 people onto an island- or a peninsula  - and they must survive by putting on a performance of Neal Simon's "The Odd Couple." Even better, toss in one 65 year old guy who has never performed before amidst a sea of veteran actors and see how long he can go before you have to call 911.

Well, I did survive my acting debut playing Vinnie the card player, the whining, hen-pecked husband – true typecasting other than the part that Vinnie always wins at poker – last night at the Rockaway Theatre Company production at the Post theater located in Fort Tilden.

I've been so involved in this project, with rehearsals almost nightly and on Sundays, I've been neglecting some of my political activities, as Mona Davids pointed out to me the other day. I even had to leave the rally at Tweed early on Thursday to get to the final dress rehearsal - which had more than a few glitches - not exactly a confidence builder going into last night.

I asked my wife to come to the dress rehearsal on Wednesday night as a check that I wasn't making a total idiot out of myself. She thought Act I was great and then left before the disasters of Acts II and III. As one of the co-directors, Mike Wotypka (a long-time member of TJC) said, "We could call the 3 acts The Good, The Bad and The Ugly."

And glitches there were again last night, but no real disasters. I missed a a cue or two as did others - what a relief to find that veteran actors also miss cues.

And, no, in this game the worst performer doesn't get voted off at the end of each performance. Or else I'd be sitting home tonight. The fact is we survived.

Tonight, a whole bunch of my old ed/political pals from the Coalition of NYC School Workers from the 70's and ICE are coming. I'll try not to invoke the names of Albert Shanker or Randi Weingarten during the performance.

---------
Teachers and the theater
I have always been proud to be a teacher and amongst teachers. So one of the joys of being involved in the RTC for the last 3 years as their videographer has been the number of current and retired teachers involved in running the theater and performing. I mentioned Mike W the co-director who works at Leon Goldstein HS. Nora Coughlin, the amazing stage manager (I never had an idea of what an important role this is) is a young woman who teaches 2nd grade. A young man, Andrew Woodbridge, the brilliant lighting director, teaches high school science.

Another young lady, Kim Simek, doing a remarkable job playing one of the Pigeon sisters, teaches 6th grade at a middle school in Brooklyn. Every single spare moment backstage Kim is doing school work. Kin is planning a big production at her school with the kids.

Jose Velez, Murray the Cop, also works in a school. Music teacher Jodee Timpone, a fabulous singer and actress in her own right, has taken on the job as Assistant Stage Manager for this show and works as hard behind the scenes as she has done on stage. And the entire RTC operation is co-managed by retired teachers Susan Jasper and the Artistic Director John Galleace.

Frank Caiati, my 24 year old acting teacher, sent a wonderfully encouraging card backstage before we went on and  was in the audience with his mom and girl friend. Frank is a professional actor and director and a natural teacher who has worked with so many people since he was a teen at Goldstein HS.

Paul Moore to Mulgrew: Get off your knees brother, even Sally Field is ashamed of you

I've been a public school worker in Miami, Florida for 27-years now. And I must share my joy at the news that Michelle Rhee is coming. It doesn't happen much, my students often ask why I never smile, but I think I'm actually giddy.

I'm happy for my big brothers and sisters in the world's most powerful teacher's union local, the United Federation of Teachers (AFT) in New York City. They will now be sparred the bleatings of their fearless leader, Michael "Chickenheart" Mulgrew, that "oh, if we don't roll over for Bloomberg and let his high society friend play with the NYCPS, the big bad Michelle Rhee is coming to get us."

Mulgrew, do you have any idea how many genuine labor leaders are turning in their graves over your cravenness? The list is so long even the Old Collaborator Albert Shanker is on it. Hell, Sally Field is ashamed of you and all she ever did was play Norma Rae in a movie. Get up off your knees brother. You know Cathie Black has no business anywhere near the children of working people.

I'm happy because Michelle Rhee hitched her wagon to another political figure like Adrian Fenty. Someone destined for a spectacular crash and burn. Like Michael Bloomberg, Florida Governor-elect Rick Scott bought his electoral victory in November. Like Bloomberg, Scott hires a corps of people to tell him that he's smart. And like Bloomberg, Scott hasn't got a clue. I think Scott wins the booby prize though. You have to try not to laugh at this, ok. Rick Scott says he will layoff 5% of the state's workforce and create 700,000 new jobs, simultaneously! Put that up against not allowing food stamp recipients to buy soda pop! Well, maybe Bloomberg is a bigger loon.

I'm happy because we have battled "the Jeb Bush" in Florida since 1994 and public education is still standing. The Bush Gang makes Michelle Rhee look like the sad little piker that she is. The Florida Commissioner of Absurdity Posed as Education Eric J. Smith enjoys big time status in the Bush, Gates, Broad, Walton, Bloomberg movement. He can manipulate graduation rates and test scores with the best of them. It's going to be fun to watch Smith and Rhee fight over the job.

But I'm happiest I think because my fellow public school workers in Florida don't know much about Michelle Rhee. Some have seen "Waiting For Superman" but those three think Michelle played Lex Luthor's evil twin sister.

I'm anxious to introduce Michelle Rhee to Florida. There's the masking tape over the mouths of Black third-graders in Baltimore and the blood. There's the miraculous rise in those same bloodied student's test scores inside of three years of teaching for which Rhee can provide no proof. There's Rhee's storybook romance with Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson and her willingness to share his affection with several of the teenage students at his charter school. Or at least cover it up.

Now Florida teachers may get the chance to be entertained with Chancellor Rhee's minstrel show. She does Al Jolson proud! She doesn't blacken her face but she does Black dialect as part of her routine and tells a story of bloodying Black children in a pathetic attempt at classroom management. Rhee's act was a big hit at this year's Washington, DC opening of school meeting.

The new white Teach For America missionary teachers just hooted when Rhee described placing masking tape over her 8-year-old student's mouths in inner-city Baltimore. The new hires seemed to accept this as a proper way to treat the kids. Hey, they're Black right! One wonders how many of these Ivy Leaguers will try Rhee's method on their charges this year. After all the Chancellor never told them she had probably committed a crime. Guess that would have killed the frivolity they were all sharing.

Then in the story of a field trip she botched in her few days of teaching Rhee launches into her imitation of Black speech. "Lawwwd Ms.Rhee whatchu gonna do!!!!??" Rhee boomed, drawing a big laugh. "Lawwwd Ms. Rhee whatchu gonna do!!!!??"

But a transcription doesn't do Michelle's racist comedy justice. You got to listen to it here in case she's ashamed to perform it again here in the Sunshine State.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/video/2010/08/13/VI2010081305444.html

Welcome to Florida, Michelle. Last stop headed South.

Paul A. Moore

Bill Gates Compared to British Oppressors in Ireland

Comment on Diane’s Bridging Differences blog about Bill Gates

Last night, (11/30/10) I listened to Diane Ravitch participate in a discussion about public schooling with a panel of parents, teachers, administrators, and politicians. She then fielded numerous questions from an audience of teachers and parents in New Haven Connecticut. She was extremely well received, and was applauded time and time again while not one NCLB panelist supporter was applauded. It is clear in my humble opinion the tide is turning on NCLB these days. She mentioned the adversary remark about "Bill Gates" in passing. In so many words she indicated Bill is a rather little man who does not know much about education with lots of money. Take away Bill's money, and people would not even notice him in a room of two, (these words are my take on her discussion of Mr. Gates not hers). But more importantly Diane passionately, elegantly, and back by facts and data supported teachers. She has become the biggest defender of tenure, unions, and teachers. She is not the defender of the status quo-she views the status quo as NCLB/RTTT, and that policy is destroying our public schools in her opinion. She took on the Blueprint and the Learn act, and said the same thing about both of them. The Blueprint in the end with hurt public schools as well. My feeling at this point is any adversary of Bill Gates is a friend of teachers these days. If Bill wants to donate to education then he should give, and step back. Bill Gates reminds me of something I learned studying the history of the Irish Famine. We had groups that offered soup and bread to the hungry in Ireland during the famine, but demanded people convert, and give up their children to the orphanages and poor houses. People resisted that kind of giving. A million souls died, and a million immigrated rather than accept their soup and bread. That equaled half the population of Ireland at the time. America would have to lose 150 million people in a decade to understand that kind of lost. This convert and eat kind of giving fueled Irish rebellions for a hundred years, and it became one of the main reasons Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom. Irish History however fondly recalls that the Quakers helped to feed us, and made no such demands on us. Irish history only remembers and admires the Quakers. These are true givers, true servants of god, and will be blessed in Irish prayers for a million years. My grandparents Irish Immigrants told us the story of the Quakers every year at Thanksgiving, and every year the Turners give without asking people to give up something in exchange. Those other so-called feed the hungry groups are portrayed as being contributors to the famine. I say Bill Gates could learn a great deal from the Quakers. While Diane Ravitch will be remember as a friend and admired by teachers, parents, and educators for years to come. Diane Ravitch and the Quakers are alright in my book. I am walking to DC, Jesse

Deny the Waiver Rally at Tweed, Dec. 2 UPDATES

From RADIO RAHIM: 

What you missed today at the protest. 
Now on you tube uncut.

SEE HERE JUST CLICK LINK AND SEE FOR YOURSELF WHY YOU MUST ATTEND OUR PROTESTS

IN THIS CLIP PEP MEMBER PATRICK J SULLIVAN

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyO2_XnXeLI

And Mona Davids
Dear Mona we must work as others sleep, we must. I made sure I got this work done for A great Mom.


Mona goes after the DOE charter authorizors for allowing corrupt charter schools to operate.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgrCQqRujE

[See video I shot for Ed Notes of Mona's testimony at the Perkins charter school hearings in March, 2010: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTbQtX-qQZI&NR=1]


Stills from the rally
http://www.flickr.com/photos/denywaiver/  photos of today’s rally

Also on Facebook  http://www.facebook.com/pages/Deny-Waiver-Coalition/117396824992566?v=photos#!/album.php?aid=18298&id=1173968249925666

Group Furthers Protest Against Waiver Decision - NY1.com:

http://bit.ly/brWaqA. Another great clip of Patrick Sullivan!

Bloomberg, Feeling Heat, Reaches Out/What Mayor Bloomberg and the Taliban have in common

From an anounymous source:

The mayor called some community leaders together yesterday for a meeting.  He asked for support for cathie black.  He made promises to get help to their communities.

What Mayor Bloomberg and the Taliban have in common

Then there was this piece from a NYC HS teacher who compares Bloomberg to the Taliban.

I hear all the time from people about how teachers are afraid to speak out. Funny, but I meet a hell of a lot of them who don't seem to be afraid. What is it? A moral imperative that overcomes fear? I don't really know. I was a big mouth but people tell me in these times I couldn't do that. If I couldn't I don't think I would have remained in the system. I feel very lucky to meet so many amazing teachers today that are out there. Seung is one of my favorites. Someone I want in the fox hole with me.

If you ask Mayor Bloomberg or any Taliban member why they are fighting the battles they do - you will hear heartfelt declarations of their ideology.  Invariably they invoke the betterment of the "people".  The Taliban, not trusting that the people know what's good for them, rely on religious police to go around measuring the length of men's beards, and imprisoning any woman caught outside without a male chaperon. 

Likewise, Mayor Bloomberg scoffs at parents who protect neighborhood schools he determines as failures.  On radio shows, he decries these parents as essentially - idiots.  Every year, his progress reports elevate the standard for A's, B's, and C's - thus assuring the closure of many schools. He absolves a democratic board of education, citing instances of corruption, while somehow rationalizing his "donations" to campaigns and foundations to sway votes, as mere charity. 

Fear is the tool that both use to get what they want.   The Taliban made soccer fields into sites for executions against those that broke their laws.  The mayor threatens the closure of schools, the firing of principals, and if he had his way, the mass firing of seasoned teachers.  Fear is such an effective tool that very few of those oppressed actually speak up. 

The societal model they both promote is a two tiered one.  The Taliban sets up one society for men, and another for women.  Men need not face any competition for jobs and schools from women.  Women walk in the shadows, denied all that men enjoy. 

In Bloomberg's world, charter schools and small schools gloss over the needs of English Language Learners, Special Education Students, and low achieving students - and often push them out - whereas public schools do not.  Charter schools get brand new technology and small class sizes  while district schools are forced to teach in cafeterias and overcrowded classrooms.

Ultimately, both have the delusion that they will make society better.  The Taliban will say that rape statistics have decreased - since women are not allowed on the streets alone.  They will say that crime is lower, since more men will keep their jobs not taken by women.  They will point to the fact divorce is almost unheard of- since women don't have the means to strike out on their own.  

Bloomberg's ideal society will be constructed in is own image.   It is a world that does not allow for plumbers, hair dressers, police officers, electricians, auto-mechanics....  And the only measure of success is to end up putting on a suit and looking down on the rest of society.  The Taliban's justification is religion, Bloomberg's justification is his egotistical vision. So what if the "people" have to suffer for the higher ideal of utopia? 

It is no wonder Mayor Bloomberg travels to China and lambasts the elected officials of our beloved yet imperfect democracy.  He could only dream of a communist structure where all his directives concerning sodium, cigarettes and unions were put into practice.  I'm sure the mayor also praises the Chinese system of education as well - where national standardized tests are required to get into middle schools, junior high schools, and high schools. 

The Taliban unleashes their fear through their guns while the mayor unleashes his through his cash.  In Afghanistan, the biggest dog on the block rules, in our land, it's the biggest bank roll.  When the majority of people accept their chains and, one day, even forgets the chains are there, then these visions of utopia will be reality.  

Seung Ok

- Teacher

See below the fold for links to a series of articles on Black & Bloomberg from The Examiner

Fightback Fridays: Sheepshead Bay HS Rally to Save the School From Closing

The Sheepshead Bay HS community in Brooklyn held a rally to save the school on Nov. 19, 2010. It is worthy to note that a group of teachers from John Dewey HS which has been holding weekly Fightback Friday rallies came in support. One Sheepshead teacher, seeing the, broke into tears. Dewey is holding a rally Fri. Dec. 3 at 3pm. (Show your support.) Note comments at the end by City Councilman Lou Fidler.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zcf-dYqMrEg

Is Cathie a Klingon? NY Ed Press Corps Getting Restless Over Black Cloaking Device

South Bronx Teacher: http://southbronxschool.blogspot.com/

(Ok, Photoshoppers, we need Unchattie Kathie the Klingon- you have license to spell her name with a "k")

Don't forget to wear red today and if you can show up at Tweed at 4pm. Ed Notes will be there covering.

Rise Up Red, New York - Protest Cathie Black Thusday at Tweed, 4pm

Ed Notes is still the first news service to get an interview with Cathie Black. (Ed Notes Exclusive: First Cathie Black Interview -...) though NYC Educator has some good stuff (The Chancellor and Her Guide)

Lots of "Where's Cathie?" stuff out. Maybe she is out there but has been dressing down as pointed out by South Bronx Teacher.

Leonie Haimson says:

Guess that they didn’t like her having to respond to real parents, like Nicole Bush, yesterday, who had actual questions for her. They seem to want to keep her completely wrapped up in a bubble, protected from the public…..weird when she’s supposed to have such great ‘people skills” you’d think they’d want her out there.

Steve Koss writes on the NYCEdNews Listserve:

Lindsey Christ did a fairly sharp-tongued report on Ms. Black's "hiding" early this afternoon. She also noted that NY1 and other (unnamed) news organizations were submitting a letter to the DOE requesting that Ms. Black's itinerary be made public every day. Kudos to Lindsey for not backing down, even on camera.

The longer this "hiding" and non-communicating goes on, the more Ms. Black reminds me of Sarah Palin, only "You betcha!" has been replaced by "Great!", as in "I feel great!" and "It was great!" Sheesh! Maybe the book Ms. Black read to kids on today's mystery school visit should be "Where's Waldo?"

DOE Continues To Be Secretive About New Chancellor's Whereabouts

http://www.ny1.com/content/top_stories/129878/doe-continues-to-be-secretive-about-new-chancellor-s-whereabouts
By: Lindsey Christ

It's been more than three weeks since Mayor Michael Bloomberg introduced Cathie Black as his next schools chancellor, but now that she's officially cleared for the job, the Department of Education is being very secretive about her whereabouts.

The Department of Education won't tell NY1 where Black is today. They admit she is visiting a school, but will not say which of the 1,500 city schools they chose to show off to the new chancellor.
Yesterday, she was in the Bronx at P.S. 109, but reporters were not allowed inside. In the past, most new chancellors have been very public with their schedules, and with Cathie Black, the question of which schools she visits and who she meets with has taken on particular significance, since she's had such limited exposure to public schools in the past.
In fact, today might be only the fourth time ever that she's been in a city public school.
She spoke briefly with reporters yesterday, but wouldn't talk about policy and said she didn't want to talk about her lack of education experience. But she did say she wanted to be open, available and in the schools.
“We’ll keep moving around the boroughs and we’ll move from lower school to middle school to high school and it’s going to take a bit of time, but that’s where I want to be,” she said.
When the DOE was asked why they are being so secret with her schedule, a spokeswoman said,
“Today's visits are private. Part of being chancellor is visiting schools and talking with principals, teachers and parents openly and candidly about what is happening in their school community. Having TV cameras and reporters over your shoulder is often not conducive to such an open exchange. So there will be public visits and private visits.”
But reporters and TV cameras weren't allowed to yesterday either – having to wait outside while she toured the school with a group of officials.
It's unclear when her first truly-public visit will take place.
NY1 has joined with other city news organizations to write the city, arguing that Black’s schedule should be public.

RBE at Perdido: Cathie Blacks Says Stupid Shit Already

NY1 reports Cathie Black responded to parents' concerns about her tenure as chancellor with the following statement:

"I feel fantastic," said Black in the Upper East Side. "I just went to a couple of parties and people said, "How wonderful. Thank you for doing this for the city.' And I feel great."

Omigod, Cathie, you went to some parties on the Upper East Side and people wearing big white Barbara Bush pearls with cucumber martinis in their hands and hedge fund managers in their families thanked you for helping to educate the children of "those" people!

How exciting!

Good grief, I can't decide if Cathie Black is Harriet Miers or Marsha Brady from that statement.

Seriously that might be the dumbest thing I have heard from a person in public in the last five years who didn't have the name Sarah Palin written on her name tag.

I do know one thing for certain after one day of Chancellor Cathie with an "i" Black - she says really, really stupid stuff.

http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2010/12/schools-chief-back-in-hiding.html

Schools chief back in hiding?

By Glenn Blain
After keeping the mayor’s new pick for schools chancellor under wraps for three weeks, the Education Department is now keeping her visits to schools a secret, reports the Daily News' Rachel Monahan and Meredith Kolodner.
Cathie Black made her first public foray into a public school on Tuesday, but stopped only briefly to chat with reporters. She brushed off questions about school policy - such as how to deal with schools slated to close. Reporters were barred from touring the school with Black. And the Education Department has refused to allow any interviews with the new chancellor.
Reporters have repeatedly requested to know where Black will be, to no avail. This is in contrast to outgoing schools chancellor Joel Klein, whose visits to schools were public when he took the job in 2002.
Here is the Education Department's response to repeated requests for access to Black while she visits schools.
“Part of being chancellor is visiting schools and talking with principals, teachers and parents openly and candidly about what is happening in their school community," press secretary Natalie Ravitz said. "Having TV cameras and reporters there is often not conducive to such an open and honest exchange. So there will be public visits and private visits."
It's hard to say how "candid" a principal might be in front of her brand new boss, who has the power to hire and fire principals, as well as close down schools, especially with Black's p.r. team in tow.
The media executive has been the center of front-page headlines for weeks on end, with parent public opinion against her because of her lack of experience in education.
Parents, as well as reporters, have plenty of questions: What schools is she visiting? What does she think of them? Is she going to the ones deemed "failing," or just the A-rated ones? What's her opinion on budget cuts?
No one outside of her closest advisors actually knows. The parents of 1.1 million school children, whose future she holds in her hands, are still waiting to find out.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2010/12/schools-chief-back-in-hiding.html#ixzz16sxUnj4S

And we'll close with Sharon Otterman at the NY Times, which has really been doing great work in the Black story.

http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/12/01/if-youve-seen-cathie-let-us-know/?ref=nyregion

December 1, 2010, 12:09 pm

If You’ve Seen Cathie, Let Us Know

By SHARON OTTERMAN

Updated, 12:11 p.m. | Where in the World is Cathie Black?
The new schools chancellor, Cathleen P. Black, told reporters on Tuesday that she would visit elementary, middle and high schools in every borough as she gets to know the nation’s largest public school system. The Department of Education acknowledged that she is on at least one school visit on Wednesday, but would not reveal where it is.
“Today’s visits are private,” said Natalie Ravitz, a spokeswoman for the Department of Education.
The New York Times and other city news organizations are requesting that Ms. Black’s daily school-visit schedule be made public, arguing that the visits are newsworthy because Ms. Black has had limited exposure to public schools and the visits will form the backbone of her knowledge of the school system.
Even if the reporters pledge to wait outside the school during the visit, as occurred during Ms. Black’s first-day visit, that is insufficient, Ms. Ravitz said.
“Part of being chancellor is visiting schools and talking with principals, teachers and parents openly and candidly about what is happening in their school community,” Ms. Ravitz said. “Having TV cameras and reporters over your shoulder is often not conducive to such an open exchange.”
Ms. Black has not been made available for any formal interviews with news organizations since her selection three weeks ago. As The Times has reported, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg’s process in selecting her was so secretive that even some of his senior advisers did not participate.
So City Room is asking readers: Should even some of Ms. Black’s public school visits be secret? Which schools should she visit? And have you seen Cathie Black today?
Update: Ms. Ravitz just said that she will reveal the identities of the schools Ms. Black visited on Wednesday at the end of the day. Extra credit for correct guesses.

Rise Up Red, New York - Protest Cathie Black Thusday at Tweed, 4pm

Rise Up Red, New York!

Thurs, Dec 2

ON THE STEPS OF TWEED COURTHOUSE, 4PM "Red Thursday" Rally to Protest Cathie Black Appointment You've signed the online petition, now make your voice heard as we gather to send a message to Mayor Bloomberg and NY State Education Commissioner David Steiner: "We want a qualified Chancellor! We don't want special deals and exemptions from the law for the Mayor's friends!" RSVP on Facebook (you don't need an account) ~> Facebook Event Page Come wearing red, and don't forget to join our Facebook and Twitter causes and share the event with fellow supporters!

Chitown and DC: Can It Happen in the UFT to Unity Caucus?

And don't forget LA

I can't tell you how many people ask about why in NYC there is so little action in opposition to Unity/UFT domination of the union. Many people have taken hope in the CORE Caucus victory in the Chicago Teachers Union election last June. Yesterday's Saunders/Peterson victory in Washington DC gave more people hope.

Reality Based Educator at Perdido Street School has some comments on the issue today.

Serving Notice To Weingarten, Mulgrew And Company

Watch out, the days of union shillery and sell-out are over in two cities now:

"Couple more sell outs and you could, despite your cronyism and corrosive clutch on power, go the way of Parker in D.C."

I want to do some analysis of the differences and similarities between other cities and NYC at a future time. But for now this will suffice.

I don't want to throw water on anyone's expectations but here's the problem. Take a look at the front page of the NY Teacher. A glance makes it seem Mulgrew fought the Black nomination. A good friend who I talk to all the time said that to me. That's all most teachers see - and the visits from Unity to their schools and the way Unity sells themselves to the chapter leaders. Thus the overwhelming majority of teachers do not know what RBE and a bunch of other bloggers and their readers know about the UFT and Unity.

Nothing will change here until there is a massive network of teacher activists in their schools who work actively to reverse the Unity spin. I'm betting that even many bloggers don't do this basic work at the school level to educate their colleagues about what the union is all about.

Chicago and DC are special cases. The Unity-like leadership in Chi was inept and split while Unity here has complete control and an internal spy network that allows no words of disagreement. I ran into a Unity guy I like at the DA and he spilled the "we could have gotten Rhee argument" which he clearly believed. They do a lot of spin internally to make sure their shock troops pass the word into the schools where many end up buying it because they hear no alternatives.

Can it be done here? So far the opposition parties, and I have been very active on ICE, have not shown an ability to create such a network. And even though I have been totally involved, I'm not sure why or how to create one. I tried when I retired in June 2002. I took Ed Notes which had been solely directed at the Delegate Assembly since 1997 and created a 16 page tabloid edition which I put out 4 times a year with up to 25,000 copies printed. I touched on all the push-button issues where the UFT was selling us out - mayoral control, not opposing the waiver for Klein, testing, merit pay, etc.

It attracted enough people to form ICE but not enough to create more of a mass movement. I did that full tabloid version for 2 years before giving up. I just didn't have the patience and fortitude as George Schmidt in Chicago who has put out Substance for 35 years. If anyone doesn't think the work that George did with Substance played a major role in CORE's victory - I bet there are few teachers in Chicago who do not know the paper - is not understanding what it will take to replicate that here.

There is an absolute need for something like Substance - like the 2002-2004 Ed Notes in a stripped down version to get into the hands of 50,000 teachers on a regular basis. There is a need for an electronic communication to go out regularly. People have to be given full information before they can act.

On the happy front, there are signs that things are stirring beyond the actions of the 2 current opposition caucuses, TJC (Teachers for a Just Contract) and ICE (Independent Community of Educators). I don't know the inside scoop at TJC. But as the person who called the first meeting of people who supported Ed Notes that turned into ICE I can say that the original crew was not thinking that ICE alone would ever be in a position to contend for power but would be part of a larger movement. The question out there is: is it better to have lots of small groups organizing on their own level or try to create an ubber umbrella group?

As the attacks on public schools grew during the fall of 2009 with closing schools and charter co-locations, many ICE people jumped into working with the Grassroots Education Movement (GEM) to try to help schools under attack organize themselves. GEM has people from a bunch of groups - including ICE, TJC, NYCORE, and Red-hook based CAPE - and is not positioned as another caucus but directed into defending public education.

I began to feel that even within ICE we have spent too much time responding and dealing with the UFT institutions of power - the Delegate Assembly and the Executive Board - talking to the leadership instead of the membership. At this point I couldn't care less what the leadership thinks or has to say - unless we can exploit it. The prime directive is to reach out directly to the 80,000 - or is it now down to 70,000 - and soon to be down to 60,000 after Black gets through with her scythe - teachers.

Many ICEers were torn between doing the work of GEM or ICE in the midst of the 2010 UFT elections which were taking place at the same time as the school closings issue and knowing full well the results were preordained chose to put more effort into the long term organizing efforts of GEM. (I did put my time into the elections but without much enthusiasm while I really enjoyed the work in GEM.)

As GEM/CAPE's Julie Cavanagh said on South Bronx Teacher radio program last night (well worth a listen) GEM wouldn't exist if the UFT was doing what it was supposed to do but she was too busy to focus on the UFT and what it should be doing. Her thinking has influenced me over the last year to spend less time addressing and responding to what the UFT was doing.

Right now, GEM is the most active group out there, committed to holding an open general meeting every month (the next one is Tues, Dec. 7 at 4:30 at CUNY) while the most active people try to build a democratic organization from the ground up.

When I spoke to a well-read NYC teacher blogger the other day who is interested in getting something going I said it all starts in your own school. Get email addresses and send out information countering the spin. Put out info fliers. Then if possible try to reach out to the nearest neighborhood school. Create your own network and link it to a citywide network.

Everyone who reads the blogs and agrees there is a need for a change in the union, the rubber meets the road in your own building. It would take about 500 pro-active people in the UFT staying on message in their buildings to get a movement started.

------------

Check out Norms Notes for a variety of articles of interest: http://normsnotes2.blogspot.com/

Saunders and Peterson Win DC Election

YIPPPEEEEE! Our pals in DC won the union election. The AFT is getting to be interesting with Karen Lewis and Nathan Saunders. Too bad our pals in Puerto Rico pulled their 40,000 teachers out of the AFT in 2003. We might have seen some interesting action in Detroit at the next AFT convention in 2012.

Miami teacher Paul Moore posted the news with this:

Getting Rid Of D.C.'s WTU Quisling For Rhee

And Quislings they are. Weingarten and Mulgrew and the entire Unity AFT/UFT crew.
 
When reported on the NYCEdNewsListserve Leonie Haimson wrote:

With Rhee, Fenty and now Parker gone, it is a new day in DC.

 Daley going too in Chicago, as well as their schools CEO, Huberman.

 Klein leaving, but not Bloomberg unfortunately….NYC is the unluckiest of the three.

I responded with:

Another union victory for the anti-Weingarten forces in the AFT.

NYC is unluckiest of the 3 because we still have Unity Caucus running the UFT.

See video I did of Nathan Saunders and Candi Peterson at the AFT convention in Seattle this summer.
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=EdNotesOnline#p/u/5/v4wo0viVzT0

Both Nathan and Candi were out in LA in the summer of 2009 when a bunch of Real Reformers (union too) met with the LA teachers union and a group from CORE in Chicago when their hope of winning the union election was slim.

The UFT/AFT ineptness (or collaboration) is creating a more militant movement within the teachers union nationwide. Detroit may be next.

There is a lot of back story here and Ed Notes has been on top of the DC story. Just look in the archives around April and May to see how Randi used a ruse to cancel the elections which were due to take place before the vote on the contract she negotiated with Rhee because she feared a Saunders win would jeopardize the vote.

Now of course the vote totals were very low and a lot of hay will be made of that but if Nathan and Candi put together a democratic union we will see these numbers go up.

WAPO reporter Bill Turque has been on top of the story in DC in a fair manner. This comment from his article is worth noting: 

With his defeat by a margin of 556 to 480, Parker joins Rhee and Mayor Adrian M. Fenty (D) as the third major figure to effectively be forced from office by political fallout from the 2007-2010 school-reform movement.

Here is Candi's first report. (click on the link to read Bill Turque's full story).

Finally!

Candi Peterson, blogger in residence and WTU General Vice President (effective December 1, 2010)

The Saunders slate won in the Washington Teachers' Union run-off election Tuesday evening at the AFT headquarters. This is the second win for the Saunders slate. We were the highest vote getter in round one of the WTU election on October 27. Given that WTU's Constitution required slates receive a 51% margin to win, a run-off election was held between the top two slates; the Saunders and Parker slate.

As I have often written about, this election has been a long protracted battle after another. To jog your memory, former" holdover" union president George Parker refused to step down and turn over union documents to the WTU Elections Committee. As a result, WTU elections were not held in May as required by our union's constitution. Long story short, AFT intervened as the WTU administrator and conducted our union elections. Fast forward to Tuesday evening and the Saunders slate can claim a victory with Nathan Saunders as the next WTU President, Candi Peterson, as the next WTU General Vice President and a host of committed and hard working Executive Board and Board of Trustee members.

Tonight we are humbled by all of the support and look forward to building a participatory union democracy committed within the next 30 days to publishing a membership and delegate assembly meetings for SY 2010-11; approving a WTU strategic plan to address IMPACT evaluations, job security and legal issues; meeting with AFT President Randi Weingarten; meeting with DC Mayor-Elect Vincent Gray to discuss IMPACT teacher evaluations and other educational issues affecting teachers, parents and students; meeting with City Council Chairman-Elect Kwame Brown to discuss IMPACT teacher evaluations and other educational issues, meeting with the 266 wrongfully terminated teachers to discuss an immediate change in their legal strategy; meeting with retired teachers and others who have been affected by the loss of retroactive pay and benefits under the new contract, hire personnel experts and human resource consultants to assist with a teacher evaluation tool, review all outstanding grievances and arbitrations, and revamp WTU's image and legal strategy to be proactive, progressive and productive.

Our slate looks forward to taking the helm and becoming the education-union leaders that DC teachers and school personnel deserve.

I hope you will check out Bill Turque, Washington Post writer's coverage on "Washington Teachers' Union President George Parker loses run-off election" (click on title link for story).

John Dewey HS Fight Back Friday - Dec. 3, 3PM

This Friday, December 3rd, our rally will begin at 3 pm and run for about an hour. We have invited Sheepshead Bay HS faculty and staff to participate as well.

Teachers from any school are invited to participate. Check out the Fight Back Fridays blog site.

http://fightbackfridays.blogspot.com/

 

Wear RED this Thursday to Show Your Outrage Over the Cathleen Black Waiver!

Join Parents, Educators, and Public Officials to Denounce the Waiver Granted to Black. Rally @ TWEED (52 Chambers) Beginning @ 4 PM.

 

No Waiver for Cathie Black Press Conference- More of what the media did not want you to see!

http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=GEMNYC1#p/a/u/0/CDqOGnpU_J0


Sheepshead Bay HS Nov. 19 Rally Video 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3iOUYSxagXU&feature=player_embedded