Showing posts with label Michael Mulgrew. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Michael Mulgrew. Show all posts

Monday, October 13, 2025

A Better Contract (ABC) to Hold Big, Beautiful Mass Meeting, Oct. 23, 7 PM: Over 700 registered so far

Capacity is limited at 1000, so claim your spot. 
 
 

October 13, 2025
 
I haven't posted much about ABC since the election ended in June. While some expected to win despite having to compete with the 3-caucus ARISE coalition, they were also excited at the 32% result for a group no one had heard of a few months before while the long-time caucuses in ARISE could manage only 14%. These results seemed proof of concept that drove ABC -- that the legacy caucus model in the UFT has failed to capture the support of the rank and file. 
 
We can even apply the legacy model to the victorious Unity Caucus, 60 years in power and only gaining a 54% vote, their lowest total ever - in actual hard numbers, a hard minority of the total membership. 
 
An ABC-type group is the future - I'm not claiming that the current version of ABC is going to be that group but some version of it -- and the important point is that ABC is open to all UFT members, even those in caucuses.
 
I think ABC as formed at this point has potential but it must grow and expand its outreach. How to do that is still up in the air and open for discussion. If you don't want to be a formal caucus than what form does it take and how to ensure a level of democracy but also a method of making decisions and carrying them out?

Oy. My sense at this point is based on the people ABC has attracted so far -- creative, competent, dynamic - a willingness to think out of the box. But without some way of making decisions, some of that energy gets dissipated. What I have found interesting is the informal leadership -- the people who rise to the occasion when needed. I hate to formalize things --- because when you do, potential leaders can get stifled. 
 
ABC, unlike other groups in the UFT, consists overwhelmingly of actively working UFTers and they felt they needed a break after a brutal election season. (Retirees are a smaller portion of ABC than they are in ARISE). 
 
The firings of ABCers at the end of June and into this school year (The Friday Night Unity Purge/Massacre) and the Pissgate (Misogyny at the UFT Delegate Assembly) June DA created a lot of internal discussion, as did the recent healthcare changes. There is a retiree group within ABC and it is growing but the perception is that RA and NAC have a bigger group based on the fact that 140 retiree ran with them. But then again retirees in the UFT voted 3-1 for the ABC slate in the election. ABC retirees are caught betwixt and between, unhappy with Unity and unhappy with the current RA/NAC leadership of the Retiree Chapter, as Arthur expressed in his weekend post: 
I agree with much of what Arthur says, though not so much with his attempts to reach out - As a member of RA Organizers, I understand the mentality there and I don't see many signs of wanting to share power with others. I've given up trying. They are enjoying being in charge of RTC and while Unity initially saw them as a threat, I sense that the Unity hierarchy, while still wanting to take back the chapter in 2027 (they won a slim majority of retiree votes in the recent election), are not too upset or threatened. So far the biggest threat took place a year ago at the first RTC meeting under the control of RA when Bennett had Marianne as his guest, which freaked Unity out (UFT Retired Teacher Chapter Meeting Takeaway).
 
ABC came together as an election slate and questions remained as to its future. Not wanting to be like a formal caucus leads to questions of exactly what form would a group like ABC take. A difference between ABC and the legacy caucuses is a willingness to take the discussion out of the backroom and open up the debate outside voices with a mass meeting on Oct. 23. (I believe we dropped the ball after months of successful mass meetings by not holding them regularly during the election.)
 
I believe over 700 have already registered, so hop on board.
 
 
 
Here are the Ed Notes posts on the election:
 

Thursday, October 2, 2025

I'm hungry and ornary - Educators of NYC/The Wire Expose on Flaws in New UFT Health Plan - happy break the fast

Mulgrew basically threw a shark into a baby pool.  What is the matter with him?... An Active Delegate

Speaking of sharks, I can't wait to get to that herring in cream sauce. I invited a non-Jewish friend over to observe how Jews eat dairy after a fast. Reading the piece below, my hunger only helps me get more pissed off - and not only at the Unity gang, who act like they have for 60 years - new faces, old places.

Thursday, Oct. 2, 2025

Daniel Alicea has been doing the work that others should have been doing. I sat next to him at the DA on Monday and he kept muttering all meeting about the flaws, while surrounding Unity gang shushed us when I tried to get exactly what he was saying. And when I got home I realized that after hearing the Unity cheers and dancing in the aisles after RTC Chapter Leader Bennett Fischer voted YES without consulting his chapter or even the 300 delegates elected with him, I realized what damage that vote may cause. 

But I get it - a consistent mentality. on the part of a segment of the opposition over decades that wants to try to play nice with Unity -- reminds me of the current leadership of the Democratic Party always trying to play nice with the Republicans and not wanting to see them as enemies, just like to these oppo people Unity is not an enemy of democracy and the way they run the union, actually anti-union. But you know what? If another issue came up the same people will do the same thing. They never learn.

They want us to focus on Trump and ally with a union leadership that has been part and parcel of the weak Democratic Party leadership that has helped bring us Trump. Yes, Randi resigned recently and Mulgrew endorsed Mamdani but keep a close eye on them and see a union leadership that strives to save the city money on our backs has really changed.  

I admit to not doing that work that Daniel and so many others had been doing in the ABC chats since the Aug. 28 first healthcare committee meeting and for that they've been attacked by the Unity lites. But I am acting under the assumption not to trust the union leadership to present things in an honest way. So I was an automatic NO, especially considering the lies and misinformation coming from Mulgrew over MedAV - you know, it was just a different name from Medicare and you can't ask your docs if they belong because the big beautiful plan doesn't exist yet - until he tried to shove down our throats an even more big beautiful plan which is would still be favoring if we hadn't won the RTC election. 

Now I know some of our leaders are patting themselves on the back for our reso calling for a vote at the DA - which we knew is stacked by Unity - instead of the membership so we would have time to study the plan in depth ---- btw -- they would say we are under time constraints to start it Jan. 1 -- do you think these constraints are an accident?
 
Below Daniel finds the chinks in the redactions which Mulgrew told us was read by his lawyers -- all of whom tried to kill the lawsuits to protect us. 
 
Remember the lies about the stabilization fund, which it seems will be vacated in this plan..
 
Water under the bridge I guess, unless there is a law suit to stop  or delay it.

I wonder when we will ever learn.
 
See Marianne, who comes under severe attack by both the Unity gang AND some of our so-called allies, breakdown the MLC: https://youtu.be/pBKF2GTWYhg?si=NSPbjs3PpGlcCo59  
 
Norm
 
We've read the fine print. And we're right. The contract says: ”Emblem will utilize UMR systems and follow UMR protocols for the provision of UM services.” We unpack what it means for denials & claims
͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­





Disclaimer
The views expressed by our individual authors are their own and may not reflect the views of the EONYC community. Just as we may not all agree with the editorial views expressed as the collective Educators of NYC community.

Behind the Gates: How UMR Takes Over Utilization Management In Our Health Plan — and Why the AI & 'Clean Claim' Clauses Should Sound Alarms

We've read the fine print. And we're right. The contract says: ”Emblem will utilize UMR systems and follow UMR protocols for the provision of UM services.” We unpack what it means for denials & claims

 



READ IN APP
 

UMR Health Plan: Addiction Treatment Coverage In NC

Meet United Medical Resources (UMR). They’re not a household name, but under the new NYCEPPO plan, UMR will become the central authority deciding what care you can and cannot get. Acting as the Third Party Administrator for UnitedHealthcare and Emblem, UMR will be the interface every member has to go through for nearly all preauthorizations, claims, and medical approvals.

It’s important to know:

Sunday, September 28, 2025

UFT Healthcare Vote at the DA: Lots of Reasons to Vote NO or Table Till We Get Further Info - Role of United Health's 32% Denial Rate

BREAKING - ADAMS HAS DROPPED OUT AS I HAVE PREDICTED - HE WAS JUST WAITING FOR THE OFFERS FROM BILLIONAIRES TO KEEP GOING UP! ADAMS VOTERS - SWITCH YOUR VOTES TO CURTIS - I'D LOVE TO SEE HIM FINISH AHEAD OF CUOMO!  

  • According to the lead consultant pushing this plan, even inside the Downstate 13, the standards remain UHC’s standards. Emblem may process the paperwork, but the rules—the criteria, or standards, that decide whether your care is approved or denied—are UHC’s. This means the entire system, for every member, retiree, and family, is governed by UHC’s standards. That’s the Trojan horse in this plan.

YES VOTERS ON UFT HEALTHCARE  TOWING THE LINES

 

The 9 a.m. Shady Deal, Explained by Leah Lin: What every UFT member needs to know before the Delegate Assembly vote. --- The 4 Myths of Michael Mulgrew - and still counting


Sunday, Sept. 28, 2025

I notice that a batch of retiree delegates who are under 65 will be voting Yes because they think they will be protected if they move away from the metro area. Did they buy a broken used car from Mulgrew? And then there is the issue of AI determining denials. 

It is bullshit fear mongering from the leadership to claim turning this down will put an end to negotiations. Remember The Maine  - I mean the two rounds of Mulgrew's perfect and then more perfect Medicare Advantage - until they faded to awful.

Marianne on Friday night: https://www.youtube.com/live/ChY8_05d_80?si=MAH2fM2AQ9_J5LjT

My last piece had some info:

EONYC has done more research. 

Why UFT Delegates Must Vote 'No' on the NYCEPPO Plan if UnitedHealthcare Standards Are Applied To All

Trust in this plan continues to be frayed as union leadership refuses to share the unredacted contract and related documents. Now, the leading consultant pushing the plan shares a shocking revelation

Sep 28, 2025
 

A Trojan Horse in Our Healthcare?

The newly proposed NYCEPPO healthcare plan is being sold to active UFT members and pre-Medicare retirees as a way to improve benefits and save money at the same time. Union leadership and the city’s negotiating committee are distributing FAQs to calm legitimate concerns about the role UnitedHealthcare (UHC) will have in this plan given its well-documented record of claim denials.

The UFT’s FAQ in particular craftily tells members not to worry:

  • “EmblemHealth will do all prior authorizations in the Downstate 13 counties in New York State, which represents 90% of claims.”

  • “UnitedHealthcare, which will process the remaining 10% of claims, will follow the exact same standards that EmblemHealth adheres to, ensuring that prior authorizations are handled uniformly nationwide.”

This framing makes it sound like most members are protected from UHC—and only a small fraction of claims (10%) will ever touch them.

But this is deeply misleading.

  • Thousands of retirees and their families live outside the Downstate 13. For them, UnitedHealthcare will be their direct administrator and gatekeeper—not Emblem.

This is strange, even morbid, “double speak” because another selling point from the UFT leadership’s paid operatives is that retirees living out of state will have more options for doctors and providers. Yet, they seem to think UHC’s 32% denial rate is somehow not going to be a big deal for most of us since it’s only going to be experienced by the 10%, mostly retirees, who don’t live locally.

  • Some active members and other city workers also live and work outside these counties—they too will fall under UHC administration.

  • According to the lead consultant pushing this plan, even inside the Downstate 13, the standards remain UHC’s standards. Emblem may process the paperwork, but the rules—the criteria, or standards, that decide whether your care is approved or denied—are UHC’s.

This means the entire system, for every member, retiree, and family, is governed by UHC’s standards.

That’s the Trojan horse in this plan.


The Shocking Revelation

Buried within this proposal is a devastating emerging reality: if UnitedHealthcare (UHC) standards for care, prior authorizations, and denials are applied across the board, every member—active or retired, teacher or paraprofessional, therapist or counselor—will be subject to one of the most notorious denial machines in the insurance industry.

Is this speculation? No!

It’s written plainly in the leaked transcript from September 10th MLC healthcare presentation meeting. There we read and hear testimony and a Q&A between MLC leaders, the paid “independent” lead healthcare consultant from Segal, Chris Calvert, and other union leaders.

In this meeting, the lead consultant informs those gathered that even in regions where EmblemHealth is technically the administrator, the standards being enforced will be UHC’s standards.

In other words: every city worker and retiree will live under UnitedHealthcare’s rules, no matter where they live.

Here is one of the exchanges where Calvert admits to the UHC standard being applied to all:

Here’s what’s being said:

  • Alan Klinger, the MLC and UFT lawyer, who also is the MLC’s appointee to the joint tripartite committee with the City, interrupts Calvert seeking to clarify that in the downstate 13 region, prior authorizations (the approvals you need before certain care or procedures are covered) will go through Emblem. He goes on to say, that if a union local’s administrators have concerns, they go through Emblem, which manages this process locally.

  • Chris Calvert responds by emphasizing that the standards being applied will be UnitedHealthcare’s standards—so no matter where a member lives, the rules are the same. But for downstate 13 specifically, the actual reviews and management of those prior authorizations will be carried out by Emblem, not directly by UnitedHealthcare.

In short:

  • Standards = UnitedHealthcare rules (applied to everyone).

  • Administration in downstate 13 = handled by Emblem (the local entity).


UnitedHealthcare’s Track Record: Profits Over Patients

UnitedHealthcare is not a neutral player or some benevolent caretaker. It is the largest corporate health insurer in the United States and has a documented, checkered history of putting profits above people. It leads private insurers with a 32% denial rate. According to an American Medical Association survey, doctors have ranked UHC as the insurer with the most prior authorization hassles, with 72% of physicians giving UHC a “high” or “extremely high” burden rating.

  • AI-Driven Denials: Investigations and lawsuits show UHC uses algorithms to prematurely cut off rehab, skilled nursing, and home care—even when doctors say patients need more time.

The same MLC meeting revealed that AI is very much part of this new agreement.

  • Ongoing Litigation: Class actions accuse UHC of violating federal law by systemically denying medically necessary care. Testimony from insiders revealed denial quotas built into policy. It also is under multiple investigations for fraud and overbilling.

  • A Pattern of Abuse: Reports nationwide show seniors denied cancer drugs, patients forced out of hospitals too soon, and families buried in appeals.

  • Multiple Federal Investigations: UnitedHealth Group is currently facing both civil and criminal investigations by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) for fraud and overbilling.

UnitedHealthCare is not who we want controlling our care, nor setting the criteria.


What This Means for Members and Retirees

If delegates approve this plan:

  1. Doctors and patients lose authority. UHC’s criteria, not medical judgment, will determine treatment.

  2. Retirees are exposed. Thousands living outside Downstate 13 will deal directly with UHC—and face its merciless denial machine without a buffer.

  3. Everyone potentially faces the same denials. Inside Downstate 13, Emblem is only administering UHC’s rules. Members will still suffer the same rejections and delays.

  4. Vulnerable populations are targeted. Retirees, post-surgical patients, lowest paid city workers and children with special needs will be most harmed by premature cut-offs and denials.

  5. Members drown in bureaucracy and red tape. Appeals, phone calls, and paperwork, stress will replace care. Those without stamina or know-how will simply go without.


Real Lives, Real Consequences

This isn’t abstract. Imagine:

  • A retired teacher recovering from hip replacement is cut off from rehab after just a week, even though her doctor prescribes three. She either pays thousands out of pocket or risks lifelong mobility issues.

  • A child of a UFT paraprofessional loses access to speech therapy because UHC’s standard says “progress plateaued.”

  • A city worker battling cancer is forced to switch procedures mid-treatment because UHC refuses to cover the one that her doctor believes will work for her.

These are not “hypotheticals.” They are documented cases from UHC’s history. And they could be our reality if this plan is approved.


The Bigger Issue: Trust and Transparency

Equally troubling is how this plan is being sold.

  • Leadership knows UHC’s record.

  • They know thousands of retirees live outside Downstate 13.

  • They know even within Downstate 13, UHC’s standards will rule.

And yet, instead of being upfront, they’ve chosen to spin, minimize, and mislead. That erodes trust. And it betrays the union’s responsibility to protect its members’ and their families’ health.


UFT Delegates’ Responsibility

Delegates are not voting on a simple healthcare plan change. They are voting on whether to hand the criteria of members’ care to UnitedHealthcare.

It’s one of the most consequential votes they will cast.

They are voting on whether retirees and families must fight an insurance giant for every day of rehab, every specialist visit, every procedure, every medication.

They are voting on whether to let leadership’s spin override the lived reality of denials, lawsuits, and suffering.

This is not about numbers on a spreadsheet or “cost savings”. It is about people’s lives.

It cannot be overstated: being under UHC’s standards is, indeed, A MAJOR CHANGE.

We did not have their standards dictating our city premium-free plan for the last several decades. This is not keeping things virtually “unchanged” while making improvements and saving money as the paid operatives for Michael Mulgrew’s Unity leadership caucus tell us.


A Better Path Forward

Rejecting this plan does not mean rejecting cost savings or efficiency. It means demanding a plan that:

  • Keeps doctors and patients—not insurers or city bureaucrats —at the center of decision-making.

  • Provides transparency and honest communication with members.

  • Protects retirees, especially those outside Downstate 13.

  • Respects the union’s duty to safeguard both wages and health benefits.


Bottom Line: Vote NO

The NYCEPPO plan is being presented as a step forward. But it is, in fact, a step backward—a Trojan horse that hands our care to UnitedHealthcare.

  • UnitedHealthcare sets the standards for everyone.

  • Retirees and active members outside Downstate 13 are fully exposed.

  • Inside Downstate 13, Emblem, the local regional administrator, simply enforces UHC’s rules for care.

  • The FAQ spin is a distraction, not a protection.

Delegates must see through the misleading promises and protect the membership.

For the teachers recovering from surgery. For the retirees fighting cancer. For the families raising children with special needs. For every member who depends on the union to safeguard their health.

  • Vote NO on the NYCEPPO plan if UHC’s standards apply. Because our health is not negotiable.


  •  

    And so has Wanda Williams 

 

A risky City Hall health care change



By WANDA WILLIAMS

PUBLISHED: September 24, 2025 at 5:00 AM EDT


I’ve spent decades fighting for New York City’s municipal workers, and let me tell you something every New Yorker should know: the city can’t function without us.

Municipal workers are the cops, firefighters, and EMTs who respond in an emergency. They are the teachers who educate your kids and the social workers and health professionals who connect people to care. They’re the sanitation workers who keep streets clean, the crews who maintain our parks, and the staff who operate our public libraries.

They are New York’s most vital organ. And right now, City Hall is trying to gut our health care.

For decades, nearly 750,000 city employees, retirees, and their families have depended on the comprehensive health care plan New York City provides.

But the city wants to dramatically change the health care coverage we rely on and push everyone into a new “self-insured” plan with zero input from the people who will live with the consequences of these changes.

Officials claim this change will save $1 billion a year. But here’s the truth: you can’t cut that much money without cutting care. The math doesn’t add up.

City leaders promise workers won’t lose anything. They even claim there will be a broader network of providers, less out of pocket costs and improved benefits. Too good to be true? It is. Every retiree who lived through the recent fight over Medicare Advantage knows better. When the city tried to force retirees onto private plans, we saw the potential consequences: smaller doctor networks, higher copays, more prior authorization hurdles, and fewer hospitals willing to take the plan.

That’s not savings, that’s just cost shifting. And it means municipal workers and their families will pay more for less. They claim that the $1 billion in savings will come from cutting payment to hospitals. Many NYC hospitals can’t afford reduced reimbursement and those that can are dealing with dramatic cuts in federal funding. What happens when the hospitals don’t agree? Do they go out of network? Does the city increase out of pocket costs?

Even worse, by “self funding” the coverage the new plan strips away the protections of New York State law, which guarantee coverage standards, state oversight and enhanced consumer rights. Under the new plan, if something goes wrong, workers and retirees won’t have the same appeal rights or oversight that they have today.

To make matters worse, they have picked UnitedHealthcare, the poster child for excessive claim denials, delays in payments, and smaller networks, to take over. Among other atrocities, UnitedHealthcare is under criminal investigation by the federal government for Medicare fraud and overbilling. While it is being portrayed as an Emblem-United partnership, make no mistake, this is a United contract and their goal will be maximizing their profits.

This new plan will be bad for municipal workers, and the way the city is handling the transition has been even worse.

There was transparency about how the decision was made and no clear explanation of how the city expects to save a billion dollars without gutting benefits. Just a backroom deal and a press release.

This isn’t the first time City Hall has tried to balance its budget on the backs of workers. And it’s not the first time New Yorkers have said “no.”

In the 1970s, workers fought against dangerous hospital conditions. Recently, retirees successfully pushed back against the forced switch to Medicare Advantage. Time and time again, when the city has tried to chip away at health care, New Yorkers have stood up and stopped it.

Why? Because we know what’s at stake. Health care isn’t just a line in a budget. It’s life and death.

If the city wants to talk about health care savings, it needs to do so in the open and with public input. It needs comptroller oversight, input from the people whose lives will be affected, and above all else, it needs to stop pretending that slashing $1 billion won’t result in less access to health care.

Changing the health care plan for 750,000 people is no small undertaking. The city plans to implement this change in the next 4 months, a dangerously tight timeline.

The city may see numbers on a balance sheet. But I see people: the sanitation worker clearing snow at 3 a.m., the teacher staying late to help a student, the EMT racing to save a life. They have earned comprehensive health care.

The city needs to honor their commitment and maintain the plan that municipal employees rely on.

Williams is a former union leader and a board member of HandsOffNYCare.

 

 

Tuesday, July 8, 2025

Today's DA and Yesterday Town Hall -- Ode to Hot Air Mike: President of Piffle, Sultan of Spin, Lord of the Loophole

Tuesday, July 8 -- a day I have to leave the beach and shlep into Manhattan for the DA.

Today is an emergency Del Ass to endorse a mayoral candidate and there is some speculation of some kind of deal between Mulgrew and Mamdani. Remember the Unity attack on DSA? I posted about this possible endorsement last week and speculated about how the UFT kiss of death may cause Mamdani to lose. 
The orthodox Jewish group, which boycotted voting for ABC or ARISE because of Amy and MORE sympathy for Palestinians and chose Unity, is certainly not happy. They put out a statement somewhere but I can't find it.
 
ABetterContract.org put this out yesterday: 
Jul 07, 2025

We need a member-led process with transparency, healthy debate, and accountability. We stand on our platform position that members should vote for major political endorsements.This is not a democratic process. It’s a performance. And it’s insulting.... 

The UFT’s Endorsement Process Is Broken: 

 
ABC who show up are going out after so why not jump on the ferry? 
 
I missed most of the retiree town hall yesterday because I didn't get the time right and logged on around 3:25 and by 3:35, it clearly ran out of steam. Some focus on the stuck para bill. I give Unity credit -- pushing a campaign for 10k para bonus worked to drain potential para votes from ABC -- our chance to win would have required a big para turnout for ABC. But that gambit won't work again. I compare the success of the Mamdani campaign to pull out new voters. And that was the same idea of the ABC campaign - not to rely on the usual suspects from legacy caucuses, which have shown no real growth over decades of so-called organizing. Their 14% was even worse than the Cuomo campaign. We can all learn from Mamdani -- and a key is people in the schools. ABC ran 520 out of the 560 who ran with us in schools while ARISE ran around 350 in school people plus 140 retirees. My advice to ABC is to start asap to build an even firmer base, not just for elections but to become a constant force in the UFT. Recent firings by Unity will help in that effort, as I will point out in an upcoming post on the Unity purges.
 
Some comments on the town hall related to the stalled para bill.
He’s right this had to do with politics. Him wanting to get re-elected and him willing lie to get votes.
 
Everyone else’s fault.
 
Politics got involved in a bill??? Dumb. 
 
He comes up with the hair brained idea. Tells the paras it is as good as done, so the paras can have a vacation on the money coming their way, tries to sell it to the City Council with a massive $ tab and gets 47 to agree to it theoretically in the middle of an election but their bluff isn’t called because they only needed the election to be over, and then blames them for not doing as he said (forgetting that the City Council isn’t the Unity caucus). Did I miss anything??
 
Mulgrew has found a way to piss off the billionaire oligarchs and lowest paid rank and file unionists in the City with one bill. Truly remarkable.
 
 And a poem:
Ode to Hot Air Mike
President of Piffle, Sultan of Spin, Lord of the Loophole


Oh Hot Air Mike, thou mighty breeze,
Who fills the halls with empty pleas,
Your town halls soar with pomp and flair—
Yet leave us gasping for real air.

Great Chancellor of Chatter Vague,
Your titles mount like anti-union plague:
“Commander of Circular Replies,”
“Baron of Bureaucratic Lies.”

At 52 Broadway you reign,
With crafted scripts and well-worn strain.
We ask for truth—you dodge and dance,
A master of the vacant stance.

You float above with bloated grace,
Your words: a cloud, your tie: a face.
Beneath, the Unity crew looks glum—
Each nodding head, profoundly dumb.

So here’s to you, oh winded knight,
Who turns each grievance into light.
Our questions burn, our hearts are sore—
You answer us with metaphor.

Long may you drift, ballooned and bold,
Your speeches tepid, stale, and cold.
But know this well, dear Mike of Mist:
The rank and file are getting pissed.
 

Friday, May 23, 2025

UFT Election Update: Where the ballots are - My Conversation with GES President When I voted In person

I mailed in a ballot last week but before the RTC meeting on Tuesday,  as a member of the UFT election committee, I decided to vote in person to get an understanding of the process. I was thinking of doing the same again to test if their system is working until I heard Unity got hysterical when someone in ABC tried to do the same. The in-person vote will invalidate the mailed ballot and I thought if you try it again that would invalidate the last time you voted but when I saw how things works it made sense why we can't vote twice in person. I wanted to know... Exactly how this process works.

The voting took place in an empty space on the corner of Exchange Pl. and New St. Three ladies were behind a desk and all I had to do was show them my UFT ID. No picture ID to show it was really me. 

I asked the woman in charge a number of questions which she answered very openly. She is the President of Global Election Services. Ahhh, I wanted to know  --- the chain of custody of the ballots and she filled me in.

I asked if she could tell me if my ballot had been received and she had a lengthy explanation why she couldn't. In other words, GES does not scan the ballots as they come in like AAA did daily. She claims this is a more secure system. So how does this work?


Ballots currently reside in a post office locker until the morning of May 28 - the day before the count - when GES has a truck pick them up and deliver them to Shanker Hall at 52 Broadway. What? The ballot will be sitting at 52 overnight until the count begins at 9 AM on May 29? (They hire security - Look for Mulgrew and Ellie Engler in security uniforms.)

At 9 AM on the morning of Thursday May 29, the outside envelopes will be scanned, which should take hours. Then run through machines that slit the envelopes open - more hours. The fact they used an open sleeve inside saves some time - in the past the second envelope had to be run through slitters to open it. But in reality, the actual count won't begin until afternoon - maybe late afternoon.

I asked about how many scanners and she said 3. I said AAA had 4 and they jammed often. She said they were brand new. And also said we would be free to roam as observers and see the machines work unlike in recent elections.

I asked about the chain of custody for in person ballots. She said they were all in locked boxes and stored on Long Island. She said these ballots -- all in booklets even if only a slate vote -- would be counted first.

She said the entire process was open for observers - Can I ride on the pickup truck? No. she said. I did intend to go to the post office to see the loading process and then onto 52 but now have a dental emergency for next Wednesday but will go in right after.

Booklets will slow up the count

They handed me the ballot book and there were voting booths behind a curtain. A word of warning was to not tear off the front page even if voting for a slate -- which you can do if voting by mail. I asked why and she said they had to maintain the integrity of the entire ballot and not have the rest of the booklets floating around. I don't quite get that point -- they could just shred the rest of the booklet. I warned her that all these booklets will delay the count because even if no marks on them, they still had to be scanned. She responded that in the last election only 10% of the voters sent in the booklet. I told her this time there will be a lot more booklets and by having the in-person booklets even if voting slate, we may be at the count over the weekend of May 31.

Some ABC people may be voting for their friends on the other slates. For instance, both ARISE and ABC are only running 550-560 AFT/NYSUT candidates and Unity is running 750, so they are voting ABC slate on the first page and then going into the booklet to vote for about 150 in ARISE and some in Unity they know.

Thursday, April 24, 2025

ABC-UFT Media - Mulgrew’s Election Tactics Spark Legal Consequences

For Immediate Release

Press contact: Mike Schirtzer

(917)683-7014


(New York, N.Y.) The "A Better Contract" slate is sounding the alarm on a desperate, undemocratic move by United Federation of Teachers President Michael Mulgrew and his Unity Caucus in the upcoming UFT union-wide officer elections. Despite paper ballots being mailed out to members on May 1st, Mulgrew has decided to add his own election rules and block several attempts to increase voter participation.


After years of rejecting electronic voting—even though our sister AFT union, PSC-CUNY, already uses it successfully—and watching turnout plummet, Unity is now pushing a last-minute in-person voting plan at select, controlled locations. Meanwhile, they’re rejecting the one solution that would actually boost turnout and empower members: in-person voting at our own schools and worksites, the same way we vote for our union contract, Chapter Leaders, Delegates, and Paraprofessional Representatives. The fact we elect our building representatives in school, but not who leads our union is absurd.


Online voting would also allow for members with disabilities, such as those who are visually impaired, to cast their votes independently. This would be considered a “Reasonable Accommodation” under the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA).


“They had no interest in increasing participation when members demanded real reform,” said Amy Arundell, UFT Presidential challenger. “Now that they’re losing their grip, they want to stage controlled, in-person voting sites where they can feed you, give you a gift—and convince you to vote again.”


Here’s the catch: if a member votes again in person, that vote overrides their mail-in ballot. That means your original vote—already cast —gets thrown out and replaced. It’s double voting with a twist: only the second vote counts.


Even more concerning, many of these in-person voting events are being held at special dinners and award ceremonies—mixing voting with celebrations in a way that creates the appearance of impropriety. This raises serious ethical concerns and calls into question the legitimacy of the entire process.


“They won’t let us vote at school or online—but they’ll hand out dinners, awards, and gift bags, then tell members to vote again. First vote tossed. That’s not democracy—it’s a scam,” said Daniel Alicea, candidate for UFT Vice President of Middle Schools.


“This is about one thing: control,” said Arundell. “Unity knows the only way they can hold onto power is by stacking the deck—selecting who votes where, while their loyal insiders run the show.”


To make matters worse, the so-called “nonpartisan” election committee is anything but. It’s filled with Unity Caucus members and paid union staffers, making this entire process biased from the top down.


The A Better Contract slate has filed a lawsuit to stop this manipulation and is demanding a fair election—where every vote counts, no matter how or where it’s cast.


“This union belongs to the educators in our classrooms—not to a political machine clinging to power,” said Arundell. “We’re not backing down.”


Link to full lawsuit here



A Better Contract is an independent slate of over 550 UFT members that will challenge the over six