 |
| Joint Tweed/UFT Firing Squad |
A nationwide movement of creative insubordination may be
the only way to put a stop to the injustice now imposed on America’s
public schools, teachers and especially students." -- Adam Urbanski, President Rochester Teachers Union
Can you imagine the UFT supporting teachers here if they
led a test boycott here? They would assist the Tweedies in choosing the firing
squad.
I'll tell you more at another time of my tweeting war with Randi and Leo over whether the UFT really opposes high stakes testing.
{Hey guys, I'm waiting for AFT/UFT messages of support to these teachers. Ho hum, better not wait too long.}
Fred Smith from Change the Stakes commented:
The revolution is near. Time to dump all of the T in the
harbor... Examinations and privatization without representation are
tyranny. The colonies are feeling it.
Meanwhile, the UFT--which has denied its rank and file a voice in the
matter and has stood in the way of an organized, mutually-empowering parent
alliance--is now ready to compromise with its demonizers and bashers.
While the movement to oppose high stakes testing is on the march, the union is
conspiring to subject its members to test-polluted teacher evaluations.
Two pieces of advice to the so-called UFT leadership: Lead,
follow or get the hell out of the way. And recognize what Walt Kelly
(Pogo) said. "We have met the enemy and it is us."
We were one of the first out of the box (thanks to Brian Jones, MORE candidate for UFT Secretary) with reports of the Seattle teacher test boycott an hour before their press conference:
Seattle Teachers Revolt Against High Stakes Test.
Since then the response has made heroes out of the teachers, who will undoubtedly face serious repercussions.
Susan Ohanian suggests:
I don't usually sign or share Change petitions because of some of their
past hijinks. But the Garfield teachers in Seattle are using Change for
their petition, so I'm urging everyone to sign it. They need hundreds
of thousands of signatures supporting them. This is not a high stakes
test but saying NO! is a huge step for teachers. Let's scare
Obama-Duncan and Bill Gates by showing that there are seeds of
resistance out there. http://tinyurl.com/apvf7bg
Parent activist in Seattle Dora Taylor:
What can I say…Seattle teachers rock!!!!
http://seattleducation2010.wordpress.com/2013/01/12/the-weekly-update-what-can-i-say-seattle-teachers-rock/
Dora reports that the PTA and the Seattle Teachers Union support the teachers and "Within hours,
teachers at Ballard High School followed suit."
(See statements of support below the Change the Stakes support message.)
Can you imagine the UFT supporting teachers here if they did that here? They would assist the Tweedies in choosing the firing squad.
Ravitch posted this on the resistance:
Adam Urbanski, head of the Rochester (NY) Teachers Union, offers this advice:
"In
his letter from the Birmingham jail, Martin Luther King wrote, 'There
are just laws and unjust laws. And we are obligated to disobey the
unjust laws.' A nationwide movement of creative insubordination may be
the only way to put a stop to the injustice now imposed on America’s
public schools, teachers and especially students."
MORE
used its meatgrinder approach (where a number of people get to chip in) to forge this statement:
11 Jan Statement from the Movement of Rank and File Educators, The Social Justice Caucus of the UFT (United Federation of Teachers)
In Solidarity with Garfield H.S. Teachers
We, the members of the Movement of Rank and File Educators (MORE) stand in solidarity with the teachers at Garfield High School in Seattle who are refusing to administer standardized tests this semester. Risking their own livelihoods to stand up for authentic teaching and learning and against the proliferation of high-stakes standardized testing, they are fighting for teachers, educators, parents and, students nationwide. All over this country, teachers and students are frustrated, demoralized, and bored by the increasing pressure to raise standardized test scores and to equate those scores with learning. All of the “data” generated by these tests have become a stick to beat students, teachers, and unions, and have created an atmosphere of fear and intimidation. We agree with the teachers of Garfield High School that these tests represent a profound waste of time and money, especially while too many of our schools are starved of basic resources. We stand in solidarity with these brave educators, and encourage parents, teachers and students nationwide to support them as well.
Movement Of Rank & File Educators (MORE)
Please “Like” The Teacher’s of Garfield H.S. Seattle Facebook page at
https://www.facebook.com/SolidarityWithGarfieldHighSchoolTestingBoycott
Change the Stakes joined the chorus.
We, the members of Change The Stakes stand in solidarity with the teachers at Garfield High School in Seattle who are refusing to administer standardized, high-stakes tests to their students as they see these as a "waste of time and money". Teachers at Garfield High School are setting an example for other teachers and parents to rally against these tests that have been, and continue, to distort education for our children and the stability of the teaching profession. It is clear that the feelings here in New York about these tests are felt nation-wide. As parents and teachers of Change The Stakes we are grateful for your courage and we share your struggle. May more teachers and parents take the stand against these standardized measures that have only created fear of school by students and teachers.
In solidarity,
CHANGE THE STAKES
The Garfield High School PTSA issued the following statement today in support of the teachers:
From the Garfield High School PTSA Board Members
Written by President, Phil Sherburne
You may have seen in the news that the Garfield teachers have decided that they are no longer going to give the MAP tests to 9th grade students at Garfield. These are tests that are given three times during the 9th grade year to assess a student’s performance level in reading and math and their progress during the course of the year. These tests have nothing to do with a student’s grades or their progress toward graduation. The test results are just information for the teachers and the school district.
However, because the tests have no consequences for the student, many students do not take them seriously. As a result the test results do not really measure a student’s knowledge level. Teachers also object because the tests are not connected to what is being taught in the classroom and they take up a lot of time. Further, the teachers are concerned that the test results might be used to evaluate teachers which they believe would be inappropriate. The teachers believe that the grades the students are earning in the classroom are much better measures of the student’s knowledge level and educational progress.
The Garfield PTSA shares the concerns of the teachers at Garfield with the MAP testing and supports termination of these tests. There are many students who start the 9th grade who cannot perform 9th grade level math and english work. Some students are far behind. The real issue is what the school district is going to do, starting early in a student’s educational life, to help as many students as possible perform at grade level. A major effort to get students to grade level performance and to keep them there through graduation requires a focus and resources that we have not seen from the District or the Legislature. It is this focus on improving student achievement and providing the resources to accomplish it that deserves all our attention.
According to the Seattle Times in an article titled
Union supports Garfield teachers’ refusal to give district test:
In the statement, SEA President Jonathan Knapp said he wants the district to set a date to stop using the MAP exams. He also said that concerns over those tests are part of larger questions about the costs of testing, and how much time schools devote to it.
The union listed its concerns as follows:
The test does not line up with state standards.
The test does not line up with district curriculum.
The test takes valuable time away from student learning.
Many students do not take the test seriously.
The testing time frame takes valuable time away from students in the school being able to access computer labs and libraries for other projects.
“This high-stakes testing – there
needs to be a moratorium on it, because it’s out of control,” says Carol Burris, principal of South Side High School in
Rockville Center,
Long Island,
N.Y. “None of these tests really have anything to do with curriculum.
Maybe they have a little bit to do with math. But that’s it.”
Dr. Burris co-authored the letter for the
New York State
principals. On Dec. 31, she started a petition in New York opposing
high-stakes testing. In 10 days, she says, 5,500 administrators,
teachers, and parents have signed it.
“Parents are
stressed. Teachers are stressed. Kids are stressed by these tests more
than parents,” Burris says. “And when you tie teachers’ evaluations to
these tests, the teachers end up focusing their lessons on the tests.
And that’s starting to destroy elementary education.”
At Montgomery County Public Schools, America’s 17th largest district, Dr. Starr says the conflicting demands of the
No Child Left Behind Act and the emerging Common Core State Standards Initiative (sanctioned by 46 states and the
District of Columbia) are overwhelming districts, teachers, and resources.
“It’s
not because I’m opposed to all standardized testing. Standardized tests
do have a place,” he says. “But more and more folks are starting to
recognize these standardized tests are not designed to do what we’re
being asked to do with them. They’re a very narrow measure.”
Starr
says many standardized tests detract from teachers’ ability to prepare
students effectively: “This isn’t about saying, ‘Do away with all
standardized testing.’ It’s about saying, ‘Do away with tests that are
not aligned with what kids will actually need to do in the 21st
century.’ ”
Starr’s words could well have been uttered here at Garfield.
“In
26 years of teaching,” says Kit McCormack, who teaches English, “this
is the first time I’ve said, ‘I’m not giving this test.’ It’s not that I
think my ninth-graders should not be tested. I want my ninth-graders to
be tested. I teach to the Common Core standards, and I am happy to
teach those standards. Bottom line is: The test is not useful to my
students.”
Ms. McBride, the academic dean, said Garfield teachers “have a myriad of reasons for not administering the MAP
test,” including “no evidence” the test is aligned with state and local
curriculum, that it’s “filled with things that aren’t a part of the
curriculum at all,” and that the district uses student test scores to
grade teachers, even though the company that markets the test says it
should not be used to assess teacher effectiveness.
“We
really think our teachers are making the right decision,” said student
body president Obadiah Stephens-Terry. “I know when I took the test, it
didn’t seem relevant to what we were studying in class – and we have
great classes here at Garfield. I know students who just go through the
motions when taking the test, just did it as quickly as possible so they
could do something more useful with their time.”
When
someone asked the teachers if they were worried about what lessons
students might take away from their collective defiance of the district,
Mario Shauvette, chairman of the math department, stepped forward. “I’m
teaching by example,” he said. “If I don’t step up now, who will? I’m
taking charge of what I do here.”
Officials from
Seattle Public Schools refused to discuss the faculty’s announcement, but it issued a three-paragraph e-mail that included a general admonition: “
Seattle Public Schools expects our teachers to administer all required tests, pursuant to our policies and procedures.”
Seattle
school officials say the MAP test, which is given as many as three
times per year, "helps improve academic decision-making and
accountability." Moreover, district officials say they are reviewing the
effectiveness of the MAP program, including input from teachers and
principals, and expect to report results this spring.
The
teachers know they’re violating district policy, as well as their union
contract. They realize consequences could be severe. “But the people
down at district headquarters are wise people, good people,” said
history teacher Jesse Hagopian. “We all want what’s best for our
students, and the faculty here is confident we can work together and
come up with ways of evaluating our kids that are a lot more effective
than this test.”
------
FairTest
National
Center
for
Fair & Open Testing
for
further information:
Dr.
Monty Neill (617)
477-9792
Bob
Schaeffer (239)
395-6773
for immediate release Monday,
January 14, 2013
NATIONAL
ASSESSMENT
REFORM LEADERS ENDORSE
SEATTLE
TEACHERS’
SCHOOL TEST BOYCOTT;
CALL
FOR MORE EDUCATORS,
PARENTS TO “JOIN IN”
The country’s
leading testing
reform organization today announced its support for the boycott
of Seattle Public
Schools’ Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) exam launched by
teachers at
Garfield High School. National Center for Fair & Open
Testing (FairTest)
Executive Director Dr. Monty Neill said, “Children across the
U.S. suffer from
far too much standardized testing that is misused to judge
students, teachers
and schools. We applaud Garfield High educators who refused to
administer these
useless exams and urge others to join in.”
Dr. Neill
explained, “Seattle requires
administration of the MAP tests three times per year. This
eliminates days of
valuable teaching time and ties up the school’s computer labs
for weeks. The
tests are used to judge teachers even though they are not
aligned with the
state’s standards and not instructionally helpful. The Northwest
Evaluation
Association, which makes the test, says the MAPs are not
accurate enough to
evaluate individual teachers. No wonder some Seattle parents
began opting their
children out of these pointless tests even before the teachers’
boycott.”
“Nationally, students are inundated with
tests far beyond
the ‘No Child Left Behind’ (NCLB) requirement to assess students
annually in
reading and math in grades 3-8 and once in high school,” Dr.
Neill continued. “States
and especially large city districts have piled on many more
tests. For example,
Chicago tests kindergarteners 14 or more times per year. Many of
these tests
were added to obtain federal NCLB waivers, which force states
and districts to impose
more exams so they can judge teachers by student scores.”
According to FairTest, the high stakes
attached to tests
have led to narrowing curriculum, teaching to the test, score
inflation and
cheating scandals. Despite the focus on tests, scores gains on
the independent
National Assessment of Educational Progress have slowed since
the 2002 start of
NCLB and are well below pre-NCLB score increases. Score gaps
between whites and
African Americans and Latinos have stopped narrowing.
“High-stakes testing is undermining the
quality of U.S.
schools and the education our children deserve,” Dr. Neill
concluded. “Teachers
and parents who boycott standardized exams are taking the lead
to reduce
over-testing and the consequences attached to it. President
Obama, Education Secretary
Arne Duncan, the Congress, governors, state legislators, and
local school
officials need to heed these voices and stop imposing
unnecessary and
educational harmful testing.”
Is your Unity Caucus so afraid to stand up to a lame duck mayor and a governor who has designs on the White House? You are fully aware the $250 million increase in state aid we would lose if there is no evaluation agreement is not like defaulting on the national debt and would not cause great difficulty in the school system. While the money is nothing to sneeze at, it could easily be absorbed and the UFT could expose much more than $250 million of waste within the system.
Your post ignores some of what the new evaluation system mandates. We already know the new law requires more observations for veteran teachers than the current system. More importantly, the burden of proof in incompetence 3020A hearings is shifting from the Board of Education to the teacher. That will effectively end tenure as we know it.
The concessionary unionism that your Unity Caucus practices is the real problem. It brought us the 2005 disaster of a contract that created the Absent Teacher Reserve pool along with other horrible givebacks. Unity Caucus created the huge mess with closing schools when they agreed to eliminate preferred placement for members when a school is closed back in that agreement. People from Unity ran around selling that pile of junk as a great victory.
Then, in 2010 your caucus inexplicably backed the change in the law to allow our ratings to be based in part on value added, otherwise known as junk science, to get your hands on some race to the top pennies. Some states didn’t want the race to the top money which is a drop in the education budget bucket. Now you are running around telling us not to worry again because this evaluation system is basically unworkable.
Some poor teacher, maybe me, will get fired and have to go to court and you say we need not worry because “If the expert community, including the organization that designed the NYS system, has no confidence that VAM scores should VAM be used to dismiss teachers? I wonder how an arbitrator or a court would rule.” I would rather not find out and use what the experts say to try to change the law now particularly since it appears we are giving in on evaluations without getting a contract. The law ties the two together (although it doesn’t mandate it); the union in Yonkers just used the evaluation deadline to secure a contract.
Your piece then states, “When the economy improves, new job opportunities are created, will candidates line up to teach? I doubt it.” Isn’t the job of a union to improve our salary and working conditions? We’re not here to accept concessions, knowing they won’t work, and maybe fix things later. Is that your strategy?
Didn’t UFT/NYSUT candidates do quite well in the recent election? Why can’t we take a stand? Are you afraid of Andrew Cuomo? Most people feel he has presidential aspirations. Isn’t he a Democrat? Taking on unions, particularly teacher unions, may play well in a Republican primary but not a Democratic primary.
I don’t advocate a strike at this point because we are totally unprepared but Chicago proved in 2012 that fighting back is better than just giving in. We need a different kind of union that fiercely defends our rights and the rights of students not to be test taking machines.
Where have you gone Charlie Cogen, Roger Parente and David Seldon?