Written and edited by Norm Scott:
EDUCATE! ORGANIZE!! MOBILIZE!!!
Three pillars of The Resistance – providing information on current ed issues, organizing activities around fighting for public education in NYC and beyond and exposing the motives behind the education deformers. We link up with bands of resisters. Nothing will change unless WE ALL GET INVOLVED IN THE STRUGGLE!
--- do it often and show how you disagree with the pro-testing, pro-common fore, pro merit pay ed deform agenda of E4E. They call them selves a teacher driven organization without mentioning they are funded by ed deformers to create a 5th column to undermine the teaching profession under false pretenses. Screen shots below of sample questions below.
I'm betting they have a way of tracking people and the people who send the link will be wiped off their list.
Dear Member,
I am writing today on behalf of Educators 4 Excellence to ask your help
with a confidential online survey about our organization. We want to
better understand your reflections and thinking about how we present and
communicate our work.
Your responses will be anonymous and confidential, which is why we are
working with an independent market research company to conduct this
study for us. Please feel free to be 100% honest.
As a special thank you for providing feedback, you may enter yourself in
a drawing for one of three $100 Amazon gift cards. The deadline for the
drawing is Wednesday, October 14 so the sooner the better. Please complete the survey at your earliest convenience.
Click on this link to begin the survey or copy and paste it into your Internet browser to begin: http://www.amrsurvey.com/67008t
Thank you for taking the time to give us your opinion. We couldn’t do this without you.
Liz Utrup
National Director of Communications
Educators 4 Excellence
No place to write in anything to keep people to their message.
Sean raises so many interesting points and angles, whatever is left of my hair hurts.
Clueless in Seattle
When the Supreme Court rules in the Friedrichs
case to end the ability of public sector unions to collect agency fees
from non-members, we can likely anticipate something along the lines of a
mass panic, widespread angst and people like Weingarten and Mulgrew
declaring yet another victory. NYSUT will be torn between a twitter
blast and videotaping ourselves doing a Last Tango dance. Lily and her
posse at NEA will read Randi's memo and do whatever it says but they'll
stretch it out for a few days to make themselves look more deliberative.
They will fool nobody just as they did with their Hillary vote.
Lily just started following my on twitter. She must be a glutton for punishment. Or maybe there is a fake Lilly out there. The AFT and NEA Hillary endorsements will be a factor in any post-Friedrich's defections.
Lily has her own problems with the NEA Hillary endorsement, as chronicled by Mike Antonucci at EIA. A few of Mike's gems:
If you want to entertain yourself with even more reactions to NEA’s endorsement of Hillary Clinton, head over to its Facebook page, which at last count had 874 comments – almost all of them negative.
Sean, who was recently elected to a position in the local union, focuses on the AFT/NYSUT situation.
So let's try
looking at it this way and trust me I barely trust me but maybe this is
the pony buried in that huge room of horse manure. If NEA and AFT are
unable to collect money from members who simply check a box that says
"Bugger Off Randi" on their deduction card, can you really see any
future or present use for Randi let alone one that's worth the $550K
she's collecting now? And trickling down the line -- as we all now these
things do since Ronald Reagan told us they would -- does anyone think
we need a Punchy Mike or a Karen McWho? An Andy Palotta or a Marty
Messner?
As they say at AA: We think not!
...what good do either of
the two major union presidents do teachers? They ignore us on Common
Core. They pay lip service to ending high stakes testing but there's no
balls to any wall on the issue. It's just whining that's easily tuned
out. They ignored us on Bernie Sanders and threw their weight (not ours)
to Hillary effing Clinton a Gates crony and former Wal Mart board
member who supports The Core and The testing and will give us the same
F.U. the current resident of 1500 Pennsylvania Ave. gave us just as soon
as he counted up the teacher votes he collected.
The current regimes
serve Randi and Lily and a small band of merry pranksters who wouldn't
know a smart board from a dry eraser. They are out of touch and out of
step and they don't even have to give a shit because they have the
process loaded up to keep them in power and keep teachers from getting
any real representation. Anything that unloads this parasitic self
serving dead weight from leadership positions in the teacher union ranks
is a good thing in my somewhat jaded book.
To my way of thinking, the union leadership may also be looking for that silver lining - getting rid of most of the people who would oppose them and solidifying their hold on power even in a smaller union.
Sean has a bit of that same view regarding TFA:
Our current
state in B-Lo with the T.F.A. bacteria is that we are somehow stuck with
them as they are technically considered B-Lo teachers. I look forward
to cutting this umbilical cord and setting them adrift once they are
offered the chance to disaffiliate themselves with our union, one I am
sure they will pounce on. Once we're no longer stuck with them I think
we set sail for the course Pittsburgh and other places have taken in
bidding them adieu and encouraging them to avoid the door hitting them
in the ass on their way out of town. Told you my glass was half full.
The current opposition in the unions won't go. But maybe some will move to another stage - urging disaffiliation and the formation of a new union, like Steve Conn is doing in Detroit. For the first time I have heard some of these people talking about that idea.
What if people who leave the unions who are committed unionists truly begin to start looking elsewhere?
When we grew up and went to school, there were certain teachers who would hurt the children anyway they could by pouring their derision upon anything we did exposing any weakness however carefully hidden by the kids... Pink Floyd
I saw a link posted to a video of Pink Floyd's 1979 "Another Brick in the Wall", one of my favorites by one of my favorite groups. I considered having my class perform this subversive assault on a repressive education system - and yes, we the teachers who help perpetuate it, at graduation, but never had the chance. And this was pre-ed deform and repressive charters. How relevant that our new education secretary, John King, was part of Uncommon Schools, one of the schools most indicative of The Wall. We should take Roger Waters on charter school tours.
No dark sarcasm in the classroom Teachers leave them kids alone Hey teacher leave them kids alone
I hope kids don't remember me as another brick in the wall - or as a teacher trying to turn them into one. Over the years I have thought back remembering times when I may have bordered on this behavior. I'm sure I did as keeping order was the major way we were judged as teachers. Luckily I rarely had children who couldn't be worked with.
Funny how I tend to think of these rather than the better stuff. Recently a former student - from the late 70s or early 80s - left a comment on Facebook about how he viewed me as a teacher that brought back the good memories:
....it's
teachers like you that make a difference in our children's lives. Every time I went to your class I was hoping to learn more about the dinosaurs and do some kind of project. It was a fun class, you hardly
had a bad day and never treated us badly like that other teacher that
rode the bike every morning to school. So, keep being you. God bless... Ruben
So funny that Ruben mentions that "other teacher" - my neighbor across the hall - who happened to be my Hebrew School teacher when I was about 10 years old and was so harsh I told my mom I would not go back.
Here is a good insurrection video on The Wall. Imagine one day, in responds to dragging kids and parents to a sham rally, the kids of Success Charters tear down that wall.
Lyrics:
We don't need no education
We don't need no thought control
No dark sarcasm in the classroom
Teachers leave them kids alone
Hey teacher leave them kids alone
All in all it's just another brick in the wall
All in all you're just another brick in the wall
We don't need no education
We don't need no thought control
No dark sarcasm in the classroom
Teachers leave them kids alone
Hey teacher leave us kids alone
All in all you're just another brick in the wall
All in all you're just another brick in the wall
PINK FLOYD ANOTHER BRICK IN THE WALL PART 1 2 3 LYRICS
Daddy's flown across the ocean
Leaving just a memory
Snapshot in the family album
Daddy what else did you leave for me?
Daddy, what'd'ja leave behind for me?!?
All in all it was just a brick in the wall.
All in all it was all just bricks in the wall.
You, Yes You, Stand Still Laddie!
When we grew up and went to school, there were certain teachers who would hurt the children anyway they could
by pouring their derision upon anything we did
exposing any weakness however carefully hidden by the kids.
Out in the middle of nowhere they were home at night
their fat and psychopathic wives
Would thrash them within inches of their lives!
We don't need no education
We don't need no thought control
No dark sarcasm in the classroom
Teachers leave them kids alone
Hey! Teacher! Leave them kids alone!
All in all it's just another brick in the wall.
All in all you're just another brick in the wall.
(A bunch of kids singing) We don't need no education
We don't need no thought control
No dark sarcasm in the classroom
Teachers leave them kids alone
Hey! Teacher! Leave us kids alone!
All in all it's just another brick in the wall.
All in all you're just another brick in the wall.
Spoken:
"Wrong, Guess again!
Wrong, Guess again!
If you don't eat yer meat, you can't have any pudding.
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat?
You! Yes, you behind the bikesheds, stand still laddie!"
Goodbye cruel world
I'm leaving you today
Goodbye
Goodbye
Goodbye
Goodbye all you people
There's nothing you can say
To make me change my mind
Goodbye
Several teachers noted that as the school
lost enrollment, it had also lost funding leading to increased class sizes. ....
A Queens UFT representative thanked the Chancellor and the
Mayor for taking a “different approach” than the previous administration, and
addressing students’ “social and emotional needs.” ... testimony at Grover Cleveland HS Receivership hearing
There you have it- the stark difference between where the UFT/Unity Caucus leadership is coming from and the teachers in the school.
The report below is from Leonie Haimson. It says so much.
We all love Leonie for the amazing work she does to defend public education - and us. What a shame she, a parent, is on the front lines while our union leaders twiddle and twaddle with rules that will force the teachers at these schools to reapply for their jobs - and we know how that will end - ATRdom.
Here is Leonie's complete posting on her blog from Sept. 27 about her testimony at the Grover Cleveland receivership hearing.
There were about fifty people in the audience at the Grover
Cleveland High School receivership hearings yesterday -- not great for a school that enrolls nearly
2,000 students, but not terrible considering it was a beautiful Saturday
morning and the hearing announcement was made just a few days before.
I entered the auditorium at about 10:20 AM, as
someone from the DOE whose name I didn’t catch was wrapping up a brief
presentation about Receivership schools, saying that the administration was
still considering whether “receivership schools will get Renewal
[school] type supports and funding.”
Principal Denise Vittor followed with a power point
presentation showing how the school was improving its graduation rate and attendance
– the two data points that apparently had placed it on the state list of “struggling
schools” for possible Receivership.
The
four-year June graduation rate last year rose to 60.7% compared to 53% in
2012-13; the August four-year rate is 62.5% compared to 60.2% two years
before.If only those students eligible
for a regular diploma were counted, its four year rate was up to 63.9%.Apparently 2.2% of the students are severely
disabled, and according to the principal, only “eligible” for the alternate
credentials of the SACC (Skills and Achievement Commencement Credential)
or the CDOS (Career Development and Occupational Studies Commencement Credential.)
The six year graduation rate increased to 69.5%, and attendance at 82.5% last
year, compared to 78% in 2012-13.
She then went on to describe various programs the schools had instituted,
including “Common Core aligned curriculum units,” AP courses, a Saturday
academy, Afterschool Expanded Learning Time, blended learning and CTE programs.
The one new program for this year is “schoolwide implementation of PBIS (Positive Behavioral Intervention and Supports) , which are alternative
ways of dealing with school discipline.
Then two DOE representatives and the Principal
answered questions that had been written on index cards by members of the
audience:
·What resources has the school received under the
Renewal program?Answer: Extended
learning time and more professional development.
·Is there a plan to reduce class size, especially
considering that last year there were classes as large as 54 in math, 37 in
English and 38 in Social Studies?Answer: Most of our classes last year met the legal limit ( meaning the UFT contractual limit of 34 students per class).
·What funding is there for electronic
resources?Answer: We receive $22,000 from NYSTL
(New York State Textbook Law) funds, and Reso
A funds from the City Council for smartboards.
·Can CTE programs for the health
professions be added?Answer: Unfortunately not; nursing
CTE programs require class sizes of nine, and we don’t have the funds.
·Why is the school receiving only 82% of its Fair
Student Funding (FSF)?Answer:FSF was developed as an “ideal” funding
level; while all Renewal schools are receiving 100% FSF, it is uncertain if the
school will receive a higher share of its FSF until a team at DOE looks into
the “comprehensive needs” of the school.At that time new resources may be allocated.
·How can a school boost its enrollment when
letters were sent out saying the school may be closing?Answer: The Chancellor is committed to not closing
schools, though we’re obligated to send letters about struggling and
persistently struggling schools (to whom?).The principal added that community members and parents should help “re-brand”
the school, and let people know that we’re on a fast track to coming off the
struggling list.
·How can I participate as a parent towards
helping the school?Answer: Come to our
monthly PA meetings; we also have workshops you can attend.
Members of the audience were invited to speak.Several teachers noted that as the school
lost enrollment, it had also lost funding leading to increased class sizes.Parents suggested that the school could
provide more information to them about class assignments, etc. by sending
messages to their cell phones; these messages should also be translated into their native languages.Students proposed that more clubs and
activities like cheerleading and fencing would help create more spirit in the
school.
One neighborhood resident announced she was a graduate of
the high school, as was her mother.She
hoped that the school would not be closed, to be converted into a specialized or
selective school instead, as she wanted her daughter who had an IEP to be able to attend
the school.She then asked, what has happened
in the past when the state took over schools?Have they improved? (Her question went unanswered, but a truthful
response would be no.)
A Queens UFT representative thanked the Chancellor and the
Mayor for taking a “different approach” than the previous administration, and
addressing students’ “social and emotional needs.”David Aglialoro, Communications Director from Cathy Nolan’s
office, read a statement from the Assemblymember.As a 1976 graduate, AM Nolan stands behind the
school, recognizes that is getting back on track, and believes that with the right
support and resources it can be “the best version of itself.”Among other things, she recommended that the school
be transformed into a Community school, and that its swimming pool be opened on
the weekends to neighborhood residents.
Evelyn Cruz, Chief of Staff of Congresswoman Velázquez observed that it
was "unconstitutional" that the school still is burdened with such large
class sizes,
especially given how many students are linguistically diverse and are
struggling to
learn a new language.The school requires
more resources to hire additional teachers; with smaller classes, she pointed out, the students would
be less likely to walk out of class because they don’t comprehend the material.The school also needs dedicated funding for more
guidance counselors.
I followed by saying that I was glad to hear of some of the
promising ways the school was improving its results, but none of these
measures have the rigorous research behind them that class size reduction does.The fact that “most” of the classes met the
legal limit of 34 last year is not good enough, especially as in 2007, NYC
promised the state as part of the Contracts for Excellence law to reduce class size to an average of 25 in high schools
citywide.In all struggling high schools
like Grover Cleveland, class sizes should immediately be capped at 25 or less.
I briefly went through the Chancellor’s “Framework
for Great Schools,” a copy of which
with space for feedback had been handed out to the audience, and
explained how each of its six elements would be difficult to achieve
without reducing class size:
“Rigorous
instruction” is nearly impossible to attain when there are thirty or more students in a class, many of
them English Language Learners, unable to get enough feedback or practice speaking to be “actively engaged in in ambitious intellectual
activity” or “develop critical thinking skills,” as the Framework demands.
How can there be a truly “Supportive Environment” for students
with classes this large, with too little individualized attention to feel “safe, supported, and challenged by their teachers
and peers”? As for “Collaborative Teachers,” do teachers
really have “a culture of respect and continuous improvement” when burdened
with excessive class sizes and a teaching load of a 150 or more students?
Can “Effective School Leadership” be maintained, affording“the instructional and social-emotional support
that drives student achievement” when students are crammed into classes of thirty
or more?
It would also be far easier to create
“Strong Family and Community Ties” if each teacher had fewer students, with the
time to reach out to parents when their children are succeeding as well as when
they are falling behind. Finally, it is
difficult to see how real “Trust” can be attained, when the administration is ignoring what is the top priority of parents
citywide for school improvement – class size reduction.
After the hearing
was over, I spoke to several teachers at the school.They all confirmed that this fall, class sizes remain
at about the contractual maximum of 34 students per class or more; and that even
English Language Learners are not provided with smaller classes.This is clearly unacceptable. While the
graduation and attendance rates at the school may continue to inch upwards, the quality of
education at this school and others like it will not fundamentally improve
without a concerted effort to provide more targeted
resources so that class sizes can be capped at 25 or less.
The list of schools faced with receivership along with hearing dates is here; comments also can be submitted here,
no later than 5:00 p.m. on the second business day after each
school's hearing date. Translated versions of the School Receivership
Public Feedback form can be found here for submission as well.
Anne Martin Williams, who is DOE Senior Director,
Teaching Recruitment and Quality, is married to Joe Williams founder of
DFER who is now working for a new organization out to privatize our schools
called the WaltonEducation Coalition? She is also a former TFA-er and KIPPster.
How bad is it getting for our "friends" at the de Blasio/Farinia DOE, that the very people who are trying to destroy the NYC public school system and teacher unions, have infiltrated so far into the fabric of our school system? Are there any worse deformers than slime balls like Joe Williams? There are always some delicious rumors floating around about William's "connections" to other major deformers. So how nice that that his wife runs the DOE department of teacher recruitment and quality.
And my goodness, as all well-behaved TFAers, Williams taught for 2 years in NYC schools: -- teacher: James Lick Middle School: 2003 – 2005 (2 years) - in San Francisco.
When Mayor Bill de Blasio became Mayor and appointed Carmen Farina as Chancellor, most educators were hoping for a "spring cleaning" of
the Bloomberg agenda at the DOE. However, it was obvious that many of
the Bloomberg managers and their agendas remained relatively untouched
by the new administration. Now Chalkbeat has reported that an
astounding 80% of the Bloomberg era managers are still at the DOE and
in the same or similar positions that they occupied under Bloomberg.
Is it little wonder why the teacher in the trenches see little change in
the hostile classroom environment or the "gotcha mentality" that
presently exists?
Of course you won't hear a peep from the Farina admin BFFs in the UFT. Chaz pointed out:
Despite the continued love affair
between Chancellor Carmen Farina and UFT President Michael Mulgrew
little has changed when it has come to DOE policy. Michael Mulgrew
claimed at the Chapter Leader conference that the Chancellor could not
remove them too rapidly because they are protected. Protected? My
question since they are managers and at will employees how are they
protected and couldn't the Chancellor remove them to positions that
didn't include implementing policy? Of course she could and as for
policies?
I have an idea: Send Anne Martin Williams back to Middle School to get some brushing up - and loads of PD.
Call the King appointment "Building the national opt-out movement one education secretary at a time."
While some of our troops in the battle against ed deform, particularly those in NY State where King served as state ed commissioner, have been tearing a their hair and rending their clothing at Duncan's replacement - ACTING, I offer cheers for the man who had such an impact in fostering NY State in having the largest opt out movement in the entire nation with 20% opting out (Let's pray for a doubling - or more - this year.)
Some people say we must put up a battle to stop King from being appointed permanently - which will never happen anyway because Obama does not want to see King in front of a Republican committee that will tear him to shreds on common core. King can slog through the next 15 months in the acting role. I say, "celebrate."
King was an executive at Uncommon Schools, which, as Michael Fiorillo points out, "is among the most revanchist of
boot camp, behavior modification, student-shaming charter schools."
Someone should ask Hillary if she supports King's appointment and let the merriment begin. Ask Bernie too. Maybe Trump also.
And since King was replaced by Elia can we long forward to Elia replacing King if he crashes and burns?
Here is the NYS Allies for Public Education www.nysape.org
US Secretary of Education Arne Duncan Steps Down - New Yorkers Declare John King No Better
The
announcement of John King to replace Arne Duncan as US Education
Secretary is bad news for the nation, according to NYS Allies for Public
Education, a coalition of more than 50 parent and educator groups
throughout the state.
“Throughout
his term in New York, John King was notorious for his complete
disconnect from parents, teachers, and school officials. His
blatant disregard for concerned parents and educators fueled opt outs to
historic numbers. Our only hope is that this bizarre move by the White
House will have the same effect across the country, spreading the Opt
Out movement to every corner of the nation,” said Jeanette Deutermann,
Long Island public school parent and founder of Long Island Opt Out.
“Former
NYS Commissioner of Education John King helped create an educational
disaster for New York and our children are still feeling the devastating
effects,” said Eric Mihelbergel, Erie County public school parent and
co-founder of NYSAPE.
“John
King was relentless in pushing the inappropriate Common Core standards,
flawed curriculum, defective exams, and an invalid teacher evaluation
system on our schools, all of which caused more than 200,000 parents to
opt out of the state exams last spring,” said Lisa Rudley, Westchester
County public school parent.
“King
was a catastrophe as New York’s Education Commissioner. Throughout his
administration, his policies were on a constant collision course with
parents, teachers and good sense,” said Bianca Tanis, Ulster County
public school parent and teacher.
Leonie
Haimson, executive director of Class Size Matters, and co-chair of the
Parent Coalition to Protect Student Privacy explained, “John King
stubbornly refused to listen to concerns of parents, Superintendents,
and legislators on the need to protect student privacy, and under his
leadership, New York was the only state in the country in which it took
an act of the Legislature to compel the state to pull out of inBloom.”
Marla
Kilfoyle, a teacher and public school parent on Long Island, pointed
out: “King left in disgrace in December 2014, with no political capital
remaining and few supporters left. A year before the state's teachers
voted ‘no confidence’ in him and called for his removal by the Board of
Regents.”
“The
fact that Obama would choose to double-down on the test-driven agenda
that King espoused, when polls show voters rejecting these policies in
increasing numbers, indicates just how unwilling this administration has
been to acknowledge the depth of parents' opposition to Common Core
and high-stakes testing,” said Nancy Cauthen, NYC parent from Change the
Stakes.
Jessica
McNair, Oneida County public school parent and educator concluded,
“This new distressing development makes it even more important that NCLB
must be revamped as soon as possible by Congress to take power out of
the hands of the Department of Education. Otherwise, John King will
continue to wreak damage on our public school children and their
schools.”
I'm betting the blow back against the scuzzballs at FES is a factor in this postponement as they rebrand. Let's hope the next time there is a blizzard.
After forcing parents to take a day off or arrange alternate child care Success has to tell them "never mind."
Why worry about a little lightning and miss a chance to spread racial divisions? If you are willing to kill a half day of school what is the problem?
And poor Jennifer Hudson, who was set to sing. Hope she has another date free to support the undermining of the American educational system.
Due to the threat of lightning in Cadman Plaza, we have postponed tomorrow's Rally for School Equality. Please stay tuned -- we will share information on the new date shortly!
Thanks,
Jeremiah
Jeremiah Kittredge
Executive Director
Families for Excellent Schools
There are protests against the race-baiting ad FES put out.
Why is FES attacking
DeBlasio now? Because the Mayor is actually working to improve these
struggling schools. And FES doesn’t want that. They want public school
funding for their privately run charter schools.
Yesterday, FES CEO Jeremiah
Kittredge went on the record opposing educational equity. FES and its
hedge fund financiers lobbied tirelessly to divert public funding away
from public schools and now they are opposing proven strategies to
improve the schools.
In truth, FES and its hedge
fund financiers have no interest in improving these schools or giving
every student an equal opportunity. What they want to do is attack the
Mayor for politically motivated reasons and they are willing to use
racist ads to do just that.
The head of the school and the school chapter committee shall meet once a month during the school year to consult on matters of school policy and on questions relating to the implementation of this Agreement.” ...... UFT contract Article 19H3
I firmly believe that a key to establishing a voice for the school chapter is related to how the official monthly meetings with the principal are organized by the chapter leader.
MORE has a fabulous chapter leader listserve where CLs from all over the city get answers to questions from other CLs.
Kevin Prosen, a middle school CL and one of the most politically astute young organizers I have met, was elected in the 2012 year cycle and re-elected last spring. I remember how unsure he was when he first took on the job and how quickly he grew into the position. He organized the chapter into a force in the school - a significant feat, given the leeway the principal had over many years. Less than a year after he was elected he was able to get most of the people in his school to sign the middle school petition to help get MORE on the ballot in the 2013 UFT election.
I know about his school for many years -- they had a very difficult principal, who has since retired - I like to think that the work Kevin was doing was a factor. Kevin has done some wonderful work in the chapter, even garnering praise from UFT officials who have seen the outcome of the work he has done. Kevin has been producing materials to help other chapter leaders.
One of the most important duties of the CL is to organize and manage how the chapter relates to the principal. The consultation committee is the key vehicle to accomplish this in its monthly meetings - required in Article 19H in the contract.
When I became CL in 1994, my principal refused to recognize the election or meet with me. It had to be made clear to the staff and people above her that she was refusing to meet with the chapter, not me, by not meeting with the committee. She, who rarely backed down, backed down and over the next 3 years we had a monthly meeting no matter how much she tried to get out of it. And a monthly meeting not just between her and I but an open meeting to which I invited any UFT member to attend as an audience, in addition to a regular committee - and I tried to include reps from all grades, divisions in the school, and the non-teaching personnel - a secretary, para, social worker, etc.
Oh, and I never allowed a meeting to take place in her office - her turf - but in the teacher room or some other classroom. And - I, not she, ran the meeting, as is the right of the CL.
Here is a letter Kevin sent to the consultation committee in his school.
Intro to Consultation Committee
Welcome to consultation! This committee is the voice of the UFT staff on the job.Consultation is a position of leadership within the UFT at the school level, giving voice to the concerns of our members, resolving problems, and helping the membership communicate with the chapter leader.
Consultation members keep up with any issues that arise throughout the year that affect the whole school or a whole department.Members with individual issues can take it up with the chapter leader directly.
The minutes are the written record of the meeting and the principal's response.We take minutes on a rotating basis.The easiest way to do it is to type them in real-time.Forward them to chapter leader when you're done to review.Minutes are posted on the UFT bulletin board, emailed to the staff, and shared with the Principal and the District Rep.
Consultation happens at every level of the DOE.Just like we gather the concerns of our members, look for patterns, and then address them as systemic issues, the same happens between the District Representative and the Superintendent, and the President of the union and the Chancellor.Issues we are unable to resolve at the school level are often referred to District consultation.
Here's some things that will help us be more effective
-Take it seriously. Please make an effort to be at every meeting.If you can't make it, please let me know in advance.Finish the minutes quickly and professionally so we can get them out to the staff.
-Phrase issues as questions when possible.We are trying to get explicit statements of school policy from the principal.
-Bring documentation. The issues we try to address are often complex, and without having it “in writing,” they are much harder to deal with.If member come to you with an issue, please ask them to provide any documentation they may have.
--Bring solutions.It's the people who do the work every day who have the best ideas about how to fix problems that arise.If a member brings a concern, ask them if they have a suggestion for how they would like to see it solved.
-Maintain order. The committee can only be effective if the meetings are respectful and orderly.Please wait to be acknowledged by the chair to speak, and stay relevant to the agenda item at hand.
-Come to the pre-meetings.We will always meet on the Tuesday before our official meeting to determine what issues to raise and what solutions we might want to propose.The pre-meetings are important- they are where our union strategy is created in terms of how we react to issues in the school.
-Leave individual issues out.Consultation is the voice of the entire chapter, not any one person.
FES is resorting to naked racism to promote their September 30 rally attacking de Blasio. People are calling on them to take it down. But then where would they put their half a million bucks? Not in the schools, pray tell. I pray tell they leave that ad up for the public to see.
You know, so many teachers are also attacking de Blasio from the other side for not reversing many of Bloomberg's policies and also attacking the UFT/Unity leadership for not doing enough to pressure him for changes because they want to be a partner (ie, stool at the table.) I keep thinking if we would be better off with the alternative - Eva or someone of that ilk - like Hakeem Jeffries who would savage teaching core and put a charter in every pot. They are going to knock off de Blasio and we will not end up with a more teacher friendly mayor -- but maybe that's better - to have a clear enemy to battle.
I reported on the Success Charter leaked memo on how to force parents into bringing their children to the upcoming Sept. 30 Charter school rally by closing down her schools and leaving them without child care, forcing many of them to take off from work that day: Eva Moskowitz Sept. 30 Rally.
Charters force march parents and students
Eva's version of the Bataan death march.
On the surface it seems as if Eva is winning. But with every outrageous act skepticism grows among the public and press. Imagine of FES has put their millions into supporting, not degrading schools?
Someone emailed me about doing something the day of the rally to protest. My response was that FES and Eva closing schools and holding a naked political rally only helps in the battle of ed deform.
Here are reports on the racist FES ad from Schools Matter and Capital NY:
“The rhetoric of this ad, and the people and money behind it, are part of the problem,” she said.
Luis Garden Acosta, the founder of El Puente Academy for Peace and Justice and the father of a child who attended a charter school, said FES was “race-baiting.”
“‘Race baiting’ like
‘red baiting’, exploiting the values and legitimate concerns of our
city’s communities of color, for whatever political purpose, is
abhorrent and posits a dangerous and expanding wedge in a city all to
segregated by class, color and community,” Mr. Acosta stated, noting
that Roberto Perez, a City Hall staffer, encouraged him to speak out.
“It is abhorrent that a movement that emerged as a demand to tell the
truth is used to obfuscate, divide and attempt to denigrate New York
City’s progressive agenda”.
While Mr. de Blasio
is enlisting surrogates to fight back on his behalf, his office was a
bit less hostile, though it called the ad “crass.” “Our students and our
families need solutions, not another crass political ad. That’s why
Mayor de Blasio and Chancellor Farina are focused on ensuring that every
child, in every classroom, has a future that isn’t limited by their ZIP
code,” said Wiley Norvell, a spokesman for the mayor.
Since failing last
year to halt the expansion of Success Academy Charter Schools, run by
his old political foe Eva Moskowitz, Mr. de Blasio has softened his
rhetoric toward charter schools, even as his liberal allies continue to
seethe. Democratic elected officials aligned with the city and state
teachers’ unions see charters as a thinly-veiled, well-moneyed effort to
erode job protections for teachers.
“These folks have
figured out a way to make profit off the same kids that they disdained
for years and years. As far as I’m concerned, its predatory education,
subprime schools,” Ms. Lewis said. “Eva Moskowitz and none of them
wouldn’t be doing this if it wasn’t making enormous profit. To then turn
around and say, ‘Oh black people, I’m trying to save you from the big
bad white man, the mayor, who wants to put you in a failing
school’–that’s racist.”
A coalition of elected officials, community organizations and
union-allied groups criticized a new Families for Excellent Schools ad
Friday, accusing the pro-charter group of "race-baiting" in order to
advance its political agenda.
The ad, first reported by POLITICO New York,
is called "Tale of Two Boys" and argues that Mayor Bill de Blasio is
forcing minority students into failing schools. It began running Friday,
though it was not publicly promoted by FES.
The ad buy will cost
FES about half a million dollars this week and will become a
multimillion-dollar ad buy over the next few weeks, according to a
source.
The ad contrasted the educations of a young white boy and a
black boy in New York City, saying the white child would attend a good
school and go to college while the black child would be trapped in a
struggling school and never make it to college.
Bertha Lewis, the president of the Black Institute, called it "the most racist ad I've seen in my life."
"They
found a way to make money and profit off little black boys and girls,"
she said. "They act as if they are here to save us."
Zakiyah
Ansari, the advocacy director of the Alliance for Quality Education,
made a similar argument. AQE is partially funded by city and state
teachers' unions.
"They are using a black face to push their
political agenda, and they make the assumption that all black people are
poor," she said. "They used our children in a race-baiting commercial."
Some called on FES to remove the ad on Friday.
Brooklyn
Assemblyman N. Nick Perry called on FES to "do the right thing" and
pull the ad. Perry — who is also the chairman of the New York State
Black, Puerto Rican, Hispanic and Asian Legislative Caucus — said he was
"incensed over the use of blatant race baiting tactics to advance the
agenda of FES."
Other elected officials also took issue with the ad.
Manhattan
Borough President Gale Brewer accused FES in a statement of helping to
"divert money, resources and space from our public schools ... into
increasingly unaccountable private empires. The rhetoric of this ad, and
the people and money behind it, are part of the problem."
New York City Council education committee chair Danny Dromm called the ad "highly divisive and harmful."
Representatives
for three of New York's largest charter networks — KIPP, Uncommon, and
Achievement First — did not respond to requests for comment about the
ad.
A spokesperson for FES declined to comment.
In New York City the United Federation of Teachers has had opposition
caucuses for years, but there is finally a concerted effort to unite all opposing factions
against the Unity Caucus, which has dominated the union’s governance
since the days of Al Shanker. Philadelphia and New York will require
multiple elections to crack, but if they do, you may soon find movement
unionists in charge of most of the largest teacher union locals in the
country. ...... Mike Antonucci - The Coming Teacher Union Crack-Up, EIA, Sept. 21, 2015
It is worth noting when a national commentator on education considers the MORE - New Action recent election alliance a possibly significant factor in the growing social justice national movement in teacher unions even if that commentator is coming from the anti-teacher right.
Despite coming at issues from a libertarian, anti-union position, Mike Antonucci covers issues on internal teacher unions like no other education commentator. I don't agree that his "crack-up" take will come to pass, given that most of the urban caucuses are united in the national organization, UCORE, that has been formed and is committed to working for change within the current union local and national union structures. Detroit is an outlier, but then again Detroit is unique - at this point. Though I don't put it beyond the Randyites to be the ones to leave and form their own union if they are ever threatened with a loss of power.
Mike has taken note of the growing social justice movement in urban teacher unions - as he did in his militants vs. establishmentarians which I commented on in Ed Notes back in June.
Now he goes into the issue in more depth and includes the MORE/New Action election deal as part of his analysis.
Believe it or
not, this was a monumental week in the world of teachers’ unions. There
was no single monumental event, but it’s rare to see such a collection
of incidents in a seven-day span that serve to indicate a clear future
direction. Let’s itemize them, then I will try to explain how I think
they all tie together. * The end of the Seattle teacher strike. * The rumor that NEA might kickstart the process of endorsing Hillary Clinton. * The rank-and-file vote by the Detroit Federation of Teachers and Steve Conn’s response. * The decision of the Caucus of Working Educators to challenge the
leaders of the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers in the next election. * The move by opposition factions within New York City’s United
Federation of Teachers to join forces against the incumbent UFT officers
in the next election.
Mike puts a lot out there to chew on here.
There is a real schism in philosophy within the teachers’ unions these days. I have previously described it as militants vs. establishmentarians, but I think I have a better description now. It is a battle between movement unionists and services unionists.
The former believe people join unions to be part of the organized
labor movement, to lobby, rally, agitate, protest and strike for a
working class agenda. That is why most movement unionists tend to be
heavily involved in many leftist causes. The latter believe people join
unions to improve their pay, benefits and working conditions. Though
heavily involved in advocacy, much of it political in nature, the
relationship of services unionists to their members is in many ways a
commercial one. Fees are paid in exchange for services – contract
negotiation, grievance processing, protection against arbitrary
employment actions, liability insurance, and so forth.
So when it comes to endorsing a candidate for President of the United
States, the movement unionists want, to the greatest extent possible,
ideological purity while the services unionists want the best bet to
win. This is exemplified in the backing of Bernie Sanders, a
self-described socialist, by the movement, and their horror to think
that NEA might summarily endorse the mainstream candidate.
Philadelphia
Mike makes note of the announcement from MORE's allies in Philadephia, WE (The Caucus of Working Educators
), whose tee-shirt I proudly wore at the MORE meeting the other day, that they were running against the establishment Randi/Mulgrew allies who have been running the union - if you can call it that, given the utter destruction of the public school system in Philly. We got to hang with them at the UCORE conference in Newark in August and I get the feeling they think they can win this election. They are a fairly new caucus but have attracted a strong following and support.
The Caucus of Working Educators
will challenge the long-time incumbents of the Philadelphia Federation
of Teachers with a platform focused on “racial inequality in schools,
increased transparency and democracy within the union, professional
development and the fight against standardized testing.” You don’t have to read far on their web site to see the distinctions they draw between themselves and the incumbents.
Seattle
He goes into more depth in some revealing comments on the Seattle strike story - a lesson in how even an establishment union leadership can be moved when an opposition militant wing challenges them even it if doesn't win.
In Seattle, a reported 83 percent of voting union members ratified a
tentative agreement after a week-long strike. The Seattle Education
Association touted the removal of student test scores from teacher
evaluations, 30 minutes of recess, and equity committees in 30 schools
to deal with “disproportionate discipline.” The district received a
longer instructional day and agreement to its pay offer. This was curious, since SEA was demanding much higher pay than it
got, and the amount it accepted was barely higher than the district’s
offer before the strike. "The district was not going to move on any more money,” said the head of SEA’s bargaining team. “I think if we held out any longer, they would’ve started taking stuff off the table.”
Also lost in the uproar over the strike was the fact that the SEA
officers had bargained the evaluation system into the last contract,
even to the point where the Seattle Times reported that it was SEA president Jonathan Knapp’s idea.
What? You mean the very union president of the SEA, following the Randi/Mulgrew model, had to strike against his own support of yet another failed evaluation scheme?
Mike asks:
So what changed? Last year SEA held an election and Knapp barely edged out challenger Jesse Hagopian and his caucus of Social Equality Educators [SEE]. Hagopian is a leftist (to say the minimum)
but in a liberal city he is sufficiently within the mainstream to
become a force within his union. By emphasizing the social justice
aspects of the agreement, Knapp and his supporters undercut Hagopian’s
criticisms, and the lack of a huge pay increase actually helps the
message – “See, it wasn’t just about money.” For his part, Hagopian doesn’t seem all that thrilled with the result.
Ahhhh, Jesse Hagopian of the SEE Caucus, another MORE ally, almost won the election and then had his social justice agenda co-opted by the incumbents. Haven't you seen Unity Caucus try to undercut the MORE agenda by sounding social-justicy?
Detroit
Steve Conn ran for the presidency of the Detroit Federation of
Teachers about a dozen times before he finally won… narrowly. Last week
he took a clear majority in a referendum on his removal from office.
Conn is no one’s idea of a leader of a movement, which is what makes the
vote all the more remarkable. If he can actually form his own union,
the Detroit Federation of Teachers will begin to disintegrate – not
because Conn is so appealing, but because he will take the movement
unionists with him, and the services union isn’t delivering the
services.
Detroit is another kettle of fish altogether. Steve Conn is not allied with UCORE but represents a different version of social justice - BAMN (By Any Means Necessary) which ran against Randi in the past few AFT elections - they do not seem to have many allies among the other SJ groups.
Steve was elected president of the DFT but his slate got on one elected to the Exec Board, which remained in the hands of the incumbent/Randi aligned caucus. The Exec Board decided to fire Steve and ban him from the union. A vote of the membership was held - Steve needed 2/3 to be reinstated. He got a majority - still a repudiation of the Exec Board action.
Steve is now going to get people to sign cards removing themselves from the DFT and forming a counter union, something I've heard people here in NYC suggest be done to counter the Unity total control of the UFT - which I do not support here but can certainly see it may be right for Steve Conn.
Conn-plication. Steve Conn, the former president of
the Detroit Federation of Teachers, appealed his removal by the union’s
executive board and won a majority of the votes cast by the
rank-and-file. Unfortunately for all sides, he needed a two-thirds
majority to overturn the board’s decision. This leaves DFT with officers
unsupported by the majority and an opposition without a path to power.
Conn reportedly will cut this Gordian knot by forming a new union. “We’ll
be circulating cards for people to sign to opt out of DFT and join our
union because teachers don’t have a union,” Conn said. “We need a union.
Teachers will have to opt out of DFT, which is their right.”
The presiding DFT leaders rightly note that it was the union’s
opponents who fought long and hard for that right, which in their
estimation makes Conn a “union buster.”
What can we expect? Mike wryly predicted the usual
Randi/AFT response - send in the locksmiths - invade the DFT and take it
over - or what is left of it. I have no doubt that if MORE were ever to win, we would find ourselves challenged and locked out, as happened in Hawaii: Union Election Lessons -If Unity Lost.
Mike then goes on to tie this entire state of affairs into the upcoming Friedrichs case coming before the Supreme Court which would allow people to stop paying dues. Mike seems to assume this will be a slam-dunk and predicts this can turn into dual and dueling separate unions.
Strangely enough, the Friedrichs case, which could put an
end to agency fees across the United States, might actually accelerate
this trend within the unions. Since teachers and other education
employees in the collective bargaining states will no longer be obliged
to financially support the union-in-charge, so to speak, they can join
the union of their choice, be it movement- or services-oriented.
Activists could get the union they have always wanted, with a
muscular social justice agenda and without the baggage of non-believers,
apathetics, and the immovable within the ranks. Workaday teachers could
get the union they have always wanted, with a single-minded commitment
to the daily lives of its members, and agnostic when it comes to DC
statehood, abortion, gun control and immigration.
The only thing that could keep the two philosophies in one organization is a defeat for the Friedrichs
plaintiffs and a massive education hiring boom that would provide new
membership revenues to heal all wounds. People don’t make drastic moves
when things are going well.
That type of rescue isn’t on the horizon, however. The end is near
for the status quo in the teachers’ unions. What follows will be both
better and worse for the rest of us.
I don't see anything like dual-unionism here in New York, given that MORE is committed to working in the UFT and forcing change from within. And with Unity Caucus controlling both NYSUT and the AFT, we won't see great changes in the AFT for some time - or at least until Randi leaves the helm to Mulgrew, who will have to punch a hell of a lot of people in the face to maintain control.
Leaked Success Academy memo: tell parents rally is not political...Upcoming charter Sept. 30 anti-de Blasio rally is blatant misuse - theft of public funds.
Success administrators are also strongly encouraging parents to attend the rally and march even if it presents hardships for them in terms of arranging for child care or taking time off from their jobs.
Meaning they have to take off from work - and if they don't want to attend the rally they have to arrange alternate child care ...
The majority of Success Academy students — 77 percent — are eligible for free or reduced price lunch, meaning their families live at or below the poverty level.For parents who feel they cannot take time off from work, employees are asked to respond, "parents took off work to stand up and make sure that you have this great school option for your family. What if they hadn't shown up and taken the day off work?"
And they will be "tossed" if they don't attend:
Staffers are also encouraged to suggest that parents with children in Success' elementary school may not have middle or high school options if they do not help further the cause of school equality by attending the rally.... "You don't want to be in a situation where we can't get middle school or high school space for your scholar's school, and you are wondering if you could have done more."
Daniel Dromm, chairman of the City Council's education committee and a teachers union ally, has accused Success of using its students as "pawns" to advance the network's political agenda and the stature of its controversial leader, Eva Moskowitz.
Is Danny Dromm the only politician with any guts?
FES is known to inflate the size of its protests. Organizers said 21,000 people attended a New York City event last October, while police estimated the crowd was about 8,000 to 10,000.
All Success teachers also attend the rallies
This is blatant theft of public funds as teachers are being paid on the public dime to attend a political rally.