Ureña, who took home $154,638 last year, left the DOE in August “before being brought up on any disciplinary charges,” a department spokesman said... NY PostSue Edelman of the Post has a story today - we wrote about this last week- The Farina Follies: OSI Charges Substantiated Against Former Principal Arisleyda Urena, Most Recently Director of School Quality.
Ureña left the DOE in August so maybe Farina did give her a push.
Remember -- that Urena had her lawyer, Timothy Parlatore, threaten the teacher and file charges against a teacher whistle blower whom Urena discontinued and had the teacher arrested.
This is a lesson for certain administrators - the blogging world will come back to bite you - one strategy is to make you name hot on google so when you all look for future advancement - there you are for all the world to see. (We do vet people to make sure whistleblowers are not just nuts - and one way is to talk to other people from the school.)
Note this comment by mouthpiece Thomas Parlatore in the Post piece:
Ureña’s lawyer, Tim Parlatore, said she blames the charges on “harassment” by a former teacher she fired and noted the investigation did not find she “took any money for herself.”
 Now here is what Thomas Parlatore was saying not long ago - 
There has been a lot of banter
concerning the conduct and actions of Arisleyda A. Ureña. Based on her
substantiated OSI memos (shown here and here), people are right to question her decisions as a school
leader and “role model” for teachers, administrators, and the
Dominican-American community. In Sue Edelman’s article, “Principal ‘raffled’
Department of Education’s $12K,” we learn that Ms. Ureña has hired lawyer
Timothy Parlatore to be her “mouth piece” for any sticky situations she gets
herself in, meaning investigations or lawsuits. Mr. Parlatore has said a number
of false statements in the defense of his client and we would like him to get
the record straight.  
| 
Mr. Parlatore claims: | 
What the facts say: | 
| 
A story
  published December 25, 2013 on the NYC
  Rubber Room Reporter and ATR CONNECT online blog (“Rubber Room Blog”),
  entitled “Principal Arisleyda Ureña Leaves The Academy For Language and
  Technology After Conducting Unauthorized Raffles” contains several false
  representations. | 
Since
  the students did not purchase tickets, the event hosted by Ms. Ureña and Mr.
  Viñales cannot be considered a “raffle,” rather, it is a “lottery.”
  Regardless, of the semantics, the “event” was not approved by the DOE.  
You
  can also view a video of these “lotteries,” which the students call “raffles”
  here: http://vimeo.com/34768875  | 
| 
The
  following statement is false: She
  had improperly purchased these items using her P-card in an inappropriate
  fashion. See the attached Excel printout (obtained as a result of a Freedom
  of Information Law request) of the purchases on her Pcard statements. | 
According
  to the OSI investigation, Ms. Ureña was unable to account for over $11,700
  P-card purchases from Apple; $918 from Modell’s; $379 from Frank’s Sport
  Shop; and $4428 from CDW Government, LLC. 
Noli
  Hourahan, a director from the Division of Financial Operations, stated that
  items paid for by a P-Card must have an “educational” purpose. The amount of
  money for student incentives cannot exceed $100 per year. Any event that
  would have students win prizes based on chance rather than merit does not
  fall under a school incentive program. Thus purchases paid for by Ureña’s
  P-Card for the lotteries would constitute a misuse of a P-Card. | 
| 
The following statement is false: Ms. Ureña has been removed from
  her position as Founding 
Principal but only time will tell whether she will
  be transferred to a different position within the Department of Education or
  undergo Educational Law 3020a charges for ‘conduct unbecoming. | 
As
  stated in the NY Post article, according to the DOE, OSI referred the case to
  the Administrative Trials Unit (ATU). Prior to being charged and possibly
  undergoing a 3020a hearing, Ms. Ureña resigned from the DOE. | 
| 
The following statement is false: Founding Principal Arisleyda Ureña
  has been involved in very questionable ethics, financial, contractual, and
  educational violations during her seven years as principal at the Academy for
  Language and Technology (ALT) in the Bronx. | 
Please see
  the above mentioned OSI reports and the following article from DTOE. “When
  asked, Ms. Ureña acknowledged that she had used her P-Card to purchase sports
  equipment she distributed as PRIZES [our emphasis] . . . She could not
  explain why she decided to distribute [the iPods and miniature laptops]
  piecemeal, years after she obtained them, rather than distributing them
  equally upon receipt.” | 
| 
Pursuant to your campaign, you have, and continue, to file Freedom of
  Information Requests (“FOIL Requests”) under the false premise that it is an
  effort to discover information to support your outlandish allegations that
  Ms. Ureña ever committed wrongdoing. Your attempts to extrapolate wrongdoing
  from these FOIL request are frivolous and serve no purpose other than to
  harass my client and others. | 
Are
  you kidding us? Once again, please see the Edelman article referenced above
  and the substantiated OSI memo. 
“Due
  to the fact that Ms. Ureña failed to maintain itemized receipts and records
  as mandated by DFO SOP, this investigator was unable to account for over
  $11,000 in purchases. Regardless of funds used, Ms. Ureña acknowledged using
  school funds to purchase items that were intended to be used for educational
  purposes. It is clear that she did not use these items for any educational
  purpose . . . they items were given as gifts, creating a condition in which
  other students at X365 were denied access to the same technological
  resources.” | 
| 
We have also been informed of your aggressive attempts to contact the
  media … in an effort to further disseminate such false and disparaging
  statements. On February 16, 2014, the NY Post article entitled Bronx
  Principal Probed Over iPad Raffles was published that contained falsehoods
  made by yourself about Ms. Ureña. | 
See above
  please. Not to mention, 5 students were interviewed and gave testimony of
  some of the items purchased, who won prizes, and when they took place. | 
| 
Ms. Ureña is a respected professional and has spent years serving the
  community where she has successfully built a positive reputation. She is well
  liked by many and maintains a positive influence in the teacher’s community.
  Your actions have not only offended Ms. Ureña, but offend an entire community
  of teachers who are fully aware that your defamatory allegations are
  baseless, devoid of truth. | 
Let’s look at some data!
  In 2013,  
·     
  24% of all teachers disagreed
  with the following statement on the Learning Environment Survey: “I have sufficient materials, equipment, and assistive
  technology in good condition to teach my class(es).” 
·     
  36% of all teachers disagreed
  with the following statement on the Learning Environment Survey: “The
  principal at my school encourages open communication on important school
  issues.” 
·     
  40% of all teachers responded with “to a lesser extent” or “to no extent” to this statement: “To
  What Extent do you feel supported by the principal at your school.” 
·     
  32% of all teachers disagreed
  with the following statement on the Learning Environment Survey: “I trust the
  principal at her word.” 
·     
  24% of all teachers do
  not feel that teachers trust each other. 
·     
  44% of all teachers do
  not feel respected by the principal. 
·     
  46% of all teachers disagree
  with the statement, “School leaders recognize teachers for their
  accomplishments.” | 
| 
Ureña
  blames the charges on “harassment” by a former teacher she fired and noted
  the investigation did not find she “took any money for herself.” | 
This “former teacher” had their record cleared of
  a termination, discontinuance, and U-rating at a settlement hearing with the
  NYC Department of Education in September 2014. This individual also had the
  “problem codes” which Ureña personally placed there as a result of several
  false investigations over the years expunged as well. Oh, and by the way, the
  ADA declined to prosecute the teacher for “harassment;” the ADA claimed that
  no evidence existed that harassment occurred.  
Do you two need a copy of the settlement to make
  sure neither of you break any of the stipulations? 
We think it’s nice that Ms. Ureña never “took any
  money for herself,” but can this be proven considering her track record? | 
 
 














