Thanks to Dave
Sunday, February 18, 2007
Saturday, February 17, 2007
When a Rose is Not a Rose
I've put up articles posted by Leonie Haimson related to Joel Rose's scams, Edison and Christopher Cerf on the Norm's Notes archive blog. Note how the NY Times has the least consequential article buried in the Metro briefing. Is there any institution in this city that has its nose buried more up Bloomberg's butt than the NY Times? Next they'll be printing articles about how Bloomberg's enemies have weapons of mass destruction. Oh! They've been there, done that already. Where's Judith Miller when they need her?
Coming soon:
My account of the Manhattan Institute luncheon at the University Club (which didn't admit women until 1987) featuring Christopher Cerf and the corporate ed-speak nonsense he spouts. Just about any NYC teacher can challenge this guy to a debate and whip his ass. I am issuing an official Education Notes challenge to the Manhattan Institute to set up a true dialogue with Cerf or anyone else they choose to debate key educational policy issues someone like Leonie Haimson, myself or any number of capable people I can think of to defend public education.
Hey guys, no guts, no glory.
Cerf preparing for the debate. His ideas are even fuzzier than he is.
Note to Unity clones:
Don't even suggest Randi Weingarten to defend our side. I've seen her on panels with these characters and all I can say is - weak weak weak!
But just watch the Manhattan Institute take up the challenge and chose Weingarten to debate Cerf. They know an easy mark when they see one.
Coming soon:
My account of the Manhattan Institute luncheon at the University Club (which didn't admit women until 1987) featuring Christopher Cerf and the corporate ed-speak nonsense he spouts. Just about any NYC teacher can challenge this guy to a debate and whip his ass. I am issuing an official Education Notes challenge to the Manhattan Institute to set up a true dialogue with Cerf or anyone else they choose to debate key educational policy issues someone like Leonie Haimson, myself or any number of capable people I can think of to defend public education.
Hey guys, no guts, no glory.
Cerf preparing for the debate. His ideas are even fuzzier than he is.
Note to Unity clones:
Don't even suggest Randi Weingarten to defend our side. I've seen her on panels with these characters and all I can say is - weak weak weak!
But just watch the Manhattan Institute take up the challenge and chose Weingarten to debate Cerf. They know an easy mark when they see one.
Friday, February 16, 2007
Teachers Battle To Keep Tilden Open - The Chief
Yesterday at a Manhattan Institute luncheon featuring Christopher Cerf, he said throwing money at educational problems should not be looked at as the only solution. I got to ask him a question as to why the DOE NEVER throws money at a school. "Why not throw lots of money at Tilden with a lot more teachers, guidance counselors, social workers, etc. instead of closing it," I asked?
He had no response. Naturally.
See the full Chief article at my archive blog, Norm's Notes
He had no response. Naturally.
See the full Chief article at my archive blog, Norm's Notes
Thursday, February 15, 2007
LA Lessons for Teacher Union Dissidents?
The excerpts below are from an article in the LA Times about the dissident movement that took over the LA teachers union in the Feb. 2005 elections. The United Action slate did not have to face a massive machine-like Unity but still, their election was a surprise. Union rules were apparently democratic enough so that they could challenge for control of the Exec. Bd.
Unity makes sure that they can control the board through at-large voting where the entire union votes including retirees for Ex bd at large (43), functional chapter (14) plus the 11 officers that are members of the Exec. Bd. That's 68 out of 89 leaving the opposition only a chance to win the elem (11) ms (5) and hs (6) EB positions. A very long shot to win all of these though New Action won the MS & HS in the early 90's. If the day comes that these 22 positions are won by the opposition, meaning serious outreach to elementary schools, it would be a sign of significant change in that these 22 positions represent the 80,000 active teachers. But it shows you how even if the opposition won the overwhelming support of the majority of teachers, they would only control 1/4 of the Executive Board.
Unity democracy inaction.
One of the interesting points about the featured activists is that one or both of them have political ties to some people in our local TJC and one of them was once in a teamsters group in California called Teamsters for a Just Contract.
Another is the dicotomy in activist groups over the strict trade union (attention only to meat and potato issues) vs. the social justice questions. We have had that debate in ICE and things flared at one point on the blogs with UTP over the emphasis on some of these issues. The debate is ongoing, one of the best things about being involved in democratic groups, as opposed to being in Unity where your lips are sealed. And all too often, your mind.
The full article is posted on my other blog, Norm's Notes
A radical change for two union militants
The former dissidents, now powerful insiders, shaped the tough tactics that got L.A. teachers more than just a raise.
the deal's details — particularly its mandate for class size reduction and new job protections for union activists — reflect the long-standing emphasis by Pechthalt, Jordan and their allies on broadening UTLA's advocacy beyond salary and benefits.
UTLA's more aggressive stance is personified by A.J. Duffy, the dapper, occasionally bombastic union president who communicates with the membership and tussles with the press. But according to people both inside and outside UTLA, the strategy has been shaped by the little-known Jordan and Pechthalt, self-described "union militants" who now hold key leadership posts.
Jordan, a top staffer, and Pechthalt, a vice president, have long ties to activist politics and to Villaraigosa, a former UTLA staffer who once represented Pechthalt in a grievance against the Los Angeles Unified School District. Along with Duffy and two other allies, Pechthalt and Jordan were unexpectedly swept into power in elections two years ago by a membership frustrated at stalled contract talks.
Their dissident status had been cemented over two decades. They staged demonstrations without the approval of union leadership. They supported bilingual education when California voters didn't, opposed standardized testing as it became popular and questioned whether homework was necessary. They published a newsletter criticizing the labor movement and their own union, particularly its focus on electing school board members to secure power and good contracts.
Instead, they said, UTLA should reinvent itself as the base for a social movement that would engage in aggressive organizing of parents and communities, confront even friendly politicians and use militant tactics rarely employed by staid public employee unions.
"UTLA has never realized its full potential, which is to organize at schools, with teachers, parents and the community," Pechthalt said. "We need to create a broader movement for public education."
But this approach has caused alarm among some in the union and in political circles. Rank-and-file teachers and even other UTLA officers suggest that in their zeal to change the organization, the new union leaders have neglected some of the nuts and bolts of unionism.
"UTLA is a labor union and has the structure and mechanisms and funding and politics of a labor union," said Warren Fletcher, a union chairman at City of Angels School downtown, who has been both ally and critic of Pechthalt and Jordan. "I'm concerned that we're approaching things from the perspective of some sort of grand movement."
We both developed the same sort of emphasis, a first principle that the activity and organizing of the membership of a union, rather than the leadership, is the key to power," Brenner said.
"Joel and I developed a critique of the narrow trade union perspective," Pechthalt said. "With the tightening of the economic pie, the only way to challenge that was to build a broad-based social movement for public education."
During UTLA's last strike, a nine-day walkout in 1989, Pechthalt and Jordan organized a rally in Exposition Park with Villaraigosa's help. In 1992, Pechthalt led a one-hour wildcat strike at Manual Arts High School, which included 30 teachers and 1,500 students, to protest cuts. The district tried to discipline Pechthalt; Villaraigosa guided his successful grievance.
About the same time, Pechthalt and Jordan began publishing A Second Opinion, a newsletter that frequently criticized UTLA. Among their contributors were other dissidents, including Julie Washington, now a vice president, and David Goldberg, now union treasurer.
"We need to once more begin transforming the image of teachers as friendly Caspar Milquetoast do-gooders into a unified, mobilized and proud bunch of unionists," Pechthalt and Jordan wrote in August 2004.
By then, Jordan was running a campaign to take over the board of directors and three officer positions with a slate of dissidents called United Action. The slate did not field a presidential candidate, and did not think Duffy, the only challenger to incumbent John Perez, stood a chance.
Though campaigning for the union presidency on his own, Duffy found he agreed with Pechthalt and Jordan on the need for militancy; United Action endorsed Duffy, and vice versa.
Their timing was good. In February 2005, the frustrated membership elected the entire slate, including Duffy.
Unity makes sure that they can control the board through at-large voting where the entire union votes including retirees for Ex bd at large (43), functional chapter (14) plus the 11 officers that are members of the Exec. Bd. That's 68 out of 89 leaving the opposition only a chance to win the elem (11) ms (5) and hs (6) EB positions. A very long shot to win all of these though New Action won the MS & HS in the early 90's. If the day comes that these 22 positions are won by the opposition, meaning serious outreach to elementary schools, it would be a sign of significant change in that these 22 positions represent the 80,000 active teachers. But it shows you how even if the opposition won the overwhelming support of the majority of teachers, they would only control 1/4 of the Executive Board.
Unity democracy inaction.
One of the interesting points about the featured activists is that one or both of them have political ties to some people in our local TJC and one of them was once in a teamsters group in California called Teamsters for a Just Contract.
Another is the dicotomy in activist groups over the strict trade union (attention only to meat and potato issues) vs. the social justice questions. We have had that debate in ICE and things flared at one point on the blogs with UTP over the emphasis on some of these issues. The debate is ongoing, one of the best things about being involved in democratic groups, as opposed to being in Unity where your lips are sealed. And all too often, your mind.
The full article is posted on my other blog, Norm's Notes
A radical change for two union militants
The former dissidents, now powerful insiders, shaped the tough tactics that got L.A. teachers more than just a raise.
the deal's details — particularly its mandate for class size reduction and new job protections for union activists — reflect the long-standing emphasis by Pechthalt, Jordan and their allies on broadening UTLA's advocacy beyond salary and benefits.
UTLA's more aggressive stance is personified by A.J. Duffy, the dapper, occasionally bombastic union president who communicates with the membership and tussles with the press. But according to people both inside and outside UTLA, the strategy has been shaped by the little-known Jordan and Pechthalt, self-described "union militants" who now hold key leadership posts.
Jordan, a top staffer, and Pechthalt, a vice president, have long ties to activist politics and to Villaraigosa, a former UTLA staffer who once represented Pechthalt in a grievance against the Los Angeles Unified School District. Along with Duffy and two other allies, Pechthalt and Jordan were unexpectedly swept into power in elections two years ago by a membership frustrated at stalled contract talks.
Their dissident status had been cemented over two decades. They staged demonstrations without the approval of union leadership. They supported bilingual education when California voters didn't, opposed standardized testing as it became popular and questioned whether homework was necessary. They published a newsletter criticizing the labor movement and their own union, particularly its focus on electing school board members to secure power and good contracts.
Instead, they said, UTLA should reinvent itself as the base for a social movement that would engage in aggressive organizing of parents and communities, confront even friendly politicians and use militant tactics rarely employed by staid public employee unions.
"UTLA has never realized its full potential, which is to organize at schools, with teachers, parents and the community," Pechthalt said. "We need to create a broader movement for public education."
But this approach has caused alarm among some in the union and in political circles. Rank-and-file teachers and even other UTLA officers suggest that in their zeal to change the organization, the new union leaders have neglected some of the nuts and bolts of unionism.
"UTLA is a labor union and has the structure and mechanisms and funding and politics of a labor union," said Warren Fletcher, a union chairman at City of Angels School downtown, who has been both ally and critic of Pechthalt and Jordan. "I'm concerned that we're approaching things from the perspective of some sort of grand movement."
We both developed the same sort of emphasis, a first principle that the activity and organizing of the membership of a union, rather than the leadership, is the key to power," Brenner said.
"Joel and I developed a critique of the narrow trade union perspective," Pechthalt said. "With the tightening of the economic pie, the only way to challenge that was to build a broad-based social movement for public education."
During UTLA's last strike, a nine-day walkout in 1989, Pechthalt and Jordan organized a rally in Exposition Park with Villaraigosa's help. In 1992, Pechthalt led a one-hour wildcat strike at Manual Arts High School, which included 30 teachers and 1,500 students, to protest cuts. The district tried to discipline Pechthalt; Villaraigosa guided his successful grievance.
About the same time, Pechthalt and Jordan began publishing A Second Opinion, a newsletter that frequently criticized UTLA. Among their contributors were other dissidents, including Julie Washington, now a vice president, and David Goldberg, now union treasurer.
"We need to once more begin transforming the image of teachers as friendly Caspar Milquetoast do-gooders into a unified, mobilized and proud bunch of unionists," Pechthalt and Jordan wrote in August 2004.
By then, Jordan was running a campaign to take over the board of directors and three officer positions with a slate of dissidents called United Action. The slate did not field a presidential candidate, and did not think Duffy, the only challenger to incumbent John Perez, stood a chance.
Though campaigning for the union presidency on his own, Duffy found he agreed with Pechthalt and Jordan on the need for militancy; United Action endorsed Duffy, and vice versa.
Their timing was good. In February 2005, the frustrated membership elected the entire slate, including Duffy.
SOS Tilden Rally - Feb. 6, 2007
Pictures from the rally.
See commentary posted on this blog below in "Deconstructing the System, School by School"
Check out http://www.allout4tilden.com/
John Lawhead on the right presents reasons Tilden should remain open.
School psychologist Kimberly Partington
Principal Diane Varano
See commentary posted on this blog below in "Deconstructing the System, School by School"
Check out http://www.allout4tilden.com/
John Lawhead on the right presents reasons Tilden should remain open.
School psychologist Kimberly Partington
Principal Diane Varano
Wednesday, February 14, 2007
UFT Election Notes - Feb. 14, 2007
Happy Valentines Day to all!
UFT election petitions were turned in this past Monday. Getting this organized is quite a task and thanks to Ira Goldfine, it all got done for ICE. Having TJC as a partner made the process so much easier. ICE and TJC have their own style of working and we haven't wasted a lot of time trying to coordinate the activities of both groups but have been able to easily work things out when we have to.
Getting involved in an election is not a simple thing and involves a major outlay of resources that small groups consisting of mostly working teachers don't always have to give. Many ICE'ers are very active in their schools as chapter leaders with a large membership to serve and others like John Lawhead at Tilden and Peter Bobrick at Lafayette are trying to keep their schools open. Some are active in groups like "UFT'ers to Stop the War." There was a certain reluctance, but once the petitions were out in January, the old election blood began to run. There was really no choice. Leave TJC out there to battle the New Action/Unity alliance alone?
Compared to the last election 3 years ago when ICE was just weeks old trying to form a group in the midst of an election campaign, getting people to run for key positions this time was a breeze. There is something to say for going through a previous experience to learn a few lessons. Having TJC come up with half the candidates made a big difference and coalition building was one of the lessons everyone learned last time. There's still a lot more to learn.
The petitioning process can be tedious but it also gives people an opportunity to engage in conversations with people in the schools. Core ICE'ers went out to their schools and as expected came through. But this time we sent out petitions to people who are not directly involved with ICE, many of them part of the Ed Notes network. The response was fantastic.
When we needed to hold mass signings, people in the schools responded. In some schools there were lots of people willing to give up their lunch hours to sign masses of petitions. Similar events took place at Port Richmond HS, home base of our friends from the UTP, Jamaica HS and PS 193K, where the incredibly popular chapter leader Yelena Siwinski, running on the ICE-TJC ticket for one of the top eleven officer positions, organized things. Seeing how colleagues in her school feel about her was affirmation that with people like Yelena on our side, whatever the outcome, we are making progress in building a progressive alternative to Unity.
Teachers from Francis Lewis HS hold a signing party.
I joined Arthur Goldstein, ICE-TJC candidate for Executive At-Large, at Francis Lewis HS and the response of people I met in the school to the campaign was wonderful. Their obvious respect and admiration for Arthur makes us proud to have him running with us.
With James Eterno as the popular chapter leader at Jamaica HS, there is no doubt as to the allegiance of the school. The announcement that they will be an Impact School seriously jeopardizes their future, but with James at the helm, the teachers there will have the very best representation they can get.
What can you say about the UTP gang at Port Richmond? They have been a breath of fresh air with their in your face attitude. Joe Mudgett who works with the UTP over there and also has his own point of view at ACT was a great help in getting things organized along with chapter leader Jeff Brace. We are proud to have both of them running for Ex. Bd at-large on the ICE-TJC ticket.
Petitions kept coming in and we went far over our limit. One school gave us 35 signatures and specifically asked us "Will you protect us from retaliation by the union?" It shows the fear there is out there as Unity has allowed the DOE to run rampant and people are frightened of both the DOE and Unity. Does Unity check the petitions to see which schools have helped us to see where opposition strength lies, then target them for special attention with extra visits from District Reps and other union officials to reinforce the Unity line? What do you think? We didn't turn in some petitions from certain schools that support us but want to lie in the weeds.
Not that more attention from the union is a bad thing. Remember — they are basically a PR machine that will dash off to fight what they perceive as a fire and schools that work with us often get better service. But people new to the political game do not know that. Weingarten takes disagreement with her as a personal insult but her response is to try to win people over rather than retaliate. Not necessarily a bad thing and it is what makes her so effective in managing the membership's anger. (Her skill will be hard to replace if she goes to the AFT in the summer of '08. Even if she doesn't give up the UFT Presidency, which is what I believe, she will not be here that often to race around from school to school.)
A perfect example was Ron Isaac, alias Redhog, who ran with ICE 3 years ago because he was so disenchanted with the union and got us most of the signatures for middle school. Soon after the election, he went over to the dark side (or maybe that was his plan all along) and was welcomed with open arms after he became a shill for the 2005 contract and began to worship Weingarten. He ended up with a job with the NY Teacher as Weingarten's personal reporter when she visits schools.
Was Isaac's defection a gain for Unity? Why am I smiling?
To be continued.
Ron Isaac stalking -- er-- covering Weingarten at the SOS Tilden rally on Feb. 6
UFT election petitions were turned in this past Monday. Getting this organized is quite a task and thanks to Ira Goldfine, it all got done for ICE. Having TJC as a partner made the process so much easier. ICE and TJC have their own style of working and we haven't wasted a lot of time trying to coordinate the activities of both groups but have been able to easily work things out when we have to.
Getting involved in an election is not a simple thing and involves a major outlay of resources that small groups consisting of mostly working teachers don't always have to give. Many ICE'ers are very active in their schools as chapter leaders with a large membership to serve and others like John Lawhead at Tilden and Peter Bobrick at Lafayette are trying to keep their schools open. Some are active in groups like "UFT'ers to Stop the War." There was a certain reluctance, but once the petitions were out in January, the old election blood began to run. There was really no choice. Leave TJC out there to battle the New Action/Unity alliance alone?
Compared to the last election 3 years ago when ICE was just weeks old trying to form a group in the midst of an election campaign, getting people to run for key positions this time was a breeze. There is something to say for going through a previous experience to learn a few lessons. Having TJC come up with half the candidates made a big difference and coalition building was one of the lessons everyone learned last time. There's still a lot more to learn.
The petitioning process can be tedious but it also gives people an opportunity to engage in conversations with people in the schools. Core ICE'ers went out to their schools and as expected came through. But this time we sent out petitions to people who are not directly involved with ICE, many of them part of the Ed Notes network. The response was fantastic.
When we needed to hold mass signings, people in the schools responded. In some schools there were lots of people willing to give up their lunch hours to sign masses of petitions. Similar events took place at Port Richmond HS, home base of our friends from the UTP, Jamaica HS and PS 193K, where the incredibly popular chapter leader Yelena Siwinski, running on the ICE-TJC ticket for one of the top eleven officer positions, organized things. Seeing how colleagues in her school feel about her was affirmation that with people like Yelena on our side, whatever the outcome, we are making progress in building a progressive alternative to Unity.
Teachers from Francis Lewis HS hold a signing party.
I joined Arthur Goldstein, ICE-TJC candidate for Executive At-Large, at Francis Lewis HS and the response of people I met in the school to the campaign was wonderful. Their obvious respect and admiration for Arthur makes us proud to have him running with us.
With James Eterno as the popular chapter leader at Jamaica HS, there is no doubt as to the allegiance of the school. The announcement that they will be an Impact School seriously jeopardizes their future, but with James at the helm, the teachers there will have the very best representation they can get.
What can you say about the UTP gang at Port Richmond? They have been a breath of fresh air with their in your face attitude. Joe Mudgett who works with the UTP over there and also has his own point of view at ACT was a great help in getting things organized along with chapter leader Jeff Brace. We are proud to have both of them running for Ex. Bd at-large on the ICE-TJC ticket.
Petitions kept coming in and we went far over our limit. One school gave us 35 signatures and specifically asked us "Will you protect us from retaliation by the union?" It shows the fear there is out there as Unity has allowed the DOE to run rampant and people are frightened of both the DOE and Unity. Does Unity check the petitions to see which schools have helped us to see where opposition strength lies, then target them for special attention with extra visits from District Reps and other union officials to reinforce the Unity line? What do you think? We didn't turn in some petitions from certain schools that support us but want to lie in the weeds.
Not that more attention from the union is a bad thing. Remember — they are basically a PR machine that will dash off to fight what they perceive as a fire and schools that work with us often get better service. But people new to the political game do not know that. Weingarten takes disagreement with her as a personal insult but her response is to try to win people over rather than retaliate. Not necessarily a bad thing and it is what makes her so effective in managing the membership's anger. (Her skill will be hard to replace if she goes to the AFT in the summer of '08. Even if she doesn't give up the UFT Presidency, which is what I believe, she will not be here that often to race around from school to school.)
A perfect example was Ron Isaac, alias Redhog, who ran with ICE 3 years ago because he was so disenchanted with the union and got us most of the signatures for middle school. Soon after the election, he went over to the dark side (or maybe that was his plan all along) and was welcomed with open arms after he became a shill for the 2005 contract and began to worship Weingarten. He ended up with a job with the NY Teacher as Weingarten's personal reporter when she visits schools.
Was Isaac's defection a gain for Unity? Why am I smiling?
To be continued.
Ron Isaac stalking -- er-- covering Weingarten at the SOS Tilden rally on Feb. 6
Another ICE'er in the Times
One of the best things about being associated with ICE have been the phenomenal people I've had the chance to work with. It is no accident that so many ICE'ers have appeared in the news over the years based on engaging in activities in their schools related to improving the educational environment for their colleagues and their students.
Jeff Kaufman was punished for assisting an incarcerated student at Riker Island with getting his college credits. Maria Colon for exposing changes in Regent scores by the administration of Kennedy HS. Today, James Eterno is quoted in the Metro section of the Times condemning Jamaica High School's being named an Impact School by the DOE. Another Surge by the DOE.
John Lawhead also appeared in Sam Freedman's column in today's Times. Unfortunately, little of what I am sure John told Freedman about the closing of large schools appeared in the article. (As I've written before, hanging out with John after I met him through Ed. Notes, made the idea of getting a group of similar people together. ICE was the result.)
While Freedman makes some very valid points, the article leaves out so much. John (who has had the most impact on the positions we in ICE have taken on the large school controversy) has been on the small schools/large schools issue for many years, having experienced the closing of Bushwich HS and now Tilden. He wrote an article on the issue for Education Notes as far back as 2002.
The quote used below -- the only one from John in the article --
“Education involves trade-offs; it always does,” said John Lawhead, who has taught English as a Second Language at Tilden for three years. “But those trade-offs, in breaking up the big high schools, should be discussed publicly so you know what’s being lost as well as what’s being gained.”
leaves out all the great stuff John has to say about these tradeoffs. John as part of SOS Tilden is trying to save the school and there is not a hint of that signficant movement in the article. With so many immigrant students who will now have to float around as nomads there will be a massive impact the closing of these schools will have on whatever large schools are left in the area, the DOE version of the domino theory.
Basically, the article endoses the small school policy but is crtical of the way they are going about it. If the DOE hadn't put Roholff in as principal of lafayette and supported her through gaffe after gaffe, the school might have been changed.
Why can't there be a system where Steve Chung could have set up a program within the structure of Lafayette? The DOE (and unfortunately the UFT which basically endorsed the closing of the school and is miffed that the DOE which was supposdly working with them to set up the small schools, reneged) has control of these schools but gets away with saying "we can't fix what we control and the only way to fix it is to destroy it."
The answer is the DOE feels they have to empty out the teaching staff and the students and start all over. It's like old construction where you have to work around things vs tearing it down. It is difficult but doable. (It wan't fun when I had a new kitchen installed but I didn't tear down my house and new people move in.) The DOE doesn't want to do the hard stuff -- only things they can show as PR.
I was in Clinton HS recently - vastly overcrowded and supposedly they are doing small learning communities there now. These are unadvertized options. Small can be good but it can be done in the context of large. I don't see them breaking up Stuvesant and I bet these kids would also benefit from smaller environements.
Some stuff on John on this blog which also includes information from George Schmidt on the Chicago experience with mayoral control and small schools - useful stuff in seeing the big picture -- it's not just BloomKlein but a national movement.
NYC Educator, as usual, hits the nail on the head: Mr. Bloomberg Vs. the Aliens
Leonie Haimson also makes some great points on the article in a much more coherent manner than I do. I am posting them on the blog I set up to archive some of the work being done on her listserv.
Why use such a large picture when so little of what John has to say is part of the article. John comes out looking great but I would have used part of the space to use more of what he had to say. Style over substance.
Tilden has John's back in this photo
Jeff Kaufman was punished for assisting an incarcerated student at Riker Island with getting his college credits. Maria Colon for exposing changes in Regent scores by the administration of Kennedy HS. Today, James Eterno is quoted in the Metro section of the Times condemning Jamaica High School's being named an Impact School by the DOE. Another Surge by the DOE.
John Lawhead also appeared in Sam Freedman's column in today's Times. Unfortunately, little of what I am sure John told Freedman about the closing of large schools appeared in the article. (As I've written before, hanging out with John after I met him through Ed. Notes, made the idea of getting a group of similar people together. ICE was the result.)
While Freedman makes some very valid points, the article leaves out so much. John (who has had the most impact on the positions we in ICE have taken on the large school controversy) has been on the small schools/large schools issue for many years, having experienced the closing of Bushwich HS and now Tilden. He wrote an article on the issue for Education Notes as far back as 2002.
The quote used below -- the only one from John in the article --
“Education involves trade-offs; it always does,” said John Lawhead, who has taught English as a Second Language at Tilden for three years. “But those trade-offs, in breaking up the big high schools, should be discussed publicly so you know what’s being lost as well as what’s being gained.”
leaves out all the great stuff John has to say about these tradeoffs. John as part of SOS Tilden is trying to save the school and there is not a hint of that signficant movement in the article. With so many immigrant students who will now have to float around as nomads there will be a massive impact the closing of these schools will have on whatever large schools are left in the area, the DOE version of the domino theory.
Basically, the article endoses the small school policy but is crtical of the way they are going about it. If the DOE hadn't put Roholff in as principal of lafayette and supported her through gaffe after gaffe, the school might have been changed.
Why can't there be a system where Steve Chung could have set up a program within the structure of Lafayette? The DOE (and unfortunately the UFT which basically endorsed the closing of the school and is miffed that the DOE which was supposdly working with them to set up the small schools, reneged) has control of these schools but gets away with saying "we can't fix what we control and the only way to fix it is to destroy it."
The answer is the DOE feels they have to empty out the teaching staff and the students and start all over. It's like old construction where you have to work around things vs tearing it down. It is difficult but doable. (It wan't fun when I had a new kitchen installed but I didn't tear down my house and new people move in.) The DOE doesn't want to do the hard stuff -- only things they can show as PR.
I was in Clinton HS recently - vastly overcrowded and supposedly they are doing small learning communities there now. These are unadvertized options. Small can be good but it can be done in the context of large. I don't see them breaking up Stuvesant and I bet these kids would also benefit from smaller environements.
Some stuff on John on this blog which also includes information from George Schmidt on the Chicago experience with mayoral control and small schools - useful stuff in seeing the big picture -- it's not just BloomKlein but a national movement.
NYC Educator, as usual, hits the nail on the head: Mr. Bloomberg Vs. the Aliens
Leonie Haimson also makes some great points on the article in a much more coherent manner than I do. I am posting them on the blog I set up to archive some of the work being done on her listserv.
Why use such a large picture when so little of what John has to say is part of the article. John comes out looking great but I would have used part of the space to use more of what he had to say. Style over substance.
Tilden has John's back in this photo
Tuesday, February 13, 2007
Sunday, February 11, 2007
Why We Need Independent Voices on the UFT Executive Board
Unity Caucus is not satisfied with holding over 90% of the seats on the Executive Board.
High School teachers will get to decide whether they want to maintain the only 6 independent voices out of 89 on the UFT Executive Board by voting the ICE-TJC slate when the ballots go out on March 9th.
High school teachers who vote the ICE-TJC slate will be casting their votes for:
James Eterno, CL Jamaica HS, Exec. Bd. member for 10 years
Jeff Kaufman, CL Island Academy, Exec. Bd. member for the pst 3 years
Sam Lazarus, CL Bryant HS
Nick Licari, CL Norman Thomas HS
Marian Swerdlow, Delegate, FDR HS
Peter Lamphere, Bronx High School of Science
Unity Caucus is not satisfied with the control of 93% of the Executive Board. So they have enlisted their partners New Action to run for the 6 seats ICE-TJC presently control. The Unity/New Action candidates will be on the ballot on both the Unity and New Action lines. Their combined vote total will be tough for the ICE-TJC slate to top.
ICE-TJC needs all high school teachers to rally behind the ICE-TJC slate and stop this naked attempt to remove independent voices from the Executive Board.
VOTE ICE-TJC
WANTED: NYC DEPT of EDUCATION
Posted on nyceducationnews listserve.
Also check out: Jim Horn's
Bloomberg's Corrupt Headmaster of School Privatization
Saturday, February 10, 2007
Class Size in California
I've posted a great post responding to critics of the class size reduction in California by Leonie Haimson on her listserve on another blog I set up called NormsNotes.
It's really worth checking out.
It's really worth checking out.
Friday, February 9, 2007
Unity Hack of the Week: Frank Desantis
Unity Caucus Chapter Leader at McKee HS in Staten Island:
For denying access to UFT mailboxes by ICE reps. They'll be baaaaack.
Cerf and Klein, Time to Resign
See today's Times article on the outrageous lies and misinformation by Cerf and Klein (sounds like a vaudeville act.) Even the picture they used of Klein is awful, a sign the press is turning on them.
"Hey Klein, It's Time to Resign" was the title of a column I wrote a few years ago. His time is coming.
See my post on Cerf's nap at Klein's press conference a few weeks ago when he announced the reorganization.
In a photo I took at the press conference, it appears as if Christopher Cerf, one of Klein’s newest appointees, might have been napping, or as the caption says on my blog, “Christopher Cerf dreams of ways to turn the NYC school system into a subsidiary of Edison.” Cerf was the CEO of Edison Schools, a fading for-profit corporation that looks to milk money out of public schools. Hey! The stock tanked and Cerf needed a job. Where else but in BloomKleindom?
Edison was once in the forefront of the ideological struggles as the right wing attempt to dismantle public education. Under Cerf’s leadership, Edison once made a run at NYC schools but was beaten back by the UFT and parent groups. Now they have the chief Edison wolf in the henhouse. So, it was not surprising to read in the Daily News a day after the press conference:
"The world's largest for-profit school operator yesterday expressed interest in being a part of the massive school reforms laid out this week. While Chancellor Joel Klein pitched his sweeping school overhaul to business leaders and educators yesterday, he said that he expected mainly universities and nonprofits to apply for the private contracts available under the reforms. He acknowledged, though, that legally he can't exclude for-profits, adding that, "I don't expect the for-profits will apply, but that's up to them. But Edison Schools - the controversial for-profit group that attempted to take over five failing city schools in 2001 - would "certainly be interested" in reviewing opportunities and seeing "whether it would be a good fit," company spokeswoman Laura Eshbaugh said yesterday."
Sure, after hiring Cerf, Klein never, ever thought of Edison applying for the PSO’s. Don’t we need to get Edison’s value up to prove the validation of the private model by having them feed at the public trough? You could actually see Klein’s nose grow as he spoke.
Also Cerf's letter to his staff.
"Hey Klein, It's Time to Resign" was the title of a column I wrote a few years ago. His time is coming.
See my post on Cerf's nap at Klein's press conference a few weeks ago when he announced the reorganization.
In a photo I took at the press conference, it appears as if Christopher Cerf, one of Klein’s newest appointees, might have been napping, or as the caption says on my blog, “Christopher Cerf dreams of ways to turn the NYC school system into a subsidiary of Edison.” Cerf was the CEO of Edison Schools, a fading for-profit corporation that looks to milk money out of public schools. Hey! The stock tanked and Cerf needed a job. Where else but in BloomKleindom?
Edison was once in the forefront of the ideological struggles as the right wing attempt to dismantle public education. Under Cerf’s leadership, Edison once made a run at NYC schools but was beaten back by the UFT and parent groups. Now they have the chief Edison wolf in the henhouse. So, it was not surprising to read in the Daily News a day after the press conference:
"The world's largest for-profit school operator yesterday expressed interest in being a part of the massive school reforms laid out this week. While Chancellor Joel Klein pitched his sweeping school overhaul to business leaders and educators yesterday, he said that he expected mainly universities and nonprofits to apply for the private contracts available under the reforms. He acknowledged, though, that legally he can't exclude for-profits, adding that, "I don't expect the for-profits will apply, but that's up to them. But Edison Schools - the controversial for-profit group that attempted to take over five failing city schools in 2001 - would "certainly be interested" in reviewing opportunities and seeing "whether it would be a good fit," company spokeswoman Laura Eshbaugh said yesterday."
Sure, after hiring Cerf, Klein never, ever thought of Edison applying for the PSO’s. Don’t we need to get Edison’s value up to prove the validation of the private model by having them feed at the public trough? You could actually see Klein’s nose grow as he spoke.
Also Cerf's letter to his staff.
Deconstructing the System, School by School
by Norman Scott
(Modified from The School Scope Column in The Wave, February 9, 2007.)
A couple of years ago I spoke at one of Joel Klein’s public meetings and said the school systems of Baghdad and Kabul would recover sooner than the NYC schools from the cataclysm Klein and his hench boss Mayor Bloomberg, have wrought. Nothing has happened in the intervening years to change my mind. In fact, I believe this more firmly than ever.
The forced closing of large high schools, along with the policy of shoving competing schools into the same space, is insane. One of my contacts at Walton HS in the Bronx works at one of the five small schools competing with the remnant of what was the old Walton in its dying days. He reports that all the schools are fighting with each other over space, which kids in the neighborhood will go to each school, and just about every other thing one can think of to fight about. Think about it: six principals and staffs. Also, think: what does it all cost?
Each small school starts off with a 9th grade and grows by a grade each year. Imagine the scene year after year. A teacher from John F. Kennedy HS in the Bronx recently said that not only do all six schools in her school hate each other but the kids from the small schools look down at the kids from the big school, as do the staffs of the small schools, leading to battles between kids and staffs at all levels.
The new small schools are often accused of cherry-picking the most proficient kids, trying to get as many of the higher performing Level Threes and Fours into their schools and avoiding the lower performing Level Ones. In actuality, many schools do take Level Ones and Twos but use a more subtle form of creaming. Students must sign up for these schools at recruiting fairs and parents who are aware of these events, no matter what the level of their students, will also be more supportive.
In addition, new small schools are exempt for two years from taking in special needs and language deficient kids, often immigrants who speak little or no English (see commnet from Luis Reyes below). These are the most difficult to teach and the large schools still standing that have an overwhelming number of them have their resources so overtaxed that they become known as failing schools and become targets for closure.
Now follow the bouncing ball on how Tweedles operate. You secretly — no consultation with parents, teachers, school administration, community and especially, local politicians – decide to close down a school a year or more before making a public announcement. You deliberately withhold resources form the school and steer kids to other schools in order to claim “no one wants to go to your school.”
At the same time, you overload the school with the very special needs and language deficient students who have been left homeless from the closing of other large schools. Then you claim this school is truly failing and it is an outrage to keep it open saying, “Look at all the small schools and their much higher graduation rates.” Oh, and make sure to emphasize the school’s failures by pointing to its low graduation rate (often in the mid-30% range compared to the rest of the city, which you claim is 58% (by including GED and excluding special ed) while state figures put it at 43%. Call it the flimflam of the century. So far. I’m confident BloomKlein are capable of coming up with better ones.
These factors came into play recently when the closing of three large south Brooklyn schools — Lafayette, Tilden and South Shore — was announced in December. The DOE has already decided to place two small schools into Tilden next year, while Tilden will no longer be accepting 9th graders. Where will those 9th graders go to school next year, especially with the neighboring South Shore also closing? Let me hazard a guess. The “better” students might get into one of the small schools or one of the higher ranked high schools like Midwood, Murrow, or Goldstein. The rest will end up at one of the nearest large neighborhood schools remaining in south Brooklyn – Canarsie and Sheepshead, the next targets on the DOE hit list. What about Midwood and Murrow and Madison? They are too “successful” to be closed. For now. But just let someone step on some political toes at the DOE and it will be very easy to use the flimflam trick to turn them into failing schools. That is why so many educators and politicians are held hostage by BloomKlein. Unfettered power in the hands of these two is a nightmare for all. Do you wonder why there is such fear and loathing of BloomKlein amongst just about everyone having anything to do with education?
Tilden has put up the biggest battle to stay open, forming an organization called “SOS Tilden.” I went to a remarkable meeting/rally at Tilden HS in East Flatbush this past Tuesday night that included all of the elements needed to put up a fight to stay open: parents, community, teachers, students, alumni, politicians and the UFT, led by Randi Weingarten, who put her full support behind the effort. As a frequent critic of Weingarten, I often say watch what she does, not what she says. But in this case, by all reports, she and the UFT are doing the right thing and she made an excellent presentation. A long line of speakers, especially the students and alumni, made a strong case for saving Tilden.
All these forces have united behind principal Diane Varano, one of the few Leadership Academy graduates who have received raves. She was sent into the school, ostensibly to turn it around. Just as the Tweedles pulled the rug out, reports surfaced that yet another high priced consulting firm (from Britain, no less) gave Tilden a good proficiency rating and noted specifically that Varano and the staff were beginning to show results. They had spent weeks in the school making their judgment, only to be ignored. Varano was herself flimflammed by Tweed, actually hearing about the closing from the UFT chapter leader. Her response: “No way!” It turns out that no one in Region 6 was consulted either. The fact that Varano was at this rally and not stepping all over “SOS Tilden,” which meets in the building every Saturday morning, is a tribute to her integrity and lack of fear of Tweedledom retaliation.
My ICE colleague John Lawhead, who went through a school closing at Bushwick HS (is the DOE “school closing unit” following him?), teaches ESL at Tilden and did an excellent presentation at the rally showing how Tilden falls in the mid-range on graduation rates (37%) out of a whole slew of large schools that remain open. While nothing to brag about, it is not far under the real 43% city grad rate. (See Jan. 12 School Scope column, “Tilden, Lafayette and South Shore: Don’t Close Schools, Fix Them” for more on the fabulous work John has done on this issue.)
The arrogance shown toward local politicians by BloomKlein, who stonewalled all requests for information, is one issue that may come back to bite them. City Councilman Lou Fidler, a Tilden grad who represents parts of the Tilden constituency along with that of South Shore, made a very strong statement and has come out of this experience with a clear eye on the BloomKlein agenda. State Senator Kevin Parker, who was not at this rally, has supposedly been so miffed by being ignored and margianalized, he is making it a priority to put serious crimps in the renewal of mayoral control when it comes up in 2009. This is the biggest threat of all to the BloomKlein plans to have their crumbling empire outlive them. And they are now responding by trying to massage the politicians. Sadly, this tactic often works.
In the works by “SOS Tilden” (http://www.allout4tilden.com/) is a plan for a big demonstration on the steps of Tweed. Every teacher, parent and student at any large high school left in the city should be there. As a matter of fact, everyone affected by BloomKlein policies should join them.Think of the joy of all the Tweedles looking out from their fancy offices at thousands of people calling for them to reverse the decision on Tilden and other schools. We know their arrogance won’t allow them to admit they are wrong (SEE: BUS FIASCO). But maybe they’ll be driven crazy by the noise of their buzzing Blackberries.
Did I say BUS FIASCO?
What else can I say? Finally, the mainstream press has said it all. Of course Klein defends the fiasco by saying the high priced consulting firm A&M (which we are proud to have written about in The Wave back in September) which came up with the plan to save a few million on the backs of 5 year-olds standing outside in freezing weather, has saved a total of $50 million by cutting custodial services and other goodies that just happen to make schools run. Klein claims this money – “FIVE O” he said as he held up his fingers “will be put into the classroom to reduce class size and purchase supplies.” HA! And he has a nice bridge in Brooklyn to sell you. Show us the money, Joel. Exactly where is this $50 million? How fast can you say “more high priced consultants and corporate-level salaries for his staff?” And a few more Blackberries.
Bloomberg Builds Stadiums, not Classrooms
Check out my blog http://ednotesonline.blogspot.com/ for some remarkable charts compiled by Leonie Haimson of Class Size Matters showing how the projective seats for stadiums in NYC is double that of classroom seats. Sometimes the flim even outdoes the flam.
Comment from Luis Reyes posted on a listserve.
This is dangerously loaded and misguided language. English language learners (ELLs) are not "language deficient"; they are limited in their English language proficiency (listening, speaking reading and writing skills). There is a world of difference between a lack of development in a second language and a language deficiency. The former is a matter of exposure to learning; the latter is a matter of physical or other underlying handicapping condition. Deficit-model theories regarding the language proficiency of ELLstudents have been debunked for years now.
Also, ELL students, whether immigrant or native-born, are not inherently nor practically "the most difficult to teach". In fact, according to NY SED and NYC DOE data reports, when provided quality bilingual and ESL programs, former ELL students outperform even non-ELL students on reading and math achievement tests and have higher graduation rates! The reasons are many. Suffice it to say, when the public school system provides the "instrumentalities of learning" (NY State Court of Appeals in CFE), ELL students can and do succeed in reaching proficiency on all the learning standards.
The concentration of ELLs in large high schools that are under-resourced, overcrowded and low-performing is a reality, created in part by the DOE. In closing down low-performing high schools and limiting ELLs' access to most new small high schools beyond the new International High Schools (which only take recently-arrived ELLs), the DOE has redirected ELLs to the remaining large high schools. Blame DOE bureaucrats for "overtaxing" the large high schools, not ELL students.
Language matters and how we talk about our diverse student population also matters!
Luis O. Reyes
Coordinator, CEEELL
Coalition for Educational Excellence for English Language Learners
I probably used the wrong term here but I am not sure exactly what term I should have used. Any suggestions appreciated. Direct comments to this piece on my blog:
http://ednotesonline.blogspot.com/2007/02/deconstructing-system-school-by-school.html
(Modified from The School Scope Column in The Wave, February 9, 2007.)
A couple of years ago I spoke at one of Joel Klein’s public meetings and said the school systems of Baghdad and Kabul would recover sooner than the NYC schools from the cataclysm Klein and his hench boss Mayor Bloomberg, have wrought. Nothing has happened in the intervening years to change my mind. In fact, I believe this more firmly than ever.
The forced closing of large high schools, along with the policy of shoving competing schools into the same space, is insane. One of my contacts at Walton HS in the Bronx works at one of the five small schools competing with the remnant of what was the old Walton in its dying days. He reports that all the schools are fighting with each other over space, which kids in the neighborhood will go to each school, and just about every other thing one can think of to fight about. Think about it: six principals and staffs. Also, think: what does it all cost?
Each small school starts off with a 9th grade and grows by a grade each year. Imagine the scene year after year. A teacher from John F. Kennedy HS in the Bronx recently said that not only do all six schools in her school hate each other but the kids from the small schools look down at the kids from the big school, as do the staffs of the small schools, leading to battles between kids and staffs at all levels.
The new small schools are often accused of cherry-picking the most proficient kids, trying to get as many of the higher performing Level Threes and Fours into their schools and avoiding the lower performing Level Ones. In actuality, many schools do take Level Ones and Twos but use a more subtle form of creaming. Students must sign up for these schools at recruiting fairs and parents who are aware of these events, no matter what the level of their students, will also be more supportive.
In addition, new small schools are exempt for two years from taking in special needs and language deficient kids, often immigrants who speak little or no English (see commnet from Luis Reyes below). These are the most difficult to teach and the large schools still standing that have an overwhelming number of them have their resources so overtaxed that they become known as failing schools and become targets for closure.
Now follow the bouncing ball on how Tweedles operate. You secretly — no consultation with parents, teachers, school administration, community and especially, local politicians – decide to close down a school a year or more before making a public announcement. You deliberately withhold resources form the school and steer kids to other schools in order to claim “no one wants to go to your school.”
At the same time, you overload the school with the very special needs and language deficient students who have been left homeless from the closing of other large schools. Then you claim this school is truly failing and it is an outrage to keep it open saying, “Look at all the small schools and their much higher graduation rates.” Oh, and make sure to emphasize the school’s failures by pointing to its low graduation rate (often in the mid-30% range compared to the rest of the city, which you claim is 58% (by including GED and excluding special ed) while state figures put it at 43%. Call it the flimflam of the century. So far. I’m confident BloomKlein are capable of coming up with better ones.
These factors came into play recently when the closing of three large south Brooklyn schools — Lafayette, Tilden and South Shore — was announced in December. The DOE has already decided to place two small schools into Tilden next year, while Tilden will no longer be accepting 9th graders. Where will those 9th graders go to school next year, especially with the neighboring South Shore also closing? Let me hazard a guess. The “better” students might get into one of the small schools or one of the higher ranked high schools like Midwood, Murrow, or Goldstein. The rest will end up at one of the nearest large neighborhood schools remaining in south Brooklyn – Canarsie and Sheepshead, the next targets on the DOE hit list. What about Midwood and Murrow and Madison? They are too “successful” to be closed. For now. But just let someone step on some political toes at the DOE and it will be very easy to use the flimflam trick to turn them into failing schools. That is why so many educators and politicians are held hostage by BloomKlein. Unfettered power in the hands of these two is a nightmare for all. Do you wonder why there is such fear and loathing of BloomKlein amongst just about everyone having anything to do with education?
Tilden has put up the biggest battle to stay open, forming an organization called “SOS Tilden.” I went to a remarkable meeting/rally at Tilden HS in East Flatbush this past Tuesday night that included all of the elements needed to put up a fight to stay open: parents, community, teachers, students, alumni, politicians and the UFT, led by Randi Weingarten, who put her full support behind the effort. As a frequent critic of Weingarten, I often say watch what she does, not what she says. But in this case, by all reports, she and the UFT are doing the right thing and she made an excellent presentation. A long line of speakers, especially the students and alumni, made a strong case for saving Tilden.
All these forces have united behind principal Diane Varano, one of the few Leadership Academy graduates who have received raves. She was sent into the school, ostensibly to turn it around. Just as the Tweedles pulled the rug out, reports surfaced that yet another high priced consulting firm (from Britain, no less) gave Tilden a good proficiency rating and noted specifically that Varano and the staff were beginning to show results. They had spent weeks in the school making their judgment, only to be ignored. Varano was herself flimflammed by Tweed, actually hearing about the closing from the UFT chapter leader. Her response: “No way!” It turns out that no one in Region 6 was consulted either. The fact that Varano was at this rally and not stepping all over “SOS Tilden,” which meets in the building every Saturday morning, is a tribute to her integrity and lack of fear of Tweedledom retaliation.
My ICE colleague John Lawhead, who went through a school closing at Bushwick HS (is the DOE “school closing unit” following him?), teaches ESL at Tilden and did an excellent presentation at the rally showing how Tilden falls in the mid-range on graduation rates (37%) out of a whole slew of large schools that remain open. While nothing to brag about, it is not far under the real 43% city grad rate. (See Jan. 12 School Scope column, “Tilden, Lafayette and South Shore: Don’t Close Schools, Fix Them” for more on the fabulous work John has done on this issue.)
The arrogance shown toward local politicians by BloomKlein, who stonewalled all requests for information, is one issue that may come back to bite them. City Councilman Lou Fidler, a Tilden grad who represents parts of the Tilden constituency along with that of South Shore, made a very strong statement and has come out of this experience with a clear eye on the BloomKlein agenda. State Senator Kevin Parker, who was not at this rally, has supposedly been so miffed by being ignored and margianalized, he is making it a priority to put serious crimps in the renewal of mayoral control when it comes up in 2009. This is the biggest threat of all to the BloomKlein plans to have their crumbling empire outlive them. And they are now responding by trying to massage the politicians. Sadly, this tactic often works.
In the works by “SOS Tilden” (http://www.allout4tilden.com/) is a plan for a big demonstration on the steps of Tweed. Every teacher, parent and student at any large high school left in the city should be there. As a matter of fact, everyone affected by BloomKlein policies should join them.Think of the joy of all the Tweedles looking out from their fancy offices at thousands of people calling for them to reverse the decision on Tilden and other schools. We know their arrogance won’t allow them to admit they are wrong (SEE: BUS FIASCO). But maybe they’ll be driven crazy by the noise of their buzzing Blackberries.
Did I say BUS FIASCO?
What else can I say? Finally, the mainstream press has said it all. Of course Klein defends the fiasco by saying the high priced consulting firm A&M (which we are proud to have written about in The Wave back in September) which came up with the plan to save a few million on the backs of 5 year-olds standing outside in freezing weather, has saved a total of $50 million by cutting custodial services and other goodies that just happen to make schools run. Klein claims this money – “FIVE O” he said as he held up his fingers “will be put into the classroom to reduce class size and purchase supplies.” HA! And he has a nice bridge in Brooklyn to sell you. Show us the money, Joel. Exactly where is this $50 million? How fast can you say “more high priced consultants and corporate-level salaries for his staff?” And a few more Blackberries.
Bloomberg Builds Stadiums, not Classrooms
Check out my blog http://ednotesonline.blogspot.com/ for some remarkable charts compiled by Leonie Haimson of Class Size Matters showing how the projective seats for stadiums in NYC is double that of classroom seats. Sometimes the flim even outdoes the flam.
Comment from Luis Reyes posted on a listserve.
This is dangerously loaded and misguided language. English language learners (ELLs) are not "language deficient"; they are limited in their English language proficiency (listening, speaking reading and writing skills). There is a world of difference between a lack of development in a second language and a language deficiency. The former is a matter of exposure to learning; the latter is a matter of physical or other underlying handicapping condition. Deficit-model theories regarding the language proficiency of ELLstudents have been debunked for years now.
Also, ELL students, whether immigrant or native-born, are not inherently nor practically "the most difficult to teach". In fact, according to NY SED and NYC DOE data reports, when provided quality bilingual and ESL programs, former ELL students outperform even non-ELL students on reading and math achievement tests and have higher graduation rates! The reasons are many. Suffice it to say, when the public school system provides the "instrumentalities of learning" (NY State Court of Appeals in CFE), ELL students can and do succeed in reaching proficiency on all the learning standards.
The concentration of ELLs in large high schools that are under-resourced, overcrowded and low-performing is a reality, created in part by the DOE. In closing down low-performing high schools and limiting ELLs' access to most new small high schools beyond the new International High Schools (which only take recently-arrived ELLs), the DOE has redirected ELLs to the remaining large high schools. Blame DOE bureaucrats for "overtaxing" the large high schools, not ELL students.
Language matters and how we talk about our diverse student population also matters!
Luis O. Reyes
Coordinator, CEEELL
Coalition for Educational Excellence for English Language Learners
I probably used the wrong term here but I am not sure exactly what term I should have used. Any suggestions appreciated. Direct comments to this piece on my blog:
http://ednotesonline.blogspot.com/2007/02/deconstructing-system-school-by-school.html
Wednesday, February 7, 2007
From: Cerf Chris
Note: Cerf will be holding a talent search, tap dancing included. Isn't amazing that they all need a chief of staff. Anyone been near a classroom?
From: Cerf Chris
Sent: Mon 1/29/07 5:53 PM
To: &All Central HQ
Subject: Departmental Announcements
Dear Colleagues:
Over the last two weeks, I have been fortunate to begin to learn more about the impressive talent and expertise that resides within our human resources department and the exciting initiatives that are underway. I am looking forward to working with the leadership of the organization, including the Directors of our Centers of Excellence, to continue to develop our strategy related to "human capital" as well as to build the most service-oriented, customer-centric, principal-focused organization possible.
While there is certainly a great deal still for me to learn, I did want to make you all aware of a few staffing changes, some of which you may already know about.
Elizabeth Arons will be serving as a Senior HR Policy advisor. Betsy will be supporting critical initiatives on teacher quality. Previously, Betsy served as the CEO of Human Resources.
Larry Becker will be serving as the Acting Chief Executive Officer of Human Resources. Previously, Larry served as the Chief Operating Officer of DHR.
Doug Jaffe will be serving as the Director of Restructuring, Human Capital. In this role, he will be responsible for coordinating all HR-related issues pertaining to organizational restructuring. He will also continue in his critical role supporting the strategic direction and implementation of Project Home Run.
Amy McIntosh will be serving as Chief Talent Officer. In this role, she will work across the DOE to shape a comprehensive strategy and lead key initiatives for recruiting, induction, ongoing development and performance management for talent at all levels of our organization: teachers, principals, leadership.
Most recently, Amy was Executive Director of the NYC Partnership for Teacher Excellence, an initiative linking the DOE with NYU and CUNY to create a new model for preparation of shortage area teachers. She will continue to oversee this important work which will now be directed by Audra Watson, reporting to Amy.
Joel Rose will be serving as my Chief of Staff. Previously, Joel served as a strategic consultant at the Fund for Public Schools where he coordinated the opening of school, supported last year's expansion of Empowerment Schools, and helped to launch several accountability-related initiatives.
From: Cerf Chris
Sent: Mon 1/29/07 5:53 PM
To: &All Central HQ
Subject: Departmental Announcements
Dear Colleagues:
Over the last two weeks, I have been fortunate to begin to learn more about the impressive talent and expertise that resides within our human resources department and the exciting initiatives that are underway. I am looking forward to working with the leadership of the organization, including the Directors of our Centers of Excellence, to continue to develop our strategy related to "human capital" as well as to build the most service-oriented, customer-centric, principal-focused organization possible.
While there is certainly a great deal still for me to learn, I did want to make you all aware of a few staffing changes, some of which you may already know about.
Elizabeth Arons will be serving as a Senior HR Policy advisor. Betsy will be supporting critical initiatives on teacher quality. Previously, Betsy served as the CEO of Human Resources.
Larry Becker will be serving as the Acting Chief Executive Officer of Human Resources. Previously, Larry served as the Chief Operating Officer of DHR.
Doug Jaffe will be serving as the Director of Restructuring, Human Capital. In this role, he will be responsible for coordinating all HR-related issues pertaining to organizational restructuring. He will also continue in his critical role supporting the strategic direction and implementation of Project Home Run.
Amy McIntosh will be serving as Chief Talent Officer. In this role, she will work across the DOE to shape a comprehensive strategy and lead key initiatives for recruiting, induction, ongoing development and performance management for talent at all levels of our organization: teachers, principals, leadership.
Most recently, Amy was Executive Director of the NYC Partnership for Teacher Excellence, an initiative linking the DOE with NYU and CUNY to create a new model for preparation of shortage area teachers. She will continue to oversee this important work which will now be directed by Audra Watson, reporting to Amy.
Joel Rose will be serving as my Chief of Staff. Previously, Joel served as a strategic consultant at the Fund for Public Schools where he coordinated the opening of school, supported last year's expansion of Empowerment Schools, and helped to launch several accountability-related initiatives.
Antoinette Kulig will be serving as our team's administrative assistant. Previously, Antoinette supported Michele Cahill's team and has also served as the administrative assistant to two previous NYC Chancellors.
Dan Weisberg will continue to serve as Executive Director, Labor Policy. Dan has done a masterful job guiding our organization through the negotiation and implementation of our collective bargaining agreements. I am looking forward to ensuring his work is effectively integrated into the larger organization.
I am also looking forward to working with Sandra Stein and the staff of the NYC Leadership Academy so that, together, we can ensure that their work is effectively aligned with our overall human capital strategy.
Chris Cerf
Tuesday, February 6, 2007
Doing Guidance at Bayard Rustin HS
Dear Randi:
I know you're busy, but I wanted you to know that things are becoming intolerable at Bayard Rustin. Half of the Guidance staff (the senior half) are being subjected to harrassment and asked to do things that make no sense. The upper school kids have holes in their programs and the four of us are being forced to write paper programs in the auditorium (not in our offices) from a master list of courses that is outdated (1/31/).
The result is chaos – students don't have complete programs, classes are not in session. On Friday I asked to do my work in my office which was filled with students. Because I didn't go down fast enough I was informed that I'm being charged with insubordination. All this while other Counselors who were asked also refused. I'm the only one being charged. This morning
again we were asked inexplicably to "fill program holes" in the auditorium with kids using the same master course list from 1/31 to make programs for classes that don't exist. Counselors were allowed to walk in and out, the AP. J. Serna, making an effort to keep them there whenever they tried to leave. It is absolute harrassment. I stayed there for 2 hours, unable to
do the rest of my work, leaving kids unserviced. I came back to find a memo asking for a list of promotion in doubt students by 10:00am tomorrow morning.
It is obvious they want to U rate me again and put me through a hearing and get me out of the system. This is abuse, it is torture. The other half of the guidance staff (the younger half) is currently at a Retreat upstate in the Catskills courtesy of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation that is backing the small school initiative. They are returning on Thursday. A
four-day vacation while the rest of us suffer. This is outrageous and as our union someone needs to come in and protect us from these abuses.
We need help. This is beyond wrong, we need some kind of protection.
I hope to hear from you soon.
A
Note: Last June, the principal of Bayrad Rustin sent A for a psychiatric exam, a common tactic used by principals to go after people. The most famous example is David Pakter who, after being judged unfit by a doctor doing the bidding of the DOE, bought along his own doctor, the well-known Dr. Albert Goldwasser and the medical office eventually reversed itself and Pakter won a significant victory. He has filed suits against a whole bunch of the people involved and may be suing the doctor who initially ruled on his case for malpractice.
When A sent out a call for help on the weekend before her medical, Pakter came to her rescue and paid Goldwasser out of his own pocket to appear with her. With Goldwasser along, the DOE quacks backed off and A was found to be ok and out of there in no time. (The UFT has been urged to put Goldwasser on retainer to assist teachers in this situation, but without success.) The principal, not being able to get his pound of flesh, has renewed his assault this year.
The DOE and old BOE have used psychiatric exams by the corrupt medical office as a weapon for years. Francine Newman exposed this in her book "The Cannibals at 110 Livingston St." The UFT has provided little backup or support, all too often assuming the position [and YES, I mean it THAT way] - where there's smoke there's fire, if not actually taking the DOE's position, but playing a neutral role.
I know you're busy, but I wanted you to know that things are becoming intolerable at Bayard Rustin. Half of the Guidance staff (the senior half) are being subjected to harrassment and asked to do things that make no sense. The upper school kids have holes in their programs and the four of us are being forced to write paper programs in the auditorium (not in our offices) from a master list of courses that is outdated (1/31/).
The result is chaos – students don't have complete programs, classes are not in session. On Friday I asked to do my work in my office which was filled with students. Because I didn't go down fast enough I was informed that I'm being charged with insubordination. All this while other Counselors who were asked also refused. I'm the only one being charged. This morning
again we were asked inexplicably to "fill program holes" in the auditorium with kids using the same master course list from 1/31 to make programs for classes that don't exist. Counselors were allowed to walk in and out, the AP. J. Serna, making an effort to keep them there whenever they tried to leave. It is absolute harrassment. I stayed there for 2 hours, unable to
do the rest of my work, leaving kids unserviced. I came back to find a memo asking for a list of promotion in doubt students by 10:00am tomorrow morning.
It is obvious they want to U rate me again and put me through a hearing and get me out of the system. This is abuse, it is torture. The other half of the guidance staff (the younger half) is currently at a Retreat upstate in the Catskills courtesy of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation that is backing the small school initiative. They are returning on Thursday. A
four-day vacation while the rest of us suffer. This is outrageous and as our union someone needs to come in and protect us from these abuses.
We need help. This is beyond wrong, we need some kind of protection.
I hope to hear from you soon.
A
Note: Last June, the principal of Bayrad Rustin sent A for a psychiatric exam, a common tactic used by principals to go after people. The most famous example is David Pakter who, after being judged unfit by a doctor doing the bidding of the DOE, bought along his own doctor, the well-known Dr. Albert Goldwasser and the medical office eventually reversed itself and Pakter won a significant victory. He has filed suits against a whole bunch of the people involved and may be suing the doctor who initially ruled on his case for malpractice.
When A sent out a call for help on the weekend before her medical, Pakter came to her rescue and paid Goldwasser out of his own pocket to appear with her. With Goldwasser along, the DOE quacks backed off and A was found to be ok and out of there in no time. (The UFT has been urged to put Goldwasser on retainer to assist teachers in this situation, but without success.) The principal, not being able to get his pound of flesh, has renewed his assault this year.
The DOE and old BOE have used psychiatric exams by the corrupt medical office as a weapon for years. Francine Newman exposed this in her book "The Cannibals at 110 Livingston St." The UFT has provided little backup or support, all too often assuming the position [and YES, I mean it THAT way] - where there's smoke there's fire, if not actually taking the DOE's position, but playing a neutral role.
Monday, February 5, 2007
U-Rating Hearing Notes from Lafayette HS
Ed Note:
Our correspondent received a UFT transfer into Lafayette in the summer of 2005, one of the last UFT transfers before the onerous contract eliminated them. She came to the school during the summer to meet the principal (who she assumed was the old one) only to find Rohloff. Her first question was, "Don't you think I should pick my own people?" - a typical response from a principal to a UFT transferee, who are all assumed to be questionable no matter what their abilities. By the 2nd week of Sept. the teacher was under attack as Rohloff clearly had made up her mind to not have a UFT transferee in her building and the teacher underwent a year of hell. The teacher had previously had 3 years of successful teaching in special ed in very difficult schools but that counts for nothing in the world of Rohloffdom and BloomKleindom.
AP [X] had been placed in the rubber room for some connection to a teacher changing a score by a point in order to allow a student to graduate. Since then, AP [X] has been demoted to a teacher as an ATR.
AP [X] was noted for following Rohloff's orders and there are reports he gave 4 U ratings last year. In the end, AP [X] got burned on the cross he helped create. But he still has a job. When chapter leader Maria Colon of JFK HS found her bosses changing piles of regent scores it was she who was sent to the rubber room for a year and a half and had her job gone after. (She is clear now and back teaching as an ATR.) Her bosses got off scot free.
Thought I'd give you the details of my hearing. Essentially, the hearing was held to fight the "U" rating I received. The true issue basically is about class management, not my knowledge of content, or my credentials as a teacher.
Our correspondent received a UFT transfer into Lafayette in the summer of 2005, one of the last UFT transfers before the onerous contract eliminated them. She came to the school during the summer to meet the principal (who she assumed was the old one) only to find Rohloff. Her first question was, "Don't you think I should pick my own people?" - a typical response from a principal to a UFT transferee, who are all assumed to be questionable no matter what their abilities. By the 2nd week of Sept. the teacher was under attack as Rohloff clearly had made up her mind to not have a UFT transferee in her building and the teacher underwent a year of hell. The teacher had previously had 3 years of successful teaching in special ed in very difficult schools but that counts for nothing in the world of Rohloffdom and BloomKleindom.
AP [X] had been placed in the rubber room for some connection to a teacher changing a score by a point in order to allow a student to graduate. Since then, AP [X] has been demoted to a teacher as an ATR.
AP [X] was noted for following Rohloff's orders and there are reports he gave 4 U ratings last year. In the end, AP [X] got burned on the cross he helped create. But he still has a job. When chapter leader Maria Colon of JFK HS found her bosses changing piles of regent scores it was she who was sent to the rubber room for a year and a half and had her job gone after. (She is clear now and back teaching as an ATR.) Her bosses got off scot free.
Thought I'd give you the details of my hearing. Essentially, the hearing was held to fight the "U" rating I received. The true issue basically is about class management, not my knowledge of content, or my credentials as a teacher.
Hearing was to commence at 9 a.m. 6 people were present, my UFT rep, me, a DOE Chairperson, a Superintendent representative from Region 7, a rep from the Chancellor's office and an impartial (?) observer. I question the impartiality of the observer, simply because she appeared to be on very familiar terms with the representative from the Region 7 office, and exchanged a number of pleasantries that would indicate a friendship with the Superintendent's rep.
Also present (by phone connection) were: Jolanta Rohloff, Principal, Ms. Makintosh (LIS, Region 7), AP [X] ( A.P. Social Studies)
We were to commence the hearing at 9 a.m. This was not so, because there were problems in calling Lafayette ( no one picked up the phone there). The rep. from District 7 offered as a reason that this was so , because today is the first date back from Regents grading, and a new semester, so having a hearing on this particular date ( today) was very poor timing.....As for AP [X], when the question came up about where he was, so that he could be cross examined, again, all concerned ( with the exception of my UFT rep and me) had to scramble to get information on where AP [X] was located, his now exact position, how he could be reached.
We finally connected with Rohloff- when asked by my rep where AP [X] was, Rohloff told my rep that "he ( meaning AP [X]) was no longer at the school". Rohloff went on to say that she had the authority to speak for him. My rep shot that down, another long search went on to connect with AP [X]. When questioned as to his whereabouts, Rohloff continually stated that "he was not at the school." My rep refused to carry on the hearing until AP[X] was located, correctly stating that AP [X] was the one that gave me the ratings, not Rohloff, who was not in the classroom with us at the time the ratings were given. When the panel found out where AP [X] was located, the rep from the Chancellor's office inadvertently blurted out: "He's in the "rubber room"!" The impartial observer and rep from the Region both made comments that the remark was inappropriate. My UFT rep and I said nothing. Finally, a private cell phone number was obtained for AP [X], the connection was made.
The UFT rep then cross examined AP [X], Rohloff, and the LIS on the Log of Assistance, did they model lessons for me, other questions along that line of reasoning. Rohloff blatantly lied about the assistance she offered me, AP [X] did not have the appropriate documents at his disposal, the LIS admitted that she knew that Rohloff had intended to "U" rate me for the year, prior to observing me. My rep brought up the point that if the LIS knew that I was to be "U" rated, would that affect her decision? The LIS said that it did not.
My observations during the hearing- The UFT rep was very much on point - kept all participants on point through his cross examinations. When it was time for Rohloff and the LIS to question me, apparently they asked questions that drew the agreement from the other reps that their questions were not germane to the hearing. One such question from the LIS: "Describe differential learning". I was not required to answer that question, as it relates more to philosophy than the issue at hand, which apparently, was more classroom management. Another question: What outside professional development seminars did I attend, which I answered. The LIS summarized that " since I did not seek professional development on my own, it's an indication of my lack of professionalism and planning". Rohloff concurred. As you know, we attended a number of PD's on a voluntary basis that were assigned to us.
As for my summary, I deferred to the UFT rep. All other present stated:" On the record".
That was it. After the hearing, the UFT rep and I spoke. I'm of the opinion that the hearing went towards my favor, however, the UFT Rep feels that even if we "won" on points, the DOE will still doggedly stand by their initial decision.
So, what was the point? Could there be a "miracle"? Is the DOE capable of retracting a decision that clearly smacks of an injustice? As for AP [X], I'm sure that the DOE Chairman knew of his situation, as well as the Regional rep., yet, this was not brought up, either by them, or the UFT rep. I was biting my tongue to bring up the situation, but the UFT rep feels that no matter how wrong the administration is, the DOE reps at the hearing would not be swayed by bringing such a situation to light.
Sunday, February 4, 2007
Bloomberg Builds Stadiums, Not Schools
from Leonie Haimson listserve
We have plenty of resources to do the job in NYC. We are not living inAfghanistan
We have plenty of resources to do the job in NYC. We are not living in
We would have solved this problem long ago if the business elite sent their kids to public schools rather than sitting in box seats in Yankee stadium.
While saying there’s no room, the city is still selling off a perfectly good school building that could house 1,000 high school students for $1 in
Few parochial schools have been leased by DOE. Meanwhile the city has a $4-5 billion surplus, like last year, and only a small percentage of these funds could leverage double the no. of schools and new seats to be created over the next four years.
See this chart: how many seats created over the last four years:
See this: twice as many seats to be created in sports stadiums than in schools over next four years:
See also from the OMB financial plan at http://www.nyc.
p. 57.
The chart shows city spending on capital needs for schools is now and projected to be a much smaller level for the next four years than we spent during the last year of Giuliani administration, despite a higher reimbursement rate from the state (now over 50% compared to only 30% then) and a $4 billion city surplus.
Also since the year 2000, a much smaller overall percentage of the city’s capital spending overall has gone into schools – even though in 1998, the city comptroller said that this was the neediest and most underinvested portion of the city’s infrastructure.
To reduce class size in all grades, we need at least 120,000 new seats to do the job while creating only about 63,000 – with 3,000 seats actually cut from the new capital plan.
Don’t tell me it’s impossible – all it takes is cash and commitment. LA is planning to create 180,000 new seats and has only 2/3 of our enrollment and no billion dollar budget surpluses.
See also the same OMB document, p. 9 for the amount of
A simple calculation on the Bloomberg mortgage calculator shows that to fund another $4 billion to double the number of seats created over the next four years – which would be sufficient to reduce class sizes in all grades, we would need to add only $288 million in annual city spending -- less than 1/3 the amount that Bloomberg now wants to cut taxes by for next year.
The sad fact is that our kids are getting shortchanged because we are stuck with an administration that doesn’t give a damn – and too many others are letting them off the hook by wrongly assuming that the situation as somehow unchangeable and outside of anyone’s ability to challenge.
Given that the state now reimburses more than 50% of everything we spend on new school construction, in order to create about 120,000 new seats over the next four years, enough to eliminate overcrowding and reduce class size in every part of the city, this would only cost about $144 million in additional city funds – only about 1/7 the amount that Bloomberg proposes to cuts taxes by next year.
Leonie Haimson
Class Size Matters
To subscribe to our newletter, send an email to classsizematters-
Saturday, February 3, 2007
Rigorous Class Size Debate
A debate in the comment section over whether class size should have been a priority contract demand by the UFT in the last 2 contracts appears on NYC Educator's blog based on a piece titled "Who Killed the CFE Lawsuit?" At least Science Sam represents Unity's viewpoint with arguments (wrong, of course) as opposed to name-calling. As usual, NYC Educator and his allies battle the forces of evil with vigor.
Woudn't it be wonderful if the UFT leadership allowed this to happen at the Delegate Assembly or the Executive Board? Maybe when certain parties are off to DC.
Woudn't it be wonderful if the UFT leadership allowed this to happen at the Delegate Assembly or the Executive Board? Maybe when certain parties are off to DC.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)