Critics of Tim Wise for Support for Teach For America

Posted to MORE Listserves

Dear New Orleans activists,

Some of you may remember Tim Wise, who was an anti-apartheid activist at Tulane in the late 1980s, and then went onto to work with the Louisiana Coalition Against Racism and Nazism (LCARN), one of the organizations that emerged in the fight against David Duke's various runs for state wide offices in the late 80s and early 90s. He later worked with the corporate foundation-funded non-profit Agenda For Children, which was also a part of the STICC outfit that was involved in the demise of the St Thomas public housing development.

Since leaving New Orleans in the mid 90s he has put his oratorical skills to use by developing  a lucrative career as a nationally renowned    "anti-racist" lecturer. As he often mentions in his lectures and writings to underscore his grassroots credentials, he was trained by the New Orleans-based People's Institute in his anti-racism work. Unsurprisingly, like the People's Institute, who assisted developer Joe Canizaro by putting a progressive anti-racist veneer on the destruction of the St Thomas public housing development  the 1990s, Tim Wise is doing the same for the hedge funders and other billionaires  bankrolling the charter school movement.  He has agreed to speak to a national gathering of "Teach For America", which is a key player in the assault on public education. http://speakoutnow.org/userdata_display.php?modin=53&uid=8451
 
Black Agenda Report, edited by Bruce Dixon and Glen Ford, who many of you are familiar with and who have written some of best critiques of the Obama administration, including the regime's "anti-racist" backers, have called on Wise to cancel his planned talk. Below is an article Bruce Dixon wrote on Wise and his planned TFA address, and the petition demanding that Wise cancel.

Please sign the petition and pass onto others.

http://www.blackagendareport.com/tfa

article by Bruce Dixon: Why Is Tim Wise Stamping the Anti-Racist Ghetto Passes at Teach For America

http://www.blackagendareport.com/tim-wise-stamps-ghetto-passes-4-tfa-say-it-aint-so

In addition I have attached a really rotten piece that Wise wrote undermining support for the courageous Edward Snowden while employing  a 'progressive', anti-racist cover.

http://www.timwise.org/2013/06/whiteness-nsa-spying-and-the-irony-of-racial-privilege/

Finally, below is an article by Adolph Reed critiquing the dead  end that of the 'anti-racism' politics of people like Tim Wise

http://www.leftbusinessobserver.com/Antiracism.html "
 

Sean Ahern responded:

I sent this note to Tim Wise

Dear Mr Wise,

I have read Bruce Dixon’s article and your response. I gather you will not be canceling your speaking engagement with Teach For America on July 27.  What’s next?

What are you going to say to Teach for America about Teach for America? Some internal reflection there  might at least cause some defections.

Here are a few suggestions for what you might say (By the way I am a NYC public school teacher who hopes that everyone with a heart and a brain who hasn’t already cut their ties to TFA will do so shortly): 

1) Michelle Rhee cheats on tests and lies about it afterwards.

. 

2) Rhee engaged in a witch hunt against Black teachers while she was in charge of the DC school system.

 

3) According to an internal United Federation of Teachers (UFT) report, TFA has contributed to the decline in the hiring of Black and Latino teachers in NYC schools under the Bloomberg school dictatorship..

4) Teach for America is part of the corporate led assault on public education in the large urban centers where the majority of students negatively affected are Black and Latino.

5) There is no “crisis of education” in the US and replacing “bad” teachers with “good” teachers is a toxic “remedy” for an already false diagnosis.

6) Contrary to what Michelle Rhee says, Unions for school workers are good things and should be expanded to include independent  parent and student unions so that schools rule themselves and  may dispense with unaccountable overseers, mayoral dictatorships and condescending saviors.

Even a bad union has benefits. For example, my own union The UFT is the largest teacher union local in the USA and it has  a terrible history of siding with administration in defending white privilege to the detriment of their members and the communities served.  In spite of this negative self destructive history the union leadership, to date at least, has not yet given up the city wide seniority system (last in first out) with regards to layoffs.  This provision, a legacy from the Shanker era, has slowed the disappearing of Black and Latino teachers in NYC and offered some protection from the Chicago scenario where city wide seniority was not in the CTU contract and school closings in Black and Latino communities have resulted in a precipitous loss of jobs for Black and Latino teachers, school aides and janitors.  Unfortunately this provision offers no protection to the students in the schools being closed who are just shuttled around to the next closing school.

Here are two suggestions for what you might do before July 27:

1)  Ask a leader of the CTU (Karen Lewis is a great speaker and former stand up comedian) to accompany you to the TFA meeting and inform them ahead of time that a CTU leader will be part of your presentation.

2)  If the CTU can’t or won’t join you, inform the TFA that you will donate your speaking fee to the CTU strike benefit fund.

By now you get the gist.  I wish you had declined the offer on the 27^th but second best would be for the TFA to cancel your engagement once they are apprised of your resolve to speak frankly.  The publicity gained might even turn out to be good for your business.  In any case, TFA is a sinking ship [Teach For America's Civil War: Organizing Resistance....]  Just hope you are not on board.

Peace,

Sean Ahern 

Mark Naison posted in Dump Duncan

Mark Naison 8:13am Jul 12 Quick background on my comments on Tim Wise before I return to my cruise. I have long been an admirer of Tim Wise's writings, but have, for the last two years, tried, without success to get him to critically comment on the Obama administrations education policies, especially school closings and teacher firings which have devastated inner city communities. I have emailed him and tweeted him repeatedly, always politely and respectfully, and heard not a word. And I ended up concluding that like the commentators on MSNBC, he didn't want to publicly criticize the Obama Administrations education policies. Hearing that he agreed to speak to Teach for America at a time when that organization is coming into cities which have fired large number of lifetime educators was the last straw. I had to say something about how wrong i think this is, and how it reflects a larger issue with his worldview. It doesn't mean that I have written off the positive things he has done.

Stop and Frisk: My Articles in The Wave

Over the past few weeks I wrote a few pieces for The Wave on S and F and race issues.

Published July 5, 2013

Confronting Myself on Race

By Norm Scott

A rally was held on July 8 at on the steps of Tweed Courthouse (Protest at Tweed Over Racist Comments Draws a Crowd), headquarters of NYC Department of Education, calling for an investigation of Minerva Zanka, the  principal of Pan American International High School in Queens, who allegedly referred to African American teachers she was firing as “big lipped,” “nappy haired,” and “gorillas.” Given the DOE’s double standard of protecting principals who do wrong while hounding teachers over relatively minor transgressions, it wouldn’t be surprising to see the principal get off with no more than a slap on the wrist.  I am not shocked that racist attitudes are still so visible.

The idea that with the election of Obama we are entering a post-racial society looks far from reality. We are ingrained with racial stereotypes from our earliest years. Black male teens and young men are often the target of these attitudes. I was in Philadelphia about 10 years ago for a conference and went to dinner with a friend who had just gotten her MBA at Wharton, one of the top schools in the nation. I walked her back to her apartment which was in an “iffy” neighborhood with lots of people hanging out on a hot June night. On the corner there was a group of black men who looked to be in their twenties and older drinking from beer cans and having a good time.  My antenna went up, though my friend seemed unconcerned. As we came to the corner, she ran up and hugged one of the guys, congratulating all of them on their graduation from Wharton with their MBAs. Big lesson learned about my own racial assumptions.

I was reminded of this event during debates on stop and frisk. What assumptions do police make, admittedly in a somewhat different situation, when they see a group of black makes, especially teens, hanging out? Having taught elementary school, I had little experience with high school students. But in the late 80s - early 90s I spent some time with a group of kids of color who played basketball on a high school team where one of my former students was a star player. I was involved in trying to find the right school for him but being a poor academic student he ended up at one of the tough neighborhood high schools which was in the process of being closed and reopened under a new name. During his freshman year there were only seniors left in the school. (The school has since been closed once again.)

For his 4 years in the school I went to most of their games and kept their stats.  I often gave them lifts. We went to basketball tournaments and Knick games. A few times I drove some of them out to my house to enjoy the beach or play computer basketball games on my computer. While at times rambunctious, like any teens, I found them to be a delightful group of kids though some did get into trouble. Living in some of the poorest neighborhoods they seemed to have experienced stop and frisk activities from police, which they accepted as an expected occurrence. I wondered how it would feel from the perspective of white kids and how their parents would react?

A few weeks ago my wife and I went into the city in the late afternoon when the subway cars were loaded with kids coming home from school. We got seats in the midst of a group of noisy and rambunctious young teens who were horsing around. Being on the trains at that time quite often, I was wary but not uncomfortable. My wife seemed a bit more concerned, at first. Until one kid, running by bumped into me. He stopped, turned around and apologized. While being aware, as one must be, ingrained assumptions can be very dangerous. Just ask George Zimmerman. [POSTNOTE: He may have gotten off but he will never rest in peace. In fact he may have been better off in the long run if convicted on the lesser charges.]

Norm blogs at ednotesonline.org.

Here is a more newsy article on a march to stop stop and frisk held in Rockaway on June 22. Published in The Wave June 28, 2013:

Rockaway Rally to Stop “Stop and Frisk”

By Norm Scott

Having read City councilman Eric Ulrich’s recent column in The Wave in which he criticized attempts to curtail Stop and Frisk and proposed bills in the City Council calling for more oversight of the police department, seeming to view them as an attack on the work of the police, I decided to check out a “Stop Stop and Frisk" march staged by a group of activists from  the Rockaway Youth Task Force, Brothers for Peace and Social Change, Culinary Kids, and People's Justice. About 30 people marched along Beach Channel Drive from Beach 57th Street to Mott Avenue on June 22, a beautiful Saturday afternoon. I was only able to cover the early part of the march which was aimed at making the community aware of their efforts, handing out leaflets and engaging in information conversations on the route.

Josmar Trujillo, one of the march organizers and a Rockaway resident said, "We're not here to say we don't want any police. We want policing to be done the right way.”

Ulrich did recognize that the policy is controversial: "Critics abound. Some argue stop and frisk violates civil liberties and unfairly targets people of color and minority communities." Ulrich did not address the impact of the policy on law-abiding young men who are so often the target based on little evidence other than the color of their skin.

One 22 year old marcher, wearing a bright orange Rockaway Youth Task Force tee-shirt, touched on the unfair aspect. "I've been stopped many times. I've even been stopped walking into my building and asked where am I going. They search and pat you down. They ask if you've ever been arrested. They look you up and they let you go. It's a waste of their time. It's a waste of my time. It doesn't actually stop crime and we're tired of it."

Christina Gonzalez, 26, who grew up in Dayton was asked about the impact of the policy on women, given that they are almost never stopped, said they are no less affected. "They're the ones who have to defend their partners or be forced to stand by and watch helplessly," she said.

Ulrich maintained that "Stop and frisk has helped drive crime to historic lows, removed thousands of illegal guns from city streets and contributed to the overall renaissance of our great city." Critics point out that evidence points to a very small percentage are actually accused of a crime. Of the nearly 5 million stops that took place in last decade, less than 1% resulted in a handgun recovered. The 101st police precinct, which covers the eastern end of the Rockaways, has some of the highest rates of stop and frisk in Queens and in the City according to the NY Civil Liberties Union and is one of the only precincts in the City that has maintained a high level of stop while the rest of the City has seen a drop.

Trujillo said, "Residents and community groups are demanding that post-Sandy Rockaway be rebuilt with as much social and racial justice as planned storm-resistant infrastructure. Inequity and injustice have no place in a community that has pledged to be united moving forward. We gathered to show that we will not let the status quo of racial profiling in Far Rockaway continue."

Some claim that efforts to curb Stop and Frisk actually serves to police department from pressure from commanding officers to meet quotas to "juke" the stats," which are often the sole method used to judge effective policing. Critics blame Bloomberg’s cuts to the police, saying if there were more officers on the street for community policing there would be less need for Stop and Frisk.

A June 24 report at CapitalNewYork.com addressed this issue. “The most recent budget does not raise taxes or include increases in fines or fees ... and does not include more money to increase the size of the New York Police Department. One reason the police stepped up their proactive tactics, according to one of [police chief Ray] Kelly's predecessors, Bill Bratton, is the reduction in the size of the police department. With fewer officers and more responsibilities to fight street crime and terrorism, police can no longer spend as much time learning about the neighborhoods they're patrolling, developing a rapport with residents and acquiring information. According to Bratton, the "political decision” not to increase the size of the police force has led to the stop-and-frisk problem Bloomberg is now dealing with."

A public debate on the issue will be organized in Far Rockaway in July. Those interested in speaking or attending can get more information. Facebook: Resist Stop and Frisk - Far Rockaway

Email: resiststopandfriskfarrock@gmail.com

Here are some press releases from the organizing groups in Rockaway.

More than six months after hurricane Sandy the Far Rockaway community is seeing a resurgence of the familiar police tactics that were the norm before the disaster. The 101st police precinct, which covers the eastern end of the Rockaways, has some of the highest rates of stop and frisks in Queens and in the City, according to the most recent NYCLU data.

Residents, community groups and stop and frisk activists will come together on Saturday, June 22nd to march from the Edgemere housing buildings on Beach 57th and Beach Channel Drive to Mott Ave, near the A train station, where we will rally to say no more to racial profiling. We demand our community, and our youth in particular, stop being treated as criminals first and citizens last.

As the Rockaways look to rebuild and build back better equipped to deal with natural disasters, we will resist the social and political disaster bestowed down to communities of color by Mayor Bloomberg and NYPD Commissioner Kelly. The status quo of racial profiling as policy for the NYPD is not tenable, legal or just. The community needs economic and social investment, not a police state.

 ----------

RESIST STOP and FRISK IN FAR ROCKAWAY

More than six months after hurricane Sandy the Far Rockaway community is seeing a resurgence of the familiar police tactics that were the norm before the disaster. The 101st police precinct, which covers the eastern end of the Rockaways, has some of the highest rates of stop and frisks in Queens and in the City, and is one of the only precincts in the City that is doing MORE stop and frisks, while the rest of the City has seen a drop. In the Rockaways the overwhelming majority of stops are occurring on the eastern end of the peninsula. It has been said that commanding officers seeking promotions come to Rockaway where they can accrue high arrest numbers for the Compustat-based police model that has dominated the NYPD in in the Bloomberg era. Revelations from the Federal trial on stop and frisk policy last month included police officers who testified as to quotas placed upon them from higher ranking officer point. The official position of the Mayor and commissioner Kelly has consistently been that stop and frisks take guns off the streets. However, of the nearly 5 Million stops that took place in last decade, less than 1% of those resulted in a handgun recovered. It has become such a scandal that the Department of Justice has even recently come out to support the creation of an independent monitor for the NYPD, which the NYPD does not want. The NYPD and the local precinct point to the high crime rate but recent 2013 data shows that there is no relationship between stop and frisk rates and crime. In the early part of the year crime went down even as stop and frisks went down across the City. Not to mention the fact that the legal basis for the tactic require reasonable suspicion of being armed. Since 99.5% of the time there is no gun, one can only come to the conclusion that these suspicions are unfounded. But the 101st precinct has clearly and unequivocally said they use stop and frisks to combat crime in general--a clear violation of the standard they are supposed to place upon the tactic. Are you interested in talking more about this issue? 

Would you like to argue for or against stop and frisk? We will be organizing a public debate in July in Far Rockaway. If you are interested in speaking or attending, please contact us. Facebook Group: Resist Stop and Frisk - Far Rockaway Email: resiststopandfriskfarrock@gmail.com

Eat a Twinkie, Be a Scab

Are Twinkies the charter schools of the junk food industry? I always thought they sucked anyway. BOYCOTT!!!

Twinkies are back after a successful union-busting campaign that placed the blame on union workers for its demise. As the media celebrates their return, they make sure to bury the real story.

Here are some resources if you have nothing better to do on a hot summer day.

1. CNBC.com
   1. Business takeaways from the return of the Hostess Twinkie
      

      Quartz ‎- 2 days ago

      Now Hostess will have non-union drivers who will be able to deliver Twinkies to almost all the convenience stores in the country. The union ...
   1. The Twinkie Returns, With Less Baggage

      Wall Street Journal‎ - 5 days ago

2. Return of the Twinkie, Sans Union Labor - Dallas - News - Unfair Park

   blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2013/06/return_of_the_twinkie.php‎

   Jun 24, 2013 - Twinkie is risen from the ashes of its liquidated parent, Hostess, and will visit the shelves of grocery stores and...

3. Hostess Ditches Union Workers – Plans July Twinkie Relaunch ...

   www.thegatewaypundit.com/.../hostess-ditches-union-workers-plans-july...‎

   Jun 23, 2013 - twinkie. Hostess union workers were hoping its new owners would rehire them after purchasing the bankrupt cakes company. Didn't happen.

4. Twinkie's future could be union-free - Apr. 25, 2013 - CNN Money

   

   money.cnn.com/2013/04/25/news/.../twinkies-union.../index.ht...‎

   by Jose Pagliery - in 91 Google+ circles

   Apr 25, 2013 - The makers of Twinkies are starting up production again soon. But union workers might not be getting their jobs back.

5. Twinkies Return, Hostess Unions Won't - ABC News

   abcnews.go.com › Money

   Apr 26, 2013 - The bankrupt assets of Hostess Brands, Inc, the company responsible for such delicacies as Twinkies, Ho Ho's, Sno Balls and Ding Dongs, are ...

6. New Twinkie Maker Shuns Union Labor - WSJ.com

   online.wsj.com/.../SB1000142412788732447400457844306238066026...‎

   Apr 24, 2013 - The company that bought the Twinkie, HoHo and Ding Dong brands out of bankruptcy won't use union labor when it reopens the plants.

7. No Union Label on Twinkie Return - Breitbart

   www.breitbart.com/Big.../2013/04/.../No-Union-Label-on-Twinkie-Retur...‎

   Apr 28, 2013 - Buried amid the generally gloomy news last week was a development that is a true cause for celebration. By July, the Twinkie, and other ...

8. What they didn't tell you about the Twinkies comeback! » peoplesworld

   peoplesworld.org/what-they-didn-t-tell-you-about-the-twinkies-comeback/‎

   Jun 27, 2013 - Those Millers Union workers who have taken jobs with the new Twinkie owners have taken substantially greater compensation hits than they ...

Teach For America's Civil War: Organizing Resistance Against Teach for America and its Role in Privatization

This summer, alumni and current teachers are launching the first ever national campaign against the organization.

This weekend former TFAers and others gathered in Chicago to discuss a resistance movement to TFA.

James Ceronsky wrote about it for The American Prospect.

Twenty-four years running, the rap on Teach for America (TFA) is a sampled, re-sampled, burned-out record: The organization’s five-week training program is too short to prepare its recruits to teach, especially in chronically under-served urban and rural districts; corps members only have to commit to teach for two years, which destabilizes schools, undermines the teaching profession, and undercuts teachers unions; and TFA, with the help of its 501(c)4 spin-off, Leadership for Educational Equity, is a leading force in the movement to close “failing” schools, expand charter schools, and tie teachers’ job security to their students’ standardized test scores. Critics burn TFA in internet-effigy across the universe of teacher listservs and labor-friendly blogs. Last July, it earned Onion fame: an op-ed entitled “My Year Volunteering As A Teacher Helped Educate A New Generation Of Underprivileged Kids,” followed by a student’s take, “Can We Please, Just Once, Have A Real Teacher?”

Despite the endless outcry, no one has ever staged a coordinated, national effort to overhaul, or put the brakes on, TFA—let alone anyone from within the TFA rank-and-file. On July 14, in a summit at the annual Free Minds/Free People education conference in Chicago, a group of alumni and corps members will be the first to do so.

 More here.

Here's the web site for the conference that ended today.

NYDN: Charter school funding balloons during Mayor Bloomberg time in office - DUHHHH!

If they can knock off 10% of the teaching staff with another 10% to come over the next few years, the city can funnel money directly to the charter jails without passing GO. Here are some points made in today's Daily News "Exclusive" -- some exclusive, telling us Bloomberg has shortchanged public schools in favor of charters.

Charter schools received billions of dollars during Mayor Bloomberg’s tenure — while teachers, school aides, principals and classrooms got a smaller share. Meanwhile, the city spent more money on direct services to schools, but reduced the percentage of funds that goes to pay for classroom staffers and materials.....NYDN

Duhhhhh, one might say given the Bloomberg ed deform aim to wipe out entire swaths of public schools and replace them with charters.

Now there are a whopping 159 charter schools in the city — and two dozen more will open in the fall. More than 100,000 students — about 10% of all city students — are expected to be enrolled when all of the schools reach capacity. 

Just watch calls for expansion when the cap is reached - given there are 159 charters in NYC already we are heading in that direction. Not only chains but every social welfare agency and mom and pop people with a vision of getting into the edu-real estate charter business where you can hold of a piece of an entire publicly funded and built building are jumping on the charter bandwagon. No unions, no worries. Think about it. 10% of the students mostly go to schools with non-union teachers. The UFT has to be taking a hit here with the loss of dues with the opening of  every new charter though the ATR deal where people are not fired like they are in other cities keeps dues coming in. But watch the final piece go into place starting this year with the new evaluation system as the city starts going after tenured teachers in droves. The entire purpose of the desperation of ed deformers to get an evaluation deal in place is all about an end run around tenure.

If they can knock off 10% of the teaching staff with another 10% to come over the next few years, the city can funnel money directly to the charter jails without passing GO.

Remember that the Chicago TU lost about 6000 teachers, around 15-20% of its membership.

EXCLUSIVE: Charter school funding balloons during Mayor Bloomberg time in office

Charter school funding, set by the state, has risen from about $32 million to about $659 million over a decade as the mayor increased their number.There were 17 charter schools in New York when Mayor Bloomberg took office. Now there are a whopping 159.

Related Stories

• Harlem Children Zone’s Promise Academy charter school, built with $60M from city, opens 
• Why charter school myths are spreading 
• Officials oppose state Senate yeshiva bus plan that could open floodgates to hundreds of millions of dollars more in city busing costs
• Democrats push back the educational policies of Mayor Bloomberg as GOP front-runner Joe Lhota makes confident play in support of reforms

 

Charter schools received billions of dollars during Mayor Bloomberg’s tenure — while teachers, school aides, principals and classrooms got a smaller share of a substantially larger school budget pie, according to documents obtained by the Daily News.
Money for charter schools exploded from about $32 million to about $659 million over a decade as Bloomberg increased their number from 17 when he took office in 2002 to 125 in 2010-11, the most recent year for which spending data are available.
Funding for charter schools is set by the state.

Now there are a whopping 159 charter schools in the city — and two dozen more will open in the fall. More than 100,000 students — about 10% of all city students — are expected to be enrolled when all of the schools reach capacity.

“This administration’s unprecedented investment in education created stability and coherence in a broken system,” said Andrew Buher, chief operating officer for the city Education Department.

But the skyrocketing expansion, a key part of Hizzoner’s education legacy, is controversial partly because charter schools receive rent-free space in city buildings and are privately run.

Roughly two-thirds of the schools are located within traditional district schools.

“It’s no secret that this administration has made charter schools a priority, and this can be seen in dollars as well as in the allocation of space,” said Kim Sweet, executive director of city nonprofit Advocates for Children.

Charter schools outperform public schools on many measures, but only 6% of their students are English-language learners, and just 9% of their students have special needs — much lower than the citywide averages.

In a speech last week at the Manhattan Institute, city Schools Chancellor Dennis Walcott boasted about“our highly sought-after charter school options.”

Charter school sources said they expect the level of growth to slow down in the next few years — even though there are huge waiting lists — because the schools can’t hire qualified staffers fast enough to keep up with demand as existing facilities reach their full capacities.

Meanwhile, the city spent more money on direct services to schools, but reduced the percentage of funds that goes to pay for classroom staffers and materials.

Teachers received about 34% of the overall education budget in 2010-11, down from roughly 40% of the overall budget in 2001-02. But their starting salaries increased — from $31,190 in September 2001 to $45,530 this year, according to education officials.

Still, teachers union head Michael Mulgrew blasted the city for skimping on teacher salaries, saying instructors haven’t received raises in the four years since their last contract expired in 2009. “If you’re going to lower the percentage you’re paying teachers, you’re not going to be able to hold on to or attract a high-quality workforce,” Mulgrew said.

Bloomberg also allotted smaller shares for custodial services, drug prevention programs and summer school, while boosting payments to private schools for special-needs students who require services district schools don’t provide.

More money was also doled out for debt service and employee benefits.
Since 2002, the overall city budget increased from about $41 billion to about $65 billion in 2011, according to figures from the Independent Budget Office.

The education budget takes up about a third of the overall city budget — and has nearly doubled since Bloomberg took office. It grew from $13 billion in 2002 to nearly $25 billion for next year.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/charter-school-funding-balloons-article-1.1398190

Martin Van Buren HS Community fight back against co-location

One of the more sinister methods the Department of Education uses to undermine comprehensive high schools is by opening up new schools within buildings that were not designed to hold multiple schools. This hurts the established school in a number of ways. The student population of the comprehensive school is reduced to accommodate the new school.  This in turn leads to a huge budget cut in the established school which leads to massive staff and program reductions. The students in the established school are also made to feel that they are second class citizens in their own school as they see the new school lavished with all kinds of state of the art equipment and facilities in their part of the building as the DOE pours start up funds into the new school. The DOE can then compare the two schools and find the established one lacking. ....James Eterno

The Martin Van Buren High School community is fighting the co-location of a new school in their building.  They are holding a press conference Monday at 1:00 pm in front of the school.  James Eterno has the details on the ICE blog.

Lois Weiner on the Survival of Unions and Why Chicago TU is Different

What we see in Chicago has been more  like the kind of organizing done by the CIO, fusing a progressive social program to union demands. CORE, the insurgent caucus that leads the CTU and was re-elected last month in a landslide (with over 60% of the members voting) has shifted the political terrain of education politics by embedding union demands in a vision for public education. ... Lois Weiner

Herman Benson, founder and driving force behind the Association of Union Democracy, is an interesting guy. He must be around a hundred years old by now.  See here, here, here.

I was in touch with the AUD early on in the life of Ed Notes. I was told by some old hands that Benson as a fan of Al Shanker and the UFT as one of the most democratic of unions (sadly, that is actually true) often left them off the hook. I imagine Benson, as others do, would think I am too harsh on the UFT given the context. But I don't know any other context personally. I guess there is another side but I have no patience for it.

Here is a great debate starting with Lois Weiner's comments referring to the debate on union democracy between Benson and Dan La Botz. Debating the Chicago model vs UFT model will be fodder for years of debate. I find it interesting that Mulgrew seems to have been selling both to Chicago and to the anti-Randy Unity Caucus people (a growing band) that he is differentiating himself from Randi. Maybe in some words and tone, but I offer my standard: watch what they do, not what they say.

A reply to Herman Benson: The Chicago Teachers Union is a different kind of labor union

http://newpol.org/content/reply-herman-benson-chicago-teachers-union-different-kind-labor-union

Lois Weiner

July 12, 2013

The exchange between Herman Benson and Dan La Botz highlights one, if not the primary, issue that has to be resolved if we are to turn back the tidal wave of anti-union and anti-democratic policies that have transformed the nation’s social and political landscape.  I think both Herman and Dan would agree that we need a revived labor movement. But what will drive the revival? And what form should it take?

Herman’s definition of revival seems to consist of more “oomph” from the AFL-CIO leadership and more attention to union democracy.  Both are sorely needed. The question is whether these are adequate to restore, let alone push forward, the political and economic policies we so desperately need.  In education, the answer is a clear “no” and the example of the Chicago Teachers Union supports Dan’s argument.

Yes, the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) conducted a militant strike. But it was not a traditional strike by any means, if we take as a definition of tradition what has existed in US unions for four decades.  What we see in Chicago has been more  like the kind of organizing done by the CIO, fusing a progressive social program to union demands. CORE, the insurgent caucus that leads the CTU and was re-elected last month in a landslide (with over 60% of the members voting) has shifted the political terrain of education politics by embedding union demands in a vision for public education. Yes, the strike was a contract dispute, but these courageous, wise activists found a way to win over the vast majority of teachers to use the contract fight to fight for much more. Theirs was a fight for public education - as is their current struggle against the unnecessary, racist school closings that other cities are facing.  CTU has taken on the power establishment of Chicago and the White House.  They organize along side parents and community activists, as partners. In doing so, the CTU has shown teachers and organized labor the kind of unions - and unionism - we need.  Now. 

The victory of “right to work” legislation in Michigan shows how very tenuous U.S. labor’s hold is on the right to bargain collectively. Is it even a movement? Herman has been so right for so long about union democracy. Still, his analysis reflects the problems liberals have had in understanding that neoliberalism has destroyed the landscape in which unions have functioned.  (In an upcoming article in “The Jacobin,” I’ll be discussing liberalism’s failure to “get” what’s ailing education and the unions more detail.)

(Note: You can now follow me on twitter @drloisweiner.)

Fiorillo: Better Randi than no union at all

The fundamental nature of the lack of democracy internally is a bigger threat to the life of the union than the external - in the long run.

I hope you've been following the over 200 comments on Diane Ravitch's blog from people all over the nation, many of whom have learned a lot from us here in NYC on how the AFT and UFT operates. Diane began with a post about her relationship with Randi Weingarten My Friend, Randi Weingarten which opened up a firestorm of criticism of Randi and in some cases unfairly to Diane for posting this. But Diane doesn't censor comments and I'm sure our union officials are not happy over the overwhelming thumbs down on Randi -- we don't even see the usual Unity hacks showing up to defend her.

But as we've been discussing in MORE, the failure of the union on so many levels creates a dangerous internal anti-union - rather than anti-union leadership which leads people to call for ending dues check-off, mandatory dues and other right wing wet dreams. I understand the frustration, especially in the UFT where even if we organized a CORE like caucus with wide outreach, we still would be far from being able to win more than a few meaningless positions. The fundamental nature of the lack of democracy internally is a bigger threat to the life of the union than the external - in the long run.

Below is Michael Fiorillo's response to a call for abandoning unions. And let me also affirm what Michael says about Randi: – who, by the way, has always been accessible and respectful to me personally, and toward whom I harbor no personal animosity....

In my case I have been particularly critical of Randi's leadership since 2001. Yet every time I see her she is friendly and personable and accessible. I know some people see this is smart politics but I am not getting into motivation. If it is politics on her part it works to the extent that we can manage to keep the discussion on a political, not personal, level.

in response to H.A. Hurley:

It may be time to abandon the unions. I can’t think of any beneficial reason to teachers for their purpose, at this time. We used to be able to count on them and I have received their assistance on several occasions. If teachers join for liability insurance only – one can get it much cheaper [...]

While it might be tempting for some teachers to imagine other uses for the money that now goes to union dues, the fact remains that unions are the ONLY institution in the country that exist to defend the rights of working people.

The worst, most corrupt union is still better than no union at all. Despite my criticisms of Randi – who, by the way, has always been accessible and respectful to me personally, and toward whom I harbor no personal animosity – and the UFT leadership, I have no illusions that my life would be better without the union, and nor should any other teacher.

Just as the public schools need to be taken back by the public and reformed in accordance with democratic principles, in the interest of Democracy itself, so too the unions must be democratized and re-energized. Those processes would occur together, and reinforce each other.

As for Diane posting about her friendship with Randi, why should anyone have a problem with it? Diane occasionally writes on the convergence of personal and political matters, and those are important discussions to have.

As for any inferences about her motivation, I take what she writes at face value, and am grateful for the platform her post gave opponents of Randi to educate teachers and AFT members in other parts of the country.

That this forum is so open and wide-ranging, and that the level of discussion and debate remain as high as they do – things that Diane has assiduously cultivated on this blog – guarantees that the truth will assert itself and be recognized among the readership.

Campbell Brown Calls for Arrest of Lucas, Disgraced Kindergarten Teacher

The Hunt

Success Academy Evil Moskowitz Sues on State Audit to Keep Dead Bodies Buried While Grabbing More Real Estate

Is this a new way of being able to steal without consequences?  True public schools have to have an accountability of every dollar. The charter schools that are occupying our community schools need to be held to the same standards. ... comment at nycednews

UPDaTeD:
Let's get our fingers into as much pie as we can while claiming we're a public school but make sure the public can't see behind the charter iron curtain.

Leonie Haimson said:

This is the second accountability section of the new charter law that Eva has openly opposed – the other one was the requirement that charters enroll and retain comparable numbers of high needs students – which her charters don’t do and she doesn’t want to be required to do. As Diane points out, Eva’s argument that the state comptroller has no authority to audit her schools puts the lie to any claim that charters are truly public schools. She wants taxpayer money – no demands it – and then refuses to be accountable for it. For shame!

From Ravitch blog:

http://dianeravitch.net/2013/07/11/moskowitz-success-academy-sues-to-block-state-audit/

When New York State Comptroller Tom Di Napoli informed Eva Moskowitz’s Success Academy charter chain of his intention to audit its financial records, the corporation sued to block the audit of public funds on grounds it was unconstitutional.

According to the story in a legal journal, “Success Academy claims that a 2009 ruling by New York’s highest court found the Legislature overstepped its bounds by passing legislation in 2005 that authorized the comptroller to audit charter schools.
“Despite fine-tuning in 2010 that resurrected the audits, they’re still unconstitutional, Success Academy claims.”

In fact, Di Napoli has audited other charters based on the change in the law in 2010 that was written specifically to authorize the Comptroller to audit the use of public funds.

In one of Success Academy’s letters to the Comptroller, it asserts that the comptroller lacked the authority to conduct such audits under the state constitution, which authorizes reviews “of any political subdivision of the state” – which charter schools are not.”

Not being “a political subdivision of the state” is another way of saying that the charter corporation is a private contractor, NOT a public school. This has been the standard line of charters across the nation to evade state labor laws and other laws that apply to public schools but not to private contractors.

http://www.courthousenews.com/2013/07/11/59266.htm

--

Proposed New Schools Success Academy Charter Schools - NYC is applying to the Trustees of the State University of New York to open new public charter schools in Manhattan, the Bronx, Queens, and Brooklyn ("New Success Academies"). Success Academy Charter Schools - NYC will be modifying its application to apply for schools in new Community School Districts ("CSDs") in these boroughs. Mission The mission of each charter school will be to provide students with an exceptionally high-quality education that gives them the knowledge, skills, character, and disposition to meet and exceed New York State standards, and the resources to succeed and lead in school, college, and a competitive global economy.   Target Population The schools will serve low-income and/or mixed-income populations residing within the neighborhood or Community School District (CSD)* of location, including English Language Learners and students with special education needs.  The aim would be to educate all students at the same high level, irrespective of socioeconomic, racial, ethnic, and/or other status.  We deeply believe that economically and racially integrated school settings provide important benefits to both students and the community.  Students from low-income families benefit academically from attending mixed-income schools, and the establishment of high-quality mixed-income schools raises the bar generally for lagging middle-class schools.  It is a core principle at Success Academy that every child should have access to a high-quality public school option. *Find Your CSD  Grades and Enrollment If approved, the New Success Academies would open in August 2014 with Kindergarten and 1st grade, and add one grade each year until they serve Kindergarten through 8th grade (middle school grades subject to government approval).  The planned total enrollment in the school’s fifth year of operation is 600-675 students. Academic Program The academic program will include daily reading, writing, math, and exploratory-based science instruction, totaling approximately four-and-one-half hours each week.  On any given day, students might dive into a good book, hypothesize about whether an object will sink or float, mold a papier-mâché dragon head, sing songs, solve the word problem of the day, challenge a fellow student in chess, write a compelling story, or score the winning soccer goal.  Success Academy scholars are critical thinkers who love learning and are college-bound. In elementary school, the day will run from 7:45 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. in Kindergarten and until4:30 p.m. for all other grades, except one day each week, the school day will run from 7:45 a.m. until 12:30 p.m. Extensive professional development will be provided for teachers on those afternoons.  Teachers will use student assessment data to drive instruction, and employ a research-based, results-driven curriculum that goes well beyond New York State standards Proposed Schools  Success Academy Charter Schools - NYC is applying to open six new public charter schools in August 2014. In support of its application, Success Academy is seeking community input in the following boroughs and CSDs. Manhattan CSD 2 Bronx CSD 8 Queens CSD 27 CSD 29 Brooklyn CSD 21 CSD 22 Comments: We welcome your comments.  Please use the form below to submit your comments and be sure to select the CSD, if any, to which your comment refers. To leave a voicemail with your comments, please call 646-747-6196, and be sure to specify the school your message concerns.  We want to serve your great community, and we will endeavor to incorporate the community’s input as we embark on this exciting mission. We look forward to working with you and becoming an integral part of your commu

https://www.successacademies.org/page.cfm?p=819&LockSSL=true

__._,_.___

TODAY MORE Summer Series 4-7pm

Hello all,

We hope you are as excited as we are for the kick off of our 2nd annual summer series at Local 138 on Ludlow st. Lower East Side, NYC. Today's forum will feature MORE members who are public school educators and parents discussing the opposition to high stakes testing, how it leads to the school to prison pipeline, and how we all can work together to have the schools our children deserve.

Check out this relevant graphic from our brothers/sisters of Chicago Teachers Union http://www.ctunet.com/blog/how-standardized-testing-feeds-the-school-to-prison-pipeline 

The happy hour specials are great and it's a fantastic chance to educate, strategize, and of course, socialize!

Our facebook event here: https://www.facebook.com/events/177003385802348/

Save the dates for upcoming summer series

Thursdays

7/25 UFT Leadership: Friend or Foe: An analysis of the leadership of our union and how a caucus such as MORE views them

8/8 How Do We Fight For a New Contract:Strategies for gaining a new contract that benefits our educators, students, and parents. 

8/22 The First Days of School-How to Build an Active Chapter: Organizing and mobilizing your school to fight back against abusive administrators and profit driven reform.

DOE Retaliates Against Children Who Opted-Out

No matter how smart they are, the majority of kids who did not take standardized tests will be forced to attend summer school. ... Takepart.com

The NYCDOE - you know those "Children First" people who are so threatened by the growing parent opt-out of the tests movement-- are forcing kids to go to summer school even it their teachers said that was not necessary. An article in takepart.com included these quotes by Change the Stakes' Andrea and Diana below:

This spring, public-school students in New York City chose a dicey way to protest standardized tests: refusing to participate. But now some students are paying the price for opting out by having to attend summer school even though their teachers have said they should be promoted to the next grade. Naturally, parents are not happy, and some recently held a press conference at the city’s Department of Education headquarters to protest the promotion procedures. “Children [who opt out of testing] are perceived the same as children who received a low score, even if they are high-performing students,” Andrea Nata, a public school parent, said at the press conference. “This is the second year in a row my child has not been promoted in June.”

“Denying promotion on the basis of parental decision to opt out is a clear retaliation method and scare tactic for future parents to make this an option,” Diana Zavala, the parent of a fourth grader in New York City and a member of Change the Stakes, told TakePart. Zavala’s son opted out of the tests for a second year in a row. He does not have to attend summer school because his portfolio was assessed and he passed.

Many parents, including Zavala, say that at the heart of the controversy is transparency. Parents are routinely denied access to evaluate the tests or see the questions their children got correct or missed. They argue that in many instances a teacher’s recommendation is absent from any decision to promote a student. Summer school, Zavala said, is not the answer for students who opted out or who are in the lower 10 percent. Change the Stakes wants students to have support when they need help during the school year instead of penalizing them with summer school. “For the students who fail the tests to begin with, those students, if really deemed to be behind academically, the answer isn't summer school (for five weeks), but actual support to get the student to grade level,” Zavala said. “And this certainly shouldn't come to a head at the end of the year, but should be something that was ongoing and addressed throughout the school year.”

The article has a misleading headline:

Opting Out of High-Stakes Testing Has Backfired in New York City

In fact the opt out movement and the DOE attempt to suppress it will ultimately backfire on the deformers as parent outrage at the testing mania grows.

Ravitch Friends Randi, Fiorillo and Many Others Object

Randi is just the mirror image of Michelle Rhee.  ... Mike from Texas, comment on Ravitch blog, My Friend, Randi Weingarten

Randi Weingarten is no friend of teachers, and has been at the center of virtually every catastrophe that has befallen us and public education in the past fifteen-plus years. ...She is part of the problem, and there will be no effective opposition to the hostile takeover of the public schools until she and her disastrous policies are repudiated by working teachers. ,,,, Michael Fiorillo, comment on Ravitch blog, My Friend, Randi Weingarten.

This comment is interesting in what it doesn't say: "who would folks prefer has Randi Weingarten’s ear: Diane Ravitch or ArneRhee&Co?" Randi as head of the AFT  should be leading the fight. Why should Diane have to compete for Randi's ear over ArneRhee? The very nature of the question is a condemning one. I too trust Diane who along with people like Leonie Haimson, a parent not a teacher, have led the fight that our supposed union leaders have abdicated. ... Ed Notes, comment on Ravitch blog.

Yes I do trust Diane and I have no problem with her being friends with Randi. Even now if I see Randi I am friendly. This is not personal as I always used to tell Randi but political.

Diane's post has gotten loads of comments, almost all unfavorable to Randi, from all over the nation. And for those who mistakenly think that her chosen successor Mike Mulgrew is trying to distance himself from Randi, those are just words, not action, designed to give a false impression.

Randi is triangulating, straddling the fence between ed deform and union leader, unwilling to fight them on every front. Witness the difference from the Chicago teachers.

Here is Michael's full comment - check all of them out and leave your own.

Michael Fiorillo
July 10, 2013 at 9:20 am
With all due respect, Diane, as a NYC public school teacher who has had to live under the consequences of her leadership, local and national, I must disagree with you about Randi Weingarten.

In 2002, the UFT under Randi’s leadership agreed to mayoral control of the schools, a policy it maintains to this day. Mayoral control has been the primary vehicle for destabilizing, taking over and privatizing public education in NYC, and has provided a national media stage for the untruths and deceptions based upon it. Towards that end, Weingarten frequently appeared at dog and pony shows where Bloomberg/Klein’s spurious test scores were touted to the public.

In 2005, Weingarten negotiated a contract that eliminated seniority transfers, whereby excessed teachers or teachers at closing/reorganizing schools were guaranteed positions at other schools based on seniority. It was that contract – which also eliminated teacher’s right to grieve letters to their personnel files – that led directly to the epidemic of school closings in recent years, since Bloomberg and his DOE apparatchiks could now close a school and compel teachers to re-apply for their jobs, and which has led to an army of senior teachers, many of them racial and ethnic minorities, being professionally destroyed.

The destruction of the neighborhood public school, one of the primary objectives of so-called education reform, was enabled and accelerated by this.

In 2009, Weingarten said and did nothing while Bloomberg used his fortune to overturn a term limits law that had twice been approved by NYC voters.

Later that year, she convened a union governance committee, on which I served, to develop alternatives to mayoral dictatorship of the schools, which was scheduled to either sunset or be re-authorized that year. While I and others developed a minority plan that involved much greater community involvement in the running of the schools, the leadership-approved plan would have been a marked improvement over what we have now.

But it was not to be, because Randi Weingarten, without consulting what is nominally the Union’s highest body, its Delegate Assembly, casually threw out that plan and unilaterally endorsed the re-authorization of mayoral dictaorship of the schools virtually unchanged. She actually had the nerve to publicly state at the time that mayoral control had brought stability to the schools.

Shortly after, she and her protege Michael Mulgrew sat on their hands and made no endorsement in the mayoral election, allowing Bloomberg to be re-elected when he was vulnerable to defeat. I assume they thought that by shutting up, they’d get a contract for us. But Bloomberg correctly read their weakness, and four years later we still have no contract, despite her protege’s having enshrined VAM, Common Corporate Standards and evaluation checklists in state law. Her protege and vizier in NYC, despite his faux tough guy persona, got nothing for those concessions.

Dozens and dozens of schools have been closed since then, affecting thousands of children and teachers.

I could go on and on: her coziness with Eli Broad, AFT-sponsored seminars on for-profit opportunities in education at the Aspen Institute, helicoptering in to cities and negotiating contracts, as in Newark, that use the pseudo science of VAM in teacher evaluations, doing nothing while politically-connected charter operators cannibalize public school facilities, egging on her own apparatchiks to boo teachers who opposed having Bill Gates as the keynote speaker at the 2010 AFT convention, while Gates returned the favor the following week by attacking our pensions.

Sure, Randi will write a letter, or get special treatment when arrested at a ritualistic, photo op demonstration protesting policies that she has enabled. Alll of that is misdirection and political triangulation, permitting her to point to a few chosen sound bites when overwhelmed teachers look to her for support.

It’s obviously not my place to question your personal friendships, Diane, but Randi Weingarten is no friend of teachers, and has been at the center of virtually every catastrophe that has befallen us and public education in the past fifteen-plus years.

She is part of the problem, and there will be no effective opposition to the hostile takeover of the public schools until she and her disastrous policies are repudiated by working teachers.

Lisa North adds:

That is she has done nothing to mobilize parents, students, teachers, and community members to organize the fight back it will take to push the privatizers out of public education and really create a strong well functioning school system. The AFT and NEA do have some of the resources to help make that happen. Missing in action.

Michael Pat D:

I would choose Ravitch also and basically trust her leadership and reproach of the ed deformers. BUT we are not out from under Randi. She is as powerful as ever. She has helped to procure some very bad contracts around the country as the President of the AFT as well as the disastrous ones here in NY. She has a strong finger, still, in NYC’s pie and she makes sure she keep Mulgrew in line. She is not our friend. Friends strengthen each other. They don't stab you in the back looking for their moment in the lime light. as Randi does by courting some of the major ed deformers. A friend fights alongside you for what is right. She is not “in our court.” Damage is still being done and Weingarten, unfortunately, is a major player in the cause.

Protest at Tweed Over Racist Comments Draws a Crowd - and TV Coverage

I got there in time to tape most of Monday's rally at Tweed. I have more to share but here are two MORE members speaking.



James Eterno posted these links on the ICE blog.

COVERAGE OF PROTEST AT TWEED

There is good video and some media coverage of yesterday's protest at Tweed by the Pan American International High School community demanding a fair investigation of allegations that the principal made racist remarks against staff members she was terminating.

Here is a link to more Channel 7 coverage of this story.

Mercedes Schneider on Another Vallas Scam: New Orleans Miracle That Wasn't

It is important for every resistance fighter be aware of the New Orleans story and all the other ed deform scams going on so you are equipped to fight the hype wherever it may come up -- you know, those social occasions with non-educators who see ed miracles touted in the media.

Diane Ravitch posted:

Schneider on the “New Orleans Miracle” That Wasn’t

By dianerav

July 6, 2013 

Corporate reformers cling passionately to the myth of the New Orleans miracle because it is all they have. The New York City miracle evaporated in 2010 when the State Education Department acknowledged that the state scores were inflated. The DC miracle never happened. The Vallas miracle in Philadelphia vanished on day one. Arne Duncan’s amazing score gains in Chicago disappeared.
All that is left is New Orleans. The media loves to find miracle schools and districts, but anyone who looks beyond the press releases soon discovers that the Recovery School District is the lowest performing district in the state.
So the reformers say, “But look at our gains.”
Mercedes Schneider takes apart those claims here.

DOENUTS IS BACK With a New Blogger

Welcome back DOENUTS even though the originator has retired -- from blogging, not teaching. I know his replacement, a passionate educator and activist who has gone through the struggle to try to keep his school open.

Backdoor School Closings, or What’s in a Name?

            School Closure is a concept that on the surface creates a lot of backlash.  When then PEP does their big “vote” every spring, hundreds, and sometimes thousands, of community members turn out in opposition to this policy for a least one night.  People claim that the process is “unjust” “unsound” and “undemocratic,” and while I couldn't agree more, I am concerned that people have gotten so caught up in the idea of school closures that they are forgetting the worst parts of the closures themselves.  It has become clear to me over the past few weeks, that even if we get a mayor who demands a moratorium on school closings, (which is of course no guarantee) the worst parts of school closings might stick around, just in another form.  People believe that a new mayor could mean the end to school closings, and I fear that a new mayor might just be an end to very public school closings, and an end to the opposition against school closings, while school closings are actually still going on.

            What happens when a school closes in New York? 

Read more at: Backdoor School Closings, or What’s in a Name?

MORE Summer Series Begins Thursday, 4PM: High Stakes Testing and the Schools Our Children Deserve

Serious discussion while enjoying a happy hour. Check out what people are saying around 7PM. Jia Lee is organizing this with other parents from Change the Stakes, so this should be fun.  

We're kicking off the summer series July 11 by taking a look at the effects of high stakes testing in our schools. Parents from Change the Stakes will be joining us to discuss why a growing parent movement against the high stakes nature of these tests is mounting not just in NYC but statewide and nationally. Discuss HST and its use as a vehicle for enabling destructive policies such as school closures & ranking and sorting students that leads to the school to prison pipeline. The socioeconomic and racial disparity in these policies have been downplayed and must be brought to light. This will be a great opportunity to discuss teacher and parent concerns as well as ways in which we can support each other and build a movement towards enabling schools that our students deserve. 

I'm in charge of the next one on July 25:

UFT/AFT Leadership: Friend or Foe? A full understanding of the role the UFT/AFT leadership plays is a crucial step for any caucus. Through what lens does an opposition caucus in the UFT view Unity, the dominant party in power? As potential partner, foe or something in between?
· To what extent can a caucus challenge the leadership without being accused of promoting an antiunion mentality amongst a disaffected membership?
· Can a caucus create pressure to force changes in policy or would
such changes be cosmetic, co-opting the opposition while strengthening the leadership?
Come to an open debate and discussion on these crucial questions that must be explored before any caucus can grow!

We'll do a little history and have various points of view on this issue. Is the UFT leadership really Vichylike or is that just hyperbole?

Here is the announcement from Mike Schirtzer:

Hi folks,

We know it's a been hot and rainy summer so far, but we hope you are finding some well deserved rest and relaxation.

 

Please join us this Thursday as we kick off our 2nd annual summer series with a discussion on the proliferation of high stakes testing, the movement to oppose it, and how we can work together to achieve the schools our children deserve.

 

More info

http://morecaucusnyc.org/2013/06/25/2013-more-summer-series%E2%80%A8-discuss-debate-educate/

4:00-7:00pm at Local 138 at 138 Ludlow St. Lower East Side NYC

Before the summer series our steering committee is meeting, which is open to all, we will discuss our upcoming campaigns and membership structure. Join us 2:00pm at Berkli Parc Cafe on the corner of Delancey and Allen St, only a couple of blocks walk  to the summer series. It is good chance to have lunch or coffee with us  and share your valued input.

Look forward to seeing everyone Thursday,

Mike Schirtzer

More details here:

*2013 MORE Summer Series*
* Discussion, Debate, Educate!*

*Every Other Thursday this Summer!* at *Local 138* 138 Ludlow St (betw. Rivington & Stanton) *4-7P**M*

Happy Hour Daily (4pm-9pm) $3 draft beer, $3 wines, $3 well drinks Nearest Transit Stations: Delancey St. (F), Essex St. (J,M,Z) 2nd Ave St (F)

Here are the August events: