Sunday, September 8, 2013

Carol Burris: The damage to educators by APPR

When the commissioner says that it is only 20%, he is of course, being disingenuous. Test scores have undue weight, and he knows it... Carol Burris, NYS Principal of the year

Posted at:

It is vital that all of the stories be told and that the data is gathered so that parents, the media and policymakers understand what a foolish and destructive evaluation system APPR is...
Below is a link to the story I wrote about an upstate New York teacher who was devastated by receiving a score of Developing. Diane Ravitch was  kind enough to help me get in touch with her after her story appeared on her blog. 
Please read it, share it, Like it for your Facebook page. The more that educators read such stories, the more willing they will be to share their own.

It is vital that all of the stories be told and that the data is gathered so that parents, the media and policymakers understand what a foolish and destructive evaluation system APPR is. Clearly, this teacher was rated poorly because of the undue emphasis that test scores have in this lopsided point system.
When the commissioner says that it is only 20%, he is of course, being disingenuous. Test scores have undue weight, and he knows it.

 We should all be especially interested in the stories of teachers and principals who were rated ineffective, yet had not one category rating of ineffective (I believe there is great potential for a winnable appeal as well as a challenge to the system) as well as teachers and principals who were rated Effective or Highly Effective on the "other 60" measure by their principal or superintendent, yet were rated Developing or Ineffective overall. We all need to do our best to get these stories out and to gather data.  People cannot be ashamed. They must fight back with dignity. 
Carol


--

UFT Misleads Membership in Latest Thompson Mailer Claiming Offer of Retro Pay

With Thompson still unable to move into second place, and DiBlasio in striking distance of avoiding a runoff entirely, this UFT leadership has reached a new desperate low... Peter Lamphere
Will Thompson offer teachers a chicken in every pot just as Herbert Hoover did in the 1928 election? (How did that work out?)

Word last night was that a desperate Leo Casey was engaged in a twitter attack over the mayoral election with MORE being a target. Maybe if Leo supported a democratically run union people in the UFT would actually give a shit. More on that later.

Does anyone smell a level of desperation coming from the UFT/AFT leadership over their Thompson endorsement in the face of the de Blasio surge? Was de Blasio being a little too rough on charter schools for the UFT to endorse him when he wants them to pay the damn rent (including the UFT charter?

What if Bloomberg's prediction that a UFT endorsement is the kiss of death? My rough guess is that they may well pull Thompson into a runoff with de Blasio and then we will have a few weeks of fun and games as the UFT and 1199 battle it out. Here is an email from the MORE Listserve showing that the UFT leadership will just make stuff up.

Peter Lamphere posted this on the MORE Listserve:
I was a little shocked to see at advertisement in my mailbox when I got home today, which claims that Thompson is in favor of retroactive pay for expired city worker contracts.

This is not true. None of the main democratic candidates has come out in favor of the full retro we are owed. Only Liu and Albanese have said that they will definitely negotiate some retro (although not as much as is owed), the others all say that they will not take any public position on future city contracts. Thompson has said that city workers "deserve a raise," but has not taken any position on retro pay.

In Tuesday's debate, Thompson even explicitly made clear that he has made no promises to the union on this question (debate segment on retro starts at 08:45, Thompson's response at 14:10).

The level of desperation in the ad (paid for by the UFT's PAC, United for the Future) is belied both by the misspelling of retroactive (indicating to me it was inserted at the last minute) and the big red message on the back - "We need to win."

With Thompson still unable to move into second place, and DiBlasio in striking distance of avoiding a runoff entirely, this UFT leadership has reached a new desperate low.

AFTERBURN FROM REALITY-BASED EDUCATOR

UFT Tells Teachers Bill Thompson Promises Retro Pay - But He Doesn't

More lies and misinformation from the United Federation of Teachers leadership over the Bill Thompson campaign:

Educational Experiment Engineered for Failure

http://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/thedailynewsonline.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/f/f3/ff3a3c78-151c-11e3-be26-001a4bcf887a/5226bb490dfd6.preview-300.jpg

Art teacher's contest entry "Educational Experiment Engineered for Failure” kids struggle w/tests as John King looks on. 

Vote for this picture to win, go to the FB page here: https://www.facebook.com/464Gallery



A Medina High School art teacher is seeking online votes in the second annual Vision Art Awards, in which she has entered a painting protesting the state-mandated standardized testing.

Vision Art Awards, sponsored by 464 Gallery at 464 Amherst St., Buffalo, seeks to support, encourage and celebrate the work of local and regional artists through a format that levels the playing field between emerging and established artists, said art teacher Jen Scott.

Scott’s oil painting titled “An Educational Experiment Engineered for Failure” shows the New York State Education Commissioner John King smiling through a classroom’s windows, while students are struggling with the influx of standardized testing.

“This painting really protests the over-reliance on standardized tests and how these tests focus so narrowly on reading and math skills,” Scott said. “Non-standard thinkers, like my son Matt, are penalized through these tests.”
 
Soon most states, including New York, will mandate so-called high-stakes tests in many subjects at several grade levels, Scott said.

She shared a statement from Howard Gardner, professor of Education at Harvard Graduate School of Education: “We must proceed cautiously before we place students’ minds and hearts at risk with tests of dubious quality, whose meaning can be over interpreted and whose consequences can be devastating. Yes, we need more rigorous academic standards, but we must also give youngsters models when it comes to developing the most crucial skills: love of learning, respect for peers and good citizenship. That is what they will need most to pass the test of life.”

Scott is asking people to vote for her painting by “liking” the 464 Gallery fan page on Facebook; clicking on the Vision Art Awards photo album; and clicking “like” on the painting.

An opening reception for the art show is scheduled from 6 to 10 p.m. Sept. 13. At this event, the winners of the People’s Choice Awards will be revealed, as well as the juried selections. In addition, some other works of note will be featured, as selected by 464 Gallery owner, Marcus Wise.
 
Leonie Haimson
Class Size Matters

Saturday, September 7, 2013

Noah Gotbaum Running for City Council


Norm --

In 4 DAYS, the UWS will have a new council member! (CLICK HERE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU VOTE SEPTEMBER 10TH!)

We all want Noah to win. That means SPREADING THE WORD!

Can you forward this email to 5 PEOPLE you know that live on the Upper West Side? It only takes a second and it goes a LONG way!

                       *                      *                     *                    *                  *

Noah Gotbaum is an Independent Democrat Running for City Council on the Upper West Side. He's the only public school parent running for this seat. Here's a few things he's done:
  • Noah led the successful fight against the demolition of PS 199 and PS 191, which developers wanted to replace with luxury high rises (article HERE)
  • Noah tackled public school overcrowding by leading the community to force the Department of Education to establish PS 452 and build the new school at Riverside Center
  • Noah fought successfully to block a contract renewal for a dangerous shelter on West 95th Street that was not only failing to provide promised services, but was pushing out existing low-income tenants 
Read more about Noah!

Noah needs your vote to keep fighting for this community. Please elect Noah Gotbaum to the City Council on September 10th.

CLICK HERE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU VOTE!

See you at the polls!!

- Team Gotbaum


http://www.gotbaumforcouncil.com/
Help us get out the vote the next 4 days! Click the button below to volunteer!



Political Rumblings - Norm in The Wave

Political Rumblings
By Norm Scott

I get it about The Wave’s dismissal of Bill de Blasio because he ignores Rockaway. Maybe it’s because I’ve only lived here for 34 of my 68 years with half my life lived in Brooklyn. I’m not a Rockaway chauvinist when it comes to choosing the next mayor. The Wave takes him to task for not showing up in Rockaway, not a life or death matter for me. I would judge him more on his plan for renovating hospitals which might save our lives. As I write, this just popped up: Bill de Blasio attends "Hospitals Not Condos" Rally. His plans for rational health care system will do more for Rockaway – if he actually delivered. I would also judge him on his stand on Stop and Frisk, but more on that in my next column which will come during the run-off, which, given the de Blasio numbers, he should make (and watch the vicious fur begin to fly then).

Let’s face it. Albanese and Liu, both of whom I like, and Weiner, are toast. I still may vote for Sal just to prove that there are people who support rational politicians. I don’t necessarily view it as a wasted vote. Do I trust de Blasio which is where I am leaning due to the liberal agenda? Not. His history shows lots of things to be concerned about. But of all the candidates who have a chance I am most comfortable with him.

The NY Times, has been dishing dirt on all the candidates, even Quinn, who they support. Quinn is a Bloomberg hack (if you loved Bloomberg vote for her and reap the consequences). And she collected more money from the real estate industry than any other Democratic mayoral candidate. The Times hit de Blasio a few times, also pointing to his ties to the real estate industry and the way he managed the Hillary Clinton campaign for Senate as they dragged out Bloomberg attack dog sleaze Howard Wolfson, who has worked for the UFT, Hillary and Attila the Hun.

They’ve done a couple of hits on Thompson’s connections to certain shady characters (I posted a link in my last column- tinyurl.com/kmw7atw). The latest on August 30 was a devastating exposure of how Thompson, as Comptroller, funneled the management of pension funds to a big campaign contributor. “Again and again, Mr. Thompson reaped political gains from those he awarded city business…. nationwide, more than half of large public pension funds outperformed the five city funds’ combined 4.84 percent return from 2002 through 2009…” Ouch. I could live with him giving my pension money to a pal, but not a pal who screwed up. NYC Teacher/Blogger Reality-Based Educator said it straight out: Bill Thompson is a Crook (http://tinyurl.com/klxhp7u). I wouldn’t go that far. In my view almost every professional politician is a crook, of some sort. Let them get a real job.

The UFT is supporting Thompson and there is some desperation given they were 3-time losers in the 2001 election when they began with Hevesi the crook, then onto Ferrar, then Green and we ended up with Bloomberg. Nice work. Imagine if Thompson doesn’t make the run-off, leaving a Quinn/de Blasio race. Where do they go then? Do they sit the runoff out or go de Blasio? Oh, the possibilities for political junkies.

Now the 3 or 4 people who read this column know that my bottom line comes down to where people stand on the education/corporate “reform” movement which I’ve dubbed the “deform” movement, especially charters, which I characterize as “the invasion of the body snatchers.” NY State Regent head Merryl Tisch, pro ed deform and an enemy of teachers, is Bill Thompson’s campaign co-chair. (By the way, with all the news on education deform, have you ever heard one public opinion from out own local regent, Geraldine Chapey?) So how does the UFT/Thompson/Tisch connection play out in the education wars? Thompson straddles the fence on charter schools. De Blasio takes the position they should pay the damn rent for occupying public school space. That’s enough to get my vote.

I lied. A word on stop and frisk. Major crime dropped under Giulianni. Did you know that Rudy, that paragon of treating people of color like crap, used stop and frisk 1/8 of the amount Bloomberg has used at its height? When Bloomberg cut down Stop and Frisk recently by significant numbers (due to the pressure), crime actually dropped. I’m not fan of Giulianni but he had lots more cops on the street while Bloomberg cut cops and decided to make S&F his major policy despite the collateral damage on people of color, instead of community policing --- saving money on the backs of the police force. No one opposed to S&F is calling for less police presence, but more. Bloomberg and Kelly are engaging in scare tactics. In fact many cops are themselves wary of S&F quotas being used to juke the stats of their superiors.

Next time: I have a bone to pick with Eric Ulrich. Norm spills his guts every day at ednotesonline.com.

John Owens and Confessions of a Bad Teacher Host Forum Sept. 10


Friday, September 6, 2013

A Big Whoo - Summer School for Teachers Report from an Undisclosed Urban Location

This came in over the transom from an Ed Notes reader:
I had the privilege of attending ten days of training in a Summer Institute. The primary advantage of attending the institute is I lost the last two weeks of my treasured summer vacation.

My district has adopted Responsive Classroom, which I have nicknamed snapping and clapping. When the teacher is pleased with a student response, a ten finger whoo may be given. Please practice now with me. Hold out your arms in the air, wiggle your fingers and shout, “Whoo.”

Another highlight of Responsive Classroom is clarifying procedures. Find a partner. Script the rules you will give to your students for walking in a line. Share the rules with your partner, get feedback and revise the rules. Then switch partners. Yes, you have to write down exactly what you plan to say to your students.
My favorite part of Responsive Classroom is the opportunity to line up pretending to be students and march around the school. I was honored to play the teacher role. The secret to maintaining an orderly line is to stand toward the middle of the line.

Did I learn anything academic? I participated in two sessions of training on Core Knowledge the new language arts literacy program in the district and one session of Math in Focus training.

All I can tell you is both programs are scripted. The teacher stands in front of the classroom and reads from the teacher manual. In kindergarten sounds are to be taught not letters. For example, this is the mmm sound and this is the symbol for the mmm sound. The name of the letter is not mentioned. Somewhere along the line after teaching 270 sounds, letters are introduced. Math in Focus involved solving very difficult third and fifth grade word problems.

All of my questions were answered with, either “I will get back to you,” or “Send me an e-mail.” I have a binder full of notes I cannot decipher and handouts I do not plan to read. Should you require any more information about Summer Institute, please ask someone else. I have no clue.



Whistle Blower Portelos Open 3020 Dismissal Hearing Sept. 12, 23, 30

Come to the circus. Press invited to find out they are spending an enormous amount of money trying to fire an accomplished teacher. Francesco is proof that rubber rooms still exist but that is a story ignored by the press, which hopped to when they had mass rubber rooms that were an embarrassment to both Tweed and the UFT. Now that they dump people in DOE offices full of wasteful bureaucrats, they all go and hide.
Greetings,
      If you are available and want to see the public modern day hanging of a parent and educator who blew the whistle and is slated for termination, see here:
Dates were just set for September 12, 23 and 30 at 49 Chambers Street.
Thank you all for your support. Regardless of the outcome, the fight for public education has a strong friend here.
-Francesco Portelos
mrportelos@gmail.com
educatorfightsback.org
Parent
Educator
UFT Chapter Leader IS 49
“In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.” -Martin Luther King Jr.

IRS Investigates CWC Charters - Run by Eva Hubby Eric Grannis - Sign Petition to Stop Them From Opening

As soon as their non-profit status was granted, CWCS quietly used their power over the local NY schools' trustees to push through exorbitant "licensing agreements" that will funnel more than $3 million of tax dollars away from the New York children they were intended for and into the hands of a few wealthy executives of CWCS, a California corporation.
Another charter that skims 8% as a mismanagement fee.

There's a new petition taking off on Change.org, and we think you might be interested in signing it:

Attorney General Eric Schneiderman: Stop CWC schools from opening

By Williamsburg Greenpoint
Brooklyn, New York


We ask the Attorney General for an injunction to stop Citizens of the World Charter Schools, a network based out of California, from opening in Williamsburg and Crown Heights on September 9, 2013 because the IRS is currently investigating the organization for fraud.
Citizens of the World Charter Schools (CWCS), a National chain of charter schools based out of California has been approved to open two schools in Brooklyn September 2013--despite the fact that CWCS is under IRS investigation for fraud.
The IRS investigation puts both CWC NY schools at risk for closure after they open. This is not fair to either the families who enrolled in CWC NY schools or the tax payers who foot the bill.
Why is the IRS investigating?
• In 2011, the scandal ridden and now defunct California non-profit Wonder of Reading funneled all of it's money and resources, which were given to build libraries in public schools, into the creation of a new chain of charter schools, Citizens of the World. Both organizations are run by the exact same executives and board members.
• CWCS was granted tax-exempt status as a charity by the IRS in 2012 on the grounds that they would provide grants to open new schools but NEVER charge the schools a fee for any rights or services. As soon as their non-profit status was granted, CWCS quietly used their power over the local NY schools' trustees to push through exorbitant "licensing agreements" that will funnel more than $3 million of tax dollars away from the New York children they were intended for and into the hands of a few wealthy executives of CWCS, a California corporation.
• To date, no grants have been given to the NY schools, only loans. And the school budgets show that the schools will not offer food, a school nurse, or even a janitor.
Parents have the right to know this critical information!
Parents who applied to Citizens of the World schools Williamsburg and Crown Heights are not aware of either the IRS investigation or that their children will not be offered food.
There has been significant opposition to Citizens of the World in the Williamsburg community since early 2012 when it was discovered that Citizens of the World had racially motivated marketing strategies and racial targets of 55% white for the CWC Williamsburg school.  Hundreds of parents protested the schools at the public hearings.
Parents in CWC LA schools are complaining that their children are not receiving promised and required services, including English Language Learners and children with special needs. There were several incidents of neglect in CWC LA schools that led to a child passed out in her own vomit, a child beaten in the bathroom, and another child in a coma for five days.
We believe that the CWC NY schools are predicated on a relationship with a corrupt organization. We also believe that the IRS investigation will bear fruit.
We believe that Brooklyn children deserve better.

Thursday, September 5, 2013

Video From Murry Bergtraum HS: Having Fun With MOSL

Posted at the MBHS chapter web site:

https://sites.google.com/site/uftmbhs/home

UFT spends $2 Million on Thompson While 1199 Spends $6,590 for de Blasio

The city's biggest unions are spending millions of dollars on independent efforts to elect their chosen mayoral candidates. Two of the three Democratic frontrunners, Council Speaker Christine Quinn and former Comptroller Bill Thompson, have both benefited from independent spending by their respective unions.
But not Public Advocate Bill de Blasio. At least not on the surface.
Some political and labor insiders have expressed surprise that Mr. de Blasio's biggest union supporter, 1199 SEIU—one of the largest unions in the city with an estimated 200,000 members—has so far declined to fund an independent expenditure in his support.
The union has only spent $6,590 on two ads for Mr. de Blasio, according to campaign finance filings. In comparison, the United Federation of Teachers has spent almost $2 million on mailings and advertisements for Mr. Thompson, while the Hotel Trades Council has spent a combined $616,000 to support Ms. Quinn... Crain's NY
Crain's New York has a fascinating article comparing the UFT's support for Thompson with 1199's support for de Blasio. We've often said that the UFT political machine which the leadership tries to present as formidable is often a Potemkin Village. The conclusion of the article is telling:
Labor insiders said that while UFT has huge sums of money is can spend on its candidates, and the Hotel Trades Council has a highly mobilized cadre of volunteers, the healthcare union's main strength is its reputation.
"The brand itself is so powerful, even among non-union members in some of these areas," one labor operative said. "The de Blasio people can slap 1199 on a piece of mail to African-Americans: that sends a message that's as important a validation as any in the black community."
Yes, what exactly is the UFT brand?

Actually, the numbers are somewhat misleading at the article goes on to point out.

1199's hidden operation for de Blasio

Public Advocate Bill de Blasio with 1199 President George Gresham (right) at an event earlier this summer. Photo:

"That IS surprising!" one union source said in an email to The Insider. "I didn't know that...particularly in light of the fact that [Mr. de Blasio] is now up there with Quinn" in the polls. In fact, he is well ahead in the polls, and even when he was mired in fourth place, 1199 leaders had pledged a huge effort on his behalf.
Some labor insiders predicted that with several large hospital contracts up for renegotiation in 2014, 1199 was being more frugal with its money than the other unions. And traditionally 1199 does not have the reputation for making large expenditures on its chosen candidates, preferring to focus on driving turnout among its membership. (Although the union did contribute $200,000 as of early August to a political action committee devoted to defeating former Gov. Eliot Spitzer in the comptroller's race.)
So on the surface, 1199 seems to be spending far less on Mr. de Blasio than other unions have been spending for his rivals. But behind the scenes, the union's leadership insists its political operation is in full gear for the public advocate.
"We've been working very hard all along since we endorsed," said Kevin Finnegan, 1199's political director.
The union's work for Mr. de Blasio falls into two categories: volunteer organizing, coordinated with and paid for by the candidate's own campaign; and member-to-member advertising and communication that is separate from the campaign.
Most of the union's spending in favor of Mr. de Blasio is on these member-to-member communications, which does not have to be disclosed to the city's Campaign Finance Board after the City Council voted in January to shield such communication from public view.
(Predictably, the CFB is not a fan of this type of spending. "New Yorkers want and deserve access to complete information about the interests supporting candidates for City office, including mass-mailings that unions, corporations and other membership organizations use to promote candidates to their members," a CFB spokesman said.)
Mr. Finnegan said 1199 had spent around $600,000 on organizing and $1 million on mailings to its members—but acknowledged that those numbers had likely since increased since he last estimated them.
Meanwhile, the de Blasio campaign paid 1199 organizers hourly for help raising an army of volunteers. More than 200 union organizers were identified for this program, Mr. Finnegan said, although it is unclear how many were actually paid by the campaign for their volunteer-organizing services.
"They had to pay for…organizers that worked on getting them volunteers," he said. "So they're getting billed for that." That ended Sept. 1, and simultaneously the union began its member-to-member mail and phone program.
Now the union is focusing on placing around 30 MPOs—or highly trained member political organizers—in a dozen council districts, mostly in minority-heavy central Brooklyn, northern Manhattan, Queens and the Bronx, to focus on getting out the vote for Mr. de Blasio.
"Beginning last night, the whole union was turned over to that effort," Mr. Finnegan said. "So we had about 250 people out knocking on doors—member doors—and talking to them about Bill de Blasio and Tish James and Scott Stringer," the union's other endorsed citywide candidates.
Mr. Finnegan attributed Mr. de Blasio's recent surge—he is now polling with more than 40% of the vote—to 1199's behind-the-scenes efforts in his support.
"There's no question in my mind the two are linked," he said. "His numbers began to rise as our first pieces of mail started going to our members. And I don't want to take too much credit, he's an excellent candidate, probably could have done it without us. But I'm certain we've had an impact."
Labor insiders said that while UFT has huge sums of money is can spend on its candidates, and the Hotel Trades Council has a highly mobilized cadre of volunteers, the healthcare union's main strength is its reputation.
"The brand itself is so powerful, even among non-union members in some of these areas," one labor operative said. "The de Blasio people can slap 1199 on a piece of mail to African-Americans: that sends a message that's as important a validation as any in the black community."

Brunch with MORE in Brooklyn on October 5, 11:30-1:30



Hello,
You are invited to the following event:
Brunch with MORE (The Movement of Rank and File Educators)
divider
Event to be held at the following time, date, and location:
Saturday, October 5, 2013 from 11:30 AM to 1:30 PM (PDT)
The Church of St. Luke and St. Matthew's Parish Hall
520 Clinton Avenue
Brooklyn, NY 11238

View Map
Yes No Maybe
Share this event:
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
divider
On October 5th, Come enjoy home-made food, meet MORE's educator activists, learn about our movement, and support our work to improve teaching and learning conditions! A brunch cocktail, gluten-free, vegan and vegetarian options will be available.    RSVP online today to reserve your place at the table, and bring your donation with you! Suggested Door Donation: $20   10-20: $10      Children...


Share this event on Facebook and Twitter

We hope you can make it!

Cheers,
MORE (Movement of Rank and File Educators)

eventbrite
Eventbrite

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Yet Another Charter Scandal

Yummy. I love charter school scandals.

Click here: Bronx charter school named in whistleblower suit - NY Daily News


Bronx charter school named in whistleblower suit

Alexis Riley, formerly a project manager at South Bronx Classical Charter, said she was fired for reporting financial and academic improprieties.

The ex-project manager of a Bronx charter school has filed a $1 million lawsuit alleging she was fired in retaliation for reporting financial and academic improprieties.
Alexis Riley claims she was terminated from her $65,000-a-year job at South Bronx Classical Charter School in June shortly after notifying a supervisor that the Department of Education had been fraudulently billed for special education students who were no longer enrolled there.
Riley’s supervisor acknowledged the problem but warned her “it wasn’t worth the battle,” according to the complaint filed last week in Brooklyn Supreme Court.
Riley, who has a law degree from New York Law School, also claims she uncovered plagiarized tests and the withholding of food to punish students.

Riley alleges in the suit that when she brought the fraudulent invoices to the attention of the school’s executive director, Lester Long, he responded dismissively, “Oh, can they really be that off?”
The final beef with school administrators came after Riley was admonished for wearing flip-flops to work because she had a dislocated bone in her foot.
A message left at the school was not returned.


[Teachersunite] Today! A New Vision for School Safety in NYC Public Schools

I support Dignity in Schools. Let's end suspension mania and find a way to deal with difficult behavioral issues in a rational way that will benefit teachers and students. I saw the Teachers Unite film Growing Fairness (see here and here) last week and that should be shown around town as an example of how students can take part in the process.

I'll write more on my feelings about discipline -- I rarely called for supervisors and I never asked to have a kid suspended. But I did teach elementary school in my own classroom with the kids all day. I had a lot of power to make their lives in school happy (and not so happy) and used it. I actually stumbled on some of the dignity in schools campaign stuff in naturally trying to figure out how to get kids to get along but wish I knew about it.

========
A New Memorandum of Understanding between the DOE and NYPD is proposed today by the Student Safety Coalition. Read the guiding principles here & more information below.

Take part in this campaign & join Teachers Unite today!

Anna Bean
Campaign Coordinator
Teachers Unite
teachersunite.net

Begin forwarded message:


CONTACTS:  
New York Civil Liberties Union, Press Line, (212) 607-3372
Shoshi Chowdhury, Dignity in Schools Campaign-NY, (347) 832-8391, shoshi@nesri.org

Students, Parents, Educators & Advocates Present A New Vision for School Safety in NYC Public Schools
Student Safety Coalition Urges Next Mayor to Implement Major Reform Governing Police in Schools

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

September 4, 2013 – The Student Safety Coalition, a diverse group  of educators, parents, students, advocates and legal experts, today called on New York City’s next mayor to implement reforms to end overly aggressive policing in the city schools and restore authority over school discipline to professional educators.
           
The coalition presented “A New Vision for School Safety” – a set of nine guiding principles for overhauling the flawed Memorandum of Understanding between the New York City Department of Education and the NYPD that governs school safety operations. Implementation of these principles would clarify that educators, not police personnel, should address the vast majority of student misbehavior.  

“The massive and largely unregulated police presence in New York City’s public schools undermines the ability of school officials to provide students the safe, nurturing educational environment they deserve,” said Donna Lieberman, executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union.  “Much too often, we’ve seen police personnel intervene in disciplinary matters, resulting in students being roughed up, handcuffed, and even taken to jail. We urge the next mayor to restore authority over school safety and discipline where it belongs – in the hands of educators, not the NYPD.”

“A New Vision for School Safety” is the Student Safety Coalition’s latest initiative aimed at ending the school-to-prison pipeline – a nationwide system of local, state, and federal education and public safety policies that pushes students out of school and into the criminal justice system.  The over-policing of New York City schools, paired with zero tolerance discipline policies in schools, contributes heavily to the school-to-prison pipeline. These policies disproportionately target youth of color and youth with disabilities.   

Extensive research shows that such zero tolerance disciplinary policies fail to differentiate between minor student misbehavior and more serious safety threats, in the process involving police officers in school disciplinary matters and dramatically escalating arrests, suspensions and referrals to juvenile and criminal court.

In 1998, the then-Board of Education entered into an agreement, a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), with the mayor that transferred school safety responsibilities from the DOE to the NYPD. Currently, there are more than 5,200 police personnel in the city’s schools. On its own, the NYPD’s
School Safety Division would be the nation’s fifth-largest police force – ahead of Boston, Detroit, Dallas, Las Vegas and Washington, D.C.

“In order to truly improve the education of New York City’s public school students, we need to address the way they are disciplined,” said Damon Hewitt, director of the education practice of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund. “Students should feel nurtured and safe at school – not degraded, mistreated, and criminalized simply for being kids.  By handing disciplinary responsibility back to educators, we can reduce the role of police in schools and create a better academic environment for our students.”
In 2011-2012, there were more than 2,500 arrests and summonses and more than 69,000 suspensions in New York City public schools.  While overall suspension numbers have decreased slightly, the DOE continues to report dramatic racial disparities.  Black students make up only 28 percent of the student population, yet they received 53 receive of the suspensions.

Students, some as young as 5 years old, have been handcuffed, taken to jail, and ordered to appear in court for infractions such as tardiness, talking back, writing on the desk, and refusing to turn over cell phones.

Students with an arrest are twice as likely to drop out of school and those with a court appearance are four times as likely to drop out.

“The next mayor has an opportunity to improve the climate in our schools and foster a more productive form of discipline,” said Kim Sweet, executive director of Advocates for Children of New York. “This can’t happen without a change in the relationship between the NYPD and the Department of Education.”

“Students, parents and teachers need to get a bigger role in deciding what happens in our schools and safety,” said Nilesh Viswashrao, a 20-year-old youth leader of Desis Rising Up and Moving. “NYPD officers and School Safety Officers are not teachers or counselors, they are going to be able to solve the problems that we as young people go through. Our peers and educators can do that. Having police and metal detectors in schools keep youth of color like us criminalized. The MOU will be one step closer to making sure our schools are kept as learning places.”
“Our front-line staff representing children in court in all five boroughs sees first-hand that we need to keep students safely in school and prevent students from being kept out of school by over-reliance on exclusionary, criminal responses to normative child and adolescent behavior which does not create safer schools,” said Steven Banks, the Attorney-in-Chief of The Legal Aid Society, the oldest and largest legal services organization in the United States which annually handles more than 300,000 legal matters for low-income New Yorkers with civil, criminal or juvenile rights problems in addition to law reform representation that benefits all two million low-income children and adults in New York City.

The push to transform the relationship between educators and police follows the release earlier this summer of a special report by The New York City School-Justice Partnership Task Force, under the leadership of former New York Chief Judge Judith Kaye. The task force, which spent two years studying local and national school disciplinary practices, calls on the next mayor to lead, convene and implement an initiative that establishes a shared goal among city agencies, in collaboration with the courts, to keep students safely in school and use positive approaches to discipline while reducing suspensions and arrests.
“I sent my children to New York City Public School to learn the skills they needed to do so, but rather than be inspired they were confronted with metal detectors and NYPD officers every day at their school’s front door,” said Cassandra Whitney, whose two children attend city public schools. “As a parent, I am fed up. It’s time we put the power and trust back in the hands of our educators, and give the authority to determine how to provide our children safe and nurturing schools.”
The Student Safety Coalition works to end the New York City school-to-prison-pipeline and its disproportionate impact on youth of color and youth with special needs. Composed of New York City advocacy, academic and community based organizations, the coalition uses a coordinated set of legislative, public education and organizing strategies. In 2011, the coalition successfully advocated for enactment of the Student Safety Act, one of the country’s most comprehensive local reporting laws on student discipline and arrests.

The Student Safety Coalition includes: Dignity in Schools Campaign – New York, Center for Community Alternatives, Children’s Defense Fund – New York, DRUM - Desis Rising Up and Moving, The Legal Aid Society, Association of Legal Aid Attorneys, Make the Road New York, National Economic and Social Rights Initiative, New York Civil Liberties Union, Teachers Unite, Urban Youth Collaborative, Advocates for Children of New York.

To access a copy of the “A New Vision for School Safety”, please visit: http://studentsafetycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Vision-Statement.pdf

-xxx-
-- 
Shoshi Chowdhury
Coordinator
Dignity in Schools Campaign-NY
90 John Street, Suite 308
New York, NY 10038
Phone:212-253-1710 ext.314
Fax:212-537-0264
shoshi@nesri.org
www.nesri.org
www.dignityinschools.org

Mulgrew's Epiphany - And Hypocrisy

Blatantly self-serving. The UFT's situational approach to issues should be called Firmly Wavering... Fred Smith
The recent push back by the unions - teachers and principals- feels so self serving and risks dividing parents/students from educators further if all the messaging is about the damage to them ( via the evaluations), when the recent graduating class ( and all others after them) has only known the HST regime imposed by Bloomberg over the past 10 years..... Anon Parent
You are so right Fred. They never stood up when kids were punished /damaged by being identified by test scores, when they were denied music and art and foreign language so that they could improve scores. They never stood up when their people got after school jobs working with kids not to improve their education, but their scores in endless hours of boring test prep after school. They never stood up when there were jobs offered to improve scores which we all knew were phony.
....Loretta Prisco
Of course Mulgrew and Randi say they are against testing NOW. I can pull out Ed Notes resos at the Del Ass back in the late 90s that Unity opposed. I won't go into all the gory details of the UFT history re: testing. I think MORE is doing something on that.

The UFT is always trying to send mixed messages so they can say they are on all sides, never leading but following. Here is Fred's full response followed by more of the debate on the Change the Stakes listserve.
======
Folks,

http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/test-mayoral-candidates-article-1.1444953

Ever notice how crappy testing was acceptable to the UFT when teachers could get bonuses (financial incentives) from DOE for higher test scores (pre-2009). Now, that teachers are being punished--teacher evaluations, effectiveness ratings, tenure decisions, published names--the union leader finally finds the tests offensive?

And I don't recall the union ever urging teachers not to score the tests in days they could grab per session money to apply slippery rubrics to the tests' open-ended questions.

Ever notice how Mulgrew keeps the need for parent involvement in what happens to their kids out of the discussion? Don't want to give a voice, real structure or a chance for unity to emerge from the adults who have the most precious stake in reforming our educational system.

Blatantly self-serving. The UFT's situational approach to issues should be called Firmly Wavering.

My two cents. Happy 5774.
---- Fred Smith
=====
Agree w/ Fred and Loretta!

The recent push back by the unions - teachers and principals- feels so self serving and risks dividing parents/students from educators further if all the messaging is about the damage to them ( via the evaluations), when the recent graduating class ( and all others after them) has only known the HST regime imposed by Bloomberg over the past 10 years.

Not sure how you "message" that we cared when it affected your kids and the curriculum but we never actively pushed back until it affected our jobs...( especially when we publicly celebrated, cashed in, and gamed the system).

Just like the UFT is embracing the CCS ( while lamenting the lack of curriculum and training) and the whole college and career ready framework so they embraced accountability by test score all these years.

Watch the usual suspect allies- see where they stand on the CCS/college and career readiness (measured by test scores and the reason we need CCS) issue, since they are the same ones that actively undermined parent push back on testing (and local control and parent empowerment) for these many years.

Anon parent

What Did You Talk About in School? Not How to Teach Johnny But MOSLs, Growth, Goals and BS

 Most people were shocked and upset about the MOSL system... Teacher report on first day PD.
I have no clue what a MOSL is -- any relation to Mozel (luck)? I
don't think luck is in the offing. More like Shlimossel (unlucky guy) where some unlucky teachers are going to get chopped.

The first days back for teachers used to be about getting ready for the kids. Setting up your room to create a welcoming environment, etc. There was so much to do, aside from the usual stuff like lesson planning.

Oh, there was always the usual bullshit from the principal about her vision -- repeated year after year almost word for word -- but that was at most 2 wasted hours where you could maybe get some paperwork done (though once she called me out as I did a roll book and ordered me to put it away -- I can multitask you know -- and when I kept doing it she charged me with insubordination -- that's another story for another time).

But it is a new ball game in the schools. It's not about kids, it's about MOSLs and how you as a teacher will be rated.

Now MOREistas have been very tuned in to the issue but the rank and file have not and may feel they are getting hit with a truck. [I'll post some comments from other teachers later who actually view this as a better thing than what came before.]

Here is a sample from one teacher about how yesterday went:
The PD on Danielson and MOSL was overwhelming to say the least. Most of the chapter was not tuned in all summer and found the presentations difficult to digest. 
 
Most people were shocked and upset about the MOSL system with most teachers coming to the conclusion that they have no control over their evaluations if they are not in Regents class.
 
I can say that out of staff of 70, 60 signed the [MORE] petition [calling for a moratorium].

I didn't pick up, in my first 1000 reads of the MOSL guide, that English/ESL teachers are required to use the NYC performance assessments  (page 14 and 16 for state measures) so this is going to mean more work for ELA/ESL teachers having to give the baseline and final (taking way learning time) and grading.

For the the MOSL committee it seems the most fair, and we understand this entire system is rigged there is no fair equation, but whats easiest, brings upon the least amount of additional work, and spread the pain evenly would be using the Regents scores and growth model as 40 % (20 school wide, 20 lowest third and Regents classes use individual as the target)

Does someone know what a sample "goal" would be if we chose that model- ay links you can share.

I do understand goals mean more work, but just want to offer committee concrete examples which I can't find in the book, it seems only 2 pages 42/43 is dedicated to this.

My suspicion is there isn't much difference between growth and goal, other than goals is much more work VAM/growth has more wiggle room. There's also safety in the herd, if everyone does VAM, we're better off doing it

I also suspect the samples on page 14/15 may be the best options.