Monday, April 20, 2015

The Roots of A Company Union - UFT/AFT Deform Ideology and Randi: Evidence of Collaboration With the Enemy, ie., Eli Broad.

The Broad Foundation is not anti-union. Rather, it seeks to transform unions into a form of company union. A company union is a union located within and run by a company or a national government, and the union bureaucracy is incorporated into the company’s management... Ken Derstine
... the "seat at the table" strategy is not due to bad strategy but in fact that strategy is endemic to the way the union leadership has operated for 50 years - part of the very fabric of their DNA. They can't try to organize the membership or run a democratic union that might threaten this seat - or stool. They are locked in....Ed Notes
As I reported last night - Ken Derstine on Randi after Watching AEI Video: This is a company union -in  re: Randi's tweet to me last night about evidence related to her VAM waffling. Let's look at the bigger picture of evidence of ed deform collaboration. Boy, is there evidence.

In order to mount an effective response to the union complicity, we must study and understand who and what the AFT/UFT really represents, which is not us but the ruling class. [I know for some people "ruling class" connotes a "RC" meeting in some dark rooms to plot - not exactly but when it comes to ed deformers like Eli Broad et al, not totally wrong.]

At Saturday's MORE meeting, Jonathan Lessuck made that very important point. (Jonathan is a member of Progressive Labor, which has been a presence at the AFT and NEA conventions.) He said that without such an analysis people in MORE will think that by certain actions they can get Mulgrew/Unity/Randi to modify their policies instead of engaging them fully.

When an opposition - like New Action - plays the role of lobbying the leadership to change instead of full-scale engagement with the rank and file - it ends up with a mindset of fighting for little crumbs rather than fully engaging the leadership in an all front battle. At times I worry about MORE becoming New Action, light, especially when I see opposition people joining UFT bullshit committees.

[Soon I'll be putting forth my argument for MORE to boycott the UFT election farce next year as a true militant "in your face" act of resistance rather than misleading members that we can win ANYTHING.  And maybe just let New Action have its little crumbs.]

There has been a yin-yang in MORE on this point over the years.

Some caucuses think that getting Randi to say she is now against VAM or supporting opt out is a victory of sorts [Let's celebrate - we got them to react - look how our work is paying off].

I don't agree. I see it as co-optation and when people like Diane Ravitch praise Randi whenever she does something like this I see it as enabling Randi to engage in further co-optation and distraction -- pulling people away from the struggle. Thus, this weekend's big NPE conf in Chicago will enable Randi to play the true reformer. I wasn't able to make it but if I could I don't know if I could be polite.

[Later I'll report on the remarkable attack Leo Casey made on Leonie Haimson and KidsPac for daring to criticize de Blasio on education.]

Without understanding the union obligations to certain interests, Mulgrew and Randi actions do not make sense - like why would the UFT not jump on the opt out and anti-common core case as a way to strike back at the deformers? {"If you fuck our members, we will fight you tooth and nail on every single initiative, even if it has merit - first stop the attacks and then we'll talk."}

I have been making this argument in MORE for years and surprisingly there has been some resistance along the lines of "what difference does their motivation make?" A component of MORE looks at the leadership as  self-interested and often blundering bureaucrats not driven by ideological or entangling alliances with elements of the Ruling Class. Some of us, often the older ICE wing of MORE who have experienced the actions of the UFT since the 60s, see much deeper roots between our union, the government and corporate interests. [We are told that if we present this to the members we will look like nuts - sometimes I think the rank and file is more advanced than the activists].

The George Schmidt 40 year old book on the AFT and the CIA and the Kahlenberg Shanker bio are must reads. (In fact I'm going to run a study group this summer on George's book and invite all of you to join in - we'll hold it a Madison Square Garden.) Some people seem to think that the "seat at the table" strategy is due to bad thinking when in fact that strategy is endemic to the way the union leadership has operated - part of the very fabric of their DNA. They can't try to organize the membership or run a democratic union that might threaten this seat. They are locked in.

Ken Derstine has been relentless in exposing the entanglements, but with a focus on Randi, he makes it look too much like it's her - rather than the 50 years of entangling alliances. If Randi didn't exist, not much would be different and one of my tasks is getting people to see that.

From Defend Public Education
The Broad Foundation and the unions

See also: Who is Eli Broad and why is he trying to destroy public education? 

This is an except from a longer article on this blog originally published on February 24, 2013 and updated numerous times: Who is Eli Broad and why is he trying to destroy public education?
Above: New York City Department of Education Chancellor Joel Klein, second right, hugs United Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten after winning The Broad Prize Tuesday, Sept. 18, 2007, in Washington. Eli Broad, left, and Bush's U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings look on.
Diane Bondareff/The Broad Foundation/AP


See:  N.Y.C. Wins Prestigious Urban Education Award | Education Week

The Broad Foundation and the unions
The Broad Foundation Mission Statement states that one of its goals is the transformation of labor relations. The Broad Foundation is not anti-union. Rather, it seeks to transform unions into a form of company union. A company union is a union located within and run by a company or a national government, and the union bureaucracy is incorporated into the company’s management. This opens up the workforce to unfettered exploitation for profits of the owners. Many right-wing governments internationally use company unions to suppress worker struggles against low living standards. In 1935, during the labor struggles of the Depression, the National Labor Relations Act was passed which outlawed company unions in the United States.

Broad has found no shortage of former or current union leaders who are willing to be bought and join his venture philanthropy to foster labor/management “collaboration”. Former President of the Service Employees International Union, Andy Stern, is just the most visible on the board. In education, the Teacher Union Reform Network (TURN) fosters this collaboration.
Outgoing President of the United Teachers - Los Angeles Helen Bernstein was TURN's first head with a grant from the PEW Charitable Trust and  started TURN in 1996. Leadership of TURN was taken over by current AFT Vice President Adam Urbanski, when he was head of the Rochester, New York local in1999. By 2001, TURN had formed a partnership with the Broad Foundation.  According to the Los Angeles Times, on April 5, 2001, Eli Broad announced his Foundation was donating $10 million to TURN to foster labor/management “collaboration”. In 2009, Broad invested $2 million in TURN, “a network of National Education Association and American Federation of Teachers locals”. (Broad's 2009 Annual Report, Page 15) (For more details about TURN's affiliation with corporate education reform see Schools Matter, "Paul Toner and the TURNcoats", July 24, 2012.)
In the early days of this collaboration, labor leaders joined leaders in politics, business and non-profit organizations in staffing the faculty at the Broad Superintendents Academy, training the future Broad Superintendents. According a 2002 Broad press release (Page 2) participants included:
• Rod Paige, U.S. Secretary of Education in the G.W. Bush Administration
• Henry Cisneros, Secretary of HUD in the first Clinton Administration and now CEO of American CityVista
• William Cox, Managing Director of Broad, School Evaluation Services
• Chris Cross, Senior Fellow, Center on Education Policy
• Chester E. Finn, Jr., President, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
• Frances Hesselbein, Chairman, The Drucker Foundation
• Don McAdams, Founder, Center for Reform of School Systems
• Donald Nielsen, President, Hazelton Corporation, Chairman of the 2WAY Corporation
• Hugh B. Price, President and CEO, National Urban League
• Paul Ruiz, Principal Partner, Education Trust
• Adam Urbanski, Director of Teacher Union Reform Network
• Randi Weingarten, President, United Federation of Teachers.
• Superintendents from the Atlanta, Baltimore, Boston, Detroit, Houston, Long Beach, Memphis, New Orleans, Oakland, Rochester, San Diego, San Francisco and Seattle school districts also addressed the Academy.
On November 8th and 9th, 2002, Randi Weingarten participated in a retreat at the Eli Broad's home which included corporate and education leaders. The Press Release said this about the Broad Foundation Summit:
"The recent launch of several initiatives incubated at previous retreats and the Foundation's increase in assets to $400 million prompted the Foundation to convene this strategic planning session. Previously, the Foundation hosted retreats in May of 1999 and February of 2000. The Broad Foundation's mission is to dramatically improve K-12 public education through better governance, management and labor relations. The Foundation's investments are designed to transform large urban school districts from lackluster bureaucracies into high-performing public enterprises."
In 2005 the Broad Foundation made a $1 million grant to help the United Federation of Teachers in New York City, at that time headed by Randi Weingarten, to open two union-run charter schools in Brooklyn, the first such schools in the country. In October, 2012, it was announced these schools are in academic and enrollment trouble and will probably close at the end of the school year. This became another opportunity for another round of teacher bashing by the right-wing media. (Note: This column is written by Micah Lasher, executive director of StudentsFirstNY.)
On September 18, 2007, the Broad Foundation awarded New York City public schools the Broad Prize for Urban Education. Joining Eli Broad on stage at the ceremony were U.S. Secretary of Education in the Bush administration Margaret Spellings, New York City Education Chancellor Joel Klein, and Randi Weingarten, President of the United Federation of Teachers.
On November 17th, 2008, shortly after the election of Barack Obama as President, Randi Weingarten spoke at the National Press Club. As reported by journalist Dana Goldstein, in a March 20, 2009 article The Education Wars in The American Prospect, Weingarten offered “an olive branch” to the corporate luminaries in attendance (including many mentioned in this article who are affiliated with the Broad Foundation). She spoke about seeking “common ground” on such things as merit pay for teachers, evaluations based on test scores, and teacher tenure.
In its 2009 Annual Report (Page 10), the Broad Foundation said,
“Teacher unions have always been a formidable voice in public education. We decided at the onset of our work to invest in smart, progressive labor leaders like Randi Weingarten, head of the United Federation of Teachers in New York City for more than a decade and now president of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT). We partnered with Weingarten to fund two union-run charter schools in Brooklyn and to fund New York City’s first incentive-based compensation program for schools, as well as the AFT’s Innovation Fund. We had previously helped advance pay for performance programs in Denver and Houston, but we were particularly encouraged to see New York City embrace the plan.” (See the picture in the 2008 Broad Foundation Annual Report, page 14 and a featured Weingarten quote on page 15.)
On the same page (Page 10) of the 2009 Annual Report the Report boasted of being one of the earliest funders of Teach For America stating “our investment in this innovative teaching corps has grown to more than $41 million.” The same page also says, “Since 2000, our CMO (charter management organization) investments have swelled to nearly $100 million, creating 54,474 charter seats in 16 cities. We provided early start-up capital for charter operators like KIPP, Aspire, Green Dot and Uncommon Schools. They have since become the models for other CMOs to emulate.”
In April, 2009, the AFT teamed with four venture philanthropies: the Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation—to create the Innovation Fund. The private-foundation contributions, in addition to the AFT's down payment of $1 million, brought the fund's total to $2.8 million. Weingarten said its funds were made available for local affiliates to "incubate promising ideas to improve schools."
In an April 28, 2009 article, Education Week’s Teacher Beat described the purpose of the Innovation Fund this way:
“Both Weingarten and the foundation folks spoke a lot about the importance of working together and collaboration...Both she and Adam Urbanski, the president of the Rochester, N.Y., affiliate who will serve as the fund's executive director, were quick to minimize the fact that AFT's education-reform objectives haven't always been in line with those of the private foundations. (Broad and Gates, for instance, were said to be primed to offer financial support behind D.C. Chancellor Michelle Rhee's two-tiered pay proposal, although as far as I know, neither foundation ever confirmed that on the record.)”
On June 3, 2010, at their union leader’s urging, the Washington D.C. teachers Union ratified a contract with the Washington D.C. School District, headed by Chancellor Michelle Rhee, which included performance pay linked to test score growth, and a weakening of seniority and tenure. Weingarten had interfered in the Union's election to ensure it would be held after the contract ratification. Rhee got most of what she wanted in terms of merit pay for teachers and loss of seniority. Union President George Parker called the ratification of the contract “a great day for teachers and students.”
When the union election was finally held on November 10, 2010, Parker was voted out of office by the union rank-and-file. On May 20, 2011, Michelle Rhee announced that Parker was joining her corporate reform organization StudentsFirst. Rhee had resigned as Chancellor of Washington D.C. schools on October 13, 2010, and started StudentsFirst soon after, after her sponsoring Mayor was not reelected. Rhee’s Deputy Chancellor and chief negotiator of the 2010 teachers’ contract, Kaya Henderson, replaced her. Henderson recently announced the proposed closing of 20 schools due to “under enrollment”.
On July 8th, 2010,   Randi Weingarten welcomed Bill Gates   as the   keynote speaker at the national AFT convention.   Subsequently, in April 17th, 2012, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation awarded $2 million to five of the AFT’s TURN regional networks through the Consortium for Educational Change, “an Illinois-based network of teacher unions, school districts, and professional organizations that work to make school systems more collaborative, high-performing organizations.” Of the grant, Mary Jane Morris, executive director of CEC said, “There is clear evidence that policies and programs that truly impact teaching effectiveness result when teacher unions and management collaborate as equal partners. Each stakeholder brings a unique understanding and knowledge-base that must be considered.”
On June 7, 2012 the Chicago Teachers Union was holding a strike authoirzation vote. (90 percent of the teachers' union, and 98 percent of those voting called for a strike.) Randi Weingarten flew into Chicago the same day, not to support the teachers, but to attend the Clinton Global Initiative Conference. She participated on a panel with Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel to praise him for his Chicago Infrastructure Trust. Speaking on the panel, she supported the neoliberal agenda of labor and management collaboration which historically has been to the advantage of capital against labor. Weingarten left town without speaking to the teachers. She did join the picket line near the end of the strike. (It has not been disclosed if she was there to support the CTU or to end the strike.)

An article in Reuters, right after the 2012 AFT convention reelected Weingarten to a third term, began: “In the maelstrom of criticism surrounding America's unionized public school teachers, the woman running the second-largest educator union says time has come to collaborate on public school reform rather than resist.”  "U.S. teacher union boss bends to school reform winds", Reuters, July 31, 2012
The Chicago teachers' strike in September, 2012, to which the AFT gave tepid financial and verbal support (not rallying locals nationally to support the CTU), ended on September 19th, 2012. On September 22nd, Weingarten joined Secretary of Education Duncan, who was on a bus tour through the Midwest to promote Race to the Top as part of the President Obama's reelection campaign.
On the tour she joined Gayle Manchin, wife of West Virginia U.S. Senator Joe Manchin, on a panel to discuss “how to build public-private partnerships to support educational improvement as the path to a brighter future.”Weingarten had praised this program as an example of business/labor collarboration at the Clinton Global Initiative conference. The state-run McDowell County, West Virginia school system and the AFT had created the philanthropy organization "Reconnecting McDowell” in 2011 to foster “collaboration between business, government and nonprofit organizations to establish programs that address the challenges faced by this community.”  The AFT has given the fund millions of dollars from the dues of the AFT rank-and-file to this corporate organization. The AFT is now teaming with Teach for America and businesses (see the last paragraph) in McDowell County to build low income teacher housing for low income teachers. (For more on this and the use of the pension funds of AFT members to invest in this and other infrastructure projects, see Which Side Are You On? on this site.)

On November 17th, 2012, Weingarten teamed with New Jersey Education Secretary Chris Cerf (Broad Academy Class of 2004) to successfully promote the ratification of a contract for Newark teachers that included merit pay based on performance (including high-stakes test scores). The merit pay scheme was subsequently deemed to be a witout merit.
On December 13, 2012, the New Jersey Education Law Center announced it had found that Eli Broad was offering a $430,000 grant to New Jersey contingent on the reelection of Governor Chris Christie. Terms of the grant include a requirement that the number of charters be increased by 50%, requiring that all public announcements of the program by the state have to be cleared with the Broad Foundation, and it contained a lengthy provision about making documents, files, and records associated with the grant the property of the Foundation. New Jersey bloggers speculated that Broad’s real concern was the keeping Cerf as the New Jersey Secretary of Education.

On December 13th, 2012, Weingarten held a press conference with Bill Clinton and Obama’s housing secretary Shaun Donovan to announce the AFT would invest $1 billion from the NYC teachers pension fund for Hurricane Sandy relief for the NYC area. NYC Mayor Bloomburg criticized the investment because taxpayers would have to bail out the pension fund if the investment failed. 
One month later the U.S. Congress allocated $50.5 billion dollars for Hurricane Sandy relief.

Weingarten had explained her belief in the investment of the teacher pension fund in infrastructure projects around the country at the June 19th, 2012 Clinton Global Initiative Conference. She has never explained what gives her the right to use the pensions of millions of teachers for this purpose.
On January 29, 2013, Weingarten was interviewed on NPR’s All Things Considered. She continued her campaign for a teacher’s “Bar Exam”. This year long campaign is an endorsement of the corporate education reformers campaign against teachers that says the problem with schools is “bad teachers” and tenure. Arne Duncan and New York Governor Cuomo have been aggressively supporting this proposal. Weingarten did this NPR interview at the same time as New York City teachers are in a battle against an unfair and flawed teacher evaluation system which Cuomo was threatening to impose through drastic cuts in state funding for NYC public schools if not agreed to or dictatorially imposing the teacher evaluation system outright.
On March 11, 2009, in an article in the NYC education website Gotham News, in the article "Eli Broad describes close ties to Klein, Weingarten, Duncan", Broad described his education philosophy and his collaboration with Klein, Weingarten, and Duncan. The article did not state that Weingarten's relationship with Broad dates back to at least 2002. 
 

Ken Derstine on Randi after Watching AEI Video: This is a company union -

...some amazing statements from Weingarten (while speaking to the enemy) about what you should say privately and publicly about the war on public education. She is quite blunt about how it is normal to be a two-faced lier and says this to an audience that is indifferent to the survival of public education. ... Ken Derstine
I fell into a twitter exchange over Randi's support for VAM, which she now disavows. Randi claims: I look at evidence Norman- been critical of Vam awhile-

This was funny since Ken Derstine had just sent me video counter evidence in a blog titled "Randi Weingarten: Sleight of Hand Artist". 
Check it out.

Ken had also sent me some video of Randi last week which I had in  draft form but hadn't published where Ken terms the AFT - and its assorted puppets:

Ken:  This is a company union
I like that better than my use of the Vichy reference.

I'm posting Ken below.

But first some of the tweets:
    - I don't support VAM to evaluate teachers-
  1. . U changed your mind after VAM proven as failure.
. u followed after evidence was in - but u were out front in favor

. @UFTunion leader must be held accountable for bad decisions- 2many2count

. Evidence:she signaled willingness to negotiate pay for performance
 And here is Ken's parsing of Randi on video:
In the Ed Notes Online article Wednesday Norm Scott said a video from the American Enterprise Institute, which is a conversation with Randi Weingarten, had been deleted from the AEI website. I found it on YouTube. If you can stand it, it is 1 hour and 14 minutes. It is an amazing mush of platitudes. 

This was done June 18, 2014.

If you can’t watch the whole thing, start at 42:00 for some amazing statements from Weingarten (while speaking to the enemy) about what you should say privately and publicly about the war on public education. She is quite blunt about how it is normal to be a two-faced lier and says this to an audience that is indifferent to the survival of public education. I wonder if she would dare to say this to a union meeting. There is a real cynicism about teachers when you take her remarks as a whole.

See what she says about Common Core at 48:00 through 57:00. 

In the Q & A look at what she says beginning at 01:04 until the end.



At the conclusion of my article about the AEI conference I said:

Panel moderator Frederick Hess at the end of panel one makes an off the cuff comment (at 51:00) which summed up the bottom line for these people.:

They (venture philanthropist) may not be as powerful as they think they are in terms of shaping what happens in the nation’s schools and classrooms, but they’re very powerful in terms of us being able to feed our families and being able to do the research and analysis we like to do.

In other words, there is no real passion, no real belief in what they are doing; they looking at spreadsheets and each others position papers….and they are just in it for the big bucks.

This is a company union!

Sunday, April 19, 2015

Sunday With Susan O

Our usual Saturday with Susan has morphed into Sunday.
The good news from New York State opt outs blanketed the Internet and I didn't try to keep up with it--other than to sit here grinning.
Kudos. Kudos. The next mass movement must be to refuse to administer the test.

You will find some ugly revelations from the test:
http://susanohanian.org/core.php?id=813
For three good cartoons, go to:
http://susanohanian.org/cartoons.php
Just scroll down the page.

And then there's No Word Left Uncovered
http://susanohanian.org/show_nclb_cartoons.php?id=1090
Needed: One More Stupid Analogy:
http://susanohanian.org/show_nclb_cartoons.php?id=1089
What If?
http://susanohanian.org/show_nclb_cartoons.php?id=1088
I'm taking tomorrow off from ed outrage and making lunch for 70. We're serving: apple/walnut salad, vegetable soup, corn bread, and pumpkin bundt cake with ice cream. I figure that the ice cream will make up for the fact that I never frost anything. Two of us are going in early--just to be sure everything gets done in time.

Susan

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
NY State Common Core ELA Exam Spring 2015--An Inside View
compiled by bdub42
the 999ers
2015-04-16
http://susanohanian.org/core.php?id=813
Read this!

Then do something. I suggest an easy thing you can do.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Surge of the opt-out movement against English Language Arts exam is act of mass civil disobedience
Juan Gonzalez
New York Daily News
2015-04-17
http://susanohanian.org/core.php?id=812
Gonzalez makes important points that other reporters ignore.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Here's Why Opting Out Doesn't Solve the Real Problem
George Schmidt
letter
2015-04-16
http://susanohanian.org/core.php?id=811
Study of 'Romeo and Juliet' cancelled because students have to spend the rest of their month on test prep and testing,

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
To the editor
multiple authors
New York times
2015-04-19
http://susanohanian.org/show_letter.php?id=1767
Note: All of the letters are by public school teachers, surely a unique occurrence in the New York Times.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
To the editor
Pete Farruggio
New York Daily News
2015-04-15
http://susanohanian.org/show_letter.php?id=1766
A letter clarifies the testing issue. An alternative to training for obedience is to teach kids to question authority and fight corruption.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
To the editor
Joseph Mugivan, retired teacher
New York Times
2015-04-15
http://susanohanian.org/show_letter.php?id=1765
Joseph Mugivan makes an important point about the strong lesson students will take from this historic opting out.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
BBB IS OUT! Barbara Byrd Bennett goes on 'leave' after desperate try to fend off corruption charges or get public legal support... Jesse Ruiz to head CPS during interim
George Schmidt
Substance News & chicago Tribune
2015-04-17
http://susanohanian.org/outrage_fetch.php?id=1962
Barbara Byrd-Bennett looks to be in serious trouble.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
The Must-Attend Event for Education Technology Investors
Natasha Singer with Ohanian Comment
New York Times
2015-04-09
http://susanohanian.org/outrage_fetch.php?id=1961
What's in a name? Nobody cares. Money's the thing.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
L.A. Schools to Drop Pearson Products Under Ambitious Technology Plan
Caroline Porter
Wall Street Journal
2015-04-16
http://susanohanian.org/outrage_fetch.php?id=1959
Los Angeles asks Pearson for meeting to discuss refund for some products that were deemed unusable. In essence, it's a complaint about the color of the deck chairs on the Titanic.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
The fabulous Freeman Grant of 2001
Robert J. Renik
Burlington Free Press
0000-00-00
http://susanohanian.org/show_yahoo.php?id=881
Always nice to have good news about libraries.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
 What's J.K. Rowling Doing to Help Vulnerable Kids Avoid Institutional Care?
 Kiersten Marek
Inside Philanthropy
2015-04-16
http://susanohanian.org/show_yahoo.php?id=880
It's good to know that an author who has gained enormous wealth from her books for children is doing such significant work for children.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
The Mismeasure of Education: A Review
Mark Garrison
Education Review
0000-00-00
http://susanohanian.org/show_research.php?id=575
A fine review for a fine book. You should read both.

Jia Lee Conversation With Mulgrew After Delegate Assembly + UFTers Follow Tisch Line

Arthur Goldstein had the most comprehensive report of the April 15 DA Report--Mulgrew Warns Against Opt-Out followed up by
MORE's Jia Lee went up to speak to Mulgrew after the DA and filed this report:
At the Delegate Assembly, a few of us MORE folks went prepared to speak. Here's a summary from Arthur's blog on the April 16 Delegate Assembly: http://nyceducator.com/2015/04/da-report-mulgrew-warns-against-opt-out.html so you can see what when down, and here's my take... 
Long story short, Mulgrew appears to be very nervous about appearances- that is, while he claims to understand that high stakes testing is wrong, yada yada yada, we still need to administer the tests and parents want to know how their kids are doing. Civil rights groups want annual testing, and we don't want to upset them! Did you catch the huge contradiction? High stakes standardized testing is what perpetuates disparity and inequality! He also stated that some teachers, (ex he gave were 19 teachers in one Brooklyn school) under the teacher evaluation matrix, who were rated ineffective by their principals were saved by having high VAM scores. If he's so worried about appearances, he would understand that we cannot use unreliable and invalid metrics only when it serves us. In fact, it highlights for me a more concerning issue that our leadership is failing to support those teachers who are obviously working in a highly oppressive environment. 

(MORE member) Francesca (Gomes)  spoke against the soft resolution on testing- she spoke directly to the fact that we shouldn't be messing around with small changes to an evaluation system we know is a sham. It's heading us to imminent doom, and she called on our leadership to organize the power of the teachers. I saw several folks nod in agreement, and I noticed that while the resolution was voted in, many people did not vote, and a few voted against, all looking our way. 


 My head hurts from today's experience, but I wanted to tell you one thing before I fall asleep. I went up to Mulgrew afterwards to give him some information about what's happening on the ground and his missed opportunity by spending so much time trying to negotiate with politicians. You know what he told me about the 95% and loss of funding from ESEA? 
He said that Title 1 funding would be lost if there was participation below 95%. I told him to give me his source; he said it was Arne Duncan. I almost starting LOL. He also told me that the Civil Rights leaders are mad at us, the teachers union and the board of education, for years of what they call lies- for not providing equitable education promised 50 years ago.

All the more reason why we need to stand firm against the use of HST which has and will continue to widen the divide! He couldn't discuss it any further, but the last thing I said was that we are the educators and we should be doing the work of communicating what they need to know.
And here is a follow-up from a Change the Stakes parent activist:
I got in an argument recently with [someone who works in community outreach for the UFT] -- and she told me the same lines about falling below 95% causing a loss of funding. They must have a book they all study from.
I told her she was wrong about the 95% rule and loss of federal funding--
and then she said to me, "No we would lose a lot of money, millions--or is it billions, I forget."

I asked her where she got her information about this question and she said, "We have lawyers!" 

I said to her, "So does NYSAPE." 

I think she simply didn't know what to make of someone contradicting her.
In what may be the most useless time I ever hit ENTER, I sent her a copy of NYSAPE's explanation about the 95% rule and asked her to show it to the UFT lawyers.
And another report from a CTS person:
When Jo Ann Simon stood up to address the crowd at the forum, she said two things that stuck way out for all of us. And mind you, I feel for her, only in the Senate for 3 months, and she explained the package they were handed as bad and worse....

Anyway, she explained why her YES vote and then addressed opt outs with the "unintended consequences" that would effect the most vulnerable schools/students. She said though she believes it is the parent's right, she feels it will hurt the kids who need the funding the most. That did not go over well.

After a kick-ass panel of activists spoke, she was asked point blank to defend her position on this. She just heard from a parent on the panel how after doing all these other things (letters, calls, protests, etc, etc) opt out was the only thing left. But her response to what can we do was, write letters to your elected officials. We all looked at each other like holy shit, what planet??

In a small group afterward, it came up again. Parent said she is doing us a disservice announcing that threat an challenged it's validity. She said it could happen, we just don't know. I reminded her there was a time slavery was sanctioned by the feds and it was time to rise up and overturn such a system. She looked at me with a blank face. It's good to hear Civil Right's groups are angry. She suggested they supported this crap. Whatever the case, parents are going to call out Mulgrew. ...along with everyone else.

Q came up about teacher's union and why aren't teachers speaking up. Spec Ed teacher had a hard time finding words. Said it was not ok for her to say tests are bad, opt out. You'll watch the videos [NOT YET AVAILABLE BUT WILL UPDATE WHEN IT IS].  Spec Ed teacher (can't remember her name), Jody and Ann Cook were mind blowing. Actually, Ann Cook said charter school/privatization agenda AND racism out loud. I heard the angels sing! We need to use that footage in big ways!
Here is a NYSUT fact sheet with contradictory evidence on school defunding over opt out.

http://www.nysut.org/~/media/files/nysut/resources/2015/january/factsheet_150127_optout.pdf?la=en

NY Post: Principals can violate any rules when they attack teachers illegally

Union or no Union, when is the UFT going call out these principals and demand something of Fariña? There are too many of them around. Not all of these principals make the news, but many staff members have been and are being harassed. ... Pat D on MORE listserve.

Shades of the Katherin Elvin John Dewey HS case.

As long as principals like this are allowed to engage in political agendas they will never be able to truly address the question of which teachers are not capable.

Principal gets off easy after ‘revenge’ review on teacher

April 19, 2015 | 11:12am

Greta HawkinsPhoto:
Greta Hawkins of PS 90 flunked teacher Vicky ­Gi asemis last school year because the principal “bore significant animus” toward the veteran instructor, an arbitrator ruled — ordering her to submit a new evaluation.
Hawkins had it in for Giasemis, a chapter leader for the teachers union who had filed a successful grievance for 13 teachers charging Hawkins with harassment in 2013. Hawkins saved a union newspaper calling her a bully as “a daily reminder of who she held responsible,” arbitrator Marlene Gold found.
Giasemis earned “effective” ratings based on how her third-graders performed on state and city tests, but Hawkins rated her “ineffective” while not performing extensive classroom observations, Gold said.
Hawkins, who had previously banned kids from singing “God Bless the U.S.A.” at graduation, will not be disciplined, a DOE spokesperson said.

http://nypost.com/2015/04/19/principal-gets-off-easy-after-revenge-review-on-teacher/
 

SRO at overcrowded MORE meeting - dozen people waiting to get in


What an excellent, well-run meeting, organized by MORE steering committee. Well, I was sort of shocked. On a beautiful Saturday afternoon, so many people tried to get into the MORE meeting, the guards had to stop people from going in -- only when someone left would someone be allowed up. A bunch of the usual participants didn't even come. MORE will have to consider a bigger space.

Who knew? And a bunch of new people too. The Cuomo ed deform program and the tepid UFT response has apparently spurred people to take some action. I never get too excited because we have been down this road before. There was so much on the agenda, the meeting went longer than expected -- but we still made it to the happy hour afterwards.

The key is will people not only come back but also become active participants on growing the movement. Parents connected to Change the Stakes attended as did some high school students and their recently rubber-roomed teachers from NYCLetEmPlay. I visited David Garcia-Rosen in the rubber room the other day and this is some story, which I will going into
David Garcia-Rosen
detail - teachers pulled from their schools because they took a personal day to take their kids on a trip - a trip they had approval for months ago but was cancelled on the orders of Farina because it is a political hot potato. David turned down a Farina job offer (bribe) at Tweed last year.

Can Farina actually turn out to be worse than Joel Klein? Wait till I report in more depth on this story. David and his crew brought the issue to MORE at the meeting and this one will have legs. If the DOE goes to a 3020a hearing it will be open and a circus.

The skinny: David, teaching in a small high school, saw that the breakup of large high schools in poor areas left the kids without decent sports programs as PSAL money kept flowing to the large high schools left intact (in more affluent areas) while small schools were starved. He started his own alternate sports league for small schools in the Bronx. And therein lies a tale. Here are some quick hits from a search to get those interested up to speed. 

  1. Ø David Garcia-Rosen sent the first of a series of FOIL requests to the DOE this morning. Ø He will continue to do this until the Mayor appoints an independent ...
  2. A teacher's crusade to bring competitive sports to small ...

    ny.chalkbeat.org/.../a-teachers-crusade-to-bring-competitive-sports-to-sm...
  3. May 9, 2013 - What David Garcia-Rosen started as a single-column spreadsheet has turned into a 17-page report and a mission to provide more team sports ...
  4. Ed Notes Online: NYC Teacher David Garcia-Rosen Battles ...

    ednotesonline.blogspot.com/.../nyc-teacher-david-garcia-rosen-battles.ht...
  5. May 28, 2014 - I ran into David Garcia-Rosen, who I met years ago at Teachers Unite meetings, at a UFT event at the Hilton recently where he was promoting ...
  6. In Schools Where Sports May Be Most Vital, New York City ...

    www.nytimes.com/.../in-schools-where-sports-may-be...
    The New York Times
    May 27, 2014 - In 2011, David Garcia-Rosen, a history teacher and dean at International, formed the small schools league, and International got its first ...

Jeff Nichols Does Uncommon Math on opt out: No wonder there's panic in the streets -- of Albany

Jeff is one of the stalwart Change the Stakes parent activists. Jeff, a music
professor at CUNY, was up late last night working some numbers:
I didn't have the benefit of Common Core math growing up, but it seems to me the opt out phenomenon is roughly proceeding by the equation 4x = y, where x is last year's total and y is this year, for any given year. That means we're 2 years away at most from the moment when they give a test and nobody comes. No wonder there's panic in the streets -- of Albany.
Jeff followed up a bit later:
Now I'm seeing a figure of 8,000 for 2013.
2013 8,000
2014 60,000
2015 250,000

Well, looks like an order of magnitude every year. They're done next year.
Well, I'm not so sure, given the ability of the evil empire to strike back. Note how the traitorous, often bought off (by Bill Gates etal) quasi, self-proclaimed civil rights leaders are jumping on the testing bandwagon.
I just saw another pro-common core ad funded by the millions from the deformers. More ominous will be attempts from Cuomo (and the Obama administration) to punish people for opting out. The cow may be out of the barn but as the entire fabric of ed deform unravels, desperate measures will be called for.

I'm heading into the city today for the Kids Pac press conference with a report card for de Blasio. I may get to say a few words representing Change the Stake - my orders are to say: THERE'S STILL TIME TO OPT OUT FOR THE MATH TESTS.


Saturday, April 18, 2015

Sunday: Parents Grade De Blasio on education: promises made, promises kept

I'm going to try to make this event with my video camera. These parents deserve our support.
Dear friend of NYC KidsPAC:
This Sunday, April 19 at noon in front of Tweed, 52 Chambers St., we will be releasing a report that grades Mayor de Blasio after one year of office on whether he’s made progress towards fulfilling his campaign promises in education.

We will be grading him in many critical areas, including parent engagement, governance, transparency and accountability, class size, special education, overcrowding, school closings, co-locations and many others.
Please join us! We will also have copies of the scorecard and report to give out at the press conference.

Shino
President, NYC KidsPAC

Here are details from Leonie:

Media advisory:

Where:  Sunday, April 19 at noon

Where: In front of the Department of Education headquarters at Tweed, 52 Chambers St., NYC
 
What: Parents, community members, and advocates will release the NYC KidsPAC education report card for Mayor de Blasio, based on how many of his campaign promises he has fulfilled after more than a year in office.

Visuals: Parents and kids to display large blown up report card. 

Report card and accompanying analysis will include grades on issues ranging from cell phones, governance, and parent engagement, to special education, class size, school overcrowding, testing and diversity, to be provided to state legislators to give input on whether Mayoral control should be renewed.

For more information, please contact: Shino Tanikawa, 
estuaryqueen@gmail.com


Chicago School "CEO" Byrd Bennett Under Federal Investigation - Takes Leave of Absence - Why Is Joel Klein Not in Cuffs?

UPDATE (Sunday, Apr. 19, 7AM):

CORRUPTION CPS: Why is CPS's cloying 'Mister Cover Up,' Jesse Ruiz, now 'Interim CEO'?... A look behind the eternal smiles of the Board's Vice President... and a closer look at how CPS voted, legally, to keep the public record secret despite Freedom of Information and Open Meetings laws...

"You lie!" The words, which broke out during a meeting of the Chicago Board of Education, were clear enough: "Jesse Ruiz! You lie!" They were spoken by a mother of four who came from the . . .


George Schmidt and Substance are on the case. He warned about Bennett from day 1 when she was brought in as a consultant under the previous disaster of a CEO brought in by Rahm, Jean Claude-Brizzard, who used to ruin schools here in Brooklyn and received a 95% vote of no confidence by Rochester teachers when he was their Supt -- and "lured" away by Rahm.

Of course the feds waited until AFTER Rahm got re-elected before exposing this scandal -- but we always know there are scandals lurking under every ed deform school administration. I just copied and pasted these headlines over the past few days from Substance. Enjoy reading. I'm heading over to the MORE Meeting - I may blog from there later.

Babrara Byrd Bennett's 2012 resume was filled with 'red flags'... Should CPS have hired Byrd Bennett with all these conflicts of interest? Didn't the Board of Education ask her to get out of these conflicts?

Chicago's public schools "Chief Executive Offier" Barbara Byrd-Bennett is now under federal investigation for improprieties because of her recommendation of a no bid $20 Million dollar contract with SUPES Training Academy. The no-bid contract was . . .

BBB IS OUT! Barbara Byrd Bennett goes on 'leave' after desperate try to fend off corruption charges or get public legal support... Jesse Ruiz to head CPS during interim...

 

The 'Chief Executive Officer' of the nation's third largest school system, Chicago's Barbara Byrd Bennett, has taken a leave of absence from the Chicago Public Schools, according to informed sources. Board of Eduction Vice President . . .

CORRUPTION CPS: Barbara Byrd Bennett gathered buddies from other states, many (but not all) vetted by the Broad Foundation, for executive jobs at CPS, with the approval of the 'Chicago' Board of Education... Most had no Illinois credentials, but the Board members did not care or bother to check...

This part of Substance's current series of stories on CORRUPTION CPS will feature the cronyism that brought dozens of "educators" to Chicago from out of state during the years since Rahm Emanuel appointed his Board . . .

Better late than never?... Federal 'investigation' of Chicago schools 'Chief Executive Officer' Barbara Byrd Bennett revealed... Years of conflicts of interest, cronyism and corruption by the CEO have been ignored by Chicago's corporate media while regularly reported in Substance...

 

Feds reportedly investigating Barbara Byrd Bennett over controversial no-bid 'SUPES' contract to train principals....

It was only a week after Rahm Emanuel won re-election and suddenly Chicago's news media were filling up with stories that the federal government is investigating Chicago Public Schools Chief Executive Officer Barbara Byrd Bennett, . . .

 

Friday, April 17, 2015

MORE's Julie Cavanagh Featured in CBS TV Report on common core and special ed students

me-and-julie-2.jpg...special education teacher Julie Cavanagh doesn't think that's enough with regard to the Common Core. She firmly believes that the new standards have made learning more difficult across the board, especially for special educations students... Cavanagh, who teaches third and fifth grade at PS 15 Patrick F. Daly in Red Hook, Brooklyn, said the new standards represent a "developmentally inappropriate curriculum" for special education students and has had the additional effect of "taking away from schools' and educators' ability to really focus on differentiated and individualized sort of goals for those students."... CBS TV Report, Common Core: What's right for special education students?
One of the things I love about being involved in MORE -- the people who get it - that the small stuff will never be addressed without also addressing the big stuff.

Years ago at an ICE meeting Jan. 2009 - we were talking about setting up a committee to fight for ATRs and closing schools. John Lawhead said we should add high stakes testing as the big enchilada since that was the instrument being used to close schools and create ATRs.

Some of  us in ICE had been involved with a NYCORE testing committee and we invited them to work with us -- and thus was born Grassroots Education Movement - GEM - a bigger idea than just a caucus focusing on narrow issues - which enabled us to attract such high quality people like Julie after we added fighting charter schools. The alliances built in MORE led to our movie, which I still consider the single most effective piece to fight ed deform I have yet seen as we took up every single issue related to deform -- we had stuff in there on charters not back filling as a way to keep scores high - we even had graphs showing how the drop in students in each successive grade related to higher scores. I think we were the first to point that out in such a public manner. Now that is a hot issue.

And GEM led to MORE and Change the Stakes, where the MORE people can focus on union related issues and the CTS people - parents mostly - but also progressive principals like Carol Burris - aim at testing.

Being involved in groups like this is enabling for both teachers and parents, who are equipped to go forth into battle with the deformers and the UFT semi-deformers. (There is a MORE general meeting tomorrow at noon.)

A recent powerful addition to MORE is special ed teacher Mindy Rosier, who made this comment on the assault on spec ed students:
I am not going to be quiet on this. Why have we NOT heard about any differentiation for our special education teachers and students? Our kids are the most neediest. Why isn't there more attention to this? Why are we continually ignored? Let's also not forget about ESL teachers and students, thanks to Arthur Goldstein's article in the NY Daily News. If the powers who be won't scream from the mountain tops, if the mass media won't cover this, then WE need to. If something is not done about this, ultimately our kids will suffer and our livelihoods are at stake. I will NOT go down without a fight!
Now, back to the CBS piece with the comments Julie makes. I am not including the charter take on special ed - go to the link - if you can stomach it. Julie commented on the piece on facebook:
Lots to say about this piece. So much important conversation was cut out, but even given the charter slant, I think it sends a clear message.

Special education students in the United States have what is called an Individualized Education Program (IEP). It provides support and services for each student depending on their learning needs. Some of that support comes in the form of accommodations during test-taking like getting extra time, having some questions read out loud (depending on the test), and being in a different testing location. 

However, even with these accommodations, special education teacher Julie Cavanagh doesn't think that's enough with regard to the Common Core. She firmly believes that the new standards have made learning more difficult across the board, especially for special educations students.
me-and-julie-2.jpg
Julie Cavanagh (Left)
CBS News
Cavanagh, who teaches third and fifth grade at PS 15 Patrick F. Daly in Red Hook, Brooklyn, said the new standards represent a "developmentally inappropriate curriculum" for special education students and has had the additional effect of "taking away from schools' and educators' ability to really focus on differentiated and individualized sort of goals for those students."

Cavanagh specifically teaches students who take alternate assessments, which means they don't take the same standardized tests as everyone else. These special education students also have IEPs but might receive more accommodations and modifications than other special education students because their learning disabilities are more significant. 

Alternate assessment allows Cavanagh to write her own version of the end-of-the year state tests - still based on the Common Core, but modified for her students.
However, some special education teachers think the basic accommodations for their students - the IEPs - are enough to help them succeed within the Common Core framework.
"I believe that given the opportunity, special education or not, the standards should be set high because once we're out of school, the standard is set high. So there is no real benefit for the child to set the standard low in their early life so that when they get out of school they are now not functioning as well as they could have," said Dan Blackburn, who teaches special education for kindergarten through fifth grade at Amber Charter School in Manhattan.

----Even Cavanagh agrees there shouldn't be a two-tiered system where children who have IEP's are working toward one set of standards and children who don't have IEP's are working toward another, but feels the Common Core's "over-emphasis" on testing "really undermines the work of that individualized, differentiated experience" that has become the hallmark of special education. 

Cavanagh also says the focus on teacher accountability can be counterproductive. In New York, 20 percent of an educator's evaluation is based on students' standardized test scores. Cavanagh said this puts an immense amount of pressure on the teachers as well as the students.
"I think where we run into a problem is expecting that children with or without an IEP are going to be able to demonstrate proficiency on those skills at the exact moment that the state or some [policymaker] has decided that they should be doing that."

Norm in The Wave: Opt Out (of tests) Movement Causing Panic in the Streets - and Halls of Power


Published April 17, 2015

-->
Opt Out (of tests) Movement Causing Panic in the Streets - and Halls of Power
By Norm Scott

I was gratified to get a message from Assemblyman Phil Goldfeder that he had voted NO on the Cuomo budget with its destructive impact on public education. It passed anyway and “Hall of shame” lists of state legislators who voted for it have gone viral nationally. It was good to not see Phil’s name on that list. Phil and I have a lot we disagree on when it comes to education. He supports choice, charters and the income tax credit that would allow people to get a tax break for private schooling.  I won’t get into the weeds on why I disagree with him at this point. As I write this on the morning NY State testing begins, there are other fish to fry.

I’ve been working with groups critical of high stake testing for many years. One of the groups here in NYC that I helped found is Change the Stakes, a mostly NYC parent group that has led the way in urging parents to opt out  of the tests.  (8 Reasons to Opt Out and How to Do It: tinyurl.com/la9t5s8). Slogans like “My child is not a test score,” have been sweeping the nation as part of a “deny them the data” movement: data this is not being used to assist teachers and students (scores don’t come back until after the school year ends) but to punish them.

Two years ago we had a handful of people in NYC opt out. Last year it began to catch on. This year there has been a storm of requests for information. In Long Island and the rest of the state there has been a storm totally the tens of thousands.

I represented CTS at a PTA meeting in Brooklyn recently where parents wanted to know more about opting out. Most won’t because of fear – and threats floating out there that the school will lose funding if too many parents opt out – a lie being floated by the people in power whose entire fabric of phony education reform (deform) that will to their main goal of privatization is threatened by the growing parent rebellion against the oppressive tests and the negative impact on so many children, teachers, and entire school systems.

Schools must make provision for the children who are opting out by finding a space for them – though some districts have what is called a “sit and stare” policy, which forces opt outers to sit with the class and stare at the walls. These policies are being fought.

Entire swaths of Long Island and upstate are having thousands of parent opt out while I expect the movement to grow more slowly here in the city  - CTS is trying to tally the numbers.

I know some non-educators who grew up taking tests, are scratching their heads. The public is still unaware of the insanity going on in NYC schools since Bloomberg took over in 2002. But this is a national problem due to federal intervention by both Bush and Obama. That has caused a right wing/tea  party counter reaction against the testing and the common core – partially a states rights movement. On the left, there has also been a reaction from the progressive parent movement.

The general public is often not aware that test results don’t come back until the summer when kids have already left the class, so the teacher gets no useful information. People say that kids have to get used to tests and show they are college ready. I get that for high school kids. But nine year olds in the 3rd grade?

I have often advocated that tests be given in September. But then ed deformers like Cuomo would lose their main motivation for the tests – using them to rate 50% of a teacher’s work based on these tests – and issue that has outraged parents and teachers. Parents get it that when a teacher’s job is on the line, the focus will be on test performance – and tests by the way that have been disparaged as being faulty. In addition, the system used to rate teachers, known as VAM, has been proven to be completely inaccurate. Cuomo better be ready for more than a few law suits from tenured teachers who are terminated based on faulty tests and faulty measures.

And speaking of tenure, the Cuomo bill extends tenure from 3 to 4 years. Not a big deal some of you are saying, but principals have the right to extend non-tenure year after year, forcing some teachers to wait 6 or 7 years with the sword hanging over them. Why is tenure so important? It is not a lifetime guarantee but offers protection from arbitrary termination because a principal doesn’t like the color of your tie. We have reports of numerous non-tenured teachers being discontinued by psycho principals, who keep getting support from the DOE.

The parent opt out movement has been causing panic amongst the deformers who are (falsely) blaming the unions, which in reality have played a minimal role. The NY State union (NYSUT) did issue a call to opt out but the UFT here in NYC has been a supporter of testing, common core and rating teachers based on test scores.

Get more information from my daily blog: ednotesonline.com