Wednesday, April 8, 2015

Ken Derstine, Using AEI Video, Parses Ed Deformers and Randi Collaboration

The second panelist, Sarah Reckhow, (starting at 16:00)  co-authored the policy paper ‘Singing from the same hymnbook': Education policy advocacy at Gates and Broad | Michigan State University . What struck me is how matter of fact she is in the video and the paper about Randi Weingarten participating with them which is obviously assumed by other panelists to be common knowledge. See pages 18 and 19 of the paper which shows Randi Weingarten’s collaboration with them. Sarah Reckhow comments that Randi Weingarten has been working with them to develop a teacher evaluation based on standardized tests......
Ken Derstine
Ken is a Philly-based activist who posted a piece this morning at Schools Matter  about the corporate deformer attacks on the opt out movement: CorpEd Assails Opt Out In Desperate Attempt to Protect House of Cards.

Ken did a video with the Alliance for Philadelphia Public Schools and the Media Mobilizing Project about school closings in October, 2013. Our Schools Are Not For Sale.  It has been viewed over 83,000 times.
I stay connected with the struggle with my Facebook https://www.facebook.com/defend.public.education and Twitter https://twitter.com/PublicEdDefense . I use them as bulletin boards for linking articles about corporate education reform and the resistance to it. I spend at least three or four hours each day posting links to posts I find on the internet about how the struggle is unfolding. The growth of people following is gradual, but some significant people from around the country are following my posts. 
Last week, in response to some of my blogs about collaborationist union Is the ‘new’ education philanthropy good for schools? Examining foundation-funded school reform 
leaders with ed deformers, Ken sent me these comments after watching 4 hours of American Enterprise video:
I have stumbled onto this amazing video from a panel at the American Enterprise Institute (look at this link) on February 5, 2015. This is a spawning center of neoliberalism! This is the corporate education reformers talking to the choir. It is amazing to watch. This confirms everything I said in Who’s Is Eli Broad and Why Is He Trying to Destroy Public Education? from their goals, to their deep collaboration with the U.S. Department of Education, to Randi Weingarten’s collaboration with them. 
I poked around and found this video at AEI of Randi: [NOTE - SINCE REMOVED- WHY? TOO MUCH EXPOSURE?]
During her follow-up conversation with AEI’s Frederick M. Hess, Weingarten confessed that “unions are not monolithic,” stressing that rather than using VAM to assess all teachers, it should be one among several components used to evaluate teacher performance. 
VAM is not a sham to Randi --

Ken gives us more entry points below for those skipping around for nuggets to use in this 4 hour plus video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMDXfl9e4DM



I have stumbled onto this amazing video from a panel at the American Enterprise Institute (look at this link) on February 5, 2015. This is a spawning center of neoliberalism! This is the corporate education reformers talking to the choir. It is amazing to watch. This confirms everything I said in Who’s Is Eli Broad and Why Is He Trying to Destroy Public Education? from their goals, to their deep collaboration with the U.S. Department of Education, to Randi Weingarten’s collaboration with them. 

Also, they might present a front that they are powerful because of the subservience of the corporate media, but among themselves they know they are just putting “a bucket in the ocean”. A number of times they ask why the corporate funders keep funding the corporate attack on education when it obviously is not working. They are also aware they are in an ivory tower and have little understanding of their impact on the “grassroots”. This is the video:


This video is also on YouTube and should be downloaded.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMDXfl9e4DM


This video is four hours long, but watch a little of it to get the flavor. (Warning: I said there is no way I can give four hours to this, but it is so engrossing and important, I watched it off and on for two days and I’m sure I will rewatch parts.) 

Watch the first two panelists in the in the first panel. The second panelist, Sarah Reckhow, (starting at 16:00)  co-authored the policy paper ‘Singing from the same hymnbook': Education policy advocacy at Gates and Broad | Michigan State University . What struck me is how matter of fact she is in the video and the paper about Randi Weingarten participating with them which is obviously assumed by other panelists to be common knowledge. See pages 18 and 19 of the paper which shows Randi Weingarten’s collaboration with them. Sarah Reckhow comments that Randi Weingarten has been working with them to develop a teacher evaluation based on standardized tests.

Anthony Cody had a post about this paper on February 9Reckhow and Tomkins-Stange Document How Gates and Broad Money Got Everyone “Singing from the Same Hymnbook  While he does link the AEI page which has this paper with an easy to miss link to the video of the four-hour AEI conference, he makes no mention of Randi Weingarten’s role.


After watching the second panelist, go to 55:00. There is a real demoralization they are showing. Notice what they say about the impact of the Chicago teachers strike.
The second panel is about the “backlash” against corporate education reform. (starts at about 1:30) The demoralization is very evident here.
Howard Fuller of Black Alliance for Educational Opportunity (which Philadelphia mayoral candidate Anthony Williams is affiliated with - see my article Corporate Education Reform and Civil Rights ) is on the second panel. Notable quote (1:54): “We (BAEO) wouldn’t exist without John Walton and this is one of the reasons I love that man."

At 1:47 the panelist Larry Cuban speaks about the Broad Superintendent’s Academy. He is followed by Howard Fuller. (Starts at 1:51.) His remarks are very revealing about how disconnected these people are from what is the reality in public schools and from the impact of what they are doing. Fuller seems totally unaware that he is working for the same political forces that have been underfunding schools for decades and the money BAEO receives from them comes from the low wage exploitation of Walmart workers.

The third panel, starts at 2:42, is about the future of corporate philanthropy. It starts with Dana Goldstein. I commented about Dana Goldstein on Schools Matter on September 30, 2014. There are also articles on Schools Matter if you do a search in the search engine for “Dana Goldstein". 

The second panelist (2:55) talks about corporate education reform in higher education. Anyone in higher education should watch this…and be very afraid. The fourth panelist, Jim Blew (3:18), left the Walton Foundation to replace Michelle Rhee at Students First. He spends most of his time attacking teacher unions. (Note: He says his father was a teacher union organizer.) One corporate ed reform organization he cites (which has gone below the radar, I never heard of them; they are not mentioned on Sourcewatch) as being very influential is the Fisher Family

This is the initial article that led to my finding this video:
March 24, 2015

Frederick Hess at the end of panel one made an off the cuff comment (at 51:00) which summed up the bottom line for these people.:

“They (venture philanthropist) may not be as powerful as they think they are in terms of shaping what happens in the nation’s schools and classrooms, but they’re very powerful in terms of us being able to feed our families and being able to do the research and analysis we like to do.” In other words, there is no real passion, no real belief in what they are doing; they looking at spreadsheets and each others position papers….and they are just in it for the big bucks.

Ken Derstine

4 comments:

  1. Weingarten has been playing both sides against the middle for years. Her 2005 contract allowed all the school closings, ATRs, and much of the surreal environments we now find ourselves in- yet she remains unaffected in any way. She will stay in her position for as long as she wants, as will Mulgrew.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What's left to do before she can removed from office for clearly violating the trust of union members? Seriously what more do we need to make the case?

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is the exact same story in Newark. Weingarten came here personally to negotiate. She dumped all the shit on us and goes about her merry way.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good old Randi; she loves to straddle the fence and will not allow her foot land on one side of the fence too long. She has been a conniving shyster from day one where there's an apropos joke that says "what do you call a bunch of lawyers in the bottom of the ocean - a good start." Her intention was to become a deity, a sovereign of the education kingdom. I am always anger that they say she taught from 1991 - 1997 (correct me if my years are wrong), but people don't know that she DID NOT teach a full program. She's a self-serving, power-hungry, two-faced faux educator. The sooner the rank and file wakes up to her chicanery, the sooner we can remove her self-worshipping throne.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are welcome. Irrelevant and abusive comments will be deleted, as will all commercial links. Comment moderation is on, so if your comment does not appear it is because I have not been at my computer (I do not do cell phone moderating).