A Meeting Unattended - Fix Retiree Benefits Replies to Retiree Advocate Formation of Election Committee

Nine for them, three for us. Echoes of UFT/Unity election committee meetings where they always get three for one. But then again, Retiree Advocate channeling Unity behavior has been striking.

 

Here is the response to a meeting from Fix Retiree Benefits that I and two others were invited to that we will not be attending. It's self-explainable. I'm scheduling this post for 6 PM, the precise time the meeting they called without consulting us is due to begin.

 

Also posted at: 

https://normscott.substack.com/p/a-meeting-unattended-fix-retiree

 

 

Monday, September 28, 2026

 

6:00 PM 

Fix Retiree Benefits Replies to Retiree Advocate’s Sudden Formation of a 13-member Election Committee

The three invited Fix Retiree Benefits members will not attend.

In June 2024, UFT retirees overturned 40 years of control of the UFT Retired Teachers Chapter (RTC) by Unity Caucus, and won elections for 10 RTC Officers, 15 Executive Board members and 300 representatives to the UFT Delegate Assembly. Retirees revolted over the old Unity RTC leadership’s support for the attempt to move us out of traditional Medicare and into a for-profit Medicare Advantage plan. Receiving 63% and over 17,000 retiree votes, the Retiree Advocate (RA) slate prevailed in the 2024 election, with the strong support of the New York City Organization of Public Service Retirees (NYCOPSR) led by Marianne Pizzitola, who spoke to a standing ovation at the very first RTC Meeting not under Unity control in October, 2024.

As a result of that massive victory, UFT leader Michael Mulgrew backed off the Medicare Advantage demand, but has refused to support retirees on City Council Bill 1008 — which would grant retirees permanent protection under the law; nor has the UFT Unity leadership supported the elimination of co-pays for UFT retirees.

Over the past two years, differences have arisen within the RTC chapter between Retiree Advocate and a newly formed group, Fix Retiree Benefits— which has focused on protecting and expanding healthcare benefits and continuing the strong alliance with Marianne Pizzitola and NYCOPSR as major factors in the attempt to keep Unity from re-taking control of the RTC.

Representatives of Fix Retiree Benefits had two meetings with RA in April and May 2026, with a proposal for the two groups to work together in the RTC elections. Fix Retiree Benefits proposed a 50-50 split of the 25 RTC Officers and Executive Board, as well as the 300 Delegate Assembly representatives. A proposed June follow-up meeting was cancelled by RA with no further response.

On Sunday, Sept. 27, three core members of Fix Retiree Benefits were informed via email by RTC Chapter Leader and RA Organizer Bennett Fischer that they had been placed on a 13-member RTC election committee, without being consulted in advance. This 13-member RTC election committee was formed unilaterally by RA. The committee also included six RA Organizing Committee members and three others with known affiliations to the RA Organizers, with no input from Fix Retiree Benefits or independents organizing for the RTC election. In the email sent to the three individuals affiliated with Fix Retiree Benefits, the election committee meeting was called for Monday, September 28 at 6 P.M. 

An email to one of the three members from Fix Retiree Benefits was sent to the wrong email address. You can read his response here: 

 
RA Calls a Last Minute Meeting, Grants Fix Retiree Benefits No Input Whatsoever (Arthur Goldstein)

This formation of a 13-member “election committee” is in essence the response by RA to our original proposal from April and May, which was for an even split of Officers, Executive Board, and Delegate Assembly Representatives, and to for a united slate in the next RTC election.

Aside from the fact that Fix Retiree Benefits was not even given the courtesy of being asked what representatives we would choose, plus the fact that Fix Retiree Benefits, a group with a strong presence of women (two of whom had already met with RA during negotiations in April and May), did not have any of them considered for the committee by RA; the very nature of a proposal to set up a “pre-election” committee in which RA members would more than double the representation of Fix Retiree Benefits is objectionable. Presumably, this 13-member committee would then determine the candidates running on the slate.

This proposal by RA is clearly one-sided and is not acceptable to those who have been critical of the manner in which the RA leadership has been running the RTC, and would amount to a continuance of the same policies that have caused a large number of retirees to reconsider voting for RA again.

Only a slate decided on and reflective of the RTC membership will have a chance to defeat Unity once again. A serious proposal would respond directly to the issue of how each group (as well as independents) would be represented on a unified slate.

While representation among the Officers, Executive Board and Delegates is important and must be resolved, there are other concerns that must be addressed. For one, what should be contained in the platform of a united slate? What issues should be emphasized? Another issue is how do we organize to get Inro 1008 passed, and how do we work with other groups to lobby for its passage?

Given these conditions, none of the three Fix Retiree Benefits members intend to attend RA’s election committee meeting. However, we remain open to working not only with RA but with the vast number of non-affiliated RTC members who wish to actively participate in the RTC election.

---

The joint-slate proposal presented by Fix Retiree Benefits to Retiree Advocate in April and May is below:

1. Protect our promised retiree healthcare. We must unite with other municipal union retirees, and work in solidarity with the New York City Organization of Public Service Retirees and its leader Marianne Pizzitola in the fight to pass City Council Intro 1008.

2. Fight to eliminate the onerous and coercive copays. Improve retiree UFT Welfare Fund benefits. Provide drug coverage for retirees and their dependents, as in all other municipal unions, and improve dental coverage.

3. Protect our pension benefits. Do not let the city balance its budget on the backs of retirees. Fight in the State to increase COLAs. Enable retirees to vote for TRS teacher trustees.

4. Oppose Unity Caucus leadership, when they pit active members against retirees or engage in undemocratic or other actions that cause harm to the membership.

We wish to run a democratic RTC, accountable to all its constituents, Medicare and pre-Medicare, inclusive of paraprofessionals and all other titles.

Fix Retiree Benefits proposed the following governing structure for the joint slate:

1. Each group (RA and FRB) would each nominate 150 of the chapter’s 300 delegates.

2. Each group (RA and FRB) would equally share the 10 officer positions (5 each).

3. Each group (RA and FRB) would share the 15 Executive Board positions, with the group nominating the chapter leader candidate choosing 7 of the 15 members of the Exec Board, and the other group choosing 8 members.

Thanks for reading FIX RETIREE BENEFITS - UFT! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support our work. 

 

It is deeply disappointing but not at all surprising to see RA leadership behaving in this way. It seems their only takeaway from the 2025 officers election, in which they lost the retiree vote by a 3-to-1 margin, was to become even more embittered and entrenched.

Despite TRIPLING the retiree vote received by RA in the 2025 election, the union activists involved in Fix Retiree Benefits have offered to split the RTC slate evenly (50/50) and to work together with RA to develop a platform. That offer from Fix Retiree Benefits was presented in good faith and in the spirit of union solidarity, and it still stands. RA should take the offer, and we should all get to work in defeating Unity, whose nearly 70-year obsessive control of the UFT has resulted in 20+ years of diminishing returns for all UFT members.

The Outrage: Blogging About Nothing, Blogging About Everything - Or Not Blogging at All

Friday, January 23, 2025 

I haven't been blogging too much in the past few years, especially since Arthur has been prolific and covering a lot of the same ground. I have a different take on some issues but not enough of a difference to take the time to write about it. It's not that I have nothing I want to write about but I have too much to write about and start around 5 blogs a day that I don't get to finish. 

 

I'm not big on going to rallies, marches, picket lines, etc because I see doing so as not organizing, but feel-good events. When we are helpless to do much about events, at least we do something to make us feel better. But I do have a level of outrage at everything Trump and Israel that forces me to act. The ICE (not UFT) mayhem is driving me out today for the Union Sq rally and march to Bryant Park at 4PM. And I hate the cold so I will be layering up like Raphies' brother Randy in Christmas Story.

 

I'm not sure I will make it to Bryant Park and do have to catch the ferry back to Rockaway as I have an early Saturday morning call at Brooklyn Botanic Garden where I've been in the garden guide training program since September. If we pass a diner I might try to convince Arthur to join me for a bite. Oh, and it's my wife birthday week and we went to the matinee of Hell's Kitchen the other day and loved it -- it is closing in late February and TDF is available -- we were in last row of orchestra. 

 

We had dinner in Grand Central Station, a spectacular setting, but cancelled The River Cafe for Sunday evening as I hear there is some kind of snow storm coming. Mamdani better make sure to have the streets in front of every synagogue cleaned or he will be accused of anti-semitism. 

 

Don't get me wrong. There's plenty to be outraged about the Trump-like Mulgrew at the UFT and the abusive behavior at the Delegate Assembly by Unity hacks where I witnessed the outrageous behavior of District 9 rep Aqeel Williams who didn't like it that long-time CL Thomas Hasler took a seat in a mostly empty row Williams was reserving for his minions and when Thomas didn't leave, moved over to sit next to him and invade his space by crossing his leg. 

 

Thomas raised the issue in a fabulous speech at the DA exposing Williams' behavior and criticizing the Mulgrew firings of Amy Arundel and David Kazansky but left off Ashley Rzonca and Leah Lin. I was sitting two rows behind and witnessed the entire episode and when I called to Thomas it was Aqeel who was harassing him, Williams turned around and yelled at me that he doesn't want to see his name coming out of my mouth. "Aqeel, Aqeel, Aqeel," I responded. "I pay your salary," which  is far above what the teacher top salary. 

 

Another outrage has been the legal threats by Unity directed at ABC for including "UFT" in the name, which Unity and all legacy caucuses do, clearly showing they have no fear of legacy caucuses but do fear ABC. 

"We previously shared back in December that Michael Mulgrew and the rest of UFT’s Unity leadership decided to waste YOUR dues money on having a white shoe law firm harass ABC with frivolous cease and desist letters intended to intimidate us. Unity Caucus has a long history of sending these letters to members who criticize Unity’s abject failure to deliver raises that beat the cost of living, protect our healthcare, and fight back against toxic administrators. These letters invariably warn of legal action if the criticism continues. Well guess what? We’re calling Unity’s bluff. ABC has retained legal counsel — paid for out of our own pockets — and sent the UFT’s attorney the letter pictured below. We DARE Mulgrew and Unity to file suit against ABC. We have already beat them in arbitration and are more than happy to replicate that outcome in court. Mulgrew and Unity have bullied the UFT membership for far too long. This is only the first step in putting a stop to that behavior for good".

Read the entire letter:

A Letter to Unity from ABC's Lawyer

A Better Contract

Jan 22, 2026

ABC has also taken the lead in a petition campaign calling for fee-free healthcare - almost 5,000 have signed. https://stopchargingretirees.org/

Unity Caucus Favors Co-Pays: NYC Educators Penalized for Retiring - Sign the Petition

Then there is the outrages Marianne Pizitola exposes almost daily.

Debunking the WHW Part 3 with Evidence!: Medicare Advantage is NOT Medicare and NOT an Advantage

Marianne Pizzitola

 

I'm not finished with my outrages. I have not been happy with the performance of the Retiree Advocate and it's control of the Retired Teacher Chapter Executive Board and delegates, both of which I am a member of. The unwillingness to confront Mulgrew publicly but they are willing to write a strongly worded letter, which they then claim has scared Mulgrew. They remind me of the Dem Party leadership scaredy cats. Schumer for next RTC leader?

 

I have too much to say about why but have to start bundling up for today's rally and march.

 

Speaking of strongly worded letters. A final outrage of the day is toward the Democratic Party - where the Republicans criticiee healthcare officials and the Dems defend them- this from Politico 

Defending Healthcare Execs: Why Democrats Lose

Politico: A MESSAGING TWIST ON HEALTH INSURERS — Republicans and Democrats swapped their typical positions on health insurers in back-to-back hearings Thursday as they laid the groundwork for midterm messaging, Kelly Hooper reports. Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means committees went on the attack against five insurance CEOs for prioritizing profits over patients. Meanwhile Democrats sympathized with the executives, arguing that they served as useful scapegoats for the GOP amid the fight over reviving expired Obamacare subsidies. “This is not your fault — this is the Republicans’ fault,” Energy and Commerce ranking member Frank Pallone said to the leaders of UnitedHealth Group, CVS Health, The Cigna Group, Elevance Health and Ascendiun. “Don’t let them drag you in here and blame you for what’s going on.” Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith later chastised Pallone for the comments. “Instead of demanding answers, a senior Democrat reassured our CEO witnesses this morning, saying, ‘It’s not your fault,’” Smith said at his committee’s hearing. “Maybe because Democrats know it’s their fault.” While Democrats were keen to blame Republicans for failing to address spiking insurance premiums, the two parties found common ground on hammering the executives for their lavish salaries. 

Final Note:

In 2013 I posted 827 blogs. In 2025, 78. So far this year, 2. The numbers began to drop off in 2019 and took a big hit during the pandemic years. Am I too busy? I was busier from the time I retired in 2002 through 2019. Does less busy = less blogging?  I find myself doing everything I can to avoid blogging. Night time is out due to evening fuzzy brain syndrome and I watch trash TV, which means political shows 'till 11:30 followed by old movies. 

My brain works better in the morning - theoretically. I watch Morning Joe, then listen to Brian Lehrer, then Sam Seder Majority Report -- which takes me followed by Breaking Points, which takes me to the evening. So UFT politics, which has been the essence of this blog, takes second or tenth place. I've also been working out a bit. And physical therapy for my knee and I've had a big belly hernia due to weakened muscles from my operation. I'm debating another operation to fix it but that would knock me out of being super active for up to 3 months. 

Just count yourself lucky I'm not including a photo of my hernia.

 

Unity Caucus Favors Co-Pays: NYC Educators Penalized for Retiring - Sign the Petition

Tell Michael Mulgrew and Unity to stop charging retirees premiums while claiming our health plan is premium free. Let’s send Unity a message to respect us. Let’s tell them we demand what other unions have. The UFT Welfare Fund is sitting on over a billion dollars. Let’s tell them how we’d like it used. Let’s tell them that the very worst time to impose premiums on us is when we retire. Let’s tell them if other unions can better support retirees, we can too. DC37 doesn’t charge members for prescription insurance when they retire. Firefighter and police unions don’t do it. Sanitation, and other unions don’t do it.... Arthur Goldstein

 Sign the petition. 1,575 have signed in 24 hours -  let's hit 5k.

Imagine a world where UFT would fight like the Nurses Union. Those nurses don’t play around. They are standing on business!! I love it....Anon. FB quote 

ABC's Leah Lin tells it all: Paying more in retirement just doesn't make sense.  

Tuesday, Jan. 13, 2026

 

I just finished 3 months of physical therapy for my knee, twice a week, at $15 co-pay a pop -- that's $30X12 weeks = $330 for my "premium free" healthcare. Plus all the other doctors I go to --- It's probably close to $500 given visits for my cancer and diabetes (due to removal of over half my pancreas). Listen, I can handle it all financially at this point, but for many NYC retirees these co-pays are a real burden. I've even heard stories of people who expected to retire are forced to hold off. 

 

I'm proud of my colleagues at ABC are at least making a stink of this while other supposedly opposition groups are fundamentally silent. My sense is that the non-Unity leaders of the RTC, many of whom defended the new healthcare plan, seem reluctant to be openly critical.

 

Today is an RTC Executive Board meeting and I'm looking forward to some action beyond a lot of whining over Mulgrew not calling on them at the DA. I detect a hint of fear that if they are too publicly critical of  the Unity leadership and Mulgrew, who has elements of Trump-like vindictiveness, he may turn off the lights and heat to their offices at 52 Broadway. I'll bring candles.

 

Arthur Goldstein authored a summary cross posted on the https://stopchargingretirees.org/ site: Should NYC Educators be Penalized for Retiring? Do you want to pay at least $180 a month, forever, when you retire? If not, please sign and share our petition. Please sign our petition demanding UFT stop charging retirees, some of whom are already struggling to get by. Please tell your friends to sign and share widely.

 ------

Here's a message from on the new PPO Plan. I logged on and found that one of my diabetes meds is not on the forumulary as a 1MG but is as 2 MG. We were promised the new plan would not result in changes. 

 

York City Municipal Employees & Retirees

 

January 1st the new NYCE PPO plan was implemented for all active workers, and Pre-Medicare Retirees.   In a few weeks, we will roll out a survey to see if you are having any concerns that need to be addressed.  

January 1st also began the new Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM) for those in the NYCE PPO plan, or those who are on the City Drug plan, the optional rider.  The new PBM is "Prime Therapeutics" - no longer Express Scripts.  They are the MANAGER...   Think of them like the middle man to your drug access.  A simple way to understand their job - they get you access to the drugs..   You have the drug manufacturers, the PBM and the Pharmacy.  

 

 

 

 

This was prepared by Bob Pfefferman as a briefing report prior to a meeting with newly elected City Council member Virginia Maloney. He invites questions and comments. 

 

Briefing paper, January 7, 2026, V3

 

The unions’ claim that they can negotiate for current retirees is specious for all of the following:

 

·      There is no such thing as a collective bargaining certificate for retirees.

 

·      Except for UFT retirees, we have no say in electing the union leadership. Even then UFT retiree votes are capped at a certain number.

 

·      To my knowledge, neither OLR or the MLC have cited a specific section of the Taylor Law that 1096 violates.  Any legal memo the city or the unions have is not public so no one can comment. Would you accept an unsupported allegation like this in a high school debate class?

 

The unions don’t mean this as a policy discussion. It is meant to intimidate any city council member that asks too many questions and threaten with a primary challenge.

 

·      When a union does negotiate, at least in my local, 371, AFSCME (DC 37), the members approve the collective bargaining demands. No such vote was held.

 

·      The results of any collective bargaining from an AFSCME entity holding a collective bargaining certificate must be approved by the membership. No such vote has been held.

 

·      Christopher Marte’s office has cited a US Supreme Court ruling Chemical Workers V Pittsburg Glass, 1971, in which it ruled that retiree benefits are not negotiated by a union

 

·      Marte also points out that in the past DC 37 and the UFT have supported city council legislation protecting retiree health care and never cited the Taylor Law. Because unions cannot bargain for retiree health care, the city council must pass legislation to change it.

 

Status of Lawsuits (Brentkowski case; I don’t know how to spell it)

 

·      Marianne’s group filed a lawsuit in September 2021 saying that the city cannot only offer one health insurance plan for retirees and must offer traditional Medicare and a wrap around. They cited 12 “causes of action” why the city could not do what they wanted.

 

·      The trial judge ruled “irreparable harm” and issued a TRO. He only ruled on one of the 12 causes of action. The city appealed and four years later, the Court of Appeals overturned the trial judge’s ruling and sent it back to the trial judge for ruling on the other 11.

 

·      Should the city and/or the unions (one entity for this purpose) be so reckless as to try this again, the trial judge would likely issue another TRO and the city and the unions will be wandering in a judicial morass for another two or three years with an uncertain outcome.

 

·      Retiree will not accept a Medical Advantage Plan as the only option for health insurance. We will fight this politically and legally. The city council has already seen what we can do. Do you really want to try it again?

 

The Comptroller’s Audit

 

·      The audit confirmed what retirees have been saying since 2021: that the fund was knowingly misused by the MLC and OLR and lacks transparency.

 

·      OLR tried to cover this up by submitting false annual certifications to the Comptroller’s Office, asserting in writing that the Fund is in compliance with Directive 27 requirements, that Fund balances are accurate, and that the Fund will be used for its stated purposes.

 

·      The audit also found that HISF lacks transparency and has inadequate governance and decision-making capacity. HISF does not maintain meeting agendas, materials distributed at meetings, or records of discussions held at meetings—such as recordings, minutes, or notes—and stated that it relies on HISF’s monthly reports which include only the Fund’s revenue, expenses, and cash balance.

 

·      Furthermore, while the $600 million would have improved HISF’s financial position somewhat, it was not sufficient, on its own, to keep HISF solvent

 

·      As detailed in Table XV in the audit, OLR and the MLC did not report significant HISF liabilities as required by Comptroller’s Directive 27 and GSAB Statement No. 54.

 

Garrido Speaks Untruths

 

·      In February of 2021, Henry Garrido reported to his delegates (I am one) that he was shocked, absolutely shocked, to discover that the HISF was bankrupt and retirees would have a new, improved health plan.

 

·      I spent almost two years plowing through federal legislation and virtually nothing he said checked out. The HISF did not suddenly go broke, and the new plan was only better in the warped minds of Garrido and Michael Mulgrew.

 

·      For example, they touted free gym membership but never reported on how many retirees not currently belonging to a gym would enroll. I believe that the number would have been miniscule and almost everyone who would enroll would drop out after a few months of basically not using it. And which gym? Not Equinox.

 

The Management Benefits Fund offers gym reimbursement but it is capped at $50 per month. Someone claiming such a benefit has to keep records and file a claim.

 

·      I then discovered that the new plan would be administered by a for-profit private insurance company accountable only to its shareholders. The newspapers over the past year or two have been bursting reporting on the fraud riddling these plans. In the 2006 amendments to the Medicare Act (best known for creating Medicare Part D), it was an experiment to see if private for-profit companies could deliver high quality health care and have cost-savings as well. It’s no secret that this experiment has failed.

 

·      Unanswered is why the union leadership was comfortable consigning retirees to a fraudulent system where the profits depended on denying care recommended by medical professionals.

 

·      Garrido got one thing right: the HISF was created to cover health insurance expenses for actives and retirees. I incorrectly thought it was created only for retiree health care.

 

·      I have an incurable but treatable neurological disease and I go three times a month for infusions. The price per infusion for the uninsured is $45K. Medicare pays about $7K. You can imagine the lack of enthusiasm that a private for-profit insurance company will have for such treatment.

 

Other reasons we need 1096:

 

·      The initial number cited by the city and the unions was $600M, however that was calculated. Henry Garrido reported to his delegates in the spring that because of DC budget actions that number was now $300M, however that was calculated.

 

·      Assuming that $300M has not vaporized further, we know from years of reports delivered to his delegates by Henry and from other sources that whatever number is being conjured by the MLC’s consultants, was going right back into the same slush fund bankrupted by the city and the unions.

 

The Thieves Have a Falling Out:

 

·      Now there is a falling out among the thieves over an alleged $4B, give or take $1B, in health care savings that the parties failed to generate in allegedly contractual commitments.

 

·      Henry Garrido has publicly and privately reported that he has in writing that the unions have been relieved of any commitment to save the $600M (or $300M. Or whatever number they are flying this week) by forcing retirees into a Medicare Advantage Plan. So the current $$$B squabble has absolutely nothing to do with retirees and we will not take the fall.

 

The Thieves Open The Backdoor

 

·      Frustrated by their unsuccessful attempt to steal health care directly from retirees, they have resorted to slapping $15 co-pays on every medical interaction after the deductibles are satisfied. This piles fees on top of one another so prevalent that retirees cannot afford them; you can’t tell where one stops and another starts.

 

·      The “lucky” ones have incomes so low that they are dual eligibles (Medicare and Medicaid) if you are callous enough to call being living in poverty “lucky.”

 

·      The rest of us have to pay deductibles that are not reimbursed, Rx drug co-pays that are not reimbursed, transportation, vision above what is reimbursed, dental above the cap, and front $2430.80 for 12 months’ premium before being reimbursed. This comes to about $5,000.

 

·      The 27% of city retirees who exist on pensions of $15K or less (even with a reasonable amount for social security added) simply can’t afford it. The 57% with pensions of $35K or less, with an appropriate amount for social security, aren’t doing so great either.

 

·      The contract for the wrap-around, currently GHI/Emblem Health Senior Care, will be re-bid this year. I an working on a table, not straightforward, showing how devastating the co-pays have become. I will forward when ready later this week.

 

·      I, personally, begin the year with 86 co-pays: 36 for the above mentioned infusions and 50 for weekly psychotherapy. That’s $1290 (minus the deductibles.) Now, I’m in physical therapy twice a week. This is a heavy hit. There is no indication that the unions will reduce the out-of-pocket in the bid document. I wonder who they think they represent: the taxpayers or their former members.

 

They have no shame:

 

·      DC 37 ought to be ashamed.  Most low-income retirees are their former members. They are stealing money from those who can least afford it to subsidize taxpayers. (If not for the co-pays, the premiums paid by the city likely would be higher.)

 

·      While DC 37 and other unions’ welfare funds provide an Rx benefit (with co-pays), many other retirees have to purchase city of New York Rx Part D with a 2026 monthly premium of $180 (some of which is reimbursed by the city or various union welfare funds). They also may face a Part D surcharge that is not reimbursed.

 

What can the city council do?

 

·      Enact 1096 which will end any discussion of a Medicare Advantage Plan or co-pays.

 

Bob

917-733-0925

 

Unity Caucus Threats Against ABC and its Members Continue - I Get Reported to HR for Fighting for the Right to Put Lit on the Table at the Delicate Assembly

“The delicate assembly.”  It sure is delicate.  A bunch of “snowflakes” in Unity Caucus.  Anyone who asks their dear leader a question is “rude.” Or a liar. That’s their favorite adjective. .. Comment of a not delicate Delegate

Is a cornered party as dangerous as a cornered rat? We should be sober: the political winds are blowing hard against the "ruling party". Unity is staring at a meltdown... defections may mount and internal chaos spreads throughout leadership. ... Tom Hartmann   

More Mulgrew Purges as District 30 Parents, Teachers, and Local Politicians Rally to Defend Fired UFT District Rep As Internal Resistance Grows... ed notes

the attorney’s letter states they will sue each UFT member individually, for having publicly stated we are UFT members. 

Wednesday, Dec. 10, 2025 -- Delicate Assembly Day - Ho Hum

Mulgrew and crew have been rehearsing, probably all day, for the DA so he knows where to point for the required sneak attack Unity reso to start the new motion period. But he has to act like this is all spontaneous, and he was absent for the acting lesson. One of the fun things is to pick out their reso from the stack. The goal is to waste as much of the 10 minute New Motion time as possible. And monitor how much speaking time goes to staff or Unity apparatchiks.

Frankly, I'm getting a bit bored by the DA, but the chance to engage with Unity slugs is too delicious to miss plus seeing lots of old and new friends. But I need an umbrella to keep from getting wet from the snowflakes. 

The answer by authoritarians when cornered is repression and increasing attacks to try to suppress voices of opposition. Or just put a photo of the leading oppo candidate for president in a urinal in the mens room at the UFT during a delicate assembly:   Misogyny at the UFT Delegate Assembly 

We are sure to hear bragging today on how effective they are on the para pay issue which has been locked up in the city council, thus forcing them to hold "massive" protests in front of the Adrienne Adams' office, who was scared to death at this turnout.

Now this is organizing.

PissGate Report

The union issued a report of its 6 month investigation of Piss Gate, (see here), that led to nothing. Apparently some strange guy they cannot identify was hanging around the men's room that day but the cameras can't seem to identify him. Probably just prostate problems. 

They are actually trying to pin it on me or someone from ABC - I think I was the only man from ABC there that day - because, you know, Unity people have such integrity.

I was told to go in and check the bathroom around 6PM after the first photo at 5:12 was found and I removed it so they can claim my fingerprints are on it. Like there's no Unity hack capable of doing this? There is video footage and there were only so many guys at the meeting. I shared my suspicions of the possible culprit with the lawyer.  

I entered the men's room to find the photo in the urinal, the second one that day and extracted it after taking a photo. I still have it and the investigator wanted me to turn it in so they could check for prints but I wasn't giving them the evidence unless I could observe the taking of the prints.

Unity motion to muzzle chapter leaders

Don't forget this gem from the Nov DA where they wanted to gag school chapter leaders like they gag CLs of functional chapters, notably Bennett Fischer of the RTC. This was their sneak attack reso. 

 

It was voted down by a slim margin, which means even some Unity CLs voted against it, which must really piss them off since the clicker we use allows for anonymity, something we didn't have in the past as the District reps had their CLs sit near them so they could monitor how they voted. 

Fighting for the right to put lit on the table 

I got a call from a union official that an HR complaint had been filed over my confrontation with a Unity hack over the restriction of needing LeRoy Barr's permission to put lit on the tables in. the lobby. She should have filed the HR complaint against LeRoy who gave her such a ridiculous assignment. 

Historical note: We had a table for non-official UFT lit for 25 years until the increasingly authoritarian LeRoy Barr barr-ed the oppo table and any lit he doesn't want displayed on the official table. When asked why, be first blamed Covid and then enemies of the UFT. You see, if you dare to criticize their worships you are an enemy -- Trumpism comes to 52 Broadway.
 

I posted a photo of the Barr henchwoman using our dues to guard the table in a recent post  Growing Authoritarianism at the UFT as Unity continues to take Lying shots at ABC 

 

Fact is she has been nasty and arrogant (confirmed by others in the UFT)  and she complains to UFT HR about me? As if I work for her and the UFT when in fact she works for me. But the UFT leadership act as if the membership works for them, so maybe they are confused. 

Talk about delicate snowflakes. She goes whining because an 80 year old 58 year member of the UFT spoke to her in a loud voice? If she can't deal with that she need to get a new job. These are the people who are supposed to defend us against Trumpism?  

 

Unity views ABC as the real threat, the legacy oppo as supplemental - but they need to find ways to stay relevant

 

I wrote about the increasing repression at the UFT the other day in this post: Growing Authoritarianism at the UFT as Unity continues to take Lying shots at ABC

 .... where I made the point that the biggest threat to Unity hegemony is coming from within the caucus, as the numerous defections to ABC in the last election proved. ABC only existed for months but garnered 32% of the vote while the 3 legacy caucuses, with 100 years of combined experience, of trying to organize in the UFT, got only14%, thus not constituting a threat to Unity, but a necessity for Unity to keep around as a counterweight to ABC. Thus, the "Unity light" label applied by some to elements of ARISE - remembering that for a dozen years, New Action was Unity light.

A key to the vast difference between ABC and ARISE was, I believe, the infusion of defecting Unity CLs who brought their staffs along to vote for ABC. Since the ARISE coalition will never get Unity defectors en masse, the demonstrated ability of ABC to do so is what makes ABC such a threat and has led to the constant attacks in Unity lit -- look for another one today at the DA.

 

Unity threatens to sue ABC and all its members individually

 
Thus, the latest round is threats and more threats for daring to say ABC is an active group in the UFT, while other groups that use the UFT logo are ignored. The geniuses at the UFT in full force where

the attorney’s letter states they will sue each UFT member individually, for having publicly stated we are UFT members. 

The letter from the lawyer also states:

“Further, throughout your website and on your social media, you refer to the A Better Contract organization as "A Better Contract - UFT" and "A Better Contract - UFT Members," signaling that the organization is a faction within the UFT when it is not.”

Mulgrew should look up the word faction - 

a small organized dissenting group within a larger one, especially in politics.

 

On the other hand, Unity Caucus using the UFT logo is fine:

 

And how about MORE?

Here is the ABC post where you can get details of the threats. 

Unity UFT Leadership Threatens to Sue ABC-UFT

And they're using your UFT dues to do it.

A Better Contract

Dec 09, 2025

 

https://abettercontract.org/p/unity-uft-leadership-threaten-to?

Michael Mulgrew and Unity UFT leadership, a political group that has controlled our union for more than sixty years and who continue to preside over diminishing returns for educators across the city, have hired the corporate law firm Norton Rose Fulbright to threaten legal action against A Better Contract (ABC-UFT). Their claim is that we, the committed educators and proud UFT members of ABC, do not have the right to refer to ourselves as UFT members.

This is not the first time Mulgrew and Unity UFT have used our dues money to threaten UFT members. In June 2025, Unity UFT hired the same law firm to file a complaint accusing A Better Contract of infringement for referring to themselves as UFT members. That complaint was rejected by an independent arbitrator, who determined that ABC-UFT’s statement of being UFT members, which we are, is legitimate and protected.

Rather than using dues to improve working conditions or strengthen our union, Mulgrew and Unity UFT leadership have chosen to use those dues to attack UFT members who are advocating for a more democratic and responsive union. 

Members can read more about that decision here: ABC Wins Arbitration

I will close with a comment on Arthur's substack:

When Mulgrew lays on his phony tough guy shtick, it does have an air of wannabe third-rate mob boss. It's pretty ineffective, though. I don't feel intimidated at all. Maybe it's working better with UFT staff at 52 Broadway. They all seem to be running scared.