Sunday, May 6, 2012

Alice McIntosh Fights Discontinuance at Rally Today

Over the years we at ICE have been contacted by a number of teachers who received the Dreaded D rating which basically blackballs them from teaching under their license again even if another principal wants to hire them.  It give unfettered power over non-tenured teachers to principals. Ask yourself why would a principal absolutely ruin a young or new teacher's career it they could find another job? Because they can. That is a sign of the kinds of people Tweed has put into school leadership positions.

Ed Notes has written about the D: Ed Notes Online: On the Dreaded D's and U's: Discontinued and ...

Ask any of them after about 6 months of obfuscation by the UFT how they feel about their union and you will have to contain the explosion.

Will the UFT be at this rally crying crocodile tears?


From Jonathan Halabi to NYC Ed Listserve:
Probationary teachers in New York City are discontinued every week, and they rarely generate news stories. Some of the discontinuances are justified, some are unjustified, but the ex-teachers usually just go away quietly. Not Alice McIntosh.
McIntosh, a 50-year-old Black woman with masters in public health from Columbia and another in education from Pace, is not going away quietly. Her story was featured in the Daily News. And now that her appeal has been denied (by the same superintendent who signed off on the U rating!), her family and friends from New Day Church are rallying in her support.
The fact that McIntosh had favorable evaluations, but questioned the use of out-dated, non-relevant curriculum, should make people of good conscience highly suspicious.
Sunday, May 6, 1:30 – 2:30.  P10X@PS15 (2195 Andrews Avenue near W 183rd, the Bronx)
Click for press release:  McIntosh 5.6 Media Advisory.



Description: Description: NWBCCCLogo,Full

Northwest Bronx Community and Clergy Coalition

103 East 196th Street
Bronx, NY 10468
Tel: 718-584-0515 cell: 646-646-6313 fax: 718-733-6922

Contact:


MEDIA ADVISORY
For Immediate Release
Alice McIntosh, 718 679-5824, aymcintosh@gmail.com
Allison Manuel, 917-213-6028 or Allison@northwestbronx.org



Fired Bronx Teacher Takes DOE To School!

Northwest Bronx Community and Clergy Coalition calls for reinstatement of teacher Alice McIntosh, administrative accountability for State-required mentoring and the creation of an unbiased appeal process for teachers


Bronx, NY— On Sunday, May 6 at 1:30 PM, the Northwest Bronx Community and Clergy Coalition; New Day Church; and former students, colleagues and supporters of 2009 Teaching Fellow Alice McIntosh will gather in front her P10X @ PS 15, in support of her being reinstatement.  According to Ms. McIntosh, former P10X literacy teacher and current Director of New Day Church Sunday school, she intends to “take the DOE to school.”  

“My case makes crystal clear that the DOE is in need of serious schooling on how to support new teacher success and an unbiased, independent appeals process,” said Ms. McIntosh. “We have sent over 200 letters, elevated the stories of other teachers like me in the press, and have made a clearly substantiated case in the NYCDOE Office of Appeals.  All have fallen on deaf ears. This Sunday, we’re taking them back to school.”

Ms. McIntosh was fired from the DOE without being mentored, as outlined by State requirements. Currently as well as during her appeal hearing the Administration of P10X has not provided any documentation that she was ever mentored.  In spite of not being supported by her administration, Ms. McIntosh received glowing recommendations from parents and her colleagues and all satisfactory observations from the same Vice Principal who supported her U-rating.

Ms. McIntosh and her supporters say they intend to visit the office of Superintendent Gary Hecht, who authorized McIntosh’s firing and decided the outcome of her appeal. They will demand that the he answer questions about the inconsistencies surrounding her unsatisfactory performance rating and ultimate firing, the appalling lack of evidence to support the allegations made against her, as well as why she worked for two years without being mentored or supported.

“I am completely disgusted by the fact that Superintendent Gary Hecht, had the power to approve my unsatisfactory rating and firing and ultimately made the final decision on my appeal,” said Ms. McIntosh. “Is there any court of law where the same judge can sentence and decide the appeal?”

Ms. McIntosh’s case is not an isolated incident, and so she and the NWBCCC have launched a campaign to hold the NYC Department of Education accountable for the impacts of lack of mentoring and relevant, consistent support for new teachers and an appeal process that at its core is corrupt and biased.  In 2004, the State of New York Board of Regents modified the teacher certification regulations, requiring all teachers with less than one year of teaching experience to receive a “quality mentoring experience” prior to receiving full certification. New York City implemented this requirement with a $36 million teacher mentoring program that was intended to "increase teacher retention, enhance classroom instruction, and improve student achievement. (Goertz, Loeb, Wyckoff, 2011)  In spite of that, The UFT reports that 40 percent of teachers leave before the end of their three-year probation period, largely because they don't get enough support and professional development. Additionally, 51% of NYC Teaching Fellows do not stay within the teaching profession for more than 5 years.  This translates into a dramatic loss of talent and potential from Teaching Fellows themselves and a costly loss of the City’s time and money spent on educating and employing them.   Fellows cite lack of mentoring and inconsistent support as a top reason for leaving within the first five years.  The Department of Education and the United Federation of Teachers have both published studies on the alarmingly high attrition rates of new teachers.  Yet nothing has been done to remedy this.

Who: The Northwest Bronx Community and Clergy Coalition, New Day Church, former students and colleagues of Alice McIntosh
What: Demonstration to demand the reinstatement of Alice McIntosh, administrative accountability for State required mentoring and the creation of an unbiased, independent appeal process for teachers
When: Sunday, May 6, 2012, 1:30 PM - 2:30 PM
Where: P10X@PS15 (2195 Andrews Avenue between W 183rd and Hall of Fame Terrace, Bronx, NY 10453)
Visuals: Giant Blackboard with the ABCs of supporting new teachers; 100 supporters of Alice McIntosh brandishing signs, singing, and praying over testimonies

Change the Stakes and GEM Invitate you to high stakes testing meeting this Wednesday

The Change the Stakes Committee formed by GEM last July has picked up a massive head of steam in fighting high stakes testing both locally and nation-wide. You know our theme in GEM has been: we have to do things like make a movie defending teacher and union rights and fight testing and teacher evaluation reports, etc, etc, etc because the UFT doesn't.

Thanks again for your support of the petition to Give New York State Parents the Right to Opt Their Children out of High Stakes Testing.

Anyone interested in joining other parents and educators working to challenge high stakes testing is invited to the next meeting of the NYC-based Change the Stakes Campaign this Wednesday.

What     Change the Stakes Meeting
Where    CUNY Graduate Center, 34th Street and 5th Avenue, Room 4204 (the Urban Education Lounge)
When    Wednesday, May 9th, 5:30-7:30 PM

For more info on Change the Stakes please visit the website or email changethestakes@gmail.com.

For more information on the upcoming boycott of June field tests please visit Time Out From Testing.

Thanks again,

Andrea from the Change the Stakes Campaign
 Here is the TOFT petition on field testing to the crooks at the NY State Ed Dept:

It has come to our attention that the State Department of Education (SED) wants our children to work for the testing company, Pearson.  Right now our children are being tested in English, math and science. They have spent many hours prepping for and taking these tests. This year the tests are much longer because Pearson Publishing has embedded field test questions in the existing tests.  These questions do not count toward your child’s grade but rather help Pearson write future tests.

The SED has awarded a $32 million contract over the next 5 years to Pearson. The DOE is mandating every school to give stand alone field tests the week of June 5th. Our children have become lab rats for this multi billion dollar testing company.

Parents want to boycott the field tests. In NYC we have 5 short weeks to get going.  We hope that many of you can convince your schools’ parents to join in and tell your principal that there should be no field testing that week. We would rather that the week of June 5th be devoted to real learning rather than test taking devoted to aiding a testing company do its job.

We have posted on our website at www.timeoutfromtesting.org both a parent letter and a boycott Fact Sheet for you to use (Spanish versions will be up soon.) The fact sheet is a way to enlighten your parent body since we have learned that most do not know about the field testing. In addition, parents are signing the letter and handing it in to their principals so that their schools don’t give the tests. Please let us know if your school is on board. We hope there will be many schools boycotting. To the best of our knowledge since these are field tests, there will be no ramifications for our children, our teachers or our schools.

Feel free to write us or call if you have questions.

Regards,
Jane Hirschmann and Dani Gonzalez
917 679 8343             646 701 4014

Saturday, May 5, 2012

The Saturday Night Special: Pete Fornatale

The Saturday Night Special is a new feature of Ed Notes published every Sat. between 9 and 12 in the evening. Hopefully, something a little different than the rest of the dribble on this blog.

Cinquo de Mayo, 2012

Well, I am not in a bar or a Mexican restaurant and I even missed the Kentucky Derby.

Why? because we are avidly listening to WFUV's tribute to Pete Fornatale. He died over a week ago from the effects of a stroke while we were down in Virginia and Washington DC. I actually learned of his death from Reality Based Educator at Perdido St. School while I was away. I had heard he was sick but had not idea this was on the horizon.

It was a shock. He was my favorite music person on the radio and I listened to him whenever possible. I came late to rock music - as I did and do to just about everything. My growing interest coincided with Pete's rise to prominence on WNEW in the early 70's, though it was hard to listen when I was at school and he had that 10-2 show. But then there was Mixed Bag.  I learned a lot about rock from him, from the way he put music together. Like I was too dumb to know that the Beatles' "Back in the USSR" was a takeoff on the Beach Boys' "California Girls" - until Pete played them back to back. OK, I told you I was late. I believe he was the guy who brought back the Beach Boys by getting rock fans to look at their work as art. But then again what do I know? And then there was Poco and the roots back to Buffalo Springfield (and can't we use their anthem song right now to battle the ed deformers?)

I loved his appearances on Mike Francesa on WFAN. Pete was Mike's English teacher in parochial school. I hope Mike replays some of those segments some time. Because I was out of town I didn't hear if Mike talked about Pete but I assume he did.

When I learned that Pete lived out here in Rockaway and the Rockaway Theatre Company was doing a salute to Simon and Garfunkle in one of their spectacular Rockaway Cafe fall shows a few years ago and hearing that Pete has a book out on S and G, I emailed him at WFUV and he offered to come to a Saturday night show. He got up on stage during intermission with my acting teacher Frank Caiati and they did some joshing back and forth. Later he arranged a book appearance and did so again a few years later with another book. We got to chat and it was so good to hear that voice in person.

It's hard to figure how the death of a person you don't know will affect you. Certainly John Lennon and others of his ilk. Harry Chapin was a guy we felt we knew and that still hurts because he was such a great guy and we attended so many of his concerts. Phil Ochs hanged himself out here in Rockaway -- my wife and I had gone to lots of his shows.

Pete falls in that category. Listening to the last 4 hours of tribute to Pete was just so sad. We just ordered tickets to his May 27 tribute.

Friday, May 4, 2012

May 5 - Toward a NYC Peoples Board of Education



NYC PEOPLES ASSEMBLY FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION (PAPE) MAY 5, 2012
“Toward a NYC Peoples Board of Education”
Preliminary Morning Schedule
 
8:30 – 9 am …… Registration and Breakfast
 
9:00 – 9:10 am ……. Welcome: Setting the Tone for Building a Movement
 
9:10 – 9:40 am …… Connecting the Dots: A Legacy of NYC Mis-Education
1.     Past: Community Control dissolves into De-centralization
2.     Present: Bloomberg - Mayoral Control / Dictatorship
3.     Future: Peoples Democracy = Peoples Assembly (People Power) —> Peoples Board of Education
 
9:40 – 10:40 am …… Connecting the Dots: “Same Struggle, Same Fight”: How mayoral control, racist practices, “mis-education for the many”, privatization, school closings, the charter school scam, attacks on workers & unions, and the complete disempowering parents & community members are ALL parts of the same problem. Allies who recognize this, organize themselves, and develop a common agenda can win.
[PANEL w/ Audience Participation] Panelists: Parent, Student, Teacher, Education Worker, Concerned Community Member
 
10:40 – 12:00 Noon …… Bringing Sanity to the Madness: How the Peoples Assembly (PAPE) & an interim Peoples Board of Education (iPBoE) can shake things up right NOW, while preparing for a sound, longer term foundation…
 
 [PANEL w/ Audience Participation] Panelists: Parent, Student, Teacher, Education Worker, And Concerned Community Member
1.     PAPE: Initial Principles of Unity
a.     Ending Mayoral Control NOW
b.     Demand Moratorium on School Closings & Turnarounds
c.      Demand Establishment of a “legislated”, people-empowered, human rights-based public education system: Peoples Board of Education (PBoE)
d.     Formation of PAPE & iPBoE NOW
2.     Composition and Structure of PAPE
a.     Composed of Rights holders
b.     General Assembly & several Working Committees
(See: “1:00 -1:45 pm” below)
3.     Establish an interim Peoples Board of Education (iPBoE) NOW
a.     iPBoE is authorized by ‘we the people’ aka: the Peoples Assembly for Public Education (PAPE).
4.     Utilize PAPE & iPBoE to:
a.     Organize a massive, anti racist, democratic, grassroots movement that is based on human rights principles and fights for POWER
 
11:55 – Noon  …… Set Date for Next General PAPE Meeting
 
Noon to 1:00 pm …… Lunch on Your Own 

Preliminary Afternoon Schedule
 
1:00 -1:45 pm  …… Breakout Groups: Peoples Assembly Working Committees Goals
                                       a) May-June 2012 b) Summer 2012 c) Fall 2012
1.     Strategic Planning & Mass Actions
2.     Outreach
3.     Legislative Action & Governance
4.     Media, Public Information
5.     Curriculum & Instruction, Teacher Training & Professional Development
6.     “Rights-holder Caucuses:
a.     Youth Caucus
b.     Parent Caucus
c.      Teacher & Ed Worker Caucus
1:45 – 2:30 pm …… PA Working Groups Report back & Discussion   
 
2:30 - 3:15 pm …… Breakout Groups: interim Peoples Board of Ed (iPBoE)
1.     Size & Composition of iPBoE
2.     Initial Ideas regarding “electing” or “selecting” the interim Board
 
3:15 – 4:00 pm …… Report back & Discussion

UFT Sells Out Teacher: The Memo(s) Mulgrew doesn't want you to see

How complicit was Randi Weingarten, Michael Mulgrew and the UFT in the Raqnel James case as criminal principal Iris Blige, supported all the way by her fellow criminals at Tweed, claimed Raqnel James threatened to kill her but did not call the police for 2 months until NY Teacher reporter Jim Callaghan called her for a comment. Did Randi protect a State Ed Department official who blocked the release of a transcript that might have helped James?
Raqnel James called me last night “jittery” because she hasn’t heard from NYSUT. She claims she was told that your office had decided to wait until after August 1 to contact DOE on her behalf, which is the day her visa expires. --- Jim Callaghan to NYSUT Attorney Claude Hirsch, c.spring 2009
Really, how far off are we from China when this can happen? In a just world, Joel Klein, Dennis Walcott and everyone at Tweed perpetrating this injustice, along with Iris Blige, would be sitting in a cell. And maybe some people at the UFT too.

Fined after putting teachers through hell.

Lots more below.
Raqnel James was arrested in April 2009, the day after I called Blige for a comment on my story. The cops first showed up at the school in February.
Mulgrew told me that his friends in NYPD said they had a video of James leaving the letter [threatening Blige's life] in the principal's mailbox- a lie.
Then they said they had her fingerprints- a lie.
Then they said it was her hand writing, which  they failed to prove in court. That was the  ENTIRE  case against her! No one else in the entire school was interviewed. Blige was not given extra police protection. So this alleged assassin was sent to the rubber room. Think: if she had threatened to murder the mayor or the Chancellor. --- Jim Callaghan
When Raqnel James was exonerated in Dec. 2011, retired UFT Bronx staffer Rodney Grubiak (the guy who tried to block me from filming Randi Weingarten at the notorious UFT wine and cheese party attempt to undermine the ATR rally in Nov. 2008) wrote a Dec. 23, 2011 post on the jd2718 blog which did a lot of coverage of the Blige/James case: Lost Three Years of My Life – The Story of a Teacher Who May Never Teach Her Students Again. Naturally, Grubiak left out the sordid role the UFT/Unity Caucus masters he served for so many years played.

While the UFT supposedly gave James nominal support, this spring 2009 memo from Jim Callaghan drills deep on what went on behind the scenes. Why was Randi protecting a NY State Ed Department official by withholding information from Callaghan that would have helped James? Here is an excerpt talking about a State Ed Dept official blocking access to a transcript of the case and denying Jim access to information for his story.
The union and DOE agreed last June on a logical solution to the transcript problem. You told me that someone at SED “blocked it.” We were in the lobby when you mentioned the person’s name, but my question, so I could prepare a memo for Randi’s approval before the story runs, was how far “up the ladder” that person was and did we appeal her denial to higher authorities at SED including the Commissioner?  


There was no mention of who in the UFT didn’t want a reporter for the union paper to have any information on this when I have been assigned to [cover] the rubber rooms all school year. 

Your comment makes me sound like the Daily News, not a veteran of the New York Teacher.  I said to you: “I have no authority to publish anything in the paper. It is up to Randi and if she wanted to make an issue of the SED person denying our proposal, she would tell me to move forward or to drop it.” 
..........

What out of control principals can now do is invent charges against a well-respected teacher, have her reassigned and arrested and even if she is cleared, she will still be deported. As you know from my story, three DOE officials told me that Iris Blige threatened to destroy the union at the school and specifically targeted chapter leaders for banishment to the rubber room- both were sent back with no charges. Then she went after the third chapter leader.
------Jim Callaghan to NYSUT attorney Claude Hirsch et al.
Ed Notes and other bloggers have been covering this case for years and we have tied the role the UFT has played into it due to the work of Callaghan. See this story  posted at Ed Notes on Jan. 11, 2011 where Jim slams the UFT leadership.
Klein knew all about Blige and the recantation of an Assistant Principal because I wrote about it in the Spring of 2009 for the New York Teacher. It didn’t take a special Condon “investigation” to uncover the Blige horror show, supported by Mulgrew and Weingarten.

I quoted members who said Blige specifically went after chapter leaders and sent them to the rubber rooms on trumped up charges - they were never charged with anything and were all sent back to the classroom.


That was the last article I was allowed to write about Blige.


When the union had a rally on March 13, 2009, Weingarten sent out a press advisory (I have a copy) knocking the total number of protesters down to 50 after she was told that 500 would attend. So even then the union was protecting Blige.
Given Callaghan's explosive info below, are these rallies held merely for the purpose of domestic consumption -- ie. to make the members THINK the leadership is doing something while behind the scenes doing something else? How does a union allow its very lifeblood, the chapter leaders, to be savaged in so many schools? I believe they try to keep all this under cover because they don't have the stomach to fight it but don't want members to know just how weak -- and gutless -- they are.

Jim wrote this in Jan. 2011, about a year BEFORE James was exonerated:
It is a New York State felony to threaten the murder of a public official. Nothing happened to the teacher until eight weeks later, in April, 2009, after I called Blige for a comment on my story. The next day, the teacher was arrested and charged with a misdemeanor. (Even if she is found guilty, she will serve 15 days of community service picking up garbage on the Grand Concourse).

The Bronx D.A.- elected with help from the UFT- did not ask for bail, didn’t ask for the teacher’s passport to be lifted and the principal never asked for extra police protection for Blige, parents, students and the staff.


Despite my urging, Weingarten refused to call the D.A. and ask that he personally look at the case. There was no police probe of the gang. The teacher - this horrible accused murderer beloved by her students and colleagues -- was sent back to the rubber room.


Nearly two years later, after the D.A. Robert Johnson asked for 15 postponements, there has been no trial and the case is still open.
[Ed Note- Show me one statement from the UFT raising this issue --- teachers forgotten and abandoned].

What would have happened if a teacher wrote a letter like that to Bloomberg of Klein?


The teacher ultimately lost her job because neither Mulgrew nor Weingarten nor NYSUT lawyer Claude Hirsch lifted a finger to help her. She never had a 3020A hearing. Klein used a loophole in the law saying he could refuse to approve her application for a work visa if she was merely “accused” of misconduct.

More Ed Notes coverage from March 13 and 14, 2009:
Teachers Protest Principal Iris Blige at ..The principal at this school, Iris Blige, is abusive, arrogant, and disrespectful of teachers. She has framed several teachers that for some ...

And this video UPDATE: Highlights of the protest written by my ICE colleague Julie Woodward where you can see Mulgrew, Leroy Barr and Bronx Borough slug Jose Vargas along with Bronx HS District Rep Lynne Winderbaum, who many consider a real trooper who did what she could for teachers, slammed into Iris Blige and her wayward approach to educators, kids, and schools and said the union is “fed up” with the DoE's ...

Well as Callaghan indicates in his memo from the spring of 2009, not all that fed up.


Updating the Raqnel James case: How complicit was the UFT? Jim Callaghan who was fired as a reporter for the NY Teacher in the summer of 2010 reveals memo which he posted on Schoolbook with this introduction:


How NYSUT lawyer Claude Hirsch and UFT lawyer Adam Ross - a nepotism hire - sold out their client with the approval of Weingarten and Mulgrew and how they and Carol Gerstl, another UFT lawyer, allowed an innocent teacher to be railroaded by Bloomberg, Klein and Walcott and Mike- three years without a contract - Mulgrew.

Jim Callaghan's letter to Hirsch, Ross, Gerstl, Weingarten. 
They did nothing to help her! There are hundreds of other stories like this that mulgrew wants to cover up.
The memos that Mulgrew doesn't want you to see. Lots more to come.
Claude,
Raqnel James called me last night “jittery” because she hasn’t heard from NYSUT. She claims she was told that your office had decided to wait until after August 1 to contact DOE on her behalf, which is the day her visa expires.

As we discussed on the elevator today, the June 5th NYSUT Legal memo regarding Raqnel James is not clear to me. (Although the memo states I was copied on June 5th, I saw it for the first time last week).

The memo is wrong when it states that the DOE “renews” visas.

That is not the case. DOE sponsors the visa and. DOE has a written policy of withdrawing applications for teachers who “are suspended or reassigned for any reason.” This was addressed in the NYSUT memo as: “DOE has not officially been told that DOE will not renew her visa.”

But the DOE written policy makes it clear that DOE will not sponsor Raqnel while she is reassigned.

This raises an important question: is the DOE policy legal or is it just a bureaucratic opinion? This was not addressed in the NYSUT memo.

The conclusion of the June 5 NYSUT Legal memo concludes that it is “unclear” whether the H-1B visa can be renewed but then states that Ms. James has a legitimate claim only if she can establish that she could renew her visa but for the failure of DOE to cooperate.
The memo states that Ms. James claims the INS can renew her visa beyond six years. (It is still unclear to if there a six year limitation or not).

When you asked me today; “What do you want us to do?” I said I don’t know the law well enough, but I know DOE unfairness when I see it.

What out of control principals can now do is invent charges against a well-respected teacher, have her reassigned and arrested and even if she is cleared, she will still be deported. As you know from my story, three DOE officials told me that Iris Blige threatened to destroy the union at the school and specifically targeted chapter leaders for banishment to the rubber room- both were sent back with no charges. Then she went after the third chapter leader.

Adam suggested one possibility in his April 14 email to you:

“Claude - if you are not already, would you please look into whether an Art.78 could be filed along the lines of what you have filed for other teachers who the DOE has acted to have their H1B visa revoked because of alleged disciplinary issues.”

Adam’s issue was not addressed in the NYSUT memo and you told me yesterday he was “confused.”

I asked Randi on April 14 if a NYSUT could lawyer help (Raqnel) with this dilemma:
I wrote: “It might be a Pyrrhic victory because her work visa expires on August 1. I have a posting from DOE saying it will not sponsor teachers for visas if they are reassigned.”
Randi said: “Yes.”

In answer to my question the next day, you said “Yes, she (Raqnel) gets 30 minutes with the immigration attorney plus the NYSUT attorney.” (Emphasis mine). And you said she would get “assistance” from NYSUT Legal. Your quote was: “We would be happy to try to assist Raqnel James in regards to her immigration attorney. We have been assisting a number of international teachers who are facing visa issues” and you added that she is entitled to a free 30 minute consultation with an outside immigration attorney.

So this is the news so far: DOE, with taxpayer funds, has forced Raqnel to hire a criminal defense attorney fight bogus charges and an immigration lawyer to keep her in the country.
What can NYSUT do for her? Can we ask DOE official that they sponsor her for the upcoming school year pending the outcome of her “criminal” charges? Can we go to court to see if their policy is legal?

I am not arguing the law with you, but to tell me today that “DOE hasn’t done anything yet” is not the point. Yes they have: they will not sponsor her while she is reassigned. The answer to the entire issue remains unclear. (E.g. whether the six year limitation can be extended and secondly: is there a stay that can be obtained until such time as a legal opinion is provided or her criminal matter is resolved?)

The fact is that DOE will not sponsor her while she is reassigned. I respect your opinion that “We don’t know if we would win the case against DOE” even though the NYSUT memo says “it is not clear” whether the visa can be renewed—it is not even clear what the “case” would be at this point.

But that leaves Raqnel one month before she faces the possibility of deportation.
Her case of threatening to murder a public official of the City of New York is being taken so seriously by the D.A. that even if she is found guilty, Donald said she is not going to jail for a misdemeanor conviction. The cops waited two months to arrest her after they found a “perfect” hand writing match. She must have some horrible danger to the community, for the arrest came on the next school day after I called Blige for comment.

My article pointed out that no other staffers or students at the school were interviewed and the detectives went straight to Raqnel because Blige said she “suspected” Raqnel of leaving a murder threat in her own hand-writing.

On another topic, we also discussed the transcript problem in early April and you promised to get back to me on the number of teachers who still don’t have a decision because the arbitrators haven’t ruled yet because they are waiting for the transcripts or just because they haven’t ruled according to the statute.

You said you were having a difficult time getting the information from the lawyers on your staff but assured me it was only “one or two cases,” You never sent me the information on the one or two cases.”

You wrote on May 8th: “The June (2008) side letter stated that DOE and the UFT would look into the feasibility of paying for the transcripts up front and the State Education Department was not interested in such an arrangement. More importantly, it appears that the transcripts have been coming much more quickly (my emphasis). It is still a problem that the State is not paying arbitrators promptly. I assume it still a problem regarding the court reporting company as well.”

However, at the April TRC meeting, one of your lawyers said that members are still waiting “two to four months” for decisions because of a delay in payments for transcripts and arbitration fees. This is a summary of her statement, taken from the UFT minutes of that meeting:

“Members who are awaiting the results of hearings should know that the New York State Education Department (SED) pays the cost of transcripts and arbitration fees and there has been a delay in these payments due to the budget situation, leading to a 2 to 4 month delay in the issuance of transcripts.” (Emphasis mine).

Your lawyer added: “We are in discussions with the SED and the DOE to speed up the process. NYSUT attorneys determine their need for a final transcript prior to the production of our closing argument on a case by case basis. It is our position arbitrators should have the hearing transcript prior to issuing a decision. We are working with the DOE and the arbitrators so we can best meet member needs related to adherence to time frames for pre-hearings, hearings and issuance of transcripts.”

When Randi told me last month to do another rubber room story, I thought a good place to start would be to see if the letter we signed last June was helping to clear up these cases.
The union and DOE agreed last June on a logical solution to the transcript problem. You told me that someone at SED “blocked it.” We were in the lobby when you mentioned the person’s name, but my question, so I could prepare a memo for Randi’s approval before the story runs, was how far “up the ladder” that person was and did we appeal her denial to higher authorities at SED including the Commissioner? I also asked if the denial was in writing and when it happened. On May 15, I asked you for the number of 3020A cases that were finished where we have no decisions and the dates they were completed.

You wrote back to me: “I am not just ignoring you. I am trying to find out from the UFT what they want me to release to you.” There was no mention of who in the UFT didn’t want a reporter for the union paper to have any information on this when I have been assigned to [cover] the rubber rooms all school year.

Your comment makes me sound like the Daily News, not a veteran of the New York Teacher. I have never had that sort of conversation with you before- and I said to you: “I have no authority to publish anything in the paper. It is up to Randi and if she wanted to make an issue of the SED person denying our proposal, she would tell me to move forward or to drop it.”

If our members are being held to the standards involving time and attendance, then so should the SED, DOE and the arbitrators. There is no excuse for delaying the payment to a transcription company or to an arbitrator while our members suffer the indignity of the rubber rooms.

So, without releasing any names of clients,

I would still like to know how many arbitration decisions are outstanding after the final hearing despite the Education Law’s 30 day rule and specifically, how many are due to transcription issues and how many are due to the fact that arbitrators haven’t ruled in a timely fashion even after they get the final transcripts.

Thank you,
Jim
AfterBurn
Here are some worthwhile comments from that Jan. 2011 Ed Notes piece:
  1. I am surprised that Callaghan- the best writer in the union- didnt get all the facts straight.
    After Weingarten wrote to Raqnel James that she was entitled to a NYSUT lawyer to handle her visa issues--- and would get one--- Claude Hirsh, Melinda Gordon and ADam Ross over- ruled Weingarten and declined to take the case.
    Ask anyone at NYSUT- most of them despise Hersch who treats them like kids. Then Garry Sprung's good buddy, lawyer Donald Vogelman, never asked for a dismissal until this year after racking up $500 a pop for court 15 "apppearances" over two years.
    When Raqnel James is acquitted, NYSUT will pay James who will then give the money to Vogelman.
    so: How close are Ross and Hersch to Vogelman?
    -Chief Justice Jeff Zahler.
    ReplyDelete
  2. Donald SegrettiMar 16, 2011 05:14 PM
    I dont know why anyone would post a note from Chief Justice Zahler, the low life Red-baiter, Weingarten's stooge.
    Just because he got his incompetent nephew- Adam Ross- a $190,000 a year job to kiss ass at the UFT is no reason to make fun of Zahler, who is now collecting four pensions.
    -Little Lord Flaunteroy (Adam)

Results of google search below the fold:

PO Teacher Takes NY Post Reporter to Task

Next time use the NY Post
In our spirit of holding reporters accountable for stories they write, especially with what is left out in such a way as to taint the story one way, we present Pissed Off Teacher's  assault on

Yellow Journalism

A guy handed me a copy of the Post as I walked off the subway this morning.  It seems this rag is trying to increase readership by bombarding pedestrians in lower Manhattan with free copies.

I took one, stuck it in my bag and opened it up on the way home.  The headline AUDIT SHOWS TEACHERS REGULARLY WORK LESS THAN THEIR CONTRACT REQUIRES almost knocked me out of my seat.  
 
How dare he write teachers don't work enough?  Teachers are programmed by administrators and administrators suck every ounce of blood out of them.  If the teacher is not in the classroom, the teacher is performing some other duty, a duty that requires sometimes possibly twice the amount of time that would have been spent in the classroom.  I have seen the work teachers with comp time jobs do and, for that reason I never took one.  And, as for after school jobs, he clearly forgets to mention the adminstrators that are paid to sit around and supervise each and every per session activity, supervisors that barely leave their offices except perhaps to go out for coffee or to go home early.

Yoav Gonan is a shill of the system.  Several years ago he interviewed me.  He was doing a story on the overcrowding and trailer conditions at Packemin.  I gave him a tour of the trailer, pointed out holes in the walls, exposed outlets and sinks and thermostats that did not work.  I remember him asking me why I still taught in the trailer since conditions were so bad.  I told him that it beat working in the noisy building.  He wrote something to the effect "teacher likes working in trailer" and ignored everything else I said.  He called me again several months later with questions about something else.  I refused to speak to him.

The Post only cares about selling papers.  This headline is just another part of the yellow journalism they use to do it.  Next time, I am turning down their free paper.  It is not even fit to line a bird cage.
 
Hey, when are we going to see Reporter Data Reports published?

More on Eva Moskowitz Charter Scam by Jim Devor

Jim Devor delves further into how the SUNY Trustees handed Eva (and soon to come other charter chains) a gold mine. Or half the mine this time, the rest on layaway. The request for a 50% increase in management fees might have been a red herring to cover up the real intent: replication, which will allow charter chains with political pull to wipe out entire swaths of public schools. In the meantime, the UFT sits helpless, forced by an ideological straight jacket on charters into sitting by while Pacman charters eat the union and the public schools for lunch.

Following Jim is information posted by a group of active parents opposing Moskowitz in Williamsburg/Greenpoint from WAGPOPS.
Norm,
I think you are quite correct that the merger issues raised at the SUNY Trustees meeting was the real "beast in the jungle" (Moskowitz No Longer Even Pretends it's About Children). 
 Along those lines, I have put together an op-ed addressing that issue. 
-- Jim Devor
While the attempt by Success Academy to increase its per capita management fees by fifty percent was (for the time being) foiled, Eva Moskowitz was typically ungracious in crediting the UFT for her (temporary?) setback.  In reality, her "reversal of fortune" was clearly attributable to the blistering Daily News article by Juan Gonzalez entitled, "Public Kept in Dark about Sweet Deals for Success Charter Network Schools":
< http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/public-dark-sweet-deals-success-charter-network-schools-article-1.1066368>.   
Meanwhile, barely noticed by all (except for Lindsay Christ of NY1) was the approval by the SUNY Trustees, at the April 24th meeting, of the merger of five Harlem Success Academies.  Yet, when understood in its larger context, that decision was just the tip of a titanic iceberg.  Likewise, an even more disturbing aspect of the session was the strident advocacy by the Charter School Institute ("CSI")  of "replication" wherein "successful" Charter School operators will be allowed to create new schools with minimal administrative oversight over the application process.


But these are only components of a Master Plan.  The real horror is the overall policy laid out  in the CSI memorandum, dated March 12, 2012, entitled  "Merger and Consolidation of Existing Charter Schools" which can be found at:


<http://www.newyorkcharters.org/documents/MergerBriefingDocs-Binder.pdf>.


As that document makes clear "replication" is NOT merely about   the "cloning" of particular Charter Schools.  Rather, CSI (and hence, SUNY) intends to facilitate, for example, the creation of "feeder school" networks  which will deliberately exclude children not "lucky" or "smart enough" to have been enrolled in one of the select Charter Schools at age five.  Moreover, those networks will not only be allowed - but actually encouraged - to create specialized programs/schools geared to segregating "problem" groups like ELLs, boys and most obviously, Special Ed children.


Meanwhile, extraordinarily complex structures will be created so that different Charter operators, for instance, can consolidate their "scholars" into off location high schools simultaneously operated by differently owned and distinct entities.  As a consequence, when fully operational, no one will then be able to figure out what "Education Corporation" is responsible for which classes.


All the while, each entity will be held "accountable" for itself and itself only. This, of course, is a guarantee of a series of clusterf*&ks of gargantuan proportions.


If you think I'm making this up, take a look at the first two items on the April 17th  CSI memorandum outlining its approval of the consolidation of two sets of charter secondary school programs into separate High Schools located in Community School Districts different from those housing their feeder schools:


<http://www.newyorkcharters.org/documents/ReportonProposedActionsByInstitute.pdf>


If anyone can figure out what this means - especially in terms of the "accountability" of the respective high schools - I suggest you share with us whatever it is you have been smoking.


What this all boils down to is the creation of entire privatized school districts within public school districts.  It is this plan of "educational governance  parasites"  that is publicly endorsed by John White for New Orleans (and throughout Louisiana) and will soon be coming to a city a mere ninety miles from our shores (to wit, Philadelphia).


I have seen the future. It is a system free of pesky "politics". In a nutshell, it is for those who think Mayoral Control is too democratic.  Oh what a Brave New World!  
---------------


Jim Devor; President, CEC-15     Follow me on Twitter @JimDevor      jimdevor@gmail.com
 =====================


The “EDUCATION REFORM” Movement Primer
Mayoral Control - The entire NYC School system is governed by the Mayor and the Panel for Educational Policy (PEP). The PEP is made up of 13 members, the majority 8 of whom are appointed by the Mayor. Those 8 PEP members have NEVER voted against a single initiative the Mayor has put on the table. There is NO democratic check on Mayoral Control. 

High Stakes Testing - Students are taking more tests than ever, with tests that last well over a week for grades 3-8 and more tests promised each year. The “high stakes” of these tests have pro- foundly altered the relationship between children and their teachers, and rewarded the narrowing of curriculum to “teach to the test.” The push for these tests is coming from policy makers, not educators, including Pearson, the for profit company with a $32 million dollar contract (for NY State alone) to administer tests, plus additional profits from packaged curriculums and textbooks. Pearson is being investigated for their illegal lobbying arm. Whenever you hear about “accountability” and “core standards,” these are code words for more and more profitable tests. NYC DOE is now talking about “account- ability” and “core standards” for PreK. 

Charter Schools are privately managed public schools. Any promise a charter school makes in their proposal is meaningless as there is no public oversight for five years until their charters are renewed. NYC has an abominable rate of closing under- performing charter schools (national average: 15%, NYC average: 4%). Charter schools repeatedly promise to enroll English Language Learners and children with special needs, but in our district, we have charters with 0% English Language Learners and not a single charter school having more than 10%. Our neighborhood public schools have as many as 28% English Language Learners. Charter schools do not enroll the same population as our public schools. 

Charter Management Organizations (CMOs) reap big benefits out of public funds for students enrolled in charter schools (Success Academy just applied for an unprecendented raise to charge 15% or $2000 for each child enrolled). These are public funds going into private hands, money that does not go into the classrooms. 

New Market Tax Credits (NMTC) Established in 2000 and available only to privately managed charter schools and not public schools, NMTCs guarantee an investor an average 5% annual return on a loan for 7 years that is above whatever interest rate the charter school pays. If the rate on the loan is only 3-4%, the investor is getting 8-9% annually on a very low risk loan (funded by your tax dollars) when comparable loans out in the market are paying about 2%. The investors in charter schools may have faith in their financial invest- ment, but they don’t put their children in these schools. 

Teach for America is an organization that provides 5 weeks training for college graduates to enter the teaching force. In spite of ALL evidence pointing to experienced teachers (teachers with five and more years of classroom experience) providing the most opportunities for learning in the classroom, the NYC DOE is looking for a cheaper and non-unionized teaching force to replace seasoned teachers. More than 50% of Teach for America graduates leave after two years and more than 80% leave after three years.

Come to the next WAGPOPS! meeting
Saturday, May 12 at 3pm
Ascension Hall (Church of the Ascension) 122 Java Street
between Manhattan Ave and Franklin St

QR CODE
Join WAGPOPS! Williamsburg and Greenpoint Parents: Our Public Schools!
www.facebook.com/WilliamsburgGreenpointParents williamsburggreenpointschools@gmail.com (646) 543-4492

Thursday, May 3, 2012

Moskowitz No Longer Even Pretends it's About Children

The den of thieves in action.  
Moskowitz blatant use of children as political and economic tools gets clearer and clearer.

For a long time I have been telling people who were looking at the current choices for mayor and assuming Quinn would have the backing of Bloomberg that there would be a clearer representative backed by Bloomberg money that would toss a hat into the ring. And why not Eva Moskowitz who will misuse the parents in her schools for her campaign. Will that be in the contract parents must sign? (Success Charter Family Handbook ).

NY Post: 
Longtime school reformer and former City Council member Eva Moskowitz could be the latest addition to a crowded mayoral field, The Post has learned.
Moskowitz said she is considering throwing her name in the mix of Dems likely to vie for the job to succeed Mayor Bloomberg, though she has been bandied about as a potential GOP candidate, too.
“I’m thinking about it, and it’s really a personal decision, in that I’ve got relatively young kids and a family,” Moskowitz said. “In the next month or so, I plan to decide.”
The former City Council member said her role as CEO of Success Academy Charter Schools has prepared her for the job.
“I consider myself a manager . . . and we need mayors who know how to get stuff done,” she said.
It has always been clear to many of us that kids and education are the last thing the charter school movement is about. While there are some good-hearted serious educators involved in some schools, the blatant political and economical actions of Eva Moskowitz and her Success Charter Network over the years has made it abundantly clear that in her case it is all about the adults, not the children.

Not only was her goal to build up a political shock force inside the school system to bully her way into schools but to use the parents at her schools for purposes beyond the schools so she can recreate her failed political career. 


Then there is the financial angle. Juan Gonzalez in the Daily News reported before the SUNY trustee meeting last week (see his full article below):
Eva Moskowitz’s Success Charter Network will see per-pupil fee rise from $1,350 to $2,000 if SUNY trustees give okay. Public kept in dark about sweet deals for Success Charter Network schools.
SUNY moving quickly, and quietly, to boost per-pupil fees and let network chief Eva Moskowitz retool Harlem charters, but documents withheld from parents
This exposure and the involvement of Noah Gotbaum seems to have scared off SUNY temporarily as they tabled the item - for now.

You can read Noah's comprehensive report on the NYC Parent blog April 24:

Noah Gotbaum on the SUNY charter committee's decision to table the hike in fees of Success Academy charter today

Here is a brief excerpt from Noah:
Some discussion about what would be on the agenda, prior resolutions, ground rules with O’Brien alternately praising CSI’s “great work” while repeatedly saying there would be no public discussion or comments.  After about 15 minutes, he called for an Executive Session and asked us all to leave, to which a number in our group asked “what are you hiding?” and “why are you shutting out the public?”  O’Brien then called the guards in while the counsel explained that they were discussing privileged and confidential lawyer/client information regarding the charter replication process.
Really, they're all crooks from top to bottom. SUNY ended up allowing Eva to merge her charters into a mini-district. 

This is a biggie and should receive more attention. We have been predicting for some time that charter chains would merge, thus allowing them to get over the charter cap of 200 schools. So instead of 15 schools Eva would count as 1. And the same for KIPP.

I found this almost funny given my conversation with a UFT person over a year ago who was laying out the UFT strategy on charters when I pointed out that with each charter the UFT was losing members. He said that the cap wouldn't change and the UFT could live with 200 schools and would be rigorously organizing them. How is that working out?

Here is a NY1 report: SUNY Approves Merger & "mini-district" for 5 Success Academy charters w/out any public input NY1.com - http://goo.gl/pdUua

Here is Juan Gonzalez' report:
Eva Moskowitz runs Harlem Success Academy and is a former City Council member in New York City. She met the Daily News Editorial Board Monday.

David Handschuh/New York Daily News


SUNY trustees are rushing to approve a whopping 50% increase in the annual per-pupil management fee the state pays to one of the city’s biggest and most controversial charter school operators.

Under the plan, the Success Charter Network, run by former City Councilwoman Eva Moskowitz, will see its management fee jump from $1,350 to $2,000 for each pupil enrolled at its five schools in the Harlem area.

Moskowitz, who currently runs 11 charter schools throughout the city, has made no secret of her plans to expand that number.

The jump in her network’s management fees from 10% to 15% of total state aid per child, however, would place it nearly on a par with fees charged by the city’s few for-profit charter operators.

One study of charter management firms two years ago found that nonprofit networks averaged 9% in fees, while for-profit firms averaged 17%.

The increase for the Success Network is being carried out in a stealth manner, as is an accompanying proposal to reorganize its five Harlem schools — Harlem Success Academy 1 to 5 — under a single nonprofit corporation, even though they are located in three separate community school districts.

Moskowitz submitted a formal application in March to both the state and the city to amend her charters for the five schools, according to documents obtained by the Daily News.
But it was not until a week ago, on the evening of April 17, that the DOE informed local parents and community education councils by email that a hearing to solicit comments on the proposal would be held three days later.

“When we asked to see the actual proposal, we were told we would have to file a Freedom of Information (Act) request,” Noah Gotbaum of the District 3 Community Education Council on the upper West Side said.

“How can the public respond when we can’t even see the real documents?”
Still, New York City education official Debra Schwartzman went ahead with the hearing on Friday evening.

As you might expect, the huge auditorium at Public School 149 where it was held was virtually empty.

Only Gotbaum and Julius Tajiddin, a member of the School Leadership Team at Frederick Douglass Academy 2, showed up.

“Schwartzman told us she wasn’t there to answer questions, only to take public comments,” Gotbaum said.

Gotbaum then pointed out to her that there was no stenographer present or even a tape recorder.

Schwartzman assured him, he said, she would recall what was said.

As Gotbaum and Tajiddian took turns registering their objections, a new email arrived on Gotbaum’s iPhone.

It was a notice that the SUNY board of trustees had scheduled a vote for Tuesday at 1 p.m. on the proposal.

So you have this mockery of the democratic process where parents are asked to comment on a document they have never seen, and even before they’ve done so, the bureaucracy schedules a vote.

Asked about her proposed changes, Moskowitz said in a statement:

“These changes will allow us to serve even larger numbers of special-needs students, particularly those with more severe needs. Also, by combining our schools at the middle school level, we will be able to provide our students with more robust programs in areas such as sports and arts.”

Supporters of Moskowitz’s schools point to the uniformly high scores on standardized tests that pupils in her six-year-old network have recorded.

Opponents claim the Success Network creams the best performing students from the public schools and foments neighborhood conflicts by always insisting on more space in public school buildings where its programs are located.

As for the big hike in fees, Success Network spokeswoman Jenny Sedlis said they were justified because the organization “provides a phenomenal level of services that goes far beyond the service level contemplated under its services agreements with its schools.”
jgonzalez@nydailynews.com

Below is the text of the NY1 report:
The Success Academy Charter schools are among the city's highest performing and most controversial schools, as they are state-funded and housed rent-free in public school buildings, and on Tuesday a state board allowed five of these schools boards to merge under a single board of trustees. NY1's Education reporter Lindsey Christ filed the following report.
More and more city students are wearing orange, the color of the Success Academy uniform. It's spreading as quickly as the schools are growing. This fall, the charter network will have 12 schools across three boroughs, with six more in the works for 2013.
Now the schools are consolidating their leadership. Under a never-before-used provision in state law, five Success Schools will merge under a single board of trustees, with plans for the rest to follow.
"I am in support of the merger. It gives parents like myself more choices," said charter school parent Tom Perna.
These choices include allowing students to transfer between the schools.
The state board that authorizes charters voted Tuesday to allow the merger.
One board member asked if they were creating a mini-school district, and the short answer is basically yes.
"I don’t appreciate their back-door method that they’re using to monopolize education in Harlem and all the communities alike," said public school parent Michelle Chapman.
There was another proposal on the table. Right now, 10 percent of what the state pays for each student goes to the Success Network Central office to cover administrative costs, open new schools and recruit students.
Success wants that raised to 15 percent, meaning less would go directly to the schools.
That got postponed after being questioned in a newspaper column Tuesday morning. A SUNY administrator said the board needs more information.
"What happened was they got caught. They tried to increase their fee in the dead of night," said parent leader Noah Gotbaum.
One charter parent defended the 15 percent charge.
"I think that is one of the equations that makes our schools work so well, that all of that administration is centralized at the network level," said charter parent Ny Whitaker.
Though the schools are high performing, communities across the city have protested their expansion into public school buildings.
The SUNY trustees did not take any community input into consideration before unanimously approving the charter schools merger. Under state law, the meeting had to be public, but they refused to allow anyone who attended to speak.

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

The Enemy Within: Randi - $493,859 - the 1%, Literally

Do these 1% union officials really understand what it's like in the classroom?  Do they understand what it's like seeing miserable pay increases all going down the whole to pay for medical benefits?  Do they understand the stress of teaching to the test and giving practice test after practice test in hopes the kids will do well on the high stakes test?
-------Stanley Heller

Norm, watch the whole two hours: 8:00 a.m. - 10:00 a.m. of Sunday, April 29, 2012, UP W/ CHRIS HAYES on MSNBC. Randi Weingarten was one of the panelists for the whole two hours on the show.   She showed and displayed her total lack of UNION FIGHTING SPIRIT and PROGRESSIVENESS. Weingarten is positioning herself for a top state or federal education position. Norm, the way you, GEM, NYCORE and others call out ALEC, Duncan, President Obama, the UFT, NYSTU and others, it is time to do likewise with full throttle on Randi Weingarten. 

--- NYC Teacher in Harlem responding to this Ed Notes post: The Enemy Within: Warning, Ed Deformer in the House.
Stanley Heller seems shocked to see how much our esteemed national union leader makes after looking at the AFT LM-2 report. Aren't you proud that Randi tops the pack of major union leaders in total compensation?

UPDATE: I don't agree with the teacher from Harlem that Randi is positioning herself for a government position. She has so much more power and money as a union leader at the top of her own authoritarian government where she has to answer to nobody. Once in the public sphere she is open game.

Stanley should check out the UFT LM-2 for some fun reading where he can count numerous 6-figure salaries on the gravy train at 52 Broadway.

If you have some time and want to check on the UFT LM-2 go to http://kcerds.dol-esa.gov/query/getOrgQry.do and put in the UFT file number: 063-924.

And in this piece of crap Randi wrote about how much she is concerned about high stakes testing (When Randi Pretends She Was a Real Teacher), notice how she tries to give the impression she was a real teacher (only full-time for 6 months with the rest of her 6 years as a sub covering 2 classes a day -- at times.)

I'm told that in Chicago when the reform caucus CORE (Caucus of Rank and File Educators) took over a corrupt union deep in debt from a Unity Caucus style leadership, they found so many people with enormous salaries. CORE ran on a platform of reducing salaries of union officers and by the time they were finished the old politically chosen field reps who were under contract and couldn't be fired were making more than president Karen Lewis, way more I am told. The debt was reduced from deep in the red to what I believe is even (though not sure.)

(It is not an accident that the caucus forming here in NYC is named Movement of Rank and File Educators (MORE) and there even was a suggestion to call it CORENYC.)

In the meantime, here is Stanley Heller from a piece on  www.EconomicUprising.com.
There was an article on Bloomberg News revealing that lots of top labor leaders are in the top 1% of income earners. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-27/union-leaders-decrying-ceo-pay-also-in-top-1-bgov-barometer.html
 
The top ten US labor leaders took home an average salary and other compensation averaging $394,925.  The Department of Labor says an income higher than $343,927 puts you in the top 1%. 
So I took a quick look at my own union, the American Federation of Teacher via the Department of Labor website. http://kcerds.dol-esa.gov/query/getOrgQryResult.do
 
There you can see the LM-2 reports that unions have to file each year.   
It shows that AFT President Randy Weingarten takes in salary and other compensation equal to  $493,859     Vice-President Loretta Johnson gets $369,408   Secretary-Treasurer Cortese: $365,014.
Dennis Van Roekel, President of the NEA took in $460,000.  James Hoffa, President of the Teamsters Unions, took in $368,000.
So tell me, do these 1% union officials really understand what it's like in the classroom?  Do they understand what it's like seeing miserable pay increases all going down the whole to pay for medical benefits?  Do they understand the stress of teaching to the test and giving practice test after practice test in hopes the kids will do well on the high stakes test? They know, but only abstractly.
Oh yeah, some of them used to be in the classroom, but that was years and years ago. Top union officials who have rich peoples salaries, private offices and staff who work for them, who go on to work for foundations, NGO's or the Democratic Party inevitably "get the bigger view".  They "understand" the problems of administration and the appreciate the views of billionaires have made their boodle and now are gracious enough to share their immense wisdom and a bit of their loot.  It's not a matter of personal corruption of union officials, but the near inevitable change when people change working conditions and class. 
It doesn't have to be that way.  Unions could be run so that officers would be paid no more than one and a half or twice what an average worker made.  They would be expected to go back into the ranks every few years. 
Hopefully there will be a radical challenge to Weingarten and company this year and if they're interested in making a real change the insurgents will pledge to reduce top salaries 50 or 75%.
And this Arjun Janah poem in response:
It's Time for Asking Questions
Arjun Janah

There are teachers, who are teaching classes five and giving grades,
Who are checking students' work at home and doing all it takes,
But are getting for this wages that they would as daily subs,
With no benefits or summer pay or pay for holidays.

And in the schools they're teaching at, you see the ATR's,
Who're floating through and won't be hired, because, one 'leader' says,
"They're all no good, with ratings U and time in Rubber Room."
And she's the one (from Unity)on whom the staff rely!

When I had joined (in '87), I worked as sub a month,
At full-time job, with day-sub pay, but then got regular checks,
Which at the time were paltry, yet was more than daily-sub's,
With benefits and holidays and summers I could rest.

And this was in the contract, plain and clear, in black-and-white,
For otherwise the contract wasn't worth a beggar's dime!
For why would city scrooges pay the salary prescribed,
If they could hire a slave, who'd work for fourth for equal time?

She justifies the wages paid to those who work for pittance,
"At least they have a job, for there's a wage-freeze on, you know."
Is it a job or is it that they're serfs? Is the union dead?
"What happened to a decent wage?" She thinks that I'm a Red.

"I cannot argue with you now." She says, and scuttles off.
What value to a contract can there be, when this goes on,
As it has been, for years now, in schools across the city?
So schools are turned to sweatshops, as our Bloomberg squeezes budgets.

And he, and those like him, fly off to winter in Caribbean,
While teachers slave, as workers have, so Bloombergs get their sun.
But some of us are saying now, who docile were, and meek,
"It's time for asking questions. How much faster can we run?" 
 

Video: Leonie Haimson at Teacher Evaluation Forum

The more I watch these videos from the GEM/CSM/PAA forum we held on April 17, the more impressed I am  --- 2 hours packed with insights. I broke them up into sections.

In this one Leonie Haimson points out that class size has not been taken into account in Teacher Data Reports and in fact class size has an impact on teacher ratings. She also talks about differentiation of instruction and how class size is ignored. It is obvious that the ability to differentiate instruction is absolutely dependent on class size. She eviscerates Dennis Walcott on his response on gifted and talented, really pointing just how pathetic and know-nothing a shill he is. And so much more.


Teacher Evaluation Forum - Leonie Haimson from Grassroots Education Movement on Vimeo.
Sponsored by GEM, Class Size Matters, Parents Across America.

See all videos from the forum

Leonie Haimson: http://vimeo.com/40760269

Carol Burris: http://vimeo.com/40748945

Khalilah Brann: http://vimeo.com/40758701

Gary Rubinstein: http://vimeo.com/40754465

Arthur Goldstein: http://vimeo.com/40740344

Q and A: http://vimeo.com/40772352