Tuesday, November 12, 2013

Chicago Teachers Union urges parents to oppose standardized tests for young kids

DENY THEM THE DATA.
The UFT is tailing on supporting the opt-out movement, as usual. But they seem to have skin in the game. The Chicago TU actually takes stands.

The Chicago Teachers Union Thursday urged its members and parents to take a stand against standardized tests.
CTU President Karen Lewis announced the “Let us Teach” campaign in Chicago as similar measures were rolled out in cities across the country.

“Why must our public school children be subjected to this battery of pointless standardized testing throughout the year, every year?,” Lewis said.
She said kids are made anxious, frustrated and depressed by the barrage of standardized tests given.
She called for an end of testing of children in the youngest grades.
“We object to the growing trend to mandate unproven standardized tests which are a major drain on classroom time, undermine education and stand in stark contrast to the proven student assessment tools of classroom teacher developed quizzes, exams, checklists and homework,” Lewis said.

Lewis was joined by three mothers who oppose standardized tests and who have opted their kids out of some testing. They urged other parents to do the same.

“Year after year, I have watched my child stress over testing,” said mom Nellie Cotton, who has a special education student at Grimes Elementary School. “Year after year, the stakes have only gotten higher and the intense pressure to attain the magic score continue to grow.” 

Chicago Public Schools said it has cut back on standardized testing.
After months of meeting with students, parents, advocacy groups, the union and conducting focus groups, CPS announced in August that it was cutting back some of the standardized tests the district requires for students, especially for the younger ones.
CPS CEO Barbara Byrd-Bennett released a statement Thursday that extolled the decrease in testing.

“As a former teacher and principal, I felt that our parents and educators raised valid concerns around district-wide testing, and our collective work has resulted in 15 fewer tests this school year, adding valuable learning time to the school day to help ensure that every child graduates 100 percent college-ready and 100 percent college-bound.” 

Kindergartners, first-graders and second-graders no longer have to take the NWEA MPG (Northwest Evaluation Association Measures of Academic Progress for Primary Grades) test in spring and fall, though their schools must choose from a list of assessments to monitor these primary students’ literacy. Second-graders will join third- through eighth-graders to take the NWEA MAP (Measures of Academic Progress) test aligned to the Common Core curriculum in spring but no longer in the fall, too. Eighth graders also will skip the EXPLORE test given in preparation for the ACT in 11th grade. And ninth- through 11th-graders also will sit for the spring session of the EPAS (Explore, Plan, ACT) tests, skipping a fall session.
Most of the reductions come from eliminating fall testing sessions, and leaving spring ones in place.

http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/23598511-418/chicago-teachers-union-urges-parents-to-oppose-standardized-tests-for-young-kids.html



IN TWO DAYS! "Don't Tread on Educators" Open Forum Nov. 14


In the midst of his endless and fascinating 3020a hearing
Jordana gets ready for afternoon nap
(another session tomorrow and I believe Friday) Portelos doesn't stop fighting - for everyone. Which is what makes him so dangerous to Tweed legal, which had 3 lawyers the other day while they called two witnesses. Total time of hearing: 10:30- 2PM. We were eating lunch by 2:30 -- 
Note to doe legal's Jordana Shenkman - apparently an avid reader of this blog - hope you had a nice afternoon off.

Add hearing officer and transcriber salary and you get an idea of what it is costing to try to get Portelos fired. One of the first acts in clearing out Tweed is to get rid of the entire legal department and get people who really want to root out people not fit for teaching instead of going on enormously expensive with hunts.

I'm rethinking my agreement not to publish details of the daily hearings. I think that is in essence a blackout and helps DOE Legal. Can't wait for Jordanna to start screaming about that. Tsk, tsk.

The hearing officer said she can only recommend we don't write about it since it is a public hearing. The other day a network curriculum person testified and it was clear that rather being there to support the teacher this was a case of being manipulated by the principal to get the teacher.

Here is Francesco's DTOE announcement for Thursday night's meeting.
Workplace Bullying in our schools? Not on my watch. This bullying comes in different forms. From colleagues, administrators, district, state and federal mandates etc. 

Your well-being is important to your students, your family and your friends. Come find out how to both cope and protect yourself.

Join the email support group by emailing a blank message to DTOE+ subscribe@googlegroups.com

Link to flyer enclosed within page.
Bloggers please share on your sites.

Francesco Portelos
IS 49 UFT Chapter Leader
Parent
Educator
www.educatorfightsback.org
Mrportelos.com
"In the end, we will not remember the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends." -Martin Luther King Jr.

Monday, November 11, 2013

Slate's New Schooled Podcast: Bad Teacher With John Owens and Alex Caputo-Pearl

I picked this audio up from Gotham's Remainders tonight. I'm posting it here so I can archive the discussion with two dynamic people I've met: John Owens who chronicled his short teaching career in the Bronx with a book which shows that he got so much about ed deform in such a short time and a teacher of 2 decades, Alex Caputo-Pearl, who is running to head the LA teachers union in the election to take place after the New Year. (In the summer of July 2009 Alex invited a crew from CORE over for breakfast and I tagged along for the great pancakes and conversation (you see what comes first in my book)).

I haven't listened to it yet but hope to get to it tomorrow. Dana Goldstein, who at times disappoints real reformers with her reporting, does the interviewing. (She did go a great piece on Alex last spring.)

http://www.slate.com/articles/podcasts/education/2013/11/schooled_podcast_confessions_of_a_bad_teacher.html
 
Welcome to Schooled, Slate’s new podcast about education.

This episode features two teachers with experience in high-poverty urban schools. We’ll find out why John Owens, the author of Confessions of a Bad Teacher, lasted less than a year when he left his publishing job to teach in the Bronx. Alex Caputo-Pearl is a 20-year veteran social studies teacher in South Los Angeles, and a member of the inaugural 1990 class of Teach for America. He was recently forced to transfer schools after he led a controversial effort to rewrite the curriculum at Crenshaw High School.
Podcast production by Sally Herships.

Schooled: Bad Teacher




  1. Alex Caputo-Pearl Archives - LA School Report

    laschoolreport.com/tag/alex-caputo-pearl/
    4 days ago - LA School Report is an online news site, focusing on the intersection of politics and education in Los Angeles. We publish news, analysis, and ...
  2. Dana Goldstein on LA Teacher Alex Caputo-Pearl ... - Ed Notes Online

Sunday, November 10, 2013

Ravitch Recuperating: To Speak at PS 15 in December

An event de Blasio should attend ...

The good news from Diane is she is out of the hospital (Update on My Health) but still working to dissolve the clot in her leg. She points to too much flying, which is probably true. (Glad I have started hating flying due to all that TSA stuff.)

Remember when Diane put up a story about Randi being her friend and people went wild on her blog. While I didn't agree that Randi is an ally I also pointed out to Diane's amazing support for our film and personal admiration for Julie Cavanagh. Well, we just got word that Diane is going to discuss her book with the PS 15 community as per Diane's announcement.
On December 11, I will speak to parents and teachers at PS 15 in Red Hook, Brooklyn. That's the Patrick Daley School, named for its beloved principal who was killed in 1992 when he stepped into gang crossfire in a housing project while going to a student's home to see if he was okay. All are welcome. 
And Julie's (RSVP required as space is limited - friendsofps15booktalk@gmail.com ).


The Friends of PS 15, The Patrick F. Daly School, Committee is pleased to announce our first ever Meet the Author and Book Talk Event, with Dr. Diane Ravitch.

We will be discussing her new book, "Reign of Error".  The flyer is attached:  December 11th from 5-7 at PS 15's newly renovated community library, 71 Sullivan Street, Red Hook, Brooklyn.

All are welcome, but please RSVP as indicated on the flyer to we can plan for space/accommodations.

Please feel free to share with others.

Folks who plan to attend should have read the book (Dr. Ravitch will not be giving a speech, but rather, we will have an intimate conversation about her book.) 

A special thank you to Diane for being our guest and our continued well wishes as she recovers.
She mentions her visit to PS 15K in her latest entry updating us all on her health: http://dianeravitch.net/2013/11/10/update-on-my-health/  ...so, thankful she is on the mend!

Best,

Julie Cavanagh
 
 I will unfortunately miss this as I will be out of town that day. I hope someone tapes it.

Flushing HS Update #4

Flushing HS teacher Seung Ok's battle over DOE hypocritical grading policies appears to be bearing fruit. Seung is an old pal from the early GEM days -- one of the most energetic, principled people I've met over all my years of organizing. He was a teacher at Maxwell HS in Brooklyn when he helped form GEM in its earliest stages in 2009 while fighting off the attacks of the Unity slugs in his school led by slug of all slugs, district rep Charlie Turner. Seung spoke out passionately at the closing school hearings at Maxwell (it never did close but there was lots of excessing) and he went to many other closing school hearings around the city with other GEMers. He and Julie Cavanagh were the only teachers to sign onto the lawsuit over the rally at Bloomberg's house we held in January 2010.

Here is a great piece from the always reliable Rachel Monahan in the Daily News (when the Post approached Sueng my advice was stay away -- they are not to be trusted. I don't trust many DN reporters either but if Rachel is involved I say go for it.)



'How are you able to diagnose the kids who are barely not getting it versus really not getting it?' Flushing High School science teacher Seung Ok says of the grading policy that sets students' lowest possible scores at 55.

Anthony DelMundo/New York Daily News

'How are you able to diagnose the kids who are barely not getting it versus really not getting it?' Flushing High School science teacher Seung Ok says of the grading policy that sets students' lowest possible scores at 55.


or click below the break

Previous Ed Notes reports on this story:

Saturday, November 9, 2013

New Content at SusanOhanian.Org!


 Nothing like starting the weekend with a batch of stuff compiled by Susan with a focus on the common core. I am so far from having been a teacher I can't focus on the educational reasons for opposing CC. I'm more interested in the politics. Like when every enemy of public education and teacher unions unite with these unions to push something down everyone's throats that's all it takes for me to say "Whoa." Yes, Virginia, I am suspicious and also a conspiracy theorist.

I'm working on a piece I'm calling "The Politics Behind the Common Core" and there should be a lot of meat in these links.



From here on it's all Susan -- and send her a donation.


I worked hard on two Common Core items--Common Porn and If You Lie Down with Dogs... I hope you'll read them. I have another piece in this mix--about progressive politicos who don't have time for a Teacher of the Year--but it's good news despite them.


There are new cartoons:
Say It
http://susanohanian.org/cartoon_fetch.php?id=839

Meet Your New Teacher
http://susanohanian.org/cartoon_fetch.php?id=838

Question of the Day
http://susanohanian.org/cartoon_fetch.php?id=837


Tom Toles cartoon
http://susanohanian.org/show_nclb_cartoons.php?id=971

Kindergarten Test Prep
http://susanohanian.org/show_nclb_cartoons.php?id=970

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
 COMMON PORN: Another school district pulls a raunchy Common Core-approved book
Susan Ohanian
blog
2013-11-08
http://susanohanian.org/core.php?id=615

A school district rejects a Common Core book, but should we rejoice when nobody seems to have read it?

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
If You Lie Down With Dogs. . .
Susan Ohanian
blog
2013-11-08
http://susanohanian.org/core.php?id=614

Ed Week provides framework to look at Gates funding in education. I dig a bit deeper, showing how circular Gates grant-making is, and how members of the circle are devouring teacher professionalism and obliterating any notion of education for equality, justice, innovation, or. . . fun.



\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
The biggest weakness of the Common Core Standards
Valerie Strauss and Marion Brady
Washington Post Answer Sheet
2013-11-07
http://susanohanian.org/core.php?id=613

Marion Brady offers a radical and reasonable view of the Common Core. What are the chances that anybody is listening?

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Catholic scholars blast Common Core in letter to U.S. bishops
Valerie Strauss
Washington Post Answer Sheet
2013-11-02
http://susanohanian.org/core.php?id=612

 130 Catholic scholars around the country have signed a hard-hitting letter to U.S. Catholic bishops denouncing the Common Core State Standards

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
A Serious Flaw in Common Core
Alan Singer
Huffington Post
2013-11-04
http://susanohanian.org/core.php?id=611

Referring to the way two very different Supreme Court justices read texts, Alan Singer offers a new and important look at the Common Core requirements as presented by David Coleman.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Should Literature Be Useful?
Lee Siegel

2013-11-08
http://susanohanian.org/show_commentary.php?id=1137

Warning us not to put too much stock in fiction's ability to deliver empathy, Lee Siegel  notes that 'Fiction's lack of practical usefulness is what gives it its special freedom.'

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
University Researchers Are Seen as Enablers in Latest Major Drug Fraud
Paul Basken
Chronicle of Higher Education
2013-11-08
http://susanohanian.org/outrage_fetch.php?id=1730

There seem to be some parallels with the Johnson & Johnson case and Common Core producers, but the latter will never be prosecuted. The sound of one child vomiting just doesn't reach the Attorney General. . . or even the local school board

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Money Follows Values
Susan Ohanian
blog
2013-11-08
http://susanohanian.org/outrage_fetch.php?id=1729

Where the values are among some Alabama legislators.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Investigators Confirm Test-Tampering At Hartford School
Kathleen Megan and Vanessa De La Torre
Hartford Courant
2013-11-06
http://susanohanian.org/outrage_fetch.php?id=1728

Very bad policy in Hartford schools comes home to roost.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Wristbands provide incentives for better performance at Land O'Lakes High School

Tampa Bay Times
2013-11-04
http://susanohanian.org/outrage_fetch.php?id=1727

What next, tattoos on the forehead?

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Chris Christie's demented 'you people' movement:
David Sirota
Salon.com
2013-11-04
http://susanohanian.org/outrage_fetch.php?id=1726

David Sirota does a rare thing: He actually researches education issues before writing about them.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Poverty in America Is Mainstream
Mark R. Rank
New York Times
2013-11-02
http://susanohanian.org/outrage_fetch.php?id=1725

Contrary to popular belief, the percentage of the population that directly encounters poverty is exceedingly high. Poverty is a mainstream event experienced by a majority of Americans. For most of us, the question is not whether we will experience poverty, but when.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Teachers Can Be Bullied Too
anonymous blog/Teaching Tolerance Staff
Teaching Tolerance
2013-11-01
http://susanohanian.org/outrage_fetch.php?id=1724

Certainly, now is the time to identify teacher bullying when it appears. Stand up. Speak out. Don't allow yourself to be bullied.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
A Major University and How It Works
Stephen Holden
New York Times
2013-11-08
http://susanohanian.org/show_yahoo.php?id=846

The New York Times film critic applauds documentarian Frederick Wiseman's magisterial examination of the University of California, Berkeley.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
 What Happens When Parents Stand Up and Say No to Testing?
Elizabeth G. Hines
AlterNet
0000-00-00
http://susanohanian.org/show_yahoo.php?id=845

Parents in one New York City school have decided to do more than complain about the perils of testing young children. They're taking action, en masse, and getting results.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Ohanian: Where was the governor? Where was Bernie? Where was the press?
Susan Ohanian
VT Digger
0000-00-00
http://susanohanian.org/show_yahoo.php?id=844

I post this in Good News because I'm very happy that a teacher in alternative ed was named Vermont Teacher of the year. But the absence of the governor, our senator who sits on the Education Committee, and press was both typical and disgusting.

Nov. 3, 2013
------------------------------
----------------------
Order the CD of the resistance:
"No Child Left Behind? Bring Back the Joy."
To order online (and hear samples from the songs)
http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/dhbdrake4
Other orders: Send $15 to
Susan Ohanian
P. O. Box 26
Charlotte, VT 05445
 
 

Norm in The Wave: Rockaway Election Results Paint Tale of Two Cities

Published in The Wave, Friday, Nov. 15, 2013
www.rockawave.com


Rockaway Election Results Paint Tale of Two Cities
By Norm Scott
Tuesday, November 12, 2013

There was some good news for Rockaway Democrats in the race for City Council. Lew Simon almost kicked Erich Ulrich’s ass, losing by a few points in the closest contest in the city. Will it be LEW TIME next time? Make sure to read the excellent Wave editorial on this race. On to the mayoral race.

In the midst of the perception of a nation-wide tea-party storm, an entire city rises up to overwhelmingly support a candidate so counter to that trend as to change many of the political conversations around the nation. At Governor Christie’s victory party when de Blasio’s image came on the screen, there was an eruption of boos. In your faces, elephant-in-the-room supporters.

Political geeks like me love to check out post-election maps for neighborhood voting patterns. Let’s take a look. With an unprecedented 50-point win by Bill de Blasio, the maps show a massive sea of de Blasio blue. Wait. There are a few red Lhota pockets. Most of Staten Island, always strong ancient Giulianni territory. Let’s see where else. I see some red at the bottom of the map. Looks like a peninsula, the West End (Breezy, Belle Harbor, Rockaway Park) jutting into the ocean and a tiny tip of the East End attached to the mainland: LHOTA RED. From roughly the middle right out to that east end tip: DE BLASIO BLUE. Holy Cow! I live in LHOTA territory. Did someone break into my house in the middle of the night and move me to Staten Island?

What part of Lhota’s message did Rockaway west enders and far east enders agree with? The Lhota ad that showed an older white woman on a subway scared to death while a young black man sat in the background? Did “He’s young and black – must be a criminal” resonate? That same young black man who might be stopped and frisked numerous times in a Lhota administration?

I prefer to think that the pro-Lhota votes in storm damaged areas like Staten Island and parts of Rockaway were due to the perception that de Blasio’s very large agenda would overwhelm attention to Sandy recovery efforts. The Wave took constant potshots at deB for not visiting Rockaway often enough and hit home with that priceless milk carton photo of the missing deB, which did seem to get his attention. The Wave post-election editorial, which I assume was written by editor Kevin Boyle (I recognize his writing from bathroom stalls), on Stop and Frisk (S&F):

“[Ulrich] was a big proponent of Stop and Frisk and The Wave believes it’s a very nuanced issue that demands sensitivity and understanding. You’re for Stop and Frisk? Just ask yourself if you’d be okay being stopped regularly or even better if you’d be okay with your teenage kids being frisked. Crime has plummeted and we’re scared to death the de Blasio era will signal a return to the bad old days but it’s not as simple as Stop and Frisk. A lot of the same people who love Stop and Frisk want government out of their lives. Ok, well, the police are the extension of our government so let’s keep that in mind.”

(Darn. I just used up 100 words. Maybe Kevin will give me a bonus for quoting him.) Since the S&F controversy began early this year the police department has cut S&F significantly, yet crime has dropped during this time. Yet Bloomberg and Ray Kelly cry about how crime will rise without S&F, a contradiction the press ignores. They can’t have it both ways (unless they are hiding murdered bodies).

Paul King’s letter on S&F in the Nov. Wave made a great point. “In America, citizens do not have to show authorities their papers… according to the Bill of Rights, we should be secure in our persons against unreasonable searches and seizures. This is a fundamental right for all Americans. The fact that NYPD is searching almost 2,000 people every day is clear evidence that people’s rights are being violated on a large scale.”

Rigid law and order folks are so willing to ignore basic constitutional rights. In his letter, Paul King was critical of the emphasis on race. I disagree. When such an overwhelming majority of the 2000 people stopped are of one race that turns it into a civil rights issue. I do agree when King says, “We all need the NYPD to do its job well. If leaders and activists think they can win by pitting black against white or all policemen against all minorities, then the rest of us lose.”

De Blasio is not anti-police and I hope he will support police on the beat more than Bloomberg by providing resources for better community policing where they won’t have to use S&F. Suspicious communities will be more likely to accept workable solutions under him.

Bill de Blasio has the potential to unite, not divide. His bi-racial family seems to have given hope that long-time racial wounds can be healed. 96% of black people voted for a white Italian guy and over 50% rejected Bill Thompson, the black candidate, in the primary.

De Blasio is not far enough left for me given his ties to certain real estate and corporate interests and to the standard political forces like the Clintons. So I don’t expect a lot but do hope for serious changes in education policies. Which is what a column called “School Scope” it all about, isn’t it?

Norm spews forth his venom daily at ednotesonline.org

Friday, November 8, 2013

Patrick Sullivan and Leonie Haimson on Leo Casey Slam at Carol Burris

Patrick J. Sullivan @PSulliv
@leoniehaimson @carolburris Didn't Casey blast @carolburris when she raised issues with the teacher evals?
.@PSulliv yup, wonder if @LeoECasey will apologize to @carolburris now & admit she was right
A follow-up to my earlier post: Hypocrisy of the Day: UFT Call for Renegotiating Evals With deB 

Perdido Street School used the Sullivan/Haimson tweets to his own riff:

Michael Mulgrew And Leo Casey Just Like The Fonz


Mikey and Leo now criticizing the teacher evaluation system they helped develop and defend against criticism from Carol Burris and Diane Ravitch.

Mikey and Leo are criticizing the system for some of the very reasons Burris and Ravitch criticized it in the past.

But Mikey and Leo never admit they were wrong to help develop this system or defend it, of course.

That would be going to far.

They cannot admit they were wr- wr- wr- wro-wrong...



Hypocrisy of the Day: UFT Call for Renegotiating Evals With deB

Those who don't remember history.... are doomed to continue to be doomed by the self-serving UFT. The latest Weingarten/Mulgrew accommodationist party line is that we should oppose the "consequences of high stakes testing." They have discovered and appropriated the word "moratorium." They always sound so reasonable and are always so late. Leading from behind ... Fred Smith
The UFT plays the wind and will reverse itself - without regards to the members - as it sees fit. We should move on - and not wait for them. Build our own grassroots movements without them. If they want to join in fine - but we cannot let them coopt and seize leadership - and they will try to shape it their way - or we are back at the beginning. I agree we need to get rid of the eval system but as a 45 year uft member and observer and critic I can't emphasize enough that they don't want to get rid of a plan they have been extolling as an improvement over what existed before. What they want to do is tweak it like they want to tweak mayoral control. Do we want to be drawn into a battle for tweaks as they urge gradualism while we lose a generation of students and teachers? Watch what they do not what they say... Norm Scott
I love to quote myself. This was my comment on a listserve after some people praised the UFT based on this Gotham Schools piece that led to some interesting commentary:

UFT president wants to renegotiate evaluations with de Blasio

Parent activist#1 comments:
Hmm…am I remembering wrong, or didn’t Leo Casey go after Carol Burris viciously for criticizing the new teacher evaluation system, and didn’t Mulgrew support it? Or is my memory defective?
Mulgrew gave few clues Wednesday about what parts of the system he would like changed, but Leo Casey, a former union official who was also at the event, said that just about everything permissible under the state law will likely be on the table.

“The whole thing could be negotiated under the law,” said Casey, the executive director of the Albert Shanker Institute, who was involved in the evaluation negotiations before he left his post as UFT vice president last year.

He said possible changes could include adding more performance-based assessments for the local measures of student growth – which make up 20 percent of teachers’ ratings – or allowing teachers to help evaluate their peers.

Parent #2 defends the UFT:
The UFT had the new evaluation system shoved down the teachers' throats. It was not agreed to by the UFT but the product of a sham interest arbitration. It is an awful system, bad for teachers and worse for students. All efforts to do away with it are worthy of high praise, in my book.

Parent #1 responds with a nice shot at Leo Casey (Does Leo Casey deserve an award for his ability to reverse himself on any issue and justify it?) by tossing his own words back in his face - and Mulgrew's too.
I agree the NYC teacher evaluation system is rotten – but it could not have been otherwise given the original rotten framework devised by John King.

And when Carol Burris, Diane and others made that point, showing how the 40% based on “objective assessments”would trump all [when there’s nothing “objective” about unreliable one year value-added measures based on flawed and invalid standardized tests], this was Leo Casey’s response:

http://www.edwize.org/setting-the-record-straight-on-teacher-evaluations-scoring-and-the-role-of-standardized-exams
It is important to have evaluations based on multiple measures of teacher effectiveness, just as it is important to evaluate students based on multiple measures of their learning: more measures and more forms of evidence produce more robust, more accurate and fairer evaluations. Further, multiple measures allowed New York to avoid placing inordinate weight on standardized exams and value-added algorithms, as other states have done to very negative consequences. And it was essential that the bulk of the evaluations be established locally through collective bargaining, with the law only providing a general framework. These objectives necessarily led to a high level of complexity.

But with that complexity, New York is on the road to teacher evaluations that will engage educators in meaningful professional dialogue, provide them with essential supports, and give them the tools to hone their craft. [emphasis mine] With evaluations based on multiple measures, evaluations will be more comprehensive, more accurate and fairer, and in sharp contrast to other states such as Florida and Tennessee, the role of standardized testing in the evaluation will be minimized. With collective bargaining playing a key role in the shaping of “on the ground” evaluations, teacher unions have the input that will allow us to protect the educational integrity and fairness of the evaluation process.

Unfortunately, complexity has provided a fertile ground for commentaries on the New York teacher evaluation framework that reach alarmist conclusions, with arguments built on a foundation of misinformation and groundless speculation. [emphasis mine] A widely circulated piece by Long Island Principal Carol Corbett Burris, published on the Washington Post’s Answer Sheet blog, is in the thrall of this alarmist alchemy.
Etc.
Then when King came up with a teacher evaluation system for NYC, b/c the UFT could not negotiate one with DOE by the deadline, Mulgrew praised it:
In a letter to teachers released Saturday, the president of the United Federation of Teachers, Michael Mulgrew, called the plan "professional and fair" and said that it was designed to help teachers improve.
"It offers teachers a professional voice in the measures that their supervisors will use to rate them," said Mulgrew. "And despite Mayor Bloomberg’s desire for a 'gotcha' system, the new system puts in place stronger due process rights to protect teachers from harassment and from principals who don’t follow the rules."
Phew. Nice shots.

Francesco Portelos come in with a link to the must watch video he put together about Mulgrew's contribution to the eval system:
It was never intended to improve teaching.  My members tell me all PDs are about evaluation and all money has gone to CCLS material. Leaving no money for new technology and no PD time for improving knowledge of material outside evaluation.
May 2010 -Michael Mulgrew endorsing teacher evaluation based on tests and subjective observations" on YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJE_dy1Ca8M&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Here is Fred Smith from CTS with the full quote as he takes the same position I do:
Sorry--don't believe in regardless of how we got here in this case. Those who don't remember history.... are doomed to continue to be doomed by the self-serving UFT. The latest Weingarten/Mulgrew accommodationist party line is that we should oppose the "consequences of high stakes testing." They have discovered and appropriated the word "moratorium." They always sound so reasonable and are always so late. Leading from behind. The real moratorium needs to be one that suspends testing indefinitely until education and teachers return from exile. Kill the tests and the consequences will die.
Enough. fred
===
Here is some guy named Norm Scott with another comment:
The uft can't just play both sides of the fence and still maintain creds and also expect not to be called on it. When they finally jump on a bandwagon instead of leading they expect pats on the back and get miffed when crit - "why do you look to the past."
While I can agree with [parent #2] that they had this forced down their throats the total capitulation, refusal to fight back or org teachers and parents to fight back and then trying to ram it down the throats of the rank and file squarely puts them in the ranks of collaborators. How fast can you say "Vichy?"
Sorry. I just can't leave the Vichy analogy alone since that way of thinking is so prevalent.
=====

Parent #2 comes back with:
Regardless of how we get here, I can not emphasize enough that this teacher evaluation system needs to go. Whether you feel UFT is coming late to the party or not, it is still the right thing to do for teachers and kids to support getting rid of this system. We need to support all efforts to change it completely and wholeheartedly no matter what view we variously may take on how we got here. It doesn't matter how we got here. It's time to move on.

That pain in the ass Norm can't leave this alone:
It's not just about the past but the future. The uft plays the wind and will reverse itself - without regards to the members - as it sees fit. We should move on - and not wait for them. Build our own grassroots movements without them. If they want to join in fine - but we cannot let them coopt and seize leadership - and they will try to shape it their way - or we are back at the beginning.
I agree we need to get rid of the eval system but as a 45 year uft member and observer and critic I can't emphasize enough that they don't want to get rid of a plan they have been extolling as an improvement over what existed before. What they want to do is tweak it like they want to tweak mayoral control. Do we want to be drawn into a battle for tweaks as they urge gradualism while we lose a generation of students and teachers? Watch what they do not what they say.

I'll close with Parent (I think) #3:
Casey adds the tepid near-afterthought: "or allowing teachers to help evaluate their peers," something that's long overdue. I've seen principal observation go way sour, especially considering the spotty quality of principals coming out of Bloomberg's Leadership Academy.

Has anyone in the establishment ever considered using parents and students an opportunity to give feedback on teachers? Just as teachers know their students and should be trusted to evaluate their progress and readiness to move onto the next grade, so do students and parents know their teachers. Given that we already fill out the school environment survey every year, the DOE could include a handful of questions about the student's classroom teacher(s) (and, heck, specialized teachers as well). I bet parents would be more enthusiastic about filling out those questions than the softballs currently on the questionnaire about "your school." Responses can be keyed to the appropriate teacher easily without risking anyone's anonymity.

To placate what I assume would be sharp union objection, perhaps parent responses could be used only to raise a teacher's rating, not lower it. Teachers could look up the collated responses if they wish to glean some feedback from parent responses, but negative evaluation would not factor into a rating. In this way, parents of special ed teachers, for instance, who see their sons or daughters making good progress but still not conforming to standardized benchmarks, can reflect that positive in their answers, thereby potentially raising a teacher's rating.

A modest proposal.
Kari
Let me say something might make my fellow teachers blanch: I agree with Kari to some extent. To me the most important feedback was from parents not from administrators - and some from students. I worked very hard to establish rapport with parents. Now I know in this world that doesn't really count for much but I knew that was often a key in getting kids to work with me and the rest of the class.

Norm in The Wave: Rockaway Election Results Paint Tale of Two Cities


Published in The Wave, Friday, Nov. 15, 2013
www.rockawave.com



Rockaway Election Results Paint Tale of Two Cities
By Norm Scott
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
There was some good news for Rockaway Democrats in the race for City Council. Lew Simon almost kicked Erich Ulrich’s ass, losing by a few points in the closest contest in the city. Will it be LEW TIME next time? Make sure to read the excellent Wave editorial on this race. On to the mayoral race.
In the midst of the perception of a nation-wide tea-party storm, an entire city rises up to overwhelmingly support a candidate so counter to that trend as to change many of the political conversations around the nation. At Governor Christie’s victory party when de Blasio’s image came on the screen, there was an eruption of boos. In your faces, elephant-in-the-room supporters.
Political geeks like me love to check out post-election maps for neighborhood voting patterns. Let’s take a look. With an unprecedented 50-point win by Bill de Blasio, the maps show a massive sea of de Blasio blue. Wait. There are a few red Lhota pockets. Most of Staten Island, always strong ancient Giulianni territory. Let’s see where else. I see some red at the bottom of the map. Looks like a peninsula, the West End (Breezy, Belle Harbor, Rockaway Park) jutting into the ocean and a tiny tip of the East End attached to the mainland: LHOTA RED. From roughly the middle right out to that east end tip: DE BLASIO BLUE. Holy Cow! I live in LHOTA territory. Did someone break into my house in the middle of the night and move me to Staten Island?
What part of Lhota’s message did Rockaway west enders and far east enders agree with? The Lhota ad that showed an older white woman on a subway scared to death while a young black man sat in the background? Did “He’s young and black – must be a criminal” resonate? That same young black man who might be stopped and frisked numerous times in a Lhota administration?
I prefer to think that the pro-Lhota votes in storm damaged areas like Staten Island and parts of Rockaway were due to the perception that de Blasio’s very large agenda would overwhelm attention to Sandy recovery efforts. The Wave took constant potshots at deB for not visiting Rockaway often enough and hit home with that priceless milk carton photo of the missing deB, which did seem to get his attention. The Wave post-election editorial, which I assume was written by editor Kevin Boyle (I recognize his writing from bathroom stalls), on Stop and Frisk (S&F):
“[Ulrich] was a big proponent of Stop and Frisk and The Wave believes it’s a very nuanced issue that demands sensitivity and understanding. You’re for Stop and Frisk? Just ask yourself if you’d be okay being stopped regularly or even better if you’d be okay with your teenage kids being frisked. Crime has plummeted and we’re scared to death the de Blasio era will signal a return to the bad old days but it’s not as simple as Stop and Frisk. A lot of the same people who love Stop and Frisk want government out of their lives. Ok, well, the police are the extension of our government so let’s keep that in mind.”
(Darn. I just used up 100 words. Maybe Kevin will give me a bonus for quoting him.) Since the S&F controversy began early this year the police department has cut S&F significantly, yet crime has dropped during this time. Yet Bloomberg and Ray Kelly cry about how crime will rise without S&F, a contradiction the press ignores. They can’t have it both ways (unless they are hiding murdered bodies).
Paul King’s letter on S&F in the Nov. Wave made a great point. “In America, citizens do not have to show authorities their papers… according to the Bill of Rights, we should be secure in our persons against unreasonable searches and seizures. This is a fundamental right for all Americans. The fact that NYPD is searching almost 2,000 people every day is clear evidence that people’s rights are being violated on a large scale.”
Rigid law and order folks are so willing to ignore basic constitutional rights. In his letter, Paul King was critical of the emphasis on race. I disagree. When such an overwhelming majority of the 2000 people stopped are of one race that turns it into a civil rights issue. I do agree when King says, “We all need the NYPD to do its job well. If leaders and activists think they can win by pitting black against white or all policemen against all minorities, then the rest of us lose.”
De Blasio is not anti-police and I hope he will support police on the beat more than Bloomberg by providing resources for better community policing where they won’t have to use S&F. Suspicious communities will be more likely to accept workable solutions under him.
Bill de Blasio has the potential to unite, not divide. His bi-racial family seems to have given hope that long-time racial wounds can be healed. 96% of black people voted for a white Italian guy and over 50% rejected Bill Thompson, the black candidate, in the primary.
De Blasio is not far enough left for me given his ties to certain real estate and corporate interests and to the standard political forces like the Clintons. So I don’t expect a lot but do hope for serious changes in education policies. Which is what a column called “School Scope” it all about, isn’t it?
Norm spews forth his venom daily at ednotesonline.org

--

MORE Video: The Time is NOW to Say NO to the High Stakes Testing Madness

Now playing at MORE: 11/7 Day of Action

Ok. So I'm a day late and a dollar short (what the hell does that mean?). The talented Dan Lupkin, one of MORE media's newer recruits, made this video for the Nov. 7 national day of action protesting testing madness, an idea that came out of MORE's participation in a national consortium of teacher unions that met in Chicago this past summer. (I have video tucked away somewhere that I have not posted yet but should.) Having Dan aboard is like finding a gold mine. He's got me all revved up to try Animoto myself.

Please share this great video with your email lists and on social media. Stop the high stakes testing madness now!



New Haven Teachers Union Sells Out - Again - With Old Joel Klein Buddy Garth Harries

"Ciararella, who won reelection unopposed after the last contract..."? Seriously? Are we seriously at the level of discussion where these changes can occur in a New Haven and leadership doesn't even get challenged at the very next election?.... JG Posted to MORE-News
Harries said Cicarella’s list is “an accurate description of a negotiation position.” But it was a negotiation tactic, he said: “It was no one’s expectation of where we should land.” 
New Haven teachers will vote Thursday night on a second landmark labor contract that would begin to tie pay raises to job evaluations and add incentives for teachers who work in difficult schools..... For the first time, the contract would end the practice of automatically promoting every teacher to a higher pay grade at the end of each year... Those who score on the bottom two levels of the five-point scale, “needs improvement” or “developing,” would be denied automatic raises unless they take extra training sessions in May or June. Those who score “effective” or higher are being offered leadership positions as teacher “facilitators.”... http://www.newhavenindependent.org/index.php/archives/entry/teachers_union_strikes_tentative_deal/
Randi's footprints on this one are invisible but there all the same given her role in past New Haven contracts. Note the presence of our old pal Garth Harries, one in the long line of Klein Klones like Marc Sternberg, Shael, John White, etc. Funny but when Harries was being considered for the job guess who one of the recruiters called cause he read about him on ed notes? That was a fun interview.

The end of the article may be the best part as union leader Cicarella used the outrageous demands from the BOE to browbeat the teachers into this.
Christmas Threat Was A Bluff
As a preamble to the proposed contract, Cicarella wrote out a list of the Board of Education’s initial offers—offers that would have slashed teachers’ contractual rights.
Proposed changes include:
• “Eliminate all class size limits”
• Increase school day to 8 hours
• “Eliminate all holidays presently in contract (Thanksgiving, Christmas, Columbus Day, all Jewish Holidays, etc)”
• No personal days in June
• “Eliminate the ability of a teacher to grieve an established policy or practice.”



Harries said Cicarella’s list is “an accurate description of a negotiation position.” But it was a negotiation tactic, he said: “It was no one’s expectation of where we should land.”
Right from the UFT playbook.
Read the entire article from the New Haven Independent http://www.newhavenindependent.org/index.php/archives/entry/teachers_union_strikes_tentative_deal/

NAEP RESULTS ADD TO EVIDENCE OF “NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND” FAILURE

A federal report released today shows that NAEP score improvement slowed or stopped in both reading and math after NCLB was implemented. 

Add Race To The Top failure too.

http://www.fairtest.org/fairtest-news-release-2013-naep-results-added-evid

FairTest News Release on 2013 NAEP Results, Added Evidence of NCLB Failure

Submitted by fairtest on November 7, 2013 - 1:49pm
for further information:                                                              
Dr. Monty Neill  (617) 477-9792                       
Bob Schaeffer     (239) 395-6773
for immediate release Thursday, November 7, 2013

NAEP RESULTS ADD TO EVIDENCE OF “NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND” FAILURE;
MORE ACHIEVEMENT GAINS BEFORE LAW WAS ADOPTED THAN AFTER;
TEST-AND-PUNISH EDUCATION POLICIES MUST CHANGE

   The latest results from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) “add to existing evidence that the federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) law has failed,” according to the National Center for Fair & Open Testing (FairTest). A federal report released today shows that NAEP score improvement slowed or stopped in both reading and math after NCLB was implemented. NAEP data also show that score gaps between whites and historically disenfranchised groups are generally not narrowing.
   The NAEP trends are consistent with recent results from the ACT and SAT college admissions tests, where average scores continue to stagnate while some racial group score gaps are widening. Gaps are stagnant for 17-year-olds on the long-term NAEP tests.
   “It is well past the time for the federal government to dramatically change course,” said FairTest Executive Director Monty Neill. “The Obama Administration has continued the Bush Administration’s failed test-and-punish approach to the nation’s public schools. These policies, including ‘Race to the Top’ and NCLB waivers, have led to stagnant achievement on independent standardized exams. At the same time, there has been a massive increase in testing our children.”
    Dr. Neill concluded, “Because of the tsunami of high-stakes testing, parents, students and teachers across the nation are rising up in growing numbers. This movement is determined to reverse the tide and bring sanity back to American education.”

Thursday, November 7, 2013

UFT'S CHARTER SCHOOL SCORES FALL UNDER COMMON CORE

Lots of meat in this piece. I wonder if there are figures on pushouts and teacher turnover. Just askin'. Isn't Evelyn DeJesus a district or borough rep? Gee, I wish she didn't have to take time away from dealing with member eval issues to deal with the charter school stuff.

See Gotham: http://gothamschools.org/2013/02/28/in-a-twist-uft-gets-attacked-over-its-charter-school-co-location/


3:38 pm Nov. 6, 2013
The U.F.T. Charter School, a Brooklyn charter run by the teachers' union, announced Wednesday that while test scores fell across subjects under the new Common Core standards, the school graduated 93 percent of its first senior class last year.
In a letter sent home to parents today, Evelyn DeJesus, the school's board president, wrote that the U.F.T.'s school test scores dropped in both English and math under the new Common Core tests. The school's elementary division scored in the top quarter in mathematics tests for its district, however, and in the top half for English.
DeJesus described middle school grades as "a constant source of concern." To try to address the issue, the school has moved its 6th, 7th, and 8th grades from a high school building into an elementary school building to build off the existing success of the elementary program.
New Common Core standards have been a hot-button subject for the union; as U.F.T President Michael Mulgrew has called for a moratorium on high-stakes consequences for the tests, and has criticized the roll out of the new standards while insisting that the Common Core is still good for teachers and students.
DeJesus also released the school's first graduation rate: 93 percent of the school's first batch of seniors graduated in June.
"With your help, our goal is to see that all our students leave the U.F.T. charter school prepared for college or for a career," she wrote.
The U.F.T. school recently announced that it would opt out of the city's controversial new teacher evaluation system, one of 80 schools able to opt out after rejecting federal Race to the Top funding.

Portelos Hearing Continues Today/ Don't Tread on Educators Forum Next Week

I'm just running out to make the hearing and also want to alert everyone to the event Francesco is putting together next Thursday at 6PM in Elmhurst.

While I am agreeing to not report details of the testimony at the hearing I will still blog about the atmosphere, who is in the room, who is testifying and any idiot things the DOE lawyers do. One of the major demands we need to make on de Blasio is to take a good hard look at these bunch of crooks and how they are perfectly willing to fabricate cases to justify their existence. They should be disbarred.
=======

“Don’t Tread on Educators” Open Forum Nov. 14

I know this site is called Protect Portelos, but I have to admit that I hate the name. I was naive when I created it and back in March 2012, I thought I was the only one under attack. Almost every night I get calls and emails from educators around the city and country who are under attack. The ones who aren’t have to wake up and realize that they are also targeted. Maybe it’s not in the form of a harassing administrator, but all this extra paperwork, testing, testing and paperwork is nothing more than a strategic obstacle. There is an attack on public education and who best to hit the hardest than the men and women on the front line…educators.

This site should be called www.Protect[Insert Your Name Here].com, but that would be a silly domain name. Instead I bought educatorfightsback.org and had it forward to protectportelos.org. I could fully change it, but that would cause a hole slew of issues with broken site links. I’m in the process of getting terminated so I don’t have that much time. In case you can’t remember thos domain names, you can also use www.RichardCandia.com. That one I bought in honor of my former UFT Chapter Leader Dr. Richard Candia. Not the guy who turned on me and his colleauges, but rather the guy I knew before that.

“Don’t Tread on Educators” Event
I rented out a hall and I am having a forum for all those educators who are feeling oppressed and want to defend themselves. I left the environmental field in 2007 thinking I was going into one of the most noble of professions. Education. The thought of having the responsibility of transferring knowledge from my brain to that of a younger generation filled me with fire. It still does. Don’t let anyone take that way from you. Don’t let them tread on you. You are not alone.

The time is now. I’m not waiting for 12.31.13 for when Mayor Bloomberg leaves office. The future is unknown and this issue is national, if not international (See teacher strikes in Greece and Mexico).  A new mayor may or may not fix this modern day witch hunt.

This forum is way overdue. Please share and join us. I welcome additional endorsements. There will be no sign in sheet and you can attend anonymously. I will share what I learned from being in the trenches, but the conversation will not be one sided. Bring your cell phone as we will use www.polleverywhere.com for continuous feedback throughout the event. (No your number will not be traced. Relax.)

Facebook Event Page (Currently this Facebook version is by invite only so as not to publicize names of attendees. FB Message me at MrPortelos Portelos)

DOE Anti-Workplace Bullying
DOE Anti-Workplace Bullying
There is also an email support group started on Google Groups. Send a blank email message to Don’T Tread on Educators dtoe+subscribe@googlegroups.com to join.

PS: Principal Hill, Superintendent Claudio, lawyers et al, when I said “You Woke a Sleeping Giant” 21 months ago…this is what I meant.

Wednesday, November 6, 2013

Video: Funeral for 168 Schools Closed Under Bloomberg



http://youtu.be/USnAoe3vgEU


Will de Blasio Make Randi's Folly - er - the UFT Charter - Pay The Damn Rent?

Eva Moskowitz is viewed as a big loser in the election and the UFT even though they jumped on the bandwagon late is viewed as a winner. But what of the charters occupying public school space - given to the UFT by the way by their pal Kathy Cashin when she ran Region 5 (Dist. 19, 23 and 27)? My guess is that it is no longer politically tenable for the UFT to get free space if deB makes Eva pay.

DeB has said that poor charters wouldn't have to pay. Can the UFT claim to be a poor charter with a million dollar donation from the likes of Eli Broad?

The political solution is for the UFT to get its own space which will accelerate the UFT shortfall as the charter school drains the budget. The real solution is the end Randi's Folly. Let the UFT charter apply to be converted to a public school. The UFT would be taking a strong stand in defense of the public school system instead of waffling and straddling the fence. (And cut out of the Green Dot deal too.)

The UFT charters have allowed the enemies to make lots of hay about the union's claim it can run a charter using union rules (which I would still question the reality of). They won't even subject the teachers to the eval system they have fostered on public school teachers.

Let me point out once again -- that ICE was the only group to oppose the establishment of the UFT charter with Michael Fiorillo leading the way. New Action, which claims it opposes charters, was right on board all the way.

What about MORE, you ask? Where do they stand on the UFT charter co-location which has led to the closing of George Gershwin MS 166K and the invasion and disruption of another middle school? While I'm sure most MOREistas are on the same page with me, MORE I believe needs to say loud and clear about the UFT charter: PAY THE DAMN RENT OR GET OUT!

====
Afternurn
Off topic a bit but I need to stick this info that just came in about the charter group that Eva's hubby Eric Grannis is involved in -- this from the corrupt sister in LA:

Here's an LA times article that just came out about CWC and Charter school issues in general:

 Scroll down to the comments, many from CWC parents.

Time Out For Fun: Peter Lugers, Rockaway Ferry and My Backyard Project

I just can't stand to throw anything away – unless I'm blessed by a massive hurricane that floods my entire basement to the ceiling and leaves 5 feet of water in my house. I am wiping pics off my phone and what better place to store them than at ednotes?

Peter Luger
Every year we celebrate my wife's cousin's birthday with steaks at Peter Luger in Williamsburg, which by the way is a few blocks from PS 16 where I spent the first 3 years of my teaching career. So Monday night we took the kids out -- well, not exactly kids: two 32 and two 27 year olds -- my wife's 2 cousins, one of their girl friends and my cousin - actually my first cousin's daughter -- a very sharp gal - not a teacher but she has it in her genes to be anti-charter and anti-TFA. OK, start drooling -- and we have leftovers for lunch today.

Happiness is meat

Don't miss the bacon slabs



The backyard
Now we come to my summer/fall project: building and rebuilding a section of my yard that was hit hard by Sandy. We lost 2 wonderful giant evergreen Hanoki Cypress  -- you can see their stumps in the pics -- and replacing them is not an option since I won't be alive to see them grow. So I came up with a different plan, starting with a small trellis and working my way across, spending hours of observation and contemplation planning. Like 6 hours of contemplation and one hour of work. Well, I am pretty much done - at least for this season. I bought some shrubs with some kind of vague plan for finishing in the spring.

See that small deck in the corner? My outdoor man cave where I will be able to smoke and read while hiding from my wife.

OK. So it is astroturf - temp I hope

The man cave- I built around the stump, now a table

Common Core Q: How many trees did I kill to build this?

The view from the man cave

The view from the other deck - my wife's turf- red flowers are Pineapple Sage - an annual fall bloomer - the best ever. Red fountain grass on left
Rockaway Ferry
Finally, some pics we took on the Rockaway ferry to Manhattan, which we took a few times -- $2 each way. It is going to be here until Jan. 15 -- we hope di Blasio keeps it going even if they raise the price. It is used by commuters quite a bit with the A train being so slow. If we could take the subway to Manhattan and get there within an hour I would never drive.




 OK, enough fun -- gotta go out an plant the bulbs. Can't wait to take pics of them in the spring.