Is Staten Island UFT assisting in the sell-out of teachers at IS 49 SI due to a cozy relationship with abusive principal Linda Hill?
In order to leave the building  the principal has to sign you out. So, a long line forms and 15 minutes  after the day is over teachers are still on line. Does that happen in  any other school? ---- conditions at IS 49 SI [WHERE IS THE UFT? - SEE BELOW]
I refuse to let him [Porteles] ruin what WE  work so hard for each and everyday. 
-----IS 49 (Staten Island) Chapter Leader Richard Candia to Principal Linda Hill who has been harassing teacher Francesco Portelos since he raised issues as to how school grant money was being spent.
They said like 3/4 of the staff  is supportive of him and that they want
 him to be chapter leader.  It  was reported to me that many were very 
supportive and very outspoken in  their support of Portelos.  ---- Chapter Leader Richard Candia to principal Linda Hill, Jan. 2012
Linda Hill answered this plea for help from chapter leader Richard Candia afraid of losing his job because Francesco Porteles is running for chapter leader -- from the rubber room, where he has been sent on trumped up charges by Hill to get him out of the school before the election against chapter leader Richard Candia.
This letter alone should get the UFT to call a press conference and go to a judge asking for an immediate injunction to get Portelos back into the school. But it won't and will let Portelos languish in the RR forever. They were so threatened by Portelos they even had him removed from a Staten Island RR out to Ozone Park in Queens at the corrupt Network 211. Imagine the costs Portelos has been subjected to with the bridge and gas bills? What does the UFT do? "Look into it." Really pathetic. 
We know many chapter leaders are more partners of the administration than of the teachers they supposedly represent. But this Candia guy takes the cake. In this communication to the principal he gives up 15 teachers who support Portelos. It is not often that they get their comeuppance but Candia looks like a deer in the headlights as he loses staff support. 
That Richard Candia is a supposedly a member of Unity Caucus, the party that has ruled the UFT for 50 years, is a further indictment.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: 
Richard Candia To: Linda Hill 
Date: Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 12:48 AM
A close friend in the building that doesn't get involved  with absolutely any BS called me tonite after checking their  email and said the buzz around the building was that I was totally wrong  by not letting Portelos speak and that the staff has no voice in the  building. I guess they feel that someone is effective if they are  confrontational with the administration...not my style.  I'm so  disappointed in so many staff members that I have spent countless hours  talking to at night and helping each and every day.  This person is a  true professional and never gets involved with anything negative and  they are always totally honest with me.  They said like 3/4 of the staff  is supportive of him and that they want him to be chapter leader.  It  was reported to me that many were very supportive and very outspoken in  their support of Portelos.  The Portelos supporters included [Candia NAMES 15 Teachers listing degree of support for Portelos].  They are clueless.  I tried to mediate  this on Thursday and he went nuts so how was I going to let him discuss  this in front of 60 people..not the forum.  I spoke to the staff..I took  questions..Then when the meeting was just about over he stood up and  went to the front of the room and started his BS..totally degrading  Susanne in front of the whole staff when we had left the room.  I keep  getting calls and texts from staff members as they receive this letter  that he sent to the whole staff.  Im thoroughly embarrassed by these  emails.  He is not going to stop harrassing people.  I am thoroughly  committed to our school community and I refuse to let him ruin what WE  work so hard for each and everyday.
 

 
Many have told me “
Good thing you are tenured.” and also “
You would never open your mouth if you weren’t tenured.”  That last one is absolutely not true at all. I admit I was against  tenure when I received it in 2010. I thought it got in the way of  getting rid of ineffective teachers. I mean teachers who were not only  poor at their job, but more importantly had no intention of improving  and were able to stay in the system.
Of course now I am happy to be tenured,