Written and edited by Norm Scott:
EDUCATE! ORGANIZE!! MOBILIZE!!!
Three pillars of The Resistance – providing information on current ed issues, organizing activities around fighting for public education in NYC and beyond and exposing the motives behind the education deformers. We link up with bands of resisters. Nothing will change unless WE ALL GET INVOLVED IN THE STRUGGLE!
There is still time to register for tonight's Retiree Advocate-UFT's meeting at 7pm on Zoom. Register Here: https://bit.ly/3yr6M8K (Close to 250 people are already registered.)
DONATE TO THE UFT PETITION CAMPAIGN FOR A HEALTHCARE VOTE - IT IS COSTING MONEY TO MAKE SURE EACH ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE WILL NOT BE TOSSED OUT BY THE UFT LEADERSHIP.
A Tale of 3 city teacher unions - and UFT/Unity are the losers
Sunday, March 26, 2023 - This post is loaded, so sit back or just ignore and go out and get some sun
No matter the liberal blather from the UFT (we support the LA teachers for not crossing picket line but would jump off the roof of 52 Broadway of NYC did the same), we have an ineffective right-center UFT leadership compared to the left wing leadership in Chicago and Los Angeles and the compilation I've gathered below proves it, not only ideologically, but in terms of actual political and economic accomplishments. My comment above about changing the leadership does not mean dumping Mulgrew for another Unity Caucus hack but removing Unity from leadership. Note these articles.
In the UFT we have decreased militancy - actually no militancy. Well, if you consider "wear certain colors certain days" as militancy.
The increasingly militant autoworkers had their first direct election of a national president and an insurgent won - barely. He said:
“This is the end
of company unionism, where the companies and the union work together in a
friendly way, because it hasn’t been good for our members ---- President Is Ousted in United Auto Workers Election --
"Company union" increasingly strikes a chord when talking about the Unity crowd. When Marianne appeared on Brian Lehrer the other day, his first comment was how surprised he was that the UFT was teaming up with the Adams administration against its own members.
We are not surprised.
A long-time UFT activist asked: What would happen if we had direct elections for presidents of the AFT and NYSUT? Right now only winner take all Unity delegates (750) vote in those elections.
There is actually a new petition campaign in the UFT to bring a level of democracy with a petition campaign based on the UFT constitution calling for a member vote on healthcare changes (as opposed to Mulgrew backroom deals through the MLC).
Sign the petition for a democratic vote on healthcare.
Attend the Retiree Advocate Zoom Sunday, March 26 at 7PM. Register: https://bit.ly/3yr6M8K
Are
you fed up with our union leadership making bad decisions for us
without our input? We never got a chance to vote about our Medicare with
Seniorcare being taken away from us. RA has no representation in the
DA, ExBd or RTC despite receiving 30% of vote in last Chapter election.
Time to build our caucus and get ready for next year's Chapter Election.
Find out how by coming to the Retiree Advocate's meeting on March 26
at 7pm on Zoom.
This morning, the Municipal Labor Committee, a group of approximately
100 NYC public sector unions, voted to ratify an agreement with the
city and Aetna to transition Medicare-eligible retirees to a Medicare
Advantage plan.
CSA voted “no” on behalf of our membership.
Throughout this entire process, we have been committed to fighting
for the highest quality of healthcare possible for every retiree. Our
retiree members have consistently asked that we advocate for an option
for Medicare-eligible retirees to keep their current plan. For a variety
of reasons, city retirees will not be allowed that choice at this time,
and too many retirees have limited options.
To be clear, our vote was not a referendum on the process nor the
Aetna proposal itself. The MLC has been diligent in fighting to protect
Medicare-eligible NYC retirees during these complex negotiations, and
Aetna has customized their proposal to try and mirror our current Senior
Care plan. Aetna representatives have been collaborative and
responsive; we greatly appreciate that they addressed our members
directly on a Zoom yesterday afternoon. They have committed to returning
to speak with our members again now that the agreement has been
ratified. Thankfully, many CSA members have had their most critical
questions and concerns addressed, and we are pleased that we were able
to support these retirees and advocate on their behalf.
However, there are currently too many CSA retirees who still believe
this plan is not right for them and their families. In January, I took
an oath to represent all CSA members to the best of my ability, and it
is my belief, along with our leadership team, that voting “no” today was
the right decision for our union.
Other union leaders within the MLC also did what they felt was right
for their members, resulting in enough votes to ratify the agreement.
Aetna has pledged to begin communicating immediately providing further
details and answering your questions. The MLC and the city will work to
ensure that the plan is implemented as promised. The dedicated staff and
leadership of the CSA Welfare Fund will begin to immerse themselves in
the new plan which include many additional, unique benefits.
We will continue to communicate regularly with you in the coming
weeks and months. Please be reminded to contact CSA Headquarters or the
Retiree Chapter with any questions or feedback about the negotiation
process. If you have specific questions regarding the transition to the
Aetna plan, please contact the CSA Welfare Fund directly.
As always, I thank you for your honest feedback, patience, and support.
Jenny
Brown reports on the vote by New York City’s Municipal Labor Committee
to scrap some of the best retiree health care coverage in the country
and push retirees onto the for-profit Medicare Advantage plan.
Protesters
in New York City against the mayor’s and the
Municipal Labor
Committee’s effort to change a city law protecting
their health care
benefits, photo undated. (Cross-Union Retirees Organizing Committee)
Defying
two years of protests and lawsuits by union retirees, New York City’s
Municipal Labor Committee voted March 9 to scrap some of the best
retiree health care coverage in the country. The change would put
250,000 city retirees into a for-profit Medicare Advantage plan run by
Aetna.
Twenty-six
unions in the MLC voted no, while others abstained. But their votes
were swamped by the votes of the largest unions on the committee, AFSCME
District Council 37 and the New York United Federation of Teachers.
Retirees
and active members protested during the MLC vote and marched to City
Hall. They are asking the city council to strengthen the law protecting
retiree health care. The NYC Organization of Public Service Retirees
promises to sue.
In traditional Medicare, available when you turn 65, you present your card, get care, and the government pays for it.
With
Medicare Advantage, a for-profit insurance company gets money from the
government to cover you. But they get to take a fat cut — Medicare
Advantage is now the most lucrative sector of an already-lucrative
health insurance industry. And they get to say what care you can get.
Medicare
Advantage plans negotiated by employers and unions provide worse
coverage than traditional Medicare. But they are generally better than
the individual Medicare Advantage plans that seniors may sign up for
themselves and which are advertised on late-night TV.
Medicare
Advantage plans that individuals buy on the private insurance market
may work out to have cheaper premiums than traditional Medicare because
they wrap in a drug benefit and may cap out-of-pocket expenses. But they
are notorious for denying expensive care, imposing narrow networks of
doctors and hospitals and ripping off the government.
On
the other hand, union-negotiated Medicare Advantage plans are the
result of insurance companies having to negotiate with unions and
employers to sign up large groups of retirees, and that may restrain the
most egregious abuses. Still, some retirees in negotiated plans report that they were denied care at the most difficult time in their lives.
Department of Health & Human Services, Washington, D.C. (Sarah Stierch, CC BY 4.0, Wikimedia Commons)
In
both cases, the for-profit insurance companies that run the plans have a
strong incentive to deny care. Every dollar they don’t pay for your
care is a dollar earned by shareholders and CEOs, who often take most of
their compensation in stock. Stock prices are based on how little care
the company can pay for.
Traditional
Medicare (part A & B) costs $164.90 a month and covers hospital
costs and 80 percent of non-hospital costs. But medical costs are such
that the 20 percent gap in coverage can quickly become ruinous. So, the
government set up a regulated market of Medigap supplements.
Retirees can pay additional premiums to private insurance companies to
cover the final 20 percent, and cap out-of-pocket costs.
Medigap
plans can cost as little as $75 a month, but can cost hundreds more,
depending on the plan, your age, gender and whether you smoke. Unlike
Medicare Advantage, however, these Medigap plans are heavily regulated.
It
is this gap for which New York City union retirees over age 65 are
covered by the city’s Senior Care plan. The city also pays the monthly
premiums for traditional Medicare, so retirees get premium-free
coverage.
Numbers Don’t Add Up
States and municipalities have increasingly tried
to put retirees into Medicare Advantage plans once they reach age 65.
Where unions have fought the change, as in Washington state and Vermont,
they have been able to prevent the switch. But in New York City,
retirees have been fighting not just the city but also their own unions
to keep from being shunted into a for-profit plan.
Public
employees in New York City have given up a lot over the years to keep
their ironclad retiree health care coverage and it paid off until now.
Along with paying traditional Medicare premiums, the city pays for
Senior Care, the wrap-around supplement that picks up nearly all costs
not covered by Medicare, along with drug benefits.
Rally in Washington, D.C., February 2013. (Djembayz, CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimedia Commons)
Leaders
of District Council 37 and the UFT claim the Medicare Advantage plan
will save money and provide the same coverage. But the numbers don’t add
up, said Len Rodberg, a retired City University of New York health
policy expert who will be affected by the change. “Medicare Advantage
starts out 20 percent below what Medicare does, in terms of actual money
available to spend on health care,” Rodberg said.
Traditional
Medicare pays 3 percent overhead. By contrast, Medicare Advantage plans
have to make a profit for shareholders, and they also pay huge
executive salaries and maintain enormous staffs to protect their profit
margins by delaying and denying care. In these for-profit plans, Rodberg
said, “basically anything that costs money would need pre-approval.”
Municipal
Labor Committee leaders said their consultants told them the difference
would be picked up by the federal government, Rodberg said. But while
the federal government used to subsidize for-profit Medicare Advantage
plans 20 percent over what they paid out for traditional Medicare
patients, that subsidy is now down to 2 percent.
Medicare
Advantage plans also cut costs by contracting with certain providers.
This means the insurance company will only pay for care provided by
certain doctors or hospitals. For retirees who move to states with
spotty coverage, Rodberg said, “suddenly their Medicare card won’t work,
cause they’re in Medicare Advantage, not Medicare.”
Quick Reaction
Retired
teacher Gloria Brandman heard about the change in 2021 from friends in
PSC-CUNY, the union of faculty and staff at the City University of New
York. She and other teacher retirees swung into action, holding a
webinar that drew 400 people. The recording of the webinar circulated
widely, leading to a whirlwind of protest which forced UFT’s president,
Michael Mulgrew, to hold a town hall where he tried to sell the change.
Retirees
from the teachers, AFSCME and several uniformed service unions formed a
Cross-Union Retirees Organizing Committee to fight. Brandman and other
CROC activists hounded newly elected Mayor Eric Adams at every
opportunity.
New YorkCity Mayor Eric Adams February, 2022. (Marc A. Hermann / MTA, CC BY 2.0, Wikimedia Commons)
They
rallied when the MLC met: “We marched on the hottest day of the year,”
Brandman recalled. They held a Valentine’s Day “Don’t Break Our Hearts,
Mayor Adams” event.
In
October they held a “Halloween Horror” press conference, saying “Mayor
Adams, You’re Scaring Us to Death.” (“Death masks optional,” said the
invitation flier).
A
city law requires that all the health care options the city provides be
premium-free. That law turned out to be an important backstop and the
NYC Organization of Public Service Retirees sued to get it enforced. A
judge agreed that it was against the law for the city to charge seniors
an extra $191 per month to stay in original Medicare.
So
Adams and the MLC leadership asked the City Council to change the law.
They walked into a buzz saw. After vigorous protests and reams of
testimony from retirees and active union members objecting to the change
— which could have undermined active members’ health care as well — the
City Council declined to alter the law.
In
her testimony before the council, Jen Gaboury, PSC chapter chair at
Hunter College said, “We know these ‘savings’ don’t come from some brand
of private business magic. If you get this money, you’ll be denying
care and/or delaying treatment to your own people, older city workers.”
Contracts Held Hostage
Part
of the problem is that the unions created a $600 million hole in the
last round of contracts and they’re trying to plug it now. They
negotiated to use a health care stabilization fund, designed to equalize
costs between health plans for active members, to bolster wage
increases. Now the fund is broke and that threatens to raise health care
costs for active members.
At the City Council hearings, PSC-CUNY proposed a way out of this mess. Retired professor James Perlstein described it in his testimony:
“(a)
Redirect funds the City holds in reserve to bridge the Municipal Labor
Committee Stabilization Fund for three years, (b) Create a stakeholders
commission charged with finding a path to control health care spending,
with hospital pricing as a priority, and (c) Develop a sustainable
mechanism for funding City health insurance.”
PSC also suggested that New York City’s very profitable non-profit hospitals contribute, since they don’t pay taxes.
None
of these steps have been taken, so far. Instead, city administrators
continue to push Medicare Advantage. “The city’s taken a hardball
position that it won’t negotiate new contracts until the unions save
them $600 million by moving forward with Medicare Advantage plan,” said
Rodberg in February. The city promises to replenish the stabilization
fund with the estimated $600 million it will save from the switch.
AFSCME
DC 37 members have been working for 18 months without a contract.
Recently the city and the union inked a tentative agreement with raises
that don’t even keep up with inflation. Other city unions object that
this low bar will harm their negotiations, since the city expects the
first agreement settled by a major city union to set a pattern which the
other municipal unions will largely follow.
And
while members will get to vote on the agreement, they won’t be able to
vote on the retiree health care concession their union agreed to behind
closed doors. It seems that as a condition for settling, the dominant
MLC unions agreed to impose what the retirees call “the nuclear option,”
deliberately misreading the city law they tried to change, and making
Medicare Advantage the only option for retirees.
Any
retiree who wants to stay in traditional Medicare would have to pay for
all of their coverage, as if they had no union at all.
The showdown
underscores just how important — and lucrative — Medicare Advantage has
become to insurers and doctors’ groups that are paid by the federal
government to care for older Americans. Roughly $400 billion in taxpayer
money went to these private plans last year. Profits on Medicare
Advantage plans are at least double what insurers earn from other kinds
of policies, according to a recent analysis by the Kaiser Family Foundation.
Without reforms, taxpayers will spend
about $25 billion next year in “excess” payments to the private plans,
according to the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, a nonpartisan
research group that advises Congress.... NYT
One thing has become increasingly care - switching us out of traditional medicare to MedAdv will raise healthcare costs by billions. Thursday's NYT has an explosive article in the print section which I am reproducing below, with the charts that show how they make money by upcoding. Like my blood tests show some sugar escalation - they will take that and get more money from medicare by classifying me as pre-diabetic.
Some hints on enormous profits for MedAdv plans -- fraud, upcoding ----- How our union's move to MedAadv will raise not cut costs while reducing service for the sick.
It would
significantly lower payments — by billions of dollars a year — to
Medicare Advantage, the private plans that now cover about half of the
government’s health program for older Americans. The change
in payment formulas is an effort, Biden administration officials say,
to tackle widespread abuses and fraud in the increasingly popular
private program. In the last decade, reams of evidence uncovered in
lawsuits and audits revealed systematic overbilling of the government. A
final decision on the payments is expected shortly, and is one of a
series of tough new rules aimed at reining in the industry. The changes fit into a broader effort by the White House to shore up the Medicare trust fund.. NYT March 23, 2023
UNITYCAUCUS-CARE
Mulgrewcare does the opposite - weakens the Medicare trust fund. This was my theme when I spoke at the UFT Ex Bd on Monday, to mostly deaf Unity Caucus ears. I think we need to make it clear - this is a Unity Caucus, not a Mulgrew operation. Do we think if Mulgrew left Unity would not support this move?
UFT is acting like Republicans
Nick had a summary of my comments (which if not for him I wouldn't remember):
Norm Scott: UFT member since 67. Wearing a UFT logo and hope no lawyers
contact me. Healthcare: MAP isn’t Medicare. If I were to pay someone to
go to the grocery store for me, that’s kind of like what Aetna is going
to do with our healthcare. If you don’t understand that healthcare
hasn’t increased in cost because of profits and denial of benefits…I
hear some people say I don’t really care about it – it’s just politics.
I’m really disturbed by the fact that I may not have access to my
doctors. I’ve got doctors for every part of my body. I’m getting calls
from all over the country by people saying they might not get access to
doctors. 60% of people are now on MAP. But what happens when it’s 80 and
90%? I’m sorry to say but this union is acting like the Republicans –
the Republicans will end up killing Medicare. Mulgrew talks about
representational voting at MLC, but not in the UFT. Even though Retiree
Advocate got about 1/3 of the vote in the retiree chapter election, we
get no say at all – not a single delegate. We think there should be a
vote on questions of healthcare. We are starting a petition campaign,
where if we get 1/3 of this body, we can get a referendum to vote on any
healthcare changes. You might win that vote anyways – why not support
it. Give members a choice to vote.
I also said that Aetna is not doing this for charity but for enormous profits -- that is the cause of healthcare rise from insurance companies, hospitals, and doctor practice corporations. By joining in with MedAdv company lines, the UFT is helping undermine and bankrupt traditional medicare which is the only publicly run healthcare agency and instrumental in keeping healthcare costs down.
Another example of the UFT leadership Scam from Nick:
A few more highlights if you don't have time to read the whole thing:
The showdown
underscores just how important — and lucrative — Medicare Advantage has
become to insurers and doctors’ groups that are paid by the federal
government to care for older Americans. Roughly $400 billion in taxpayer
money went to these private plans last year. Profits on Medicare
Advantage plans are at least double what insurers earn from other kinds
of policies, according to a recent analysis by the Kaiser Family Foundation.
Older
Americans have flocked to Medicare Advantage, finding that many
policies offer lower premiums and more benefits than the traditional
government program. The insurers
receive a flat rate for every person they sign up — and get bonuses for
those with serious health conditions, because their medical care
typically costs more. But numerous studies from academicresearchers, governmentwatchdogagencies
and federal fraud prosecutions underscore how the insurers have
manipulated the system by attaching as many diagnosis codes as possible
to their patients’ records to harvest these bonus payments. Four of the largest five insurers have either settled or are currently facing lawsuits claiming fraudulent coding. Similar lawsuits have also been brought against an array of smaller health plans.
In 1975 the overwhelming majority of teachers (I was one of them) were
willing to accept two for one Taylor Law penalties to stand up for their
15,000 laid off colleagues. The UFT is a very different union from
those days.
The contrast between the NYC UFT and the LA UTLA teacher unions is beyond astounding. Our leaders emphasize our right not to strike and use their shills to claim we are in a post-teacher strike phase.
while the teacher union in Los Angelos is refusing to cross the picket lines for the next three days of the lowest paid school workers.
Note how our UFT leadership begged the city council (unsuccesfully) to create a two-tier healthcare system by allowing the wealthiest members to buy their way out of Medicare Advantage.
The union that represents 30,000 support
workers in the Los Angeles Unified School District is seeking a 30
percent pay increase, saying that many employees make little more than
the minimum wage and are struggling to afford the cost of living in
Southern California.
Security attempts to corral Medicare Advantage protesters inside the Conrad Hotel in New York City. Photos by Steve Wishnia
By Steve Wishnia
A
group of seven New York City municipal retirees protesting NYC’s plan
to privatize their Medicare coverage slipped into the Conrad Hilton
hotel today in Battery Park City where the Aetna insurance company was
about to hold a session to prepare union staff on how to tell retirees
about the company’s Medicare Advantage plan.
“We
want to keep the care we have!” retired music teacher Trudy Silver
called out from one side of the room, where attendees were finishing
their lunches and mingling before the session. “We don’t want your Aetna
plan!” her compatriots — all of them women — responded from the other
side of the space.
Silver then swiveled through the crowd, around the small barstool-style tables, and past the buffet, as men in purple Aetna-logo T-shirts tried to push her out. One tried to block a news photographer’s camera angles. Eventually, all seven women were herded out by security guards.
Members of the Cross-Union Retirees Organizing Committee deliver their message despite attempts to shut them out.
“They’re
preparing the propaganda,” Sarah Shapiro of the Cross-Union Retirees
Organizing Committee [CROC] said before the March 20 action.
Earlier
this month, the Municipal Labor Committee [MLC], which includes 102
unions representing civil service workers, approved the city’s agreement
with Aetna to provide a privatized, profit-driven Medicare Advantage
plan for retirees, who now have traditional Medicare with city-funded
supplemental coverage. Mayor Eric Adams’ administration then announced
its intention to make the Aetna plan the only premium-free health
coverage available to retirees.
“We
want to keep the health care we have, and we’re not going to give up,”
Silver told Work-Bites afterwards. “Forty percent of the nation has been
boondoggled into accepting privatized Medicare. We’re not going to in
New York.”
Retired
United Federation of Teachers member and former special-education
teacher Denise Rickles said that she opposes the privatization of
Medicare and that “Aetna is a disreputable insurance company” that’s
under federal investigation.
In
2021, CVS Health, which acquired Aetna three years prior, revealed in a
financial filing that it was being audited by federal Department of
Health and Human Services inspectors to check for “diagnostic upcoding,”
in which patients’ diagnoses are written to list more serious
conditions than they actually have. Medicare pays insurers at a higher
rate if the people they cover are sicker.
These NYC municipal retirees successfully slipped into the Conrad Hotel on March 20, to protest the ongoing campaign to privatize traditional Medicare coverage.
Last
year, a Kaiser Health News review of 90 audits of Medicare Advantage
plans done by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services between
2011 and 2013 — the most recent available, obtained after litigation —
found upcoding a common practice in the industry. The overpayments
averaged more than $1,000 per person at 23 plans, including 10 owned by
Humana. Overall, the companies had claimed excess payments for 20
percent of the patients in the audits.
In
October 2021, the Justice Department sued Kaiser Permanente, the
fifth-largest insurer in the Medicare Advantage market, charging that it
used algorithms to find ailments it could then pressure doctors to add
to diagnoses. It sought reimbursement and triple damages for more than
350 allegedly fraudulent diagnoses.
CVS
Health has 3.1 million people enrolled in its Medicare Advantage plans,
according to a study last year by the Kaiser Family Foundation. That
gave it 11 percent of the market, ranking fourth among U.S.
health-insurance companies after United Health, Humana, and Blue Cross
Blue Shield. New York City imposing Medicare Advantage on retirees would
add as many as 250,000 more enrollees.
“People put their trust in unions,” Rickles added. “But for the past
few decades, unions have not really represented their membership.”
The
UFT and District Council 37, the two largest unions in the Municipal
Labor Committee, have actively pushed for the switch to Medicare
Advantage, as has the Uniformed Sanitationmen’s Association. The
Professional Staff Congress [PSC], which represents City University of
New York faculty and staff, has opposed it. A PSC staffer attending the
session said he was sympathetic to the protesters, but wasn’t the right
person to comment.
“I’m on your side,” another union official told the protesters after they’d left the building. She quickly rushed inside.
Silver, a jazz singer, said she knew the attendees had heard their message.
Being Critical is Political - UFT Leadership Mantra to critics telling them to STFU
We have seen an uptick in aggressive attacks on opposition voices by some in the UFT leadership, accusing them of playing politics when they raise critical issues. While not a new tactic, used by authoritarians over the decades to paint critics as "the other", recent variations have escalated at the Exec Bd and DA and on social media. "We do the work" is their mantra and when that work is criticized, they take umbrage. Like we know Mulgrew is doing the work - for the city and Aetna. And when union officials ignore and bury complaints from schools, they want a free pass.
In the meantime, the real work continues.
As per Article V, Section 10 of the UFT Constitution, we call for a
membership-wide vote for any significant changes to active and/or
retired members’ healthcare.
Mulgrew has a weighed vote on healthcare at the MLC using our total members as leverage, as if we actually have a say. Politicians believe him -- that members are OK with these changes. We can force a referendum on health care related changes by using
BRING DEMOCRACY TO THE UFT: SIGN THE PETITION CALLING FOR A VOTE ON HEALTHCARE CHANGES
The Unity assassins were out celebrating the Ides of March at the Delegate Assembly with plastic
knives. As we speak, union officials are combing through ancient UFT
scrolls blacking out the word Strike.
"In 1967, UFT members went on strike extended the summer vacation by two weeks. They did the same by 3 months in 68."
Reminds me of Florida new curriculum where Rosa Parks was not black and was asked to go to the back of the bus because she didn't have a ticket.
HOW DARE YOU TAMPER WITH OUR PERFECT RESOLUTION ON UFT HISTORY WHERE EVERYTHING WE WON CAME FROM BEGGING AND PLEADING, AND MENTION THE DEADED S-WORD --- UFT/UNITY CANCEL CULTURE AFTER CONSULTATION WITH RON DISANCTIMONIUS
If I am not the president, the next president will have a big say in
how this is done. Aetna saying they have the best Medicare advantage
program in the country. They are excited about it....Michael Mulgrew, Mar. 15, 2023 DA
And UFT members are equally excited about Mulgrew not being president. Is he sending a signal? Let the Unity hunger games begin. Mike Sill made his move at the DA by lauding the history of the UFT, which has never had a strike.
Sunday, March 19
James Eterno called me to say MORE used the old Norm tactic at DAs of amending Unity resos. I used to get the floor by calling out "speaker against" on resos they thought no one would oppose. "I'm against this pablum joint Unity/New Action reso because it sucks." They were shocked. And I was approached by a union official afterwards that Randi complained my scornful approach didn't show proper respect. I had mocked their "we plead" context at Bloomberg goons instead of telling them to go fuck themselves.
I was spared the mahem on Wednesday by staying outside the DA, as usual, handing out a leaflet calling for the above referendum on healthcare issues. I had some interesting conversations. One guy seems to have pretty much bought the Mulgrew line. The perception is that retirees are the ones affected and people don't look too far into the future. Medicare will be gone by the time most of them reach 65, with a plastic knife in the back from Et Tu Mulgrew.
And Kate Conners from MORE was handing out info on the NY Health Act. She and I talked about the segment Brian Lehrer did with State Senator Gustavo Rivera who explains how that's the real way to save money, not MulgrewCare.
She said she would raise the issue with Mulgrew and she did by asking him to talk to Rivera. He refused.Mulgrew's commitment to higher costs through privatized healthcare is firm. I hear he made some comment that hinted he may not be running for president again. Maybe that board position at Aetna is looming.
It was cold on Wednesday - how are we letting them get away with not letting us give our lit in the lobby like we'd done for decades? Or not allowing us to observe the DA from the 19th floor? So I left at 5 and went into Whole Foods to get some hot soup.
It was only when I got uptown to my apartment when I started reading accounts of the DA. A MORE member used an old tactic I used to use by amending a mom and apple pie reso on UFT history by suggesting the UFT origin story and growth of power were based on strikes and strike threats in the 60s. ( I was on the 67, 68 and 75 strikes - but too young for the 60 and 62. )
Note the vote totals for opening up Taylor Law discussion, despite LeRoy Barr misleading obfuscation.
Here is Nick's report on that part of the meeting.
Michael Sill: Honored to support the resolution speaking in favor of
UFT’s anniversary. Asks founders of union to stand for a round of
applause (standing ovation). 60 years ago, we faced off with the DOE on
contract. That had never happened before. 1960 may seem like an abstract
concept. Many teachers we meet elsewhere don’t have collective
bargaining rights. They might have consultation rights, but can’t do
anything on salary/vacation days. Teacher I spoke to makes 30k; at end
she’ll make 35k. She pays a premium for healthcare. That’s life without
collective bargaining. Our founders looked around them and saw tons of
groups, divided by subject, age, ethnic background, vision. They wanted
to bring these groups together. They built a whole wing onto the house
of labor. Without them, maybe the Florida teacher might have seen my
salary and thought I had it bad. These aren’t mythical creatures. Standing ovation.
James Cole: Rise to make an amendment. Adds one whereas about the key
role of the strike, without which we couldn’t have formed. Also resolved
to fight for right to strike, now illegal. 1960 wasn’t just a vote that
brought us together – there was a strike. And in doing so, we were able
to win collective bargaining rights. Over the years, those have been
codified in law, but with draconian anti-strike clauses. Strikes brought
us real raises – not 3%. Currently there are legislators who are
working to amend the constitution. We improve our collective bargaining
but winning the right to strike.
LeRoy Barr: Rises in opposition. Acknowledges who were here. With
respect to amendment, if case where contract was going to go away, would
you go on strike? Gives some other examples. There are reasons we would
go on strike, break the Taylor Law. This union was built on the strike
we had in 1960. If we didn’t ask to get rid of Taylor Law. Without the
Taylor Law, we would have lost the contract. Can romanticize going on
strike. Understand what you’re asking for – people will go on strike.
Maggie Joyce: Taylor Law protects our contract. Other districts HAVE
to go on strike. Chicago went on strike to get what we have. Remember
when we were about to go on strike? My husband can support me, but I
have paras who support their entire families. A lot of people here live
paycheck to paycheck.
Nick Bacon: speaks in favor. This amendment DOESN’T ask to repeal the
entire part of the Taylor Law, just the anti-strike clause. We’ve been
affected by this clause. We got an email during the beginning of COVID
that we had to go in – not take sick days – or we might lose the
automatic payment of dues. That’s the Taylor Law. This reso doesn’t mean
we’re going to strike – it just asks the UFT to push for our right to
be able to do so if we need to. Others have said that we’d strike if
issues were big enough, but right now we have the opposite issue – we’re
getting so little (from collective bargaining), such as 3% raises, that
our members feel the opposite of mobilized to take actions. Let’s join
many other unions in this country in simply having one more tool in our
union toolkit – the right to strike.
Question called on amendment. Yeses: 271; Nos: 363; Room: yeses: 37; nos: 148. 38% yes, 62% no. Failed.
Eterno report:
Honor UFT for 63rd birthday.
Mike Sill speaks in support of
honoring the UFT on its 63rd anniversary. Honors founders. Look
elsewhere in the country to see collective bargaining rights don't exist
in many places. Some only have consultation rights, some nothing.
Teacher makes $30,000 a year and maxes out at $35,000. Premium for
healthcare. That was reality before 1960 in NYC. 106 groups represented
teachers. Brought groups together. Built wing on house of labor.
Amendment
to add that we went on strike to get those collective bargaining rights
and we want to negotiate to get that right to strike back. Strike to
get real raises. State assembly and state senate people are working to
get amendment passed to legalize right to strike for public sector
workers. Honor founders by passing this amendment.
Leroy Barr
opposes the amendment. Grateful for what our founders have done and
continue to do. There are reasons we would go on strike in spite of the
Taylor law if they tried to take away the Taylor Law like if they cut
our pay in half or we had to work Saturdays. Another Unity person
agrees with that. Hard to get people on board with striking in 2020 with
COVID. Says strikes are for the privileged.
Nick Bacon says that
there is a problem with the Taylor Law. We are only trying to push
getting rid of this part of the Taylor Law prohibiting strikes, a
fundamental human right. We have to have the right to strike. We need
that one union tactic back to be able to strike. We haven't had a
strike since 1975 and this is not calling for a strike.
Vote to close debate on all matters passes.
Vote on amendment:
On Phone 271 to 363 No
In the Room I can't hear numbers.
38% vote for amendment.
38% in a DA often translates into 10% higher with general members. The UFT leadership attempt to distract from any chance to raise the issue is indicative of how they see the Taylor Law anti-strike provision as protection for themselves from even having to raise the issue.
D
