Saturday, December 21, 2024

UFT Elections: The Two Slate Solution - Keep Calm

The level of upset amongst the world of opp over two slates is over the top. Calm down folks.

How one non-Unity slate can still win in a 3-way race. 

A few key takeaways up front:

  • I've maintained the only way to win this election with the prospects of building dynamic change into the UFT is by enlisting large numbers of working UFTers. Do not rely on retirees to win and dominate a fossilized union (yes I am one of these fossils.) The current configuration of the legacy caucuses unfortunately leads us in this direction.
  • The 63% retiree vote that the legacy caucuses are relying to deliver will not hold up for this election. In the 2022 UFT general election retirees won 29% -the same number they did in the 2021 RTC election. In the latter election word was out about the medicare situation - my biggest disappointment in that election was not seeing the retiree vote expand. That we didn't increase the retiree vote from the year before when few knew about the health plan changes. That led to me being pessimistic for the June election. I was wrong. We ran a great campaign but the difference maker: Marianne. Where will she land in this election and if she doesn't get her people involved the retiree vote will drop significantly.
  • Unity still won over 10k in the 2024 chapter loss. Expect that to hold and grow as Unity supporters may have turned on Tom Murphy as RTC leader but may not be willing to turn over the entire union to what will clearly be labeled a left-wing opposition run by legacy caucuses that they have fought for years. RA did not have a bad rep a year ago.
  • ABC is the non-ideological, non-sectarian option with people from every caucus, including Unity, so Unity retirees who know the score may go ABC, but not with a slate dominated with MORE candidates. 
  •  The numbers from the UFC full frontal coalition vote in 2022 were not much different from the smaller MORE/NAC coalition in 2016. Why would this election be any different from the in-service vote (Mah Nishtanah), especially since what was UFC is diminished? Given the 2022 vote and reduced caucus coalitions, I maintain Unity would win the election if we were limited to a coalition run similar to UFC, which the legacy caucuses not even reaching the same levels of organizing that UFC had reached.
  • Oh, but what about the retiree and para votes from last spring? They are not automatic and must be worked for. Fix Para Pay is aligned at this point with ABC. So Don't forget the 27k para potential vote. The in-service para vote, with 27k paras, long ignored by the opposition,  may prove more crucial than the retiree vote if we get turnout. Note: A key organizing strategy is taking direct aim at this vote with a plan to fight for para pay instead of the Unity policy of telling them to be happy they have a job.
  • ABC with a drastic new approach to not just running in the election but open to taking the election-building process out from behind closed doors and get more rank and file involved - and it has been working. Sample: 100 showed for a zoom for paras and district 75 on Tuesday, and over 50 for a High School zoom Wednesday, including chapter leaders from large high schools, including some key people from Unity.That followed a general meeting with 260 people. Think each in-service having some kind of network outreach in their schools. ABC is building the broadest coalition and still invites all legacy caucus members and supporters to run on the ABC independent slate with no labels. Already some have signed up to run. Is it enough yet? No. But there's a long way to go before ballots go out in May and petitioning starting Feb. 12. And ABC has the petition king: ME.
  • Almost 40% of Trump supporters in NYS are in a union and many of them in the UFT and also anti-Mulgrew. Many have been non-voters in the past. With an ABC option that is focused on bread and butter and without a leftist ideology reputation, they may vote. Some will say how dare you hope Trump supporters vote for you? How dare I run to win.

Saturday, December 21 - The shortest day of the year, starting tomorrow the days grow longer

Something to look forward to. 

Did I tire you out yet with my key takeaways? Here's some more analysis.

June joy in oppo Mudville turns to fall blues as Mulgrew offers teeth and eyes, soon to be followed by feet (every member gets a silver sneaker once a year.)

After the para and retiree elections plus the TRS election (UFT's 3 Consequential Elections) showed gaping holes in the Unity Caucus machine, two things happened. 

Enormous excitement and hope amongst the anti-Unity forces and fear and despair and rending of garments and gnashing of teeth in the halls of UFT/Unity. 

LeRoy Barr at a UFT staff meeting while they were in Houston at the AFT convention in July warned them that the oppo was coming for their jobs and Unity went into full gear by the end of the summer with a full-court blitz to defend itself by word salad changes in their positions on Medicare, getting better dental, and sending their troops into the schools (not always to their advantage). And it just may be working to some extent. We insiders may LOL, but to the masses in the rank and file who think a caucus is some kind of rash (and they may be right), some of this blitz registers. 

Then came the opposition which is, and always has been, a contorted mess. From enormous excitement in June and August, we have seen a split in what began back in March with a unified view of the 3 caucuses and ABC, and ended in October. I will go into the timeline and details at another time.                  

So, now the fear, despair and rending of garments and gnashing of teeth has infected the oppo and Unity forces are perking up, though some Unity staff have noticed the budding excitement and have reached out asking about what will happen to their jobs.

Even at Tuesday's final RTC meeting of the year, a few retirees who I didn't even know stopped by to say they are big Ed Notes and Arthur readers and were very worried about a two oppo slate. I was even called by a friend and current MORE member asking if there was anything he could do to help heal the breach. My response was long (of course) and complicated and had to include the history going back to March and through October to understand the current situation. I keep getting called out on my insistence of showing background history- that I should focus on today, but context and history count. You can't grow a plant if there are no roots. 

Is there a way forward to running one united slate? I tend to say no at this point and will proceed in this analysis to my theory of how the only slate than can win is ABC, even if it might seem far-fetched.

So let me start with some history, of course.

The 2022 UFC coalition failures

United for Change was a milestone in UFT history as every oppo group joined in and we ran 400 people, a massive undertaking that included, RA, MORE, NAC, ICE, Solidarity, EONYC, OT/PT and some independents. 

UFC's main success was the increased % for UFC but that was due to Unity drops which did not go to UFC. That dropped Unity vote just might shift into the ABC column due to the Unity presence in ABC.  UFC did not bump up the in-service vote or even the retiree vote in that election.

Look at the charts Jonathan posted and note the key turnout numbers for in-service compared to retirees:


 

I contend that with a weakened UFC, these numbers will remain constant for the caucus coalition, with the only wild cards retirees. The only way to win is to go after the 80% who don't usually vote, not an easy task but that looks like the major initiative of ABC and to siphon off Unity votes.

In a follow-up I will explore this issue with a forensic analysis  and breakdown of strengths and weaknesses of the caucuses and what they have done so far with further analysis of how ABC can win a two slate race.

In my conversations with progressives over this election, their response is to tell me this goal of reaching deep into the schools is wishful thinking -- that people are too busy and overworked to care. I guess being in the schools they know about the apathy but they seem to have given up on breaking through. I still have faith and confidence.

I get being excited by the retiree win and the opportunity it offers. How ironic that the usual suspects in the oppo who have opposed the influence retirees had in UFT elections when they were pro-Unity have now seemingly shifted positions and want to win with the retiree vote. 

I end with an big OY! See next post for the VEY!

And don't forget if you are a retiree, Join the ABC zoom:

ABC's Retiree 2025 UFT Election Committee to launch with Zoom meeting on Sun, January 5th, at 7 PM

 

Monday, December 16, 2024

ABC's Retiree 2025 UFT Election Committee to launch with Zoom meeting on Sun, January 5th, at 7 PM

This is getting to be fun - reaching to people in new ways for an election.  Registration over less than 24 hours has been very brisk. If you are a retiree hop for the Jan. 5 event with Arthur, Pat, Laura, Claudia and me. Arthur is working on a dynamite slide show.

Monday, Dec. 16, 2024

In this upcoming historic election race, we will wake a sleeping giant and take back our union ! RSVP for our Zoom meeting: http://retiree.uftmembers.org

This went out on The Wire, but I want to share it with you. Please come meet with us on January 5th to discuss how we, as retirees, will move forward with a democratic union. - Arthur Goldstein

Hey UFT retirees!

We're gearing up for the 2025 UFT citywide election campaign and need your invaluable experience, expertise and passion.

Join us for the first zoom meeting of ’A Better Contract’ slate’s retiree election committee.

We will meet on Sunday, January 5th, at 7 PM to strategize and organize for the upcoming 2025 UFT citywide elections.

RSVP, now: http://retiree.uftmembers.org


RSVP: ABC UFT Election Retiree Committee


Your voice continues to be crucial in preserving and improving our healthcare, pension, and retiree benefits. We need leadership that is committed to ensuring no more givebacks and willing to stand up for all UFT members.

Let's come together to ensure our hard-earned rights are protected and our collective future remains safe and secure.

Don't miss this chance to make a difference in this historic election —see you there!

  • Arthur Goldstein, RTC Vice Chair and former UFT executive board member

  • Pat Dobosz, UFT RTC delegate

  • Laura Genovese, UFT RTC delegate

  • Claudia Giordano, UFT RTC delegate

  • Norm Scott, UFT RTC executive board member


RSVP: ABC UFT Election Retiree Committee


ABC (A Better Contract) is dedicated to building a union where every member feels valued, heard, and empowered. We are union proud and union strong. We are non-partisan and focused solely on bread and butter issues.

With your support we can continue to challenge the status quo, win the upcoming 2025 Union leadership election, and bring about the change we need.

If you have any questions, suggestions, or want to get more involved, don’t hesitate to reach out. Together, we can create a stronger, more equitable future.

Finally, please take a moment to check out our landing page to see how you can get involved: http://uftmembers.org

Stay updated with us at: http://abettercontract.org

To run on the ABC slate for the 2025 election, go to: http://slate.uftmembers.org

Download, share and print a flyer to post at your school/work site: flyer.uftmembers.org

And follow us at:

Saturday, December 14, 2024

'A Better Contract' Pushes Forward for a Member-Led UFT

I admit that at times I've been a skeptic, but when almost 300 registered and 230 showed -wow! And what an interesting presentation and discussion. People seem to think this is all about the upcoming UFT election. The next contract is where a battle will take place. This is not only about the election, but about organizing the unorganized. Sign up for something.

This is basic organizing 101.



'A Better Contract' Pushes Forward for a Member-Led UFT

ABC continues to set the pace for the 2025 UFT Election race and transformative changes. ABC champions a better contract with the City of New York and a better social contract with union leadership.

 



READ IN APP
 


Happy Weekend, UFT!

Thank you to all who attended The ABCs of Pay — Let’s Talk About Pay UFT Member Assembly this past Tuesday. Your time, insights, questions and thoughtful contributions made the discussion both engaging and productive. Together, we’re building the foundation for a union that puts members’ priorities like pay, dignity, and working conditions first.

As we discussed during the meeting, improving pay and working conditions requires collective action and a bold strategy that reflects the needs of our members.

Our union president, Michael Mulgrew, recently acknowledged the challenges of pay equity, citing pattern bargaining as a barrier to addressing inequitable pay disparities for paraprofessionals.

While pattern bargaining has been a defining strategy under the current leadership, it is not the only approach to fix para pay and secure a living wage.

A more creative and assertive bargaining strategy, along with an action-ready membership, can challenge the status quo, ensuring that all members receive the compensation and respect they deserve. This reinforces the importance for new union leadership that listens to members and explores all options to secure a fair contract.

Our discussion on Tuesday showed that simply by coming together, we are already making an impact. The issues we raised are now being addressed. This demonstrates the power of collective action and the effectiveness of amplifying our voices.

We’re excited to keep this momentum going!


Here’s how you can stay involved:

Join us at upcoming UFT Member Assemblies: Mark your calendar for January 7, 2025. RSVP, here.

Join a Working Group: We currently have working groups centered around: Organizing, High School, Elementary, District 75, Paras, and social media. Some will be meeting next week, already! See the dates and times, below.

To get started, go to: join.uftmembers.org

Spread the Word: Encourage your colleagues to join our movement and attend the next meeting. Check out our LinkTree for ways to share our message.

Join our Slate of Candidates: Want to join this historic movement for member-led transformative change? We are actively seeking prospective candidates to run for UFT executive board, AFT and NYSUT delegate positions. To connect with us, go to: slate.uftmembers.org


Here are our upcoming ABC Working Group meetings:


ALL District 75 UFT Members and All UFT Paraprofessionals Citywide

Tue, 12/17 at 7 PM

Register here


High School Division

Wed, 12/18 at 7 PM

Register here


Organizing Committee

Wed, 12/18 at 7 PM

Register here


** We are scheduling meetings for retirees, elementary and middle school and other functional titles, very shortly. We will keep you updated.


ABC (A Better Contract) is dedicated to building a union where every member feels valued, heard, and empowered. We are union proud and union strong. We are non-partisan and we are not affiliated with the establishment union caucuses that are often too self-agendized.

With your support we can continue to challenge the status quo, win the upcoming 2025 Union leadership election, and bring about the change we need.

If you have any questions, suggestions, or want to get more involved, don’t hesitate to reach out. Together, we can create a stronger, more equitable future.

Finally, please take a moment to check out our landing page to see how you can get involved: http://uftmembers.org

Stay updated with us at: http://abettercontract.org

Download, share and print a flyer to post at your school/work site: flyer.uftmembers.org

And follow us at:


In solidarity,

Katie Anskat, Queens Metropolitan HS Delegate
katieharten@gmail.com

Paul Egan, PS/MS 194 Chapter Leader
Egan10980@gmail.com

Arthur Goldstein, Vice Chair of Retiree Teachers Chapter (RTC)
agoldstein@uftmembers.org

Chad Hamilton, P.S. K231 Chapter Leader
chadhamilton231@gmail.com

Steve Swieciki, Lehman High School Chapter Leader
uft.swieciki@gmail.com





Thanks for reading A BETTER CONTRACT - UFT MEMBERS! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

 
Like

Comment

Restack

 

Tuesday, December 10, 2024

UFT Caucuses: When to Hold and When to Fold, UFT Members Assembly - The ABCs of Better Pay

I agree (Union Activists - Are We Weird?. )  Prioritizing building an all-inclusive coalition is a losing game. We've seen where that goes and the fact that UFC evaporated shortly after the last election is all the evidence that anyone needs to know that these types of marriage of convenience strategies aren't built for long term organizing. How many UFC officer candidates left the DOE post election? This pattern of squabbling between elections and trying to come together last min is a real bummer.... Anon. comment on Ed Notes
A very incisive comment from someone who seems to be on the inside. And after the public service announcement below I will delve into the 50 year failures of election coalitions in the UFT - believe me I know. I helped put them together multiple times, only to see the coalitions come apart for years before they awaken like a bear out of hibernation to redo the same old thing once again when the election bell rings, the so-called Einstein def of insanity. Or the Pavlov dogs of the UFT. 
 
The current caucus structure even with one slate can't win - and if they did imagine each caucus doing what they always do - retreating to their corners to use their position to build their caucus so the next time they could ice everyone else out to try to win the whole thing for themselves. MORE is in a much better position than NAC to do that. After the 2022 election all pleas to MORE to keep meeting were ignored. It took most of the year for the break with New Action on the exec bd to come. MORE sits as far away as they could from NAC. (maybe now they will sit together to show a united front while they  gnash their teeth. So imagine this shot gun alliance now. Just like UFC the day after the election, win or lose, infighting and positioning will start. It's in their DNA. Only RA doesn't have to do that because a) it's an oligarchy and b) they have no competition from another caucus so they can act with impunity.

 
There's still time to register for today's ABC Member Meetup zoom.

We’re excited to invite you to an important UFT Members Assembly: "The ABCs of Pay: Let's Talk!". In this Zoom meeting, we will dive into one of the most pressing issues for educators - fair compensation.

Surveys show fair compensation is the leading issue for UFT members. This meet-up will focus on the nuances of pattern bargaining and how to break it, plus other ideas on how to increase compensation. Within two hours of posting this meeting, 100 people signed up. You can't run in an election calling for better compensation without an actual plan on how to win that and developing a strategy that differs from the Unity strategies. Explore the options and compare to how the current leadership approaches the issue - Hands up, surrender to the pattern. What is the Municipal Labor Committee and how do we break its stranglehold on pattern bargaining?

RSVP, Tuesday 12/10 @7PM: UFT Members Assembly - The ABCs of Better Pay

Date: Tuesday, December 10, 2024
Time: 7-8 PM
Location: Zoom [rsvp.uftmembers.org]

RSVP: 12/10 Member Assembly

 
Future meetups will focus on other issues. Tent Date for next one on How to win changes in Tier 6 is Jan. 7.


Tuesday, Dec. 10, 2024
 
UFT Caucuses: When to Hold and When to Fold
 
UFT Caucuses come and go - except for Unity. And there are some signs of lower level desertions.
 
Here's a little history of UFT oppo groups, over 55 years of observance where in most elections coalitions were built and ended the day after the elections.
 
My 1970s caucus, Coalition of NYC School Workers, was extremely active for a decade and was a one-third component of the New Action Coalition, a united front of 3 caucuses that came together every two years to run in UFT elections from late 70s through early 90s and then went their own ways between elections, often competing with each other for a scarcity of activists. The other two caucuses were New Directions (founded in 1976) and Teachers Action Caucus (c.1968) and merged c.1995. This pattern, while eventually winning some exec bd seats, which often seemed the sole purpose of running, made no progress in building a serious caucus to challenge Unity, a consistent fatal flaw.
 
The School Worker Coalition's key organizers began to lose interest in the early 80s - I bought a house in 1979 and began an MA in computer science and taught at Brooklyn College that took up the rest of the 80s into the early 90s. We didn't try to breathe life into a dying caucus corpse. The core stayed together and began to meet and eat socially - which those of us still alive still do. The main organizing we did was menus. But we continued to talk about the major issues and stayed informed. Discussions still ran deep and incisive and when I re-emerged those talks gave me a base with which to organize in my own school.

I came back to life in the UFT in 1994 when I became chapter leader, but my focus was on my school and district where I had to battle a principal and try to woo a district and local union leadership that had viewed me as an enemy in the 70s - and I was fairly successful in neutralizing them since they knew I could still be a problem for them if I did exposes. I did not have much time to do central UFT work other than go to the DA.

Not until 1997 when I was no longer teaching and working at the district did I have time and energy to do central union organizing work with the debut of Ed Notes, the newsletter. But I was a lone wolf in a sea of caucuses. I relished the freedom but understood you need a caucus to move the ball. The lone wolf phase lasted through 2003 when NAC sold out to Unity and I helped found ICE, not a caucus loaded with limits or norms (except me) in response. 
 
New Action was composed of the other two wings of the original election New Action Coalition that functioned from 1979-1995, TAC and ND.

TAC and ND continued as separate active caucuses through the 80s and early 90s. The original coalition, not the caucus New Action but the coalition of caucuses, began to win the high schools and the biggie came in 1985 with winning the HSVP and then 1991 winning the 13 HS and MS exec bd. But they lost it all in 1993 which opened Unity to taking away the right for divisions to choose their own VPs.

Then came the 1995 contract battle and the voting it down, led by TAC, ND and independents. (I played little part in that for reasons I can't remember.) Apparently talks for a merger of TAC and ND had been going on and that led to the current edition of New Action - New for ND and Action for TAC. Both groups knew it was time to fold into something new and it worked, attracting people like James and the future Camille Eterno. And Lisa North. So TAC and ND folded for something better - more big tent than either ND or TAC (which was considered the left at the time.)

There were other caucuses called PAC - Progressive Action Caucus. c. 1997. They were focused on teacher who were having trouble passing the license exams and they existed through the 2004 elections when they ran with ICE. They had a big court case and when that was lost they folded -- but funny thing they recently won on appeal 2 decades later.

And Teachers for a Just Contract (TJC) which was founded in 1992 but didn't participate in UFT elections until 2004. More on them later.

Now let's leap ahead to ICE - Independent Community of Educators -  which came out of a meeting I called on Halloween 2003. We attracted those who quit New Action like the Eternos, Ellen Fox and Lisa North plus very newly active UFTers like Jeff Kaufman and Julie Woodward, but also what was left of the core people from the old 70s School Workers Caucus. I was impressed by how many independents there were who were not interested in New Action, PAC or TJC and were looking for something that ICE seemed to offer - an Independent point of view freed from caucus hierarchies. And I will say, ICE has never had hierarchies.
 
This combination in ICE proved dynamic - for a few years. And then it wasn't after the 2007 election when we clearly began to shrink. Meetings of 50 went down to 12. While others persisted I read the cards. We had no real future as a traditional caucus but could continue in some ways to have influence in the UFT, even today. Despite my reluctance we gave it one more try in the 2010 elections, when we ran with TJC. It was time to fold as a traditional caucus after that, to the consternation of people like the late James Eterno and Ellen Fox.

Oh, TJC - Teachers for a Just Contract. They were around since the 90s but came to life as a caucus for the 2004 elections when ICE and TJC ran separate slates except for the high schools where we ran the same candidates and won. BTW - a formula for running two slates in the coming up election with enough candidates on both slates to win a majority of exec bd and ad com. A possible solution to settle differences. But leave that for another time. The older ICE socialists were very much opposed to the TJC version of socialism and  I would say ICE formed as much to stop TJC from representing the opposition. ICE was a bullwark to both NAC and TJC. To say TJC was pissed is putting it likely. They viewed ICE like ABC is viewed by the legacy oppo today.

TJC was the hot, younger thing then while ICE leaned older. So they may have had legs but also faded when the younger International Socialists (ISO) abandoned the older socialist Solidarity segment and by the 2010 election they could only field a relatively small number of candidates. It was clear that both ICE and TJC had no future.

In 2009, some of us in ICE founded a new non-caucus group called GEM - Grassroots Education Movement - a group that had no intention of running in UFT elections but was an advocacy group for public education. GEM attracted new people not interested in UFT politics and, unencumbered by the burden of trying to build a caucus, GEM took off like a rocket - we accomplished more in a 2-3 year period than any caucus I've seen - totally focused, not on positioning, but united on key issues. Even parents were involved. GEM had legs but we got waylaid.

Then came the 2010 Chicago victory of CORE, a caucus founded only two years before as a union study group. Suddenly some eyes in GEM lit up - we need a CORE in the UFT - and that folded GEM, sadly, and all groups linked to the UFT were invited to discussions of what became MORE - Movement of Rank and File Educators. I was involved in choosing that name - I always wanted to see the word Educators or workers in group names.

The day of MORE's first big meeting, TJC folded, but ICE people were a major presence in the founding of MORE. And don't think many ICEers weren't reluctant. Gloria, Lisa and I led the push for ICE to give up our autonomy and veto power as we entered MORE. James Eterno was a skeptic. The recently passed Ellen Fox never failed to remind me she opposed ICE giving up autonomy. She wanted to see MORE as a coalition of groups instead of a caucus. Sadly, I now think she was right.

But as MORE grew, ICE continued to function -- at times were accused by some in MORE of functioning as a caucus within a caucus which was LOL since we are the most undisciplined group of anarcho-socialists. Rice pudding over politics. One thing I learned in MORE was there were highly disciplined factions in MORE that did operate semi-undercover as a caucus within a caucus and were using MORE to recruit for their own outside groups. 
 
In 2014 a segment of MORE split off to form Solidarity Caucus, which is still around today. Solidarity was very dependent on the leadership of Francesco Porteles and Lydia Howrilka and when they left Solidarity has floundered. After MORE/NA won the 2016 hs seats (where they functioned fairly well together despite MORE steering attempts to interfere and "steer" the exec bd, to no avail - which led to the future troubles and the purging of ICE. 

So, I gave you a history of most UFT caucuses (I'm leaving out Retiree Advocate for now) and how they merged or folded or became something other than a caucus. 
 
The conclusion: I'm clearly not opposed to caucuses. I do push back against caucuses when I consider them fundamentally ineffective. Ed Notes once rated a caucus as A caucus in Need of Improvement. I reserve the right to be critical of caucuses  - some for external policies, but also for those with clunky over burdened internal process that bog them down in minutia and too many rules and norms - I hate norms.

I can only say my best experience in caucuses and uncaucuses had been when there is dynamic conversations on issues of concern to NYC educators -- while some caucuses spend a lot to time talking about themselves. 

So far my ABC non-caucus experience has been much more of the dynamic conversations with ideas flowing freely. I care more about that process at this point then imposing a formal structure on the UFT election process.