Zuckerberg came to recognize that school reform alone isn’t enough, that if we’re going to make a difference in the classroom, we also need to make a difference in the lives of these children, many of whom struggle against the debilitating effects of poverty and trauma... Review of The PrizeDUHHHH! What happened to the "no excuses" response to teachers who have been saying the same thing and pleading for services for their children for the past 20 years of ed deform? Zuckerberg should have asked me and I could have saved him a cool 100 mil.
The subtititle of this account should be "How to drop 100 million into a trench of ed deform consultants and scam artists. Instead it is Who is in charge of American Schools? We know who is in charge - the ed deformers though mayoral control and control of the national and state education agencies - directed by people like Bill Gates and other billionaire deformers.
Ed Notes Newark reporter Abbie Shure sent this excellent review analyzing the Facebook/Newark debacle.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/08/23/books/review/the-prize-by-dale-russakoff.html?referrer=&_r=0
‘The Prize,’ by Dale Russakoff
By ALEX KOTLOWITZ
August 19, 2015
In
 America, education was long seen as the great equalizer, but that has 
become mostly myth. So, over the past decade, there has been a vigorous 
effort to fortify and rebuild our schools, and in this there is a 
recognition that we have failed our children, especially those living in
 poverty, those for whom education could — and should — be 
transformational. From Chicago to New Orleans, school reform has been 
engineered by the well heeled and well connected — from hedge fund 
managers to corporate heads to directors of foundations — who believe 
that with the right kind of teachers and pedagogy, and with a 
business-like administration, schooling can trump the daily burdens and
 indignities of growing up poor. “No excuses” has become the rallying 
cry of the reformers.
Along comes Dale 
Russakoff’s “The Prize,” a brilliantly reported behind-the-scenes 
account of one city’s attempt to right its failing public schools. When 
Russakoff began reporting this book in 2010, fewer than 40 percent of 
the students in the third through eighth grades in Newark, N.J., were 
reading or doing math at grade level — and nearly half of the system’s 
students dropped out before graduating. The schools were so broken that 
the state had taken them over. Something needed to be done. From this 
rubble emerged an exciting if not unusual partnership between three 
individuals who couldn’t have been more different from one another. The 
city’s black Democratic mayor, the charismatic and ambitious Cory 
Booker, joined hands with the state’s blustery and ambitious white 
Republican governor, Chris Christie, to reimagine Newark’s schools. 
Together, they enlisted Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, who pledged a 
whopping $100 million — to be matched by another $100 million, which the
 city raised, mostly from foundations and private individuals. It was 
such an extraordinary gift that Zuckerberg, with Booker and Christie by 
his side, announced it on “The Oprah Winfrey Show.” As Russakoff writes:
 “Their stated goal was not to repair education in Newark but to develop
 a model for saving it in all of urban America.” This is what makes “The
 Prize” essential reading. Newark was to be our compass for school 
reform.
Russakoff, a longtime Washington Post
 reporter, had the good sense to recognize the potential power and 
import of this story early on, and so embedded herself in Newark, 
winning access not only to the key players — Booker, Christie and 
Zuckerberg — but also to some remarkable teachers and students whose 
stories serve as a reality check to the maneuverings of those commanding
 the reform efforts. A lesser reporter might have succumbed to the 
seduction of such intimate access to the rich and powerful, but 
Russakoff maintains a cleareyed distance, her observations penetratingly
 honest and incisive to what she sees and what she hears. I suspect some
 may have regretted letting Russakoff in. We couldn’t have asked for a 
better guide.
When Zuckerberg declared his 
grant, the agenda was pretty clear: Turn the Newark schools around in 
five years and make it a national model. But from the get-go, there 
seemed little agreement as to how best to proceed. More than anything, 
Christie wanted to break the hold of the entrenched teachers’ unions. 
Booker wanted more charter schools. Zuckerberg wanted to raise the 
status of teachers and to reward teaching that improved students’ 
performance.
Their five-year plan gets off to
 a rocky start. Initial funds go to a bevy of consultants, most of them 
white, most of them well connected, some of whom are getting paid $1,000
 a day. One educator labels them the “school failure industry.” 
Moreover, it quickly becomes apparent that this is a top-down effort, 
with politicians and the well-to-do setting the agenda. When Booker sets
 up a local foundation to handle Zuckerberg’s gift, the seats on the 
board go only to donors of at least $5 million. You can begin to see 
where this story’s headed. Booker shows more interest in his own 
political career than he does in running his city. Christie hires an 
ideologue as his point person on the Newark schools. And Zuckerberg, a 
newcomer to philanthropy, seems frustrated by the inability to negotiate
 a union contract that would quickly raise the salaries of promising 
young teachers and pay substantial merit bonuses for high performers.
Moreover,
 they bring in a superintendent, Cami Anderson, from the New York City 
schools, whose unbending management style only affirms teachers’ and 
parents’ worst fears. To be fair, she’s a complicated figure. She 
doesn’t simply line up behind Booker, Christie and their moneyed backers
 in their ideological furor to create more charter schools, which as 
we’ve seen in city after city leaves behind an eviscerated public school
 system. Anderson, Russakoff writes, “called this ‘the lifeboat theory 
of education reform,’ arguing that it could leave a majority of children
 to sink on the big ship.” But Anderson, like the other main characters 
in this effort, seems tone-deaf to the demands of the community to be 
involved in the process. It’s the irony of ironies. Public education is 
the bedrock of democracy — and yet when it comes to repairing our 
schools the democratic process is too often ignored. What ultimately 
derails this grand experiment is the unwillingness of the reformers to 
include parents and teachers in shaping the reforms.
“The
 Prize” is paradoxically a sobering yet exhilarating tale. For alongside
 the stories of those calling the shots, Russakoff tells the stories of 
those most profoundly affected by their decisions: teachers, students 
and their parents. It’s here where rhetoric, politics and grand plans 
meet reality. I repeatedly found myself writing in the margins, “Wow,” 
either because of the heroic efforts by teachers and staffers or because
 of the obstacles facing their students. Russakoff writes of three 
siblings whose mother is badly beaten by her boyfriend. The principal 
goes to court with the mother and helps her file charges while other 
staff members create a car-pooling schedule to get the kids to and from 
school each day. Another student, Alif Beyah, continually disrupts his 
classroom. With unusual self-awareness for a sixth grader, he tells a 
teacher, “If I get thrown out of class, nobody finds out I can’t read.” 
So the school assigns a teacher to meet with him in one-on-one sessions,
 and over the course of the year he jumps three grades in his reading 
levels. In a school that had one social worker for 612 students, 
teachers create a special class for children suffering from trauma, 
offering tai chi, yoga and breathing techniques. But what becomes clear 
is that these are exceptions rather than the rule. In fact, when Beyah 
enters high school, most of his support disappears.
“The
 Prize” may well be one of the most important books on education to come
 along in years. It serves as a kind of corrective to the dominant 
narrative of school reformers across the country. I’m not giving 
anything away by telling you that this bold effort in Newark falls far 
short of success. Most everyone moves on. Booker is elected to the 
Senate — and his nemesis, a high school principal deeply critical of his
 school reform efforts, becomes the city’s next elected mayor. Christie 
gets caught up in the bridge-lane-closure scandal, and of course is now 
running for president. Anderson recently announced her resignation as 
superintendent. 
The one individual who appears changed by the experience
 is, somewhat surprisingly, Zuckerberg. Last year, along with his wife, 
Priscilla Chan, who as a pediatric intern cared for underserved children
 around San Francisco, Zuckerberg announced a gift of $120 million in 
grants to high-poverty schools in the Bay Area. This time, though, they 
declared their intent to include parents and teachers in the planning 
process. But more to the point, a key component to their grants includes
 building “a web of support for students,” everything from medical to 
mental health care. Zuckerberg came to recognize that school reform 
alone isn’t enough, that if we’re going to make a difference in the 
classroom, we also need to make a difference in the lives of these 
children, many of whom struggle against the debilitating effects of 
poverty and trauma. Here is where this story ends — but also where the 
next story begins.
THE PRIZE
Who’s in Charge of America’s Schools?
By Dale Russakoff
246 pp. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. $27.
 
 
1 comment:
Credit goes to schoolgal on the Ravitch blog.
Abigail Shure
Post a Comment