Monday, December 12, 2011

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Judge Overturns Arbitrary Unsatisfactory Rating for Bronx Science Teacher Peter Lamphere

Read closely to see how the DOE kept persecuting Peter even after Reidy stopped contesting the U. What does that tell everyone about their interest in keeping quality teachers, especially in areas of need like math where they allowed the persecution of the entire math department.

Also note the comment from Mark Kagen who happens to have a sister on the US Supreme Court.
-------------
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 
Date:  Monday, December 12, 2011    
Contact:  Peter Lamphere, peter.lamphere@gmail.com, 917-969-5658
 
Judge Overturns Arbitrary Unsatisfactory Rating for Bronx Science Teacher
 
In an oral bench decision Wednesday, December 7th, New York State Supreme Court Justice Paul Feinman granted the petition to overturn a 2009 Unsatisfactory rating for Peter Lamphere, former math teacher and UFT chapter leader at the Bronx High School of Science.  The decision is a small step in restoring some of the damage done to the careers of numerous teachers at the prestigious Bronx school, where a deteriorating relationship between Principal Valerie Reidy and faculty has dramatically increased staff turnover accompanied by a decline in the school's national ranking (New York Magazine, December 12, 2011, New York Times, September 15, 2011, Daily News, March 29, 2011, attached).   

The decision rejects the Department of Education's attempt to ignore scrutiny of Principal Reidy's administrative actions. The DOE disregarded a fact finding ruling by an independent arbitrator last April upholding claims of harassment by 20 math teachers at the school, including Lamphere (New York Times, April 28, 2010). Even after Valerie Reidy abandoned the 2009 Unsatisfactory rating by refusing to contest Lamphere's administrative appeal, the DOE arbitrarily upheld the rating. 

"This is an alert to the Department of Education that they need to examine more closely what's happening at Bronx Science," was Lamphere's first response to the news.  "It's outrageous that they have chosen to look the other way while the school adminstration at Bronx Science has undermined the learning environment at what should be one of the crown jewels of the city's educational system."

Lynne Winderbaum, former UFT High School District Representative, commented: "It is a shame that teachers have to use the court system to get fairness. But justice will be done whenever the abusive tactics of principals such as Valerie Reidy are exposed to an unbiased hearing.

Mark Kagan, who voluntary transferred from Bronx Science as part of the exodus of 40% of the Social Studies faculty this year, added, "It was understood at Bronx Science that Valerie Reidy used U-ratings and denials of tenure for non-pedagogical reasons. I'm glad to see that the court saw this clearly. But it's too bad for the students that Peter and other good teachers were forced out of Bronx Science."

Former Bronx Science teacher Mark Sadok said, "I am delighted to hear the news, as it not only vindicates Lamphere, but also paves the way for a return to teaching for those of us whose dismissals were based on observations that violated the UFT-DOE contract." 

Megan Behrent, of the activist group Teachers' Unite, pointed out how this case "exposes the way teacher evaluations are used for political rather than professional reasons and how the 'the bad teacher' narrative provides cover for retaliation against activists. It also shows why tenure is so important. Without tenure, this victory would never have happened as Lamphere would have been dismissed without any due process at all."

Brian Jones, activist with the Grassroots Education Movement, stated that "Peter Lamphere is a dedicated and highly intelligent educator; and yes, he's also a union activist. Unfortunately the national campaign to scapegoat and punish teachers has meant that the former fact mattered less than the latter. I'm glad to see that Peter received some small measure of justice. Let's hope that this reversal reverberates through the halls of power and gives our highest officials reason for pause.

Jonathan Halabi, chapter leader of neighboring High School for American Studies, commented that "This unjustified U-rating should have been overturned much earlier.  Today's decision shows that the DOE's current internal hearings and appeals are unfair and rigged against the employee. New Action/UFT remains deeply concerned by the problem of abusive administrators.  A victory, especially by a chapter leader who had been targeted for abuse, is a victory for all of us. "

Another arbitrary U-rating for Lamphere, from 2008, remains the subject of another case before Judge Paul Wooten, with a decision expected soon. But, regardless of the outcome of this individual case, the recommendations of the independent arbitrator's 2010 fact-finding report will still not have been implemented, and the struggle to replace the current administration at Bronx Science with one that can work together with Bronx Science teachers to rebuild a positive environment and a commitment to educational excellence has a long way to go.

Additional Contacts: 

Mark Sadok - msadok@verizon.net

Lynne Winderbaum – lynwindy@hotmail.com

Megan Behrent - ebehrent@gmail.com



Cheers,
Norm Scott

Twitter: normscott1

Education Notes
ednotesonline.blogspot.com

Grassroots Education Movement
gemnyc.org

Education columnist, The Wave
www.rockawave.com

nycfirst robotics
normsrobotics.blogspot.com

Sent from my BlackBerry

6 comments:

Jim Callaghan said...

Mulgrew and staff directors Leroy Barr and Ellie Engler prevented me from writing about the fact that Reidy lied under oath. Also, Lynne and others were asking me to write about the school long before the stories hit the daily press and Weingarten always refused. What did she and Mulgrew get out of the deal is still an open question.
A UFT nepotism hire, UFT lawyer Adam Ross wouldnt even tell me -after five e-mails- what the penalty is for perjury. (Ross was hired because he is Jeff Zahler's nephew).

Anonymous said...

This is some story, but Jim's comment is the one that's most interesting. There are things going on at the head of the UFT that really needs to come to light.

Anonymous said...

The UFT can't even get us a pay raise. I think all teachers need to form a new union. Only those who can afford private lawyers can get any kind of fair hearing. The UFT's only use is to the retired Tier 1 and 2 teachers who ate their young in 75k.

Anonymous said...

Why is anyone sure that Randi and Mulgrew are hiding something or are receiving something in return? Perhaps it's just not having "cajones." Perhaps its just business as usual. You know, the belief that if we play it cool, the DOE will be nice to us. Kind of reminds me of inviting Bill Gates to the UFT conference. Maybe if we are nice, he'll be nice. Pretty sad as usual.

Anonymous said...

who was Peter Lamphere's lawyer, what was his/her name or the firms name, if someone can post that it could be of great help to alot of teachers

ed notes online said...

Brian is first name of lawyer. Also Portelos is using him.