The TU was so weakened by the attacks (and mistakes it made) that when the UFT was formed out of the Teachers Gild (what a lesson on how this group functioned - it explains a lot about how the UFT works today) and the High School Teachers Association, the TU lost to the UFT in the bargaining election. TU later evolved into Teachers Action Caucus in 1968 to become the official opposition to Unity and around 1990 merged with New Directions to form the current New Action - there's a lot of history in the background behind the New Action sell-out to Unity in 2003. I was telling this story yesterday to some of the young teachers in the New Teacher Underground and they were eating it up.
I've been waiting for the Taylor book for years. I've known his twin brother Larry, just retired chapter leader of Art and Design HS (David Pakter's Chapter leader for reference) for years through union activism (Larry is one of the best people I've met in the union) but only met Clarence last summer at a forum on the 1968 strike.
Weds night I and a bunch of GEM/ICEers are going over to this book party. ICE will be sponsoring a future study group on both the Taylor and Murphy books.
July 13th, 2011 7:30 PM
BOOK PARTY / FORUM
Reds at the Blackboard
Communism, Civil Rights and the New York City Teachers Union
Clarence Taylor
The New York City Teachers Union shares a deep history with the American left, having participated in some of its most explosive battles. Established in 1916, the union maintained an early, unofficial partnership with the American Communist Party, winning key union positions and advocating a number of Party goals. Clarence Taylor recounts this pivotal relationship and the backlash it created, as the union threw its support behind controversial policies and rights movements. Taylor's research reaffirms the party's close ties with the union—yet it also makes clear that the organization was anything but a puppet of Communist power.
Reds at the Blackboard showcases the rise of a unique type of unionism that would later dominate the organizational efforts behind civil rights, academic freedom, and the empowerment of blacks and Latinos. Through its affiliation with the Communist Party, the union pioneered what would later become social movement unionism, solidifying ties with labor groups, black and Latino parents, and civil rights organizations to acquire greater school and community resources. It also militantly fought to improve working conditions for teachers while championing broader social concerns. For the first time, Taylor reveals the union's early growth and the somewhat illegal attempts by the Board of Education to eradicate the group. He describes how the infamous Red Squad and other undercover agents worked with the board to bring down the union and how the union and its opponents wrestled with charges of anti-Semitism.
Reds at the Blackboard showcases the rise of a unique type of unionism that would later dominate the organizational efforts behind civil rights, academic freedom, and the empowerment of blacks and Latinos. Through its affiliation with the Communist Party, the union pioneered what would later become social movement unionism, solidifying ties with labor groups, black and Latino parents, and civil rights organizations to acquire greater school and community resources. It also militantly fought to improve working conditions for teachers while championing broader social concerns. For the first time, Taylor reveals the union's early growth and the somewhat illegal attempts by the Board of Education to eradicate the group. He describes how the infamous Red Squad and other undercover agents worked with the board to bring down the union and how the union and its opponents wrestled with charges of anti-Semitism.Clarence Taylor is professor of history and black and Hispanic studies at Baruch College and professor of history at the Graduate Center, City University of New York. He has written or edited several books, including The Black Churches of Brooklyn and Knocking at Our Own Door: Milton A. Galamison and the Struggle to Integrate New York City Schools.
Please Forward Widely
The Brecht Forum
451 West Street (Between Bank and Bethune)
212-242-4201
Register here: www.brechtforum.org
The Brecht Forum
451 West Street (Between Bank and Bethune)
212-242-4201
Register here: www.brechtforum.org
Wednesday, July 13
7:30 pm BOOK PARTY / FORUM
Reds at the Blackboard
Communism, Civil Rights and the New York City Teachers Union
Clarence Taylor
The New York City Teachers Union shares a deep history with the American left, having participated in some of its most explosive battles. Established in 1916, the union maintained an early,...
Check out Norms Notes for a variety of articles of interest: http://normsnotes2.blogspot.com/. And make sure to check out the side panel on right for news bits.
4 comments:
Norm,
It would be interesting for someone like you to flesh out for others how Unity's tactics (pledge/DA protocols) are linked to Trots and democratic centralism. I have always found it ironic to think about how certain members of the left would actually run DA's if they were the ruling caucus. In a nutshell, it would like this: Lots and lots of debate and "democracy" but in the end it would be their way or the highway. Make no doubt about it. I can't stand Unity and it's anti-democratic practices, but I also know that if any other caucus came into power with strong links to any vanguard like party, the union be crushed overnight. What are your thoughts?
The struggle of Ocean Hill - Brownsville schools 1968.
http://rutube.ru/tracks/3885818.html?v=b4dcb27667a363b81a32f30d515c50c1&autoStart=true&bmstart=1000
want to share this with you especially since you were affected by the strike.
I will flesh it out more but are you saying that Unity uses undemocratic methods to keep people out of power who might use undemocratic measures? Because after all Unity is the utmost of democratic centralism. Pretty ironic that the founding ideology of the UFT comes from a former Trot Max Schactman whose wife Yetta was Shanker's long-time secretary.
Yes I agree that if the UFT were controlled by certain (not all) left forces we would also face a battle. But that will not happen as long as independent activists like me are around.
There is some irony in the fact that the central theme of Taylor's book is the takeover of the Teachers Union by the Rank and File Caucus which was definitely controlled by the Communist Party. Rather than fight it out inside the TU for power, the people who founded the Teachers Gild which led to the UFT just left in 1935 - we call that dual unionism which now the UFT would accuse anyone else of doing.
Good points. Thanks Norm. Unity practices "democratic centralism" at the DA but has an anti-communist ideological stance. One other point of irony: The problem with independent lefties (myself included) and
"democracy" is it can be hard to move things forward. In other words, issues of consensus can paralyze leadership initiatives. Does this make sense?
Post a Comment