data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb869/fb869f708319abff4484eebdfdb69af44f04c43a" alt=""
And on Charlie Rose, Randi said "after getting help" - what exactly is "help", like maybe cutting class size in a struggling school which apparently is not part of the UFT formula - schools should be closed (Shanker used to say the same thing). No matter how many resolutions the UFT passes, they are not opposed to closing schools and Peter Goodman (Ed in the Apple and Edwize) has made some nice bucks working on committees that lead to closing schools.
Call the article in the NY Teacher wishful thinking.
Below, George Schmidt gives a broader perspective.
After reading the information provided by James Eterno on the destabilization of Jamaica High, it all sounded too familiar.
The privatization formula is simple. First the public school is destabilized, then they come in with a "solution" off the privatization and public school replacement script.
I wish we had had enough staff and will in Chicago to track every instance of this, since Chicago provided many of the templates. But I was glad to read that you are documenting these realities in real time. Thanks.
Let's get together in Chicago during AFT and figure out how to maintain our tracking of these things in the big cities.
Next on your agenda, if the pattern is followed:
Complete privatization via charter schools is the next wave they implemented in Chicago -- with the "failing" high schools as the primary targets.
You're already in trouble in NYC because your local union (thanks, Leo) has cocked up support for the "charter ideal" with those silly samples.
Starting this year, Chicago has been replacing its "failing" small schools with "turnarounds" and charters. You're next. And with the help of your own union leaders, you've already given a green light to the privatization via charters.
George Schmidt
Editor, Substance
No comments:
Post a Comment