Yes Commissioner King, “the clock is ticking”- on my children’s education. How many years of their schooling will be ruined by the high-stakes testing mania that results from the policies you advocate? Who benefits? Not the children.... Chris Cerrone, who I had the pleasure of hanging with at SOS in DC last August. Oh, those one dollar margaritas.
My district, Hamburg, is in the same situation as you folks- no APPR agreement yet.
Since my school is the only one left in Western New York without an agreement, we have been inundated with NYSED propaganda.
Please give this a read:
2013/01/06/education- propagandists-do-it-for-the- children/
Regards, Chris Cerrone
January 6, 2013 by Chris CerroneIn New York, school districts across the state have been scrambling to complete and revise their agreements to a new teacher evaluation system. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, a wannabe Presidential Candidate, has used the now common carrot and stick approach to education policy by threatening to withhold a district’s state aid increase for this year unless a new teacher evaluation plan is approved by January 17th. Of the approximately seven hundred districts in New York, only nine have not submitted their plans as of January 2nd. A press release about the evaluation deadline which appeared on NYSED’s website and made print and television media reports contains so much nonsense that it shows the ignorance of state education officials or just proves the leaders have clear anti-teacher motives.Yes, Ms. Tisch, we need quality educators in every classroom but the evaluation plan you support will not accomplish that goal. The random invalid results that will occur because of the emphasis on test scores will not determine who is a quality educator. Many districts around the state(and country) have tremendous models of teacher evaluation that contribute to maintaining high-quality educators in our classrooms, but you ignore those facts and perpetuate the myth of widespread teacher incompetence. The growth and VAM models that the New York plans emphasize are prone to wild swings from year to year and will not produce accurate determinations of teacher effectiveness.“Our students are waiting“? Seriously? Our students want more test prep and high-stakes tests? The madness of test preparation may reach a new level now that educators are being directly judged by assessment results. When the “ed deformers” try to spew their nonsense, they resort to saying “it is for the children”.Does Commissioner King base this statement on any research? How exactly do the vague results teachers receive from state assessment help improve their practice? If I had a dime for every time I hear oft repeated mantra of”college and career ready” we could fund schools properly. The sad irony is the policy of using high-stakes tests to evaluate our teachers will not prepare our children for either post graduate goal.Commissioner King says it is not just about the state aid, but that is why most districts approved the plans. Many schools reluctantly approved their evaluation plans for fear of losing money in an era of scarce funding. Some districts that have complied with the evaluation plan are holding out hope that the ridiculous evaluation policies coming from Albany would fall apart in short order. Failure is possible, but I would not count on the current ed reformers backing down even when proven wrong. The profit and power motives are too high for the use of high-stakes assessment to end easily. Testing companies are making millions and the anti-union forces are using the new evaluation systems to chip away at teacher rights.Yes Commissioner King, “the clock is ticking”- on my children’s education. How many years of their schooling will be ruined by the high-stakes testing mania that results from the policies you advocate? Who benefits? Not the children.Follow the author on twitter at http://twitter.com/