data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8400/c8400aebfbc43a54418643835eddb452da73efbb" alt=""
Randi Weingarten bragged about the no-layoff clause in the contract at a recent meeting, slipping in the proviso "as long as there isn't a fiscal crisis." Remembering 1975 when contracts were rendered moot, this is a very apt observation and possibly a warning. ICE's Michael Fiorillo has raised this issue on ICE-mail and at ICE meetings.
The UFT in defending the open market system always points to the no-layoff clause, somewhat moot with so many new teachers recruited each year. They argue that ATR's always will have a job. In '75 as teachers were excessed they had seniority to protect them. What would happen today if there were a fiscal crises of the same scope?
Check out Reality-Based Educator's post Bull@#$% Market at NYC Educator for the state of the economy.
No comments:
Post a Comment